Is it okay to refuse entirely to answer “desired salary” question?
I am finishing up a graduate degree and am looking for my first full-time job. I recently had a second interview (Skype) with a place I'm interested in and the interviewer asked me what my desired salary was. My plan for this question has been to politely refuse to be the first person to offer a number and that's what I did, in an indirect way. The interviewer pushed to get a number from me, even saying something along the lines of "what is your dream salary for this job, even if it's high?" I still refused to offer a number, eventually directly ("I don't want to offer a number right now, if that is all right.") After the direct refusal the interviewer moved on to other questions.
I've looked through other questions on this site on this topic, and there is lots of advice on how to answer the "desired salary" question. However, I didn't find anywhere that answered specifically the question is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question? Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the first party to throw out a number?
I'm wondering because, in my situation, I don't really have any previous salaries I can point to as a baseline for expectations, and many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries. I suspect these places will pay well, but I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary or give myself a pay cut with too low a desired salary and that's why I have taken my stance of not wanting to offer the first number.
Duplicate? I believe the specific question as I have worded it is not a duplicate, though I realize my search may not have been exhaustive and/or its answer may have been addressed in another question. Please point me there if so, otherwise I argue that my specific question is not a duplicate.
salary negotiation
New contributor
add a comment |
I am finishing up a graduate degree and am looking for my first full-time job. I recently had a second interview (Skype) with a place I'm interested in and the interviewer asked me what my desired salary was. My plan for this question has been to politely refuse to be the first person to offer a number and that's what I did, in an indirect way. The interviewer pushed to get a number from me, even saying something along the lines of "what is your dream salary for this job, even if it's high?" I still refused to offer a number, eventually directly ("I don't want to offer a number right now, if that is all right.") After the direct refusal the interviewer moved on to other questions.
I've looked through other questions on this site on this topic, and there is lots of advice on how to answer the "desired salary" question. However, I didn't find anywhere that answered specifically the question is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question? Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the first party to throw out a number?
I'm wondering because, in my situation, I don't really have any previous salaries I can point to as a baseline for expectations, and many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries. I suspect these places will pay well, but I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary or give myself a pay cut with too low a desired salary and that's why I have taken my stance of not wanting to offer the first number.
Duplicate? I believe the specific question as I have worded it is not a duplicate, though I realize my search may not have been exhaustive and/or its answer may have been addressed in another question. Please point me there if so, otherwise I argue that my specific question is not a duplicate.
salary negotiation
New contributor
You might be interested in Does the first person to mention a number in a salary negotiation lose?
– a CVn
3 hours ago
2
Note that although the accepted answer in the linked question says "the first person to name a salary loses" the author does in fact name a salary (range) first, in order to set expectations.
– mcknz
2 hours ago
requiring a salary is very common today.
– Keltari
2 hours ago
1
If someone asks me, point blank, what my "dream salary is" I'm going to give them a 6 or 7 figure number. That's a great excuse to anchor super high.
– mkingsbu
1 hour ago
@mkingsbu One million dollars! (per year)
– Steve-O
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I am finishing up a graduate degree and am looking for my first full-time job. I recently had a second interview (Skype) with a place I'm interested in and the interviewer asked me what my desired salary was. My plan for this question has been to politely refuse to be the first person to offer a number and that's what I did, in an indirect way. The interviewer pushed to get a number from me, even saying something along the lines of "what is your dream salary for this job, even if it's high?" I still refused to offer a number, eventually directly ("I don't want to offer a number right now, if that is all right.") After the direct refusal the interviewer moved on to other questions.
I've looked through other questions on this site on this topic, and there is lots of advice on how to answer the "desired salary" question. However, I didn't find anywhere that answered specifically the question is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question? Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the first party to throw out a number?
I'm wondering because, in my situation, I don't really have any previous salaries I can point to as a baseline for expectations, and many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries. I suspect these places will pay well, but I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary or give myself a pay cut with too low a desired salary and that's why I have taken my stance of not wanting to offer the first number.
Duplicate? I believe the specific question as I have worded it is not a duplicate, though I realize my search may not have been exhaustive and/or its answer may have been addressed in another question. Please point me there if so, otherwise I argue that my specific question is not a duplicate.
salary negotiation
New contributor
I am finishing up a graduate degree and am looking for my first full-time job. I recently had a second interview (Skype) with a place I'm interested in and the interviewer asked me what my desired salary was. My plan for this question has been to politely refuse to be the first person to offer a number and that's what I did, in an indirect way. The interviewer pushed to get a number from me, even saying something along the lines of "what is your dream salary for this job, even if it's high?" I still refused to offer a number, eventually directly ("I don't want to offer a number right now, if that is all right.") After the direct refusal the interviewer moved on to other questions.
I've looked through other questions on this site on this topic, and there is lots of advice on how to answer the "desired salary" question. However, I didn't find anywhere that answered specifically the question is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question? Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the first party to throw out a number?
I'm wondering because, in my situation, I don't really have any previous salaries I can point to as a baseline for expectations, and many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries. I suspect these places will pay well, but I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary or give myself a pay cut with too low a desired salary and that's why I have taken my stance of not wanting to offer the first number.
Duplicate? I believe the specific question as I have worded it is not a duplicate, though I realize my search may not have been exhaustive and/or its answer may have been addressed in another question. Please point me there if so, otherwise I argue that my specific question is not a duplicate.
salary negotiation
salary negotiation
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
Joshua
1562
1562
New contributor
New contributor
You might be interested in Does the first person to mention a number in a salary negotiation lose?
– a CVn
3 hours ago
2
Note that although the accepted answer in the linked question says "the first person to name a salary loses" the author does in fact name a salary (range) first, in order to set expectations.
– mcknz
2 hours ago
requiring a salary is very common today.
– Keltari
2 hours ago
1
If someone asks me, point blank, what my "dream salary is" I'm going to give them a 6 or 7 figure number. That's a great excuse to anchor super high.
– mkingsbu
1 hour ago
@mkingsbu One million dollars! (per year)
– Steve-O
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You might be interested in Does the first person to mention a number in a salary negotiation lose?
– a CVn
3 hours ago
2
Note that although the accepted answer in the linked question says "the first person to name a salary loses" the author does in fact name a salary (range) first, in order to set expectations.
– mcknz
2 hours ago
requiring a salary is very common today.
– Keltari
2 hours ago
1
If someone asks me, point blank, what my "dream salary is" I'm going to give them a 6 or 7 figure number. That's a great excuse to anchor super high.
– mkingsbu
1 hour ago
@mkingsbu One million dollars! (per year)
– Steve-O
1 hour ago
You might be interested in Does the first person to mention a number in a salary negotiation lose?
– a CVn
3 hours ago
You might be interested in Does the first person to mention a number in a salary negotiation lose?
– a CVn
3 hours ago
2
2
Note that although the accepted answer in the linked question says "the first person to name a salary loses" the author does in fact name a salary (range) first, in order to set expectations.
– mcknz
2 hours ago
Note that although the accepted answer in the linked question says "the first person to name a salary loses" the author does in fact name a salary (range) first, in order to set expectations.
– mcknz
2 hours ago
requiring a salary is very common today.
– Keltari
2 hours ago
requiring a salary is very common today.
– Keltari
2 hours ago
1
1
If someone asks me, point blank, what my "dream salary is" I'm going to give them a 6 or 7 figure number. That's a great excuse to anchor super high.
– mkingsbu
1 hour ago
If someone asks me, point blank, what my "dream salary is" I'm going to give them a 6 or 7 figure number. That's a great excuse to anchor super high.
– mkingsbu
1 hour ago
@mkingsbu One million dollars! (per year)
– Steve-O
1 hour ago
@mkingsbu One million dollars! (per year)
– Steve-O
1 hour ago
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question?
Yes. You can clearly refuse to answer any question you prefer not to answer, for any reason.
Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the
first party to throw out a number?
Certainly. Most interviewers expect an answer when they ask a question. Your refusal to answer could be ignored, could go down as a negative, or could even cause a complete rejection.
You have to decide how important it is to you not to answer any question. While it's a fairly common negotiating strategy to try not to be first to mention a salary, this strategy has significant risks. That's particularly true when the interviewer pushes hard for an answer.
add a comment |
As an employee, I hated answering this question. As an employer, I realized that it's wonderfully practical. It gives me some small insight into how self-aware you are about your abilities and your sense of confidence.
A person with a nominal resume but a high-salary expectation may be self-centered or arrogant despite the polite courtesy shown in the interview.
A person with a great resume but a low-salary expectation may be nervous, naturally self-disparaging, or have low self-esteem.
Alone, a datapoint like this is nothing more than a flag that there may be an issue to be considered. Possibly negative as shown: but that means asking more questions! Because what I might discover is that the high-salary person has intentionally minimized his resume to avoid appearing too presumptuous and the low-salary person may be padding a resume.
Can you refuse to answer? Absolutely. Don't work for a company that doesn't let you comfortably answer or not answer any question. But also realize that you're depriving the interviewer of information that reflects who you are and how you see yourself.
Your school should have a job counselor. This would be a great question to ask that person to get an idea of the different ways this information is used during the hiring process and how to better assess an answer for yourself.
New contributor
2
I don't think this will make a reader more likely to open their mouth. Basically your two bulleted points say: No matter whether your guess is above or below the number I was thinking of, it's a count against you. Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?
– Henning Makholm
2 hours ago
@HenningMakholm, I understand what you're saying, but there it is. No employer I've ever known (or me, for that matter) was worried about the exact number. The issue was, what do you think you're worth? Only a fool would say, "this job is worth 65K, no more, no less. Anything above is arrogant, anything below is desparate." The hiring process is nowhere near that objective.
– JBH
1 hour ago
2
Don't take it so literally. But still what you're saying is "this is a useful question to ask because it may give me a reason to think less of the candidate". From that description it seems to be in the candidate's best interest to refuse to answer, if for no other reason then to avoid the risk of falling into one of your two possible outcomes.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
@HenningMakholm "Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?" - Both. The ability to leap tall buildings with a single bound would be nice as well. But I don't expect to get everything I want in life ;)
– alephzero
30 mins ago
@HenningMakholm, I apologize, but it appears you've already dicided that there is no positive way to look at this situation. I can only guess, but my guess is that you've not been an employer yourself. If I'm right, you should look forward to the chance. It's eye-opening.
– JBH
19 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
I've often heard the advice to not say what salary you're expecting, either until very late in the interview process, or to refuse to be the first to give a number.
The reasoning is usually given as, "If you quote a number less than what they were prepared to offer, they'll then agree to this lower number when you could have gotten more."
It's certainly possible that it could work that way. But there are many other possible scenarios.
Like, the maximum the company is prepared to pay for this job is less than your minimum requirement. Then you're just wasting your time talking to them, because when you finally get to talking numbers, it's going to be an impasse.
Or, the company considers your resume and performance in the first interview and says, "Hmm, someone with these qualifications will surely demand at least $X. We can't afford him, let's look for more realistic candidates." In fact you are willing to work for much less than that. By refusing to give a number, you just negotiated yourself out of a job.
A company once tried to sell me a service contract. I asked how much it cost. The salesman said, "Not much, when you consider what you're getting." At that point I said forget it, I'm not interested. I've seen plenty of advertisements that don't give a price. I immediately lose interest. If they're afraid to tell me the price, I work on the assumption that the price must be high and they're hoping to trick me into committing before I know how expensive it is. I'm not interested.
Frankly, I think the idea that your last job paid, say, $50,000 a year but now a company will offer you $200,000 is pure fantasy. Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen.
If you want to try to maneuver the company into giving a number first, fine, go ahead and try. But if they refuse, I don't think it's worth turning it into a stand-off. Just give a somewhat high number and let them make a counter-offer.
I gave a certain figure as my expectation, and received an offer for $10k more. Not all questions of this nature are traps.
– EvilSnack
1 hour ago
1
@EvilSnack and it's entirely possible that they would've been happy to pay more than (your offer + $10k), but you gave them a discount. The point is that you don't have enough information to know if you're getting a good deal or not.
– Justin Lardinois
31 mins ago
"Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen" you'd be surprised.
– Justin Lardinois
28 mins ago
add a comment |
Consider that you're entering into a negotiation and knowing what you want is simply a matter of being prepared.
I recommend digging deeper to find out what you're worth. Find as many data points as you can (ask people, similar job listings that list a salary range, sites to help you calculate your worth, data from similar positions, etc). The more data points you're able to collect, the more accurate your number will become.
Once you have a general idea, give a number that's slightly higher (assuming you're still unsure). You're better off coming in a bit high than low. By showing respect for yourself, you will gain the respect of others, and it's probably your best shot at getting what you deserve when throwing out the first number and not knowing exactly what you're worth.
Now, you could still chose to try and have them give a number first. You could ask them before they have a chance to ask you, for instance, though they may just turn the question back at you. It's a tricky game to play and I'm not sure I would advise simply refusing to answer the question.
add a comment |
Is it okay to refuse entirely to answer “desired salary” question?
As you demonstrated yourself in your interview, it is entirely possible to put off salary discussions until later, a practice which most experts recommend. The interviewer, however, holds all the cards. If an interviewer insists that you name a salary, you don't have much choice. That's why experts recommend that you have a number in mind when going into an interview (your walkaway number), even if you never have to name it.
I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary
In my experience this never happens. In fact, you're more likely to offend an interviewer by not naming a salary at all, as opposed to naming a salary that's too high. If you put off salary discussions until later, and eventually get to a point where you are discussing salary, the employer likely wants to hire you, and is more likely to propose a lower counter-offer than to tell you to go home.
many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries
In reality there are very few positions that are so specialized you can't glean anything from sites like Glassdoor or other job boards. You should at least be able to tell based on the overall industry, skill sets used, and years of experience a ballpark for a salary range. When in doubt, go high.
add a comment |
Asking salary range makes a lot of sense. If you want more than the company is willing to pay, you can stop the interviewing process right there. It would suck for you if you felt you're underpaid. You'd probably leave soon. That sucks for the company, as it has to go through hiring and training again.
You should do your homework and have a good idea of what someone with your experience in that position and place makes. Ask around and check salary websites like indeed.com.
Then give a range. Most people don't insist on a single number, and an answer like "65k to 70k per year" is fine. If you're still unsure, you can add that this would also depend on other benefits like work from home days, flexible hours, and so on.
Don't treat this as a you against the company game, where you try to trick the other player (i.e., the company). It sends the message that you only (or at least mostly) care about the salary, not about the company or the work. As a hiring manager, this would be a big red flag for me. Will you leave as soon as some other company offers 5 bucks more?
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: false,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Joshua is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125610%2fis-it-okay-to-refuse-entirely-to-answer-desired-salary-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question?
Yes. You can clearly refuse to answer any question you prefer not to answer, for any reason.
Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the
first party to throw out a number?
Certainly. Most interviewers expect an answer when they ask a question. Your refusal to answer could be ignored, could go down as a negative, or could even cause a complete rejection.
You have to decide how important it is to you not to answer any question. While it's a fairly common negotiating strategy to try not to be first to mention a salary, this strategy has significant risks. That's particularly true when the interviewer pushes hard for an answer.
add a comment |
is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question?
Yes. You can clearly refuse to answer any question you prefer not to answer, for any reason.
Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the
first party to throw out a number?
Certainly. Most interviewers expect an answer when they ask a question. Your refusal to answer could be ignored, could go down as a negative, or could even cause a complete rejection.
You have to decide how important it is to you not to answer any question. While it's a fairly common negotiating strategy to try not to be first to mention a salary, this strategy has significant risks. That's particularly true when the interviewer pushes hard for an answer.
add a comment |
is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question?
Yes. You can clearly refuse to answer any question you prefer not to answer, for any reason.
Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the
first party to throw out a number?
Certainly. Most interviewers expect an answer when they ask a question. Your refusal to answer could be ignored, could go down as a negative, or could even cause a complete rejection.
You have to decide how important it is to you not to answer any question. While it's a fairly common negotiating strategy to try not to be first to mention a salary, this strategy has significant risks. That's particularly true when the interviewer pushes hard for an answer.
is it okay to refuse entirely to answer the "desired salary" question?
Yes. You can clearly refuse to answer any question you prefer not to answer, for any reason.
Are there any downsides to absolutely refusing (politely) to be the
first party to throw out a number?
Certainly. Most interviewers expect an answer when they ask a question. Your refusal to answer could be ignored, could go down as a negative, or could even cause a complete rejection.
You have to decide how important it is to you not to answer any question. While it's a fairly common negotiating strategy to try not to be first to mention a salary, this strategy has significant risks. That's particularly true when the interviewer pushes hard for an answer.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 3 hours ago
Joe Strazzere
242k1187071003
242k1187071003
add a comment |
add a comment |
As an employee, I hated answering this question. As an employer, I realized that it's wonderfully practical. It gives me some small insight into how self-aware you are about your abilities and your sense of confidence.
A person with a nominal resume but a high-salary expectation may be self-centered or arrogant despite the polite courtesy shown in the interview.
A person with a great resume but a low-salary expectation may be nervous, naturally self-disparaging, or have low self-esteem.
Alone, a datapoint like this is nothing more than a flag that there may be an issue to be considered. Possibly negative as shown: but that means asking more questions! Because what I might discover is that the high-salary person has intentionally minimized his resume to avoid appearing too presumptuous and the low-salary person may be padding a resume.
Can you refuse to answer? Absolutely. Don't work for a company that doesn't let you comfortably answer or not answer any question. But also realize that you're depriving the interviewer of information that reflects who you are and how you see yourself.
Your school should have a job counselor. This would be a great question to ask that person to get an idea of the different ways this information is used during the hiring process and how to better assess an answer for yourself.
New contributor
2
I don't think this will make a reader more likely to open their mouth. Basically your two bulleted points say: No matter whether your guess is above or below the number I was thinking of, it's a count against you. Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?
– Henning Makholm
2 hours ago
@HenningMakholm, I understand what you're saying, but there it is. No employer I've ever known (or me, for that matter) was worried about the exact number. The issue was, what do you think you're worth? Only a fool would say, "this job is worth 65K, no more, no less. Anything above is arrogant, anything below is desparate." The hiring process is nowhere near that objective.
– JBH
1 hour ago
2
Don't take it so literally. But still what you're saying is "this is a useful question to ask because it may give me a reason to think less of the candidate". From that description it seems to be in the candidate's best interest to refuse to answer, if for no other reason then to avoid the risk of falling into one of your two possible outcomes.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
@HenningMakholm "Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?" - Both. The ability to leap tall buildings with a single bound would be nice as well. But I don't expect to get everything I want in life ;)
– alephzero
30 mins ago
@HenningMakholm, I apologize, but it appears you've already dicided that there is no positive way to look at this situation. I can only guess, but my guess is that you've not been an employer yourself. If I'm right, you should look forward to the chance. It's eye-opening.
– JBH
19 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
As an employee, I hated answering this question. As an employer, I realized that it's wonderfully practical. It gives me some small insight into how self-aware you are about your abilities and your sense of confidence.
A person with a nominal resume but a high-salary expectation may be self-centered or arrogant despite the polite courtesy shown in the interview.
A person with a great resume but a low-salary expectation may be nervous, naturally self-disparaging, or have low self-esteem.
Alone, a datapoint like this is nothing more than a flag that there may be an issue to be considered. Possibly negative as shown: but that means asking more questions! Because what I might discover is that the high-salary person has intentionally minimized his resume to avoid appearing too presumptuous and the low-salary person may be padding a resume.
Can you refuse to answer? Absolutely. Don't work for a company that doesn't let you comfortably answer or not answer any question. But also realize that you're depriving the interviewer of information that reflects who you are and how you see yourself.
Your school should have a job counselor. This would be a great question to ask that person to get an idea of the different ways this information is used during the hiring process and how to better assess an answer for yourself.
New contributor
2
I don't think this will make a reader more likely to open their mouth. Basically your two bulleted points say: No matter whether your guess is above or below the number I was thinking of, it's a count against you. Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?
– Henning Makholm
2 hours ago
@HenningMakholm, I understand what you're saying, but there it is. No employer I've ever known (or me, for that matter) was worried about the exact number. The issue was, what do you think you're worth? Only a fool would say, "this job is worth 65K, no more, no less. Anything above is arrogant, anything below is desparate." The hiring process is nowhere near that objective.
– JBH
1 hour ago
2
Don't take it so literally. But still what you're saying is "this is a useful question to ask because it may give me a reason to think less of the candidate". From that description it seems to be in the candidate's best interest to refuse to answer, if for no other reason then to avoid the risk of falling into one of your two possible outcomes.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
@HenningMakholm "Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?" - Both. The ability to leap tall buildings with a single bound would be nice as well. But I don't expect to get everything I want in life ;)
– alephzero
30 mins ago
@HenningMakholm, I apologize, but it appears you've already dicided that there is no positive way to look at this situation. I can only guess, but my guess is that you've not been an employer yourself. If I'm right, you should look forward to the chance. It's eye-opening.
– JBH
19 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
As an employee, I hated answering this question. As an employer, I realized that it's wonderfully practical. It gives me some small insight into how self-aware you are about your abilities and your sense of confidence.
A person with a nominal resume but a high-salary expectation may be self-centered or arrogant despite the polite courtesy shown in the interview.
A person with a great resume but a low-salary expectation may be nervous, naturally self-disparaging, or have low self-esteem.
Alone, a datapoint like this is nothing more than a flag that there may be an issue to be considered. Possibly negative as shown: but that means asking more questions! Because what I might discover is that the high-salary person has intentionally minimized his resume to avoid appearing too presumptuous and the low-salary person may be padding a resume.
Can you refuse to answer? Absolutely. Don't work for a company that doesn't let you comfortably answer or not answer any question. But also realize that you're depriving the interviewer of information that reflects who you are and how you see yourself.
Your school should have a job counselor. This would be a great question to ask that person to get an idea of the different ways this information is used during the hiring process and how to better assess an answer for yourself.
New contributor
As an employee, I hated answering this question. As an employer, I realized that it's wonderfully practical. It gives me some small insight into how self-aware you are about your abilities and your sense of confidence.
A person with a nominal resume but a high-salary expectation may be self-centered or arrogant despite the polite courtesy shown in the interview.
A person with a great resume but a low-salary expectation may be nervous, naturally self-disparaging, or have low self-esteem.
Alone, a datapoint like this is nothing more than a flag that there may be an issue to be considered. Possibly negative as shown: but that means asking more questions! Because what I might discover is that the high-salary person has intentionally minimized his resume to avoid appearing too presumptuous and the low-salary person may be padding a resume.
Can you refuse to answer? Absolutely. Don't work for a company that doesn't let you comfortably answer or not answer any question. But also realize that you're depriving the interviewer of information that reflects who you are and how you see yourself.
Your school should have a job counselor. This would be a great question to ask that person to get an idea of the different ways this information is used during the hiring process and how to better assess an answer for yourself.
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Joe Strazzere
242k1187071003
242k1187071003
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
JBH
69110
69110
New contributor
New contributor
2
I don't think this will make a reader more likely to open their mouth. Basically your two bulleted points say: No matter whether your guess is above or below the number I was thinking of, it's a count against you. Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?
– Henning Makholm
2 hours ago
@HenningMakholm, I understand what you're saying, but there it is. No employer I've ever known (or me, for that matter) was worried about the exact number. The issue was, what do you think you're worth? Only a fool would say, "this job is worth 65K, no more, no less. Anything above is arrogant, anything below is desparate." The hiring process is nowhere near that objective.
– JBH
1 hour ago
2
Don't take it so literally. But still what you're saying is "this is a useful question to ask because it may give me a reason to think less of the candidate". From that description it seems to be in the candidate's best interest to refuse to answer, if for no other reason then to avoid the risk of falling into one of your two possible outcomes.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
@HenningMakholm "Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?" - Both. The ability to leap tall buildings with a single bound would be nice as well. But I don't expect to get everything I want in life ;)
– alephzero
30 mins ago
@HenningMakholm, I apologize, but it appears you've already dicided that there is no positive way to look at this situation. I can only guess, but my guess is that you've not been an employer yourself. If I'm right, you should look forward to the chance. It's eye-opening.
– JBH
19 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
2
I don't think this will make a reader more likely to open their mouth. Basically your two bulleted points say: No matter whether your guess is above or below the number I was thinking of, it's a count against you. Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?
– Henning Makholm
2 hours ago
@HenningMakholm, I understand what you're saying, but there it is. No employer I've ever known (or me, for that matter) was worried about the exact number. The issue was, what do you think you're worth? Only a fool would say, "this job is worth 65K, no more, no less. Anything above is arrogant, anything below is desparate." The hiring process is nowhere near that objective.
– JBH
1 hour ago
2
Don't take it so literally. But still what you're saying is "this is a useful question to ask because it may give me a reason to think less of the candidate". From that description it seems to be in the candidate's best interest to refuse to answer, if for no other reason then to avoid the risk of falling into one of your two possible outcomes.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
@HenningMakholm "Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?" - Both. The ability to leap tall buildings with a single bound would be nice as well. But I don't expect to get everything I want in life ;)
– alephzero
30 mins ago
@HenningMakholm, I apologize, but it appears you've already dicided that there is no positive way to look at this situation. I can only guess, but my guess is that you've not been an employer yourself. If I'm right, you should look forward to the chance. It's eye-opening.
– JBH
19 mins ago
2
2
I don't think this will make a reader more likely to open their mouth. Basically your two bulleted points say: No matter whether your guess is above or below the number I was thinking of, it's a count against you. Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?
– Henning Makholm
2 hours ago
I don't think this will make a reader more likely to open their mouth. Basically your two bulleted points say: No matter whether your guess is above or below the number I was thinking of, it's a count against you. Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?
– Henning Makholm
2 hours ago
@HenningMakholm, I understand what you're saying, but there it is. No employer I've ever known (or me, for that matter) was worried about the exact number. The issue was, what do you think you're worth? Only a fool would say, "this job is worth 65K, no more, no less. Anything above is arrogant, anything below is desparate." The hiring process is nowhere near that objective.
– JBH
1 hour ago
@HenningMakholm, I understand what you're saying, but there it is. No employer I've ever known (or me, for that matter) was worried about the exact number. The issue was, what do you think you're worth? Only a fool would say, "this job is worth 65K, no more, no less. Anything above is arrogant, anything below is desparate." The hiring process is nowhere near that objective.
– JBH
1 hour ago
2
2
Don't take it so literally. But still what you're saying is "this is a useful question to ask because it may give me a reason to think less of the candidate". From that description it seems to be in the candidate's best interest to refuse to answer, if for no other reason then to avoid the risk of falling into one of your two possible outcomes.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
Don't take it so literally. But still what you're saying is "this is a useful question to ask because it may give me a reason to think less of the candidate". From that description it seems to be in the candidate's best interest to refuse to answer, if for no other reason then to avoid the risk of falling into one of your two possible outcomes.
– Henning Makholm
1 hour ago
@HenningMakholm "Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?" - Both. The ability to leap tall buildings with a single bound would be nice as well. But I don't expect to get everything I want in life ;)
– alephzero
30 mins ago
@HenningMakholm "Do you want to hire people who can do their job, or psychics who can guess which number you're thinking of?" - Both. The ability to leap tall buildings with a single bound would be nice as well. But I don't expect to get everything I want in life ;)
– alephzero
30 mins ago
@HenningMakholm, I apologize, but it appears you've already dicided that there is no positive way to look at this situation. I can only guess, but my guess is that you've not been an employer yourself. If I'm right, you should look forward to the chance. It's eye-opening.
– JBH
19 mins ago
@HenningMakholm, I apologize, but it appears you've already dicided that there is no positive way to look at this situation. I can only guess, but my guess is that you've not been an employer yourself. If I'm right, you should look forward to the chance. It's eye-opening.
– JBH
19 mins ago
|
show 2 more comments
I've often heard the advice to not say what salary you're expecting, either until very late in the interview process, or to refuse to be the first to give a number.
The reasoning is usually given as, "If you quote a number less than what they were prepared to offer, they'll then agree to this lower number when you could have gotten more."
It's certainly possible that it could work that way. But there are many other possible scenarios.
Like, the maximum the company is prepared to pay for this job is less than your minimum requirement. Then you're just wasting your time talking to them, because when you finally get to talking numbers, it's going to be an impasse.
Or, the company considers your resume and performance in the first interview and says, "Hmm, someone with these qualifications will surely demand at least $X. We can't afford him, let's look for more realistic candidates." In fact you are willing to work for much less than that. By refusing to give a number, you just negotiated yourself out of a job.
A company once tried to sell me a service contract. I asked how much it cost. The salesman said, "Not much, when you consider what you're getting." At that point I said forget it, I'm not interested. I've seen plenty of advertisements that don't give a price. I immediately lose interest. If they're afraid to tell me the price, I work on the assumption that the price must be high and they're hoping to trick me into committing before I know how expensive it is. I'm not interested.
Frankly, I think the idea that your last job paid, say, $50,000 a year but now a company will offer you $200,000 is pure fantasy. Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen.
If you want to try to maneuver the company into giving a number first, fine, go ahead and try. But if they refuse, I don't think it's worth turning it into a stand-off. Just give a somewhat high number and let them make a counter-offer.
I gave a certain figure as my expectation, and received an offer for $10k more. Not all questions of this nature are traps.
– EvilSnack
1 hour ago
1
@EvilSnack and it's entirely possible that they would've been happy to pay more than (your offer + $10k), but you gave them a discount. The point is that you don't have enough information to know if you're getting a good deal or not.
– Justin Lardinois
31 mins ago
"Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen" you'd be surprised.
– Justin Lardinois
28 mins ago
add a comment |
I've often heard the advice to not say what salary you're expecting, either until very late in the interview process, or to refuse to be the first to give a number.
The reasoning is usually given as, "If you quote a number less than what they were prepared to offer, they'll then agree to this lower number when you could have gotten more."
It's certainly possible that it could work that way. But there are many other possible scenarios.
Like, the maximum the company is prepared to pay for this job is less than your minimum requirement. Then you're just wasting your time talking to them, because when you finally get to talking numbers, it's going to be an impasse.
Or, the company considers your resume and performance in the first interview and says, "Hmm, someone with these qualifications will surely demand at least $X. We can't afford him, let's look for more realistic candidates." In fact you are willing to work for much less than that. By refusing to give a number, you just negotiated yourself out of a job.
A company once tried to sell me a service contract. I asked how much it cost. The salesman said, "Not much, when you consider what you're getting." At that point I said forget it, I'm not interested. I've seen plenty of advertisements that don't give a price. I immediately lose interest. If they're afraid to tell me the price, I work on the assumption that the price must be high and they're hoping to trick me into committing before I know how expensive it is. I'm not interested.
Frankly, I think the idea that your last job paid, say, $50,000 a year but now a company will offer you $200,000 is pure fantasy. Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen.
If you want to try to maneuver the company into giving a number first, fine, go ahead and try. But if they refuse, I don't think it's worth turning it into a stand-off. Just give a somewhat high number and let them make a counter-offer.
I gave a certain figure as my expectation, and received an offer for $10k more. Not all questions of this nature are traps.
– EvilSnack
1 hour ago
1
@EvilSnack and it's entirely possible that they would've been happy to pay more than (your offer + $10k), but you gave them a discount. The point is that you don't have enough information to know if you're getting a good deal or not.
– Justin Lardinois
31 mins ago
"Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen" you'd be surprised.
– Justin Lardinois
28 mins ago
add a comment |
I've often heard the advice to not say what salary you're expecting, either until very late in the interview process, or to refuse to be the first to give a number.
The reasoning is usually given as, "If you quote a number less than what they were prepared to offer, they'll then agree to this lower number when you could have gotten more."
It's certainly possible that it could work that way. But there are many other possible scenarios.
Like, the maximum the company is prepared to pay for this job is less than your minimum requirement. Then you're just wasting your time talking to them, because when you finally get to talking numbers, it's going to be an impasse.
Or, the company considers your resume and performance in the first interview and says, "Hmm, someone with these qualifications will surely demand at least $X. We can't afford him, let's look for more realistic candidates." In fact you are willing to work for much less than that. By refusing to give a number, you just negotiated yourself out of a job.
A company once tried to sell me a service contract. I asked how much it cost. The salesman said, "Not much, when you consider what you're getting." At that point I said forget it, I'm not interested. I've seen plenty of advertisements that don't give a price. I immediately lose interest. If they're afraid to tell me the price, I work on the assumption that the price must be high and they're hoping to trick me into committing before I know how expensive it is. I'm not interested.
Frankly, I think the idea that your last job paid, say, $50,000 a year but now a company will offer you $200,000 is pure fantasy. Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen.
If you want to try to maneuver the company into giving a number first, fine, go ahead and try. But if they refuse, I don't think it's worth turning it into a stand-off. Just give a somewhat high number and let them make a counter-offer.
I've often heard the advice to not say what salary you're expecting, either until very late in the interview process, or to refuse to be the first to give a number.
The reasoning is usually given as, "If you quote a number less than what they were prepared to offer, they'll then agree to this lower number when you could have gotten more."
It's certainly possible that it could work that way. But there are many other possible scenarios.
Like, the maximum the company is prepared to pay for this job is less than your minimum requirement. Then you're just wasting your time talking to them, because when you finally get to talking numbers, it's going to be an impasse.
Or, the company considers your resume and performance in the first interview and says, "Hmm, someone with these qualifications will surely demand at least $X. We can't afford him, let's look for more realistic candidates." In fact you are willing to work for much less than that. By refusing to give a number, you just negotiated yourself out of a job.
A company once tried to sell me a service contract. I asked how much it cost. The salesman said, "Not much, when you consider what you're getting." At that point I said forget it, I'm not interested. I've seen plenty of advertisements that don't give a price. I immediately lose interest. If they're afraid to tell me the price, I work on the assumption that the price must be high and they're hoping to trick me into committing before I know how expensive it is. I'm not interested.
Frankly, I think the idea that your last job paid, say, $50,000 a year but now a company will offer you $200,000 is pure fantasy. Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen.
If you want to try to maneuver the company into giving a number first, fine, go ahead and try. But if they refuse, I don't think it's worth turning it into a stand-off. Just give a somewhat high number and let them make a counter-offer.
answered 1 hour ago
Jay
9,11211532
9,11211532
I gave a certain figure as my expectation, and received an offer for $10k more. Not all questions of this nature are traps.
– EvilSnack
1 hour ago
1
@EvilSnack and it's entirely possible that they would've been happy to pay more than (your offer + $10k), but you gave them a discount. The point is that you don't have enough information to know if you're getting a good deal or not.
– Justin Lardinois
31 mins ago
"Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen" you'd be surprised.
– Justin Lardinois
28 mins ago
add a comment |
I gave a certain figure as my expectation, and received an offer for $10k more. Not all questions of this nature are traps.
– EvilSnack
1 hour ago
1
@EvilSnack and it's entirely possible that they would've been happy to pay more than (your offer + $10k), but you gave them a discount. The point is that you don't have enough information to know if you're getting a good deal or not.
– Justin Lardinois
31 mins ago
"Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen" you'd be surprised.
– Justin Lardinois
28 mins ago
I gave a certain figure as my expectation, and received an offer for $10k more. Not all questions of this nature are traps.
– EvilSnack
1 hour ago
I gave a certain figure as my expectation, and received an offer for $10k more. Not all questions of this nature are traps.
– EvilSnack
1 hour ago
1
1
@EvilSnack and it's entirely possible that they would've been happy to pay more than (your offer + $10k), but you gave them a discount. The point is that you don't have enough information to know if you're getting a good deal or not.
– Justin Lardinois
31 mins ago
@EvilSnack and it's entirely possible that they would've been happy to pay more than (your offer + $10k), but you gave them a discount. The point is that you don't have enough information to know if you're getting a good deal or not.
– Justin Lardinois
31 mins ago
"Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen" you'd be surprised.
– Justin Lardinois
28 mins ago
"Thinking that by refusing to give a number might result in some fabulous offer beyond your wildest dreams ... it's just not going to happen" you'd be surprised.
– Justin Lardinois
28 mins ago
add a comment |
Consider that you're entering into a negotiation and knowing what you want is simply a matter of being prepared.
I recommend digging deeper to find out what you're worth. Find as many data points as you can (ask people, similar job listings that list a salary range, sites to help you calculate your worth, data from similar positions, etc). The more data points you're able to collect, the more accurate your number will become.
Once you have a general idea, give a number that's slightly higher (assuming you're still unsure). You're better off coming in a bit high than low. By showing respect for yourself, you will gain the respect of others, and it's probably your best shot at getting what you deserve when throwing out the first number and not knowing exactly what you're worth.
Now, you could still chose to try and have them give a number first. You could ask them before they have a chance to ask you, for instance, though they may just turn the question back at you. It's a tricky game to play and I'm not sure I would advise simply refusing to answer the question.
add a comment |
Consider that you're entering into a negotiation and knowing what you want is simply a matter of being prepared.
I recommend digging deeper to find out what you're worth. Find as many data points as you can (ask people, similar job listings that list a salary range, sites to help you calculate your worth, data from similar positions, etc). The more data points you're able to collect, the more accurate your number will become.
Once you have a general idea, give a number that's slightly higher (assuming you're still unsure). You're better off coming in a bit high than low. By showing respect for yourself, you will gain the respect of others, and it's probably your best shot at getting what you deserve when throwing out the first number and not knowing exactly what you're worth.
Now, you could still chose to try and have them give a number first. You could ask them before they have a chance to ask you, for instance, though they may just turn the question back at you. It's a tricky game to play and I'm not sure I would advise simply refusing to answer the question.
add a comment |
Consider that you're entering into a negotiation and knowing what you want is simply a matter of being prepared.
I recommend digging deeper to find out what you're worth. Find as many data points as you can (ask people, similar job listings that list a salary range, sites to help you calculate your worth, data from similar positions, etc). The more data points you're able to collect, the more accurate your number will become.
Once you have a general idea, give a number that's slightly higher (assuming you're still unsure). You're better off coming in a bit high than low. By showing respect for yourself, you will gain the respect of others, and it's probably your best shot at getting what you deserve when throwing out the first number and not knowing exactly what you're worth.
Now, you could still chose to try and have them give a number first. You could ask them before they have a chance to ask you, for instance, though they may just turn the question back at you. It's a tricky game to play and I'm not sure I would advise simply refusing to answer the question.
Consider that you're entering into a negotiation and knowing what you want is simply a matter of being prepared.
I recommend digging deeper to find out what you're worth. Find as many data points as you can (ask people, similar job listings that list a salary range, sites to help you calculate your worth, data from similar positions, etc). The more data points you're able to collect, the more accurate your number will become.
Once you have a general idea, give a number that's slightly higher (assuming you're still unsure). You're better off coming in a bit high than low. By showing respect for yourself, you will gain the respect of others, and it's probably your best shot at getting what you deserve when throwing out the first number and not knowing exactly what you're worth.
Now, you could still chose to try and have them give a number first. You could ask them before they have a chance to ask you, for instance, though they may just turn the question back at you. It's a tricky game to play and I'm not sure I would advise simply refusing to answer the question.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
aw04
55317
55317
add a comment |
add a comment |
Is it okay to refuse entirely to answer “desired salary” question?
As you demonstrated yourself in your interview, it is entirely possible to put off salary discussions until later, a practice which most experts recommend. The interviewer, however, holds all the cards. If an interviewer insists that you name a salary, you don't have much choice. That's why experts recommend that you have a number in mind when going into an interview (your walkaway number), even if you never have to name it.
I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary
In my experience this never happens. In fact, you're more likely to offend an interviewer by not naming a salary at all, as opposed to naming a salary that's too high. If you put off salary discussions until later, and eventually get to a point where you are discussing salary, the employer likely wants to hire you, and is more likely to propose a lower counter-offer than to tell you to go home.
many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries
In reality there are very few positions that are so specialized you can't glean anything from sites like Glassdoor or other job boards. You should at least be able to tell based on the overall industry, skill sets used, and years of experience a ballpark for a salary range. When in doubt, go high.
add a comment |
Is it okay to refuse entirely to answer “desired salary” question?
As you demonstrated yourself in your interview, it is entirely possible to put off salary discussions until later, a practice which most experts recommend. The interviewer, however, holds all the cards. If an interviewer insists that you name a salary, you don't have much choice. That's why experts recommend that you have a number in mind when going into an interview (your walkaway number), even if you never have to name it.
I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary
In my experience this never happens. In fact, you're more likely to offend an interviewer by not naming a salary at all, as opposed to naming a salary that's too high. If you put off salary discussions until later, and eventually get to a point where you are discussing salary, the employer likely wants to hire you, and is more likely to propose a lower counter-offer than to tell you to go home.
many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries
In reality there are very few positions that are so specialized you can't glean anything from sites like Glassdoor or other job boards. You should at least be able to tell based on the overall industry, skill sets used, and years of experience a ballpark for a salary range. When in doubt, go high.
add a comment |
Is it okay to refuse entirely to answer “desired salary” question?
As you demonstrated yourself in your interview, it is entirely possible to put off salary discussions until later, a practice which most experts recommend. The interviewer, however, holds all the cards. If an interviewer insists that you name a salary, you don't have much choice. That's why experts recommend that you have a number in mind when going into an interview (your walkaway number), even if you never have to name it.
I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary
In my experience this never happens. In fact, you're more likely to offend an interviewer by not naming a salary at all, as opposed to naming a salary that's too high. If you put off salary discussions until later, and eventually get to a point where you are discussing salary, the employer likely wants to hire you, and is more likely to propose a lower counter-offer than to tell you to go home.
many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries
In reality there are very few positions that are so specialized you can't glean anything from sites like Glassdoor or other job boards. You should at least be able to tell based on the overall industry, skill sets used, and years of experience a ballpark for a salary range. When in doubt, go high.
Is it okay to refuse entirely to answer “desired salary” question?
As you demonstrated yourself in your interview, it is entirely possible to put off salary discussions until later, a practice which most experts recommend. The interviewer, however, holds all the cards. If an interviewer insists that you name a salary, you don't have much choice. That's why experts recommend that you have a number in mind when going into an interview (your walkaway number), even if you never have to name it.
I don't want to inadvertently offend them with too high a desired salary
In my experience this never happens. In fact, you're more likely to offend an interviewer by not naming a salary at all, as opposed to naming a salary that's too high. If you put off salary discussions until later, and eventually get to a point where you are discussing salary, the employer likely wants to hire you, and is more likely to propose a lower counter-offer than to tell you to go home.
many of the positions I'm applying to are specialized or at specialized companies that don't have enough people working those positions/companies to give Glassdoor, etc., a handle on estimating salaries
In reality there are very few positions that are so specialized you can't glean anything from sites like Glassdoor or other job boards. You should at least be able to tell based on the overall industry, skill sets used, and years of experience a ballpark for a salary range. When in doubt, go high.
answered 2 hours ago
mcknz
16.5k65771
16.5k65771
add a comment |
add a comment |
Asking salary range makes a lot of sense. If you want more than the company is willing to pay, you can stop the interviewing process right there. It would suck for you if you felt you're underpaid. You'd probably leave soon. That sucks for the company, as it has to go through hiring and training again.
You should do your homework and have a good idea of what someone with your experience in that position and place makes. Ask around and check salary websites like indeed.com.
Then give a range. Most people don't insist on a single number, and an answer like "65k to 70k per year" is fine. If you're still unsure, you can add that this would also depend on other benefits like work from home days, flexible hours, and so on.
Don't treat this as a you against the company game, where you try to trick the other player (i.e., the company). It sends the message that you only (or at least mostly) care about the salary, not about the company or the work. As a hiring manager, this would be a big red flag for me. Will you leave as soon as some other company offers 5 bucks more?
add a comment |
Asking salary range makes a lot of sense. If you want more than the company is willing to pay, you can stop the interviewing process right there. It would suck for you if you felt you're underpaid. You'd probably leave soon. That sucks for the company, as it has to go through hiring and training again.
You should do your homework and have a good idea of what someone with your experience in that position and place makes. Ask around and check salary websites like indeed.com.
Then give a range. Most people don't insist on a single number, and an answer like "65k to 70k per year" is fine. If you're still unsure, you can add that this would also depend on other benefits like work from home days, flexible hours, and so on.
Don't treat this as a you against the company game, where you try to trick the other player (i.e., the company). It sends the message that you only (or at least mostly) care about the salary, not about the company or the work. As a hiring manager, this would be a big red flag for me. Will you leave as soon as some other company offers 5 bucks more?
add a comment |
Asking salary range makes a lot of sense. If you want more than the company is willing to pay, you can stop the interviewing process right there. It would suck for you if you felt you're underpaid. You'd probably leave soon. That sucks for the company, as it has to go through hiring and training again.
You should do your homework and have a good idea of what someone with your experience in that position and place makes. Ask around and check salary websites like indeed.com.
Then give a range. Most people don't insist on a single number, and an answer like "65k to 70k per year" is fine. If you're still unsure, you can add that this would also depend on other benefits like work from home days, flexible hours, and so on.
Don't treat this as a you against the company game, where you try to trick the other player (i.e., the company). It sends the message that you only (or at least mostly) care about the salary, not about the company or the work. As a hiring manager, this would be a big red flag for me. Will you leave as soon as some other company offers 5 bucks more?
Asking salary range makes a lot of sense. If you want more than the company is willing to pay, you can stop the interviewing process right there. It would suck for you if you felt you're underpaid. You'd probably leave soon. That sucks for the company, as it has to go through hiring and training again.
You should do your homework and have a good idea of what someone with your experience in that position and place makes. Ask around and check salary websites like indeed.com.
Then give a range. Most people don't insist on a single number, and an answer like "65k to 70k per year" is fine. If you're still unsure, you can add that this would also depend on other benefits like work from home days, flexible hours, and so on.
Don't treat this as a you against the company game, where you try to trick the other player (i.e., the company). It sends the message that you only (or at least mostly) care about the salary, not about the company or the work. As a hiring manager, this would be a big red flag for me. Will you leave as soon as some other company offers 5 bucks more?
answered 17 mins ago
Robert
179111
179111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Joshua is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joshua is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joshua is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joshua is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125610%2fis-it-okay-to-refuse-entirely-to-answer-desired-salary-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You might be interested in Does the first person to mention a number in a salary negotiation lose?
– a CVn
3 hours ago
2
Note that although the accepted answer in the linked question says "the first person to name a salary loses" the author does in fact name a salary (range) first, in order to set expectations.
– mcknz
2 hours ago
requiring a salary is very common today.
– Keltari
2 hours ago
1
If someone asks me, point blank, what my "dream salary is" I'm going to give them a 6 or 7 figure number. That's a great excuse to anchor super high.
– mkingsbu
1 hour ago
@mkingsbu One million dollars! (per year)
– Steve-O
1 hour ago