Why was POSIX.1e withdrawn?












4














The proposed POSIX.1e standard defines a few things like ACLs that are widely supported. But the proposal itself was withdrawn. How come? The only reasoning I've found online is this quote from http://wt.tuxomania.net/topics/1999_06_Posix_1e/:




Why Posix.1e was abandoned is difficult to understand from today's
(July 2014) point of view. Solaris, Irix, Linux, and probably other
Unices seemed to recognize the standard. On the other hand the FreeBSD
project found counter arguments and didn't integrate capabilities
('fine grained privileges') by default.




On the other hand, Jörg Schilling said this on this site (What is the exact purpose of `mask` in file system ACL?)




BTW: The POSIX-1003.1 draft for ACLs has been withdrawn in 1997 by the
reference implementations (a.g. Solaris) because it turned out that
customers wanted a more powerful method that has later been
standardized as NVSv4 ACLs.




Is there a more detailed account of what happened?










share|improve this question



























    4














    The proposed POSIX.1e standard defines a few things like ACLs that are widely supported. But the proposal itself was withdrawn. How come? The only reasoning I've found online is this quote from http://wt.tuxomania.net/topics/1999_06_Posix_1e/:




    Why Posix.1e was abandoned is difficult to understand from today's
    (July 2014) point of view. Solaris, Irix, Linux, and probably other
    Unices seemed to recognize the standard. On the other hand the FreeBSD
    project found counter arguments and didn't integrate capabilities
    ('fine grained privileges') by default.




    On the other hand, Jörg Schilling said this on this site (What is the exact purpose of `mask` in file system ACL?)




    BTW: The POSIX-1003.1 draft for ACLs has been withdrawn in 1997 by the
    reference implementations (a.g. Solaris) because it turned out that
    customers wanted a more powerful method that has later been
    standardized as NVSv4 ACLs.




    Is there a more detailed account of what happened?










    share|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4


      2





      The proposed POSIX.1e standard defines a few things like ACLs that are widely supported. But the proposal itself was withdrawn. How come? The only reasoning I've found online is this quote from http://wt.tuxomania.net/topics/1999_06_Posix_1e/:




      Why Posix.1e was abandoned is difficult to understand from today's
      (July 2014) point of view. Solaris, Irix, Linux, and probably other
      Unices seemed to recognize the standard. On the other hand the FreeBSD
      project found counter arguments and didn't integrate capabilities
      ('fine grained privileges') by default.




      On the other hand, Jörg Schilling said this on this site (What is the exact purpose of `mask` in file system ACL?)




      BTW: The POSIX-1003.1 draft for ACLs has been withdrawn in 1997 by the
      reference implementations (a.g. Solaris) because it turned out that
      customers wanted a more powerful method that has later been
      standardized as NVSv4 ACLs.




      Is there a more detailed account of what happened?










      share|improve this question













      The proposed POSIX.1e standard defines a few things like ACLs that are widely supported. But the proposal itself was withdrawn. How come? The only reasoning I've found online is this quote from http://wt.tuxomania.net/topics/1999_06_Posix_1e/:




      Why Posix.1e was abandoned is difficult to understand from today's
      (July 2014) point of view. Solaris, Irix, Linux, and probably other
      Unices seemed to recognize the standard. On the other hand the FreeBSD
      project found counter arguments and didn't integrate capabilities
      ('fine grained privileges') by default.




      On the other hand, Jörg Schilling said this on this site (What is the exact purpose of `mask` in file system ACL?)




      BTW: The POSIX-1003.1 draft for ACLs has been withdrawn in 1997 by the
      reference implementations (a.g. Solaris) because it turned out that
      customers wanted a more powerful method that has later been
      standardized as NVSv4 ACLs.




      Is there a more detailed account of what happened?







      posix history acl






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 19 '18 at 4:32









      Tavian Barnes

      297210




      297210



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489820%2fwhy-was-posix-1e-withdrawn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489820%2fwhy-was-posix-1e-withdrawn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Morgemoulin

          Scott Moir

          Souastre