Why was POSIX.1e withdrawn?
The proposed POSIX.1e standard defines a few things like ACLs that are widely supported. But the proposal itself was withdrawn. How come? The only reasoning I've found online is this quote from http://wt.tuxomania.net/topics/1999_06_Posix_1e/:
Why Posix.1e was abandoned is difficult to understand from today's
(July 2014) point of view. Solaris, Irix, Linux, and probably other
Unices seemed to recognize the standard. On the other hand the FreeBSD
project found counter arguments and didn't integrate capabilities
('fine grained privileges') by default.
On the other hand, Jörg Schilling said this on this site (What is the exact purpose of `mask` in file system ACL?)
BTW: The POSIX-1003.1 draft for ACLs has been withdrawn in 1997 by the
reference implementations (a.g. Solaris) because it turned out that
customers wanted a more powerful method that has later been
standardized as NVSv4 ACLs.
Is there a more detailed account of what happened?
posix history acl
add a comment |
The proposed POSIX.1e standard defines a few things like ACLs that are widely supported. But the proposal itself was withdrawn. How come? The only reasoning I've found online is this quote from http://wt.tuxomania.net/topics/1999_06_Posix_1e/:
Why Posix.1e was abandoned is difficult to understand from today's
(July 2014) point of view. Solaris, Irix, Linux, and probably other
Unices seemed to recognize the standard. On the other hand the FreeBSD
project found counter arguments and didn't integrate capabilities
('fine grained privileges') by default.
On the other hand, Jörg Schilling said this on this site (What is the exact purpose of `mask` in file system ACL?)
BTW: The POSIX-1003.1 draft for ACLs has been withdrawn in 1997 by the
reference implementations (a.g. Solaris) because it turned out that
customers wanted a more powerful method that has later been
standardized as NVSv4 ACLs.
Is there a more detailed account of what happened?
posix history acl
add a comment |
The proposed POSIX.1e standard defines a few things like ACLs that are widely supported. But the proposal itself was withdrawn. How come? The only reasoning I've found online is this quote from http://wt.tuxomania.net/topics/1999_06_Posix_1e/:
Why Posix.1e was abandoned is difficult to understand from today's
(July 2014) point of view. Solaris, Irix, Linux, and probably other
Unices seemed to recognize the standard. On the other hand the FreeBSD
project found counter arguments and didn't integrate capabilities
('fine grained privileges') by default.
On the other hand, Jörg Schilling said this on this site (What is the exact purpose of `mask` in file system ACL?)
BTW: The POSIX-1003.1 draft for ACLs has been withdrawn in 1997 by the
reference implementations (a.g. Solaris) because it turned out that
customers wanted a more powerful method that has later been
standardized as NVSv4 ACLs.
Is there a more detailed account of what happened?
posix history acl
The proposed POSIX.1e standard defines a few things like ACLs that are widely supported. But the proposal itself was withdrawn. How come? The only reasoning I've found online is this quote from http://wt.tuxomania.net/topics/1999_06_Posix_1e/:
Why Posix.1e was abandoned is difficult to understand from today's
(July 2014) point of view. Solaris, Irix, Linux, and probably other
Unices seemed to recognize the standard. On the other hand the FreeBSD
project found counter arguments and didn't integrate capabilities
('fine grained privileges') by default.
On the other hand, Jörg Schilling said this on this site (What is the exact purpose of `mask` in file system ACL?)
BTW: The POSIX-1003.1 draft for ACLs has been withdrawn in 1997 by the
reference implementations (a.g. Solaris) because it turned out that
customers wanted a more powerful method that has later been
standardized as NVSv4 ACLs.
Is there a more detailed account of what happened?
posix history acl
posix history acl
asked Dec 19 '18 at 4:32
Tavian Barnes
297210
297210
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489820%2fwhy-was-posix-1e-withdrawn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489820%2fwhy-was-posix-1e-withdrawn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown