Integral with fraction and square root produces wrong vertical alignment












3














This code produces an ankward vertical alignment which involves the integral symbol and the fraction with the square root at the denominator. Why? How can I fix this?



documentclass[a4paper]{article}



usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{amsthm}

usepackage{mathtools}



begin{document}

 [

 int_{x_0}^{x(t)} ! ! ! frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl

 (E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0

 ]

end{document}





spacing vertical-alignment fractions integral sqrt







share|improve this question






















  • What is awkward for you and how would you like it to look?
    – TeXnician
    2 hours ago










  • I've also tried using the "bigints" package to get a bigger integral symbol, but it doesn't do the job, in fact the symbol won't get aligned properly anyway... Answering TeXnician: the integral symbol should be vertically aligned with the square root symbol at the denominator.
    – Lele99_DD
    2 hours ago








  • 1




    Does any of the answers to this question help?
    – marmot
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    I see nothing strange.
    – egreg
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    If it was not for the negative spaces and the non-upright differential d, I'd agree with @egreg.
    – marmot
    2 hours ago
















3














This code produces an ankward vertical alignment which involves the integral symbol and the fraction with the square root at the denominator. Why? How can I fix this?



documentclass[a4paper]{article}



usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{amsthm}

usepackage{mathtools}



begin{document}

 [

 int_{x_0}^{x(t)} ! ! ! frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl

 (E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0

 ]

end{document}





spacing vertical-alignment fractions integral sqrt







share|improve this question






















  • What is awkward for you and how would you like it to look?
    – TeXnician
    2 hours ago










  • I've also tried using the "bigints" package to get a bigger integral symbol, but it doesn't do the job, in fact the symbol won't get aligned properly anyway... Answering TeXnician: the integral symbol should be vertically aligned with the square root symbol at the denominator.
    – Lele99_DD
    2 hours ago








  • 1




    Does any of the answers to this question help?
    – marmot
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    I see nothing strange.
    – egreg
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    If it was not for the negative spaces and the non-upright differential d, I'd agree with @egreg.
    – marmot
    2 hours ago














3












3








3







This code produces an ankward vertical alignment which involves the integral symbol and the fraction with the square root at the denominator. Why? How can I fix this?



documentclass[a4paper]{article}



usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{amsthm}

usepackage{mathtools}



begin{document}

 [

 int_{x_0}^{x(t)} ! ! ! frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl

 (E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0

 ]

end{document}





spacing vertical-alignment fractions integral sqrt







share|improve this question













This code produces an ankward vertical alignment which involves the integral symbol and the fraction with the square root at the denominator. Why? How can I fix this?



documentclass[a4paper]{article}



usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{amsthm}

usepackage{mathtools}



begin{document}

 [

 int_{x_0}^{x(t)} ! ! ! frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl

 (E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0

 ]

end{document}





spacing vertical-alignment fractions integral sqrt




spacing vertical-alignment fractions integral sqrt






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Lele99_DD

795




795












  • What is awkward for you and how would you like it to look?
    – TeXnician
    2 hours ago










  • I've also tried using the "bigints" package to get a bigger integral symbol, but it doesn't do the job, in fact the symbol won't get aligned properly anyway... Answering TeXnician: the integral symbol should be vertically aligned with the square root symbol at the denominator.
    – Lele99_DD
    2 hours ago








  • 1




    Does any of the answers to this question help?
    – marmot
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    I see nothing strange.
    – egreg
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    If it was not for the negative spaces and the non-upright differential d, I'd agree with @egreg.
    – marmot
    2 hours ago


















  • What is awkward for you and how would you like it to look?
    – TeXnician
    2 hours ago










  • I've also tried using the "bigints" package to get a bigger integral symbol, but it doesn't do the job, in fact the symbol won't get aligned properly anyway... Answering TeXnician: the integral symbol should be vertically aligned with the square root symbol at the denominator.
    – Lele99_DD
    2 hours ago








  • 1




    Does any of the answers to this question help?
    – marmot
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    I see nothing strange.
    – egreg
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    If it was not for the negative spaces and the non-upright differential d, I'd agree with @egreg.
    – marmot
    2 hours ago
















What is awkward for you and how would you like it to look?
– TeXnician
2 hours ago




What is awkward for you and how would you like it to look?
– TeXnician
2 hours ago












I've also tried using the "bigints" package to get a bigger integral symbol, but it doesn't do the job, in fact the symbol won't get aligned properly anyway... Answering TeXnician: the integral symbol should be vertically aligned with the square root symbol at the denominator.
– Lele99_DD
2 hours ago






I've also tried using the "bigints" package to get a bigger integral symbol, but it doesn't do the job, in fact the symbol won't get aligned properly anyway... Answering TeXnician: the integral symbol should be vertically aligned with the square root symbol at the denominator.
– Lele99_DD
2 hours ago






1




1




Does any of the answers to this question help?
– marmot
2 hours ago




Does any of the answers to this question help?
– marmot
2 hours ago




2




2




I see nothing strange.
– egreg
2 hours ago




I see nothing strange.
– egreg
2 hours ago




1




1




If it was not for the negative spaces and the non-upright differential d, I'd agree with @egreg.
– marmot
2 hours ago




If it was not for the negative spaces and the non-upright differential d, I'd agree with @egreg.
– marmot
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6














That's how it's supposed to be typeset.



Growing the integral symbol is out of the question, in my opinion. Moving it down is similarly disgraceful.



documentclass[a4paper]{article}



usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{amssymb}

usepackage{amsthm}

usepackage{mathtools}



begin{document}



noindent

No square root

 [

 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}

   biggl(frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)biggr)^{!-1/2}, dx = t-t_0

 ]

Smashed square root

 [

 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}

   frac{1}{sqrt{smash[b]{frac{2}{m}}(E_0-V(x))}} , dx = t-t_0

 ]

Normal

 [

 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}

   frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0

 ]

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























    2














    I probably would do



    documentclass[a4paper]{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    

    
begin{document}
    
 [
    
 intlimits_{x_0}^{x(t)}  frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl
    
 (E_0-V(xi)bigr)}} , mathrm{d}xi = t-t_0
    
 ]
    
end{document}


    enter image description here



    to avoid confusion between the upper limit of the integral, x(t), and the integration variable as well between some quantity d (like a diameter, say) and the differential d. intlimits makes the integral symbol look higher.






    share|improve this answer





























      0














      As marmot suggested, I tried using the scalerel package and I like the outcome. It's not perfect, but I think it's acceptable. The integral symbol is finally aligned with the bottom of the fraction.



      documentclass[a4paper]{article}
      

      
usepackage{amsmath}
      
usepackage{amssymb}
      
usepackage{amsthm}
      
usepackage{mathtools}
      

      
usepackage{scalerel}
      

      
begin{document}
      
 defx{frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V
      
 (xi)bigr)}}}
      
 [
      
 {scalerel*[2.2ex]{int}{x}}_{!!!x_0}^{,x(t)}x,,
      
 dxi , = , t-t_0
      
 ]
      
end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "85"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467920%2fintegral-with-fraction-and-square-root-produces-wrong-vertical-alignment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6














        That's how it's supposed to be typeset.



        Growing the integral symbol is out of the question, in my opinion. Moving it down is similarly disgraceful.



        documentclass[a4paper]{article}
        

        
usepackage{amsmath}
        
usepackage{amssymb}
        
usepackage{amsthm}
        
usepackage{mathtools}
        

        
begin{document}
        

        
noindent
        
No square root
        
 [
        
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
        
   biggl(frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)biggr)^{!-1/2}, dx = t-t_0
        
 ]
        
Smashed square root
        
 [
        
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
        
   frac{1}{sqrt{smash[b]{frac{2}{m}}(E_0-V(x))}} , dx = t-t_0
        
 ]
        
Normal
        
 [
        
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
        
   frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0
        
 ]
        
end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer


























          6














          That's how it's supposed to be typeset.



          Growing the integral symbol is out of the question, in my opinion. Moving it down is similarly disgraceful.



          documentclass[a4paper]{article}
          

          
usepackage{amsmath}
          
usepackage{amssymb}
          
usepackage{amsthm}
          
usepackage{mathtools}
          

          
begin{document}
          

          
noindent
          
No square root
          
 [
          
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
          
   biggl(frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)biggr)^{!-1/2}, dx = t-t_0
          
 ]
          
Smashed square root
          
 [
          
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
          
   frac{1}{sqrt{smash[b]{frac{2}{m}}(E_0-V(x))}} , dx = t-t_0
          
 ]
          
Normal
          
 [
          
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
          
   frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0
          
 ]
          
end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer
























            6












            6








            6






            That's how it's supposed to be typeset.



            Growing the integral symbol is out of the question, in my opinion. Moving it down is similarly disgraceful.



            documentclass[a4paper]{article}
            

            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
usepackage{amssymb}
            
usepackage{amsthm}
            
usepackage{mathtools}
            

            
begin{document}
            

            
noindent
            
No square root
            
 [
            
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
            
   biggl(frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)biggr)^{!-1/2}, dx = t-t_0
            
 ]
            
Smashed square root
            
 [
            
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
            
   frac{1}{sqrt{smash[b]{frac{2}{m}}(E_0-V(x))}} , dx = t-t_0
            
 ]
            
Normal
            
 [
            
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
            
   frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0
            
 ]
            
end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer












            That's how it's supposed to be typeset.



            Growing the integral symbol is out of the question, in my opinion. Moving it down is similarly disgraceful.



            documentclass[a4paper]{article}
            

            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
usepackage{amssymb}
            
usepackage{amsthm}
            
usepackage{mathtools}
            

            
begin{document}
            

            
noindent
            
No square root
            
 [
            
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
            
   biggl(frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)biggr)^{!-1/2}, dx = t-t_0
            
 ]
            
Smashed square root
            
 [
            
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
            
   frac{1}{sqrt{smash[b]{frac{2}{m}}(E_0-V(x))}} , dx = t-t_0
            
 ]
            
Normal
            
 [
            
 int_{x_0}^{x(t)}
            
   frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V(x)bigr)}} , dx = t-t_0
            
 ]
            
end{document}


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            egreg

            708k8618823164




            708k8618823164























                2














                I probably would do



                documentclass[a4paper]{article}
                
usepackage{amsmath}
                

                
begin{document}
                
 [
                
 intlimits_{x_0}^{x(t)}  frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl
                
 (E_0-V(xi)bigr)}} , mathrm{d}xi = t-t_0
                
 ]
                
end{document}


                enter image description here



                to avoid confusion between the upper limit of the integral, x(t), and the integration variable as well between some quantity d (like a diameter, say) and the differential d. intlimits makes the integral symbol look higher.






                share|improve this answer


























                  2














                  I probably would do



                  documentclass[a4paper]{article}
                  
usepackage{amsmath}
                  

                  
begin{document}
                  
 [
                  
 intlimits_{x_0}^{x(t)}  frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl
                  
 (E_0-V(xi)bigr)}} , mathrm{d}xi = t-t_0
                  
 ]
                  
end{document}


                  enter image description here



                  to avoid confusion between the upper limit of the integral, x(t), and the integration variable as well between some quantity d (like a diameter, say) and the differential d. intlimits makes the integral symbol look higher.






                  share|improve this answer
























                    2












                    2








                    2






                    I probably would do



                    documentclass[a4paper]{article}
                    
usepackage{amsmath}
                    

                    
begin{document}
                    
 [
                    
 intlimits_{x_0}^{x(t)}  frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl
                    
 (E_0-V(xi)bigr)}} , mathrm{d}xi = t-t_0
                    
 ]
                    
end{document}


                    enter image description here



                    to avoid confusion between the upper limit of the integral, x(t), and the integration variable as well between some quantity d (like a diameter, say) and the differential d. intlimits makes the integral symbol look higher.






                    share|improve this answer












                    I probably would do



                    documentclass[a4paper]{article}
                    
usepackage{amsmath}
                    

                    
begin{document}
                    
 [
                    
 intlimits_{x_0}^{x(t)}  frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl
                    
 (E_0-V(xi)bigr)}} , mathrm{d}xi = t-t_0
                    
 ]
                    
end{document}


                    enter image description here



                    to avoid confusion between the upper limit of the integral, x(t), and the integration variable as well between some quantity d (like a diameter, say) and the differential d. intlimits makes the integral symbol look higher.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    marmot

                    87.1k4100187




                    87.1k4100187























                        0














                        As marmot suggested, I tried using the scalerel package and I like the outcome. It's not perfect, but I think it's acceptable. The integral symbol is finally aligned with the bottom of the fraction.



                        documentclass[a4paper]{article}
                        

                        
usepackage{amsmath}
                        
usepackage{amssymb}
                        
usepackage{amsthm}
                        
usepackage{mathtools}
                        

                        
usepackage{scalerel}
                        

                        
begin{document}
                        
 defx{frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V
                        
 (xi)bigr)}}}
                        
 [
                        
 {scalerel*[2.2ex]{int}{x}}_{!!!x_0}^{,x(t)}x,,
                        
 dxi , = , t-t_0
                        
 ]
                        
end{document}


                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer




























                          0














                          As marmot suggested, I tried using the scalerel package and I like the outcome. It's not perfect, but I think it's acceptable. The integral symbol is finally aligned with the bottom of the fraction.



                          documentclass[a4paper]{article}
                          

                          
usepackage{amsmath}
                          
usepackage{amssymb}
                          
usepackage{amsthm}
                          
usepackage{mathtools}
                          

                          
usepackage{scalerel}
                          

                          
begin{document}
                          
 defx{frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V
                          
 (xi)bigr)}}}
                          
 [
                          
 {scalerel*[2.2ex]{int}{x}}_{!!!x_0}^{,x(t)}x,,
                          
 dxi , = , t-t_0
                          
 ]
                          
end{document}


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer


























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            As marmot suggested, I tried using the scalerel package and I like the outcome. It's not perfect, but I think it's acceptable. The integral symbol is finally aligned with the bottom of the fraction.



                            documentclass[a4paper]{article}
                            

                            
usepackage{amsmath}
                            
usepackage{amssymb}
                            
usepackage{amsthm}
                            
usepackage{mathtools}
                            

                            
usepackage{scalerel}
                            

                            
begin{document}
                            
 defx{frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V
                            
 (xi)bigr)}}}
                            
 [
                            
 {scalerel*[2.2ex]{int}{x}}_{!!!x_0}^{,x(t)}x,,
                            
 dxi , = , t-t_0
                            
 ]
                            
end{document}


                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer














                            As marmot suggested, I tried using the scalerel package and I like the outcome. It's not perfect, but I think it's acceptable. The integral symbol is finally aligned with the bottom of the fraction.



                            documentclass[a4paper]{article}
                            

                            
usepackage{amsmath}
                            
usepackage{amssymb}
                            
usepackage{amsthm}
                            
usepackage{mathtools}
                            

                            
usepackage{scalerel}
                            

                            
begin{document}
                            
 defx{frac{1}{sqrt{frac{2}{m}bigl(E_0-V
                            
 (xi)bigr)}}}
                            
 [
                            
 {scalerel*[2.2ex]{int}{x}}_{!!!x_0}^{,x(t)}x,,
                            
 dxi , = , t-t_0
                            
 ]
                            
end{document}


                            enter image description here







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited 1 hour ago

























                            answered 1 hour ago









                            Lele99_DD

                            795




                            795






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467920%2fintegral-with-fraction-and-square-root-produces-wrong-vertical-alignment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                -

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Morgemoulin

                                Image
                                Morgemoulin — miejscowość i gmina — Państwo   Francja Region Grand Est Departament Moza Okręg Verdun Kod INSEE 55357 Powierzchnia 6,82 km² Populacja  (1990) • liczba ludności 75 • gęstość 11 os./km² Kod pocztowy 55400 Położenie na mapie Francji Morgemoulin 49°14′N   5°35′E / 49,233333   5,583333 Portal Francja Morgemoulin – miejscowość i gmina we Francji, w regionie Grand Est, w departamencie Moza. Według danych na rok 1990 gminę zamieszkiwało 75 osób, a gęstość zaludnienia wynosiła 11 osób/km² (wśród 2335 gmin Lotaryngii Morgemoulin plasuje się na 970. miejscu pod względem liczby ludności, natomiast pod względem powierzchni na miejscu 848.). Bibliografia | Francuski urząd statystyczny ( fr. ) . p   •   d   •   e Gminy okręgu Verdun Abaucourt-Hautecourt • Aincreville • Ambly-sur-Meuse • Amel-sur-l'Étang • Ancemont • Arrancy-sur-Crusne • Aubréville • Autré...
                                Read more

                                Scott Moir

                                Image
                                Scott Moir Tessa Virtue i Scott Moir w 2016 r. Reprezentacja   Kanada Data i miejsce urodzenia 2 września 1987 London Wzrost 180 cm Konkurencja Pary taneczne Partner sportowy Tessa Virtue Trener Marie-France Dubreuil, Patrice Lauzon, Romain Haguenauer Poprzednio: Marina Zujewa, Oleg Epstein, Igor Szpilband, Johnny Johns, Carol Moir, Paul MacIntosh, Suzanne Killing Klub Montreal International School of Skating Poprzednio: Arctic Edge FSC Ilderton Skating Club Lokalizacja treningowa Montreal Poprzednio: Canton Kitchener Rekordy życiowe ISU przed sezonem 2018/2019 Nota łączna 206,07 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Taniec krótki 83,67 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Taniec dowolny 122,40 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Dorobek medalowy Reprezentacja   Kanada Igrzyska olimpijskie Złoto Vancouver 2010 pary taneczne Złoto Pjongczang 2018 pary taneczne Złoto Pjongczang 2018 drużynowo Srebro S...
                                Read more

                                Souastre

                                Image
                                Souastre — miejscowość i gmina — Herb Państwo   Francja Region Hauts-de-France Departament Pas-de-Calais Okręg Arras Kod INSEE 62800 Powierzchnia 7,18 km² Populacja  (1990) • liczba ludności 352 • gęstość 49 os./km² Kod pocztowy 62111 Położenie na mapie Francji Souastre 50°09′N   2°34′E / 50,150000   2,566667 Portal Francja Souastre – miejscowość i gmina we Francji, w regionie Hauts-de-France, w departamencie Pas-de-Calais. Według danych na rok 1990 gminę zamieszkiwały 352 osoby, a gęstość zaludnienia wynosiła 49 osób/km² (wśród 1549 gmin regionu Nord-Pas-de-Calais Souastre plasuje się na 887. miejscu pod względem liczby ludności, natomiast pod względem powierzchni na miejscu 507.). Bibliografia | Francuski urząd statystyczny ( fr. ) . p   •   d   •   e Gminy okręgu Arras Ablain-Saint-Nazaire Ablainzevelle Acheville Achicourt Achiet-le-Grand Achiet-le-Pe...
                                Read more