Present perfect tense and specific time expression?
According to many grammar textbooks, present perfect tense should not be used with specific time expression. Therefore, it is grammatically wrong to say "I have sold my house on 10 December 2018."
However, I often see this type of sentence in the writings from the United States:
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of said City this 26th day of August, 1954.
Questions:
Does the word 'this' make it an exception that 'present perfect tense' can be used with specific time expression in this construction?
or
Is the use of present perfect tense with specific time expression allowed only in American English?
grammar usage present-perfect
New contributor
add a comment |
According to many grammar textbooks, present perfect tense should not be used with specific time expression. Therefore, it is grammatically wrong to say "I have sold my house on 10 December 2018."
However, I often see this type of sentence in the writings from the United States:
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of said City this 26th day of August, 1954.
Questions:
Does the word 'this' make it an exception that 'present perfect tense' can be used with specific time expression in this construction?
or
Is the use of present perfect tense with specific time expression allowed only in American English?
grammar usage present-perfect
New contributor
The tense seems redundant if you mention a specific date. "I sold my house on 10 December 2018" says the same thing in fewer words. In regards to the American English usage, I wouldn't say its common. The example you gave seems to be very formal, perhaps a speech or legal statement, which may bend the rules to add emotion/emphasis/flow/procedure. Also - your example seems to come from 1954, usage rules have evolved a lot since then.
– Balaz2ta
18 hours ago
We are required to show background research effort to avoid the question being closed.
– Kris
14 hours ago
This is not much of American English.
– Kris
14 hours ago
add a comment |
According to many grammar textbooks, present perfect tense should not be used with specific time expression. Therefore, it is grammatically wrong to say "I have sold my house on 10 December 2018."
However, I often see this type of sentence in the writings from the United States:
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of said City this 26th day of August, 1954.
Questions:
Does the word 'this' make it an exception that 'present perfect tense' can be used with specific time expression in this construction?
or
Is the use of present perfect tense with specific time expression allowed only in American English?
grammar usage present-perfect
New contributor
According to many grammar textbooks, present perfect tense should not be used with specific time expression. Therefore, it is grammatically wrong to say "I have sold my house on 10 December 2018."
However, I often see this type of sentence in the writings from the United States:
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Official Seal of said City this 26th day of August, 1954.
Questions:
Does the word 'this' make it an exception that 'present perfect tense' can be used with specific time expression in this construction?
or
Is the use of present perfect tense with specific time expression allowed only in American English?
grammar usage present-perfect
grammar usage present-perfect
New contributor
New contributor
edited 15 hours ago
Omega Krypton
228213
228213
New contributor
asked 18 hours ago
Tanchnit Rhutnkzin
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
The tense seems redundant if you mention a specific date. "I sold my house on 10 December 2018" says the same thing in fewer words. In regards to the American English usage, I wouldn't say its common. The example you gave seems to be very formal, perhaps a speech or legal statement, which may bend the rules to add emotion/emphasis/flow/procedure. Also - your example seems to come from 1954, usage rules have evolved a lot since then.
– Balaz2ta
18 hours ago
We are required to show background research effort to avoid the question being closed.
– Kris
14 hours ago
This is not much of American English.
– Kris
14 hours ago
add a comment |
The tense seems redundant if you mention a specific date. "I sold my house on 10 December 2018" says the same thing in fewer words. In regards to the American English usage, I wouldn't say its common. The example you gave seems to be very formal, perhaps a speech or legal statement, which may bend the rules to add emotion/emphasis/flow/procedure. Also - your example seems to come from 1954, usage rules have evolved a lot since then.
– Balaz2ta
18 hours ago
We are required to show background research effort to avoid the question being closed.
– Kris
14 hours ago
This is not much of American English.
– Kris
14 hours ago
The tense seems redundant if you mention a specific date. "I sold my house on 10 December 2018" says the same thing in fewer words. In regards to the American English usage, I wouldn't say its common. The example you gave seems to be very formal, perhaps a speech or legal statement, which may bend the rules to add emotion/emphasis/flow/procedure. Also - your example seems to come from 1954, usage rules have evolved a lot since then.
– Balaz2ta
18 hours ago
The tense seems redundant if you mention a specific date. "I sold my house on 10 December 2018" says the same thing in fewer words. In regards to the American English usage, I wouldn't say its common. The example you gave seems to be very formal, perhaps a speech or legal statement, which may bend the rules to add emotion/emphasis/flow/procedure. Also - your example seems to come from 1954, usage rules have evolved a lot since then.
– Balaz2ta
18 hours ago
We are required to show background research effort to avoid the question being closed.
– Kris
14 hours ago
We are required to show background research effort to avoid the question being closed.
– Kris
14 hours ago
This is not much of American English.
– Kris
14 hours ago
This is not much of American English.
– Kris
14 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The signer of a legal document is not narrating a past event, as in your example
I sold my house on 10 Dec. 2018.
but testifying that he/she has very recently signed and applied an official seal to the document on a specific date.
This usage is called the present perfect of the recent past. The whereof and hereunto are also clues that legal jargon is filled with 18th and 19th century forms which have no bearing on present day English.
Jargon apart, it's still a valid and necessary structuring. Btw, this is present perfect, not past perfect. Also, rather than a recent event, it's an event that has relevence to the present (context).
– Kris
14 hours ago
Oops, past perfect of the recent past would be an interesting tense. Corrected. I disagree with your analysis, as the relevAnce of the document doesn't affect how the event is depicted. Validity also doesn't enter into the mix because simple past would be just as valid if custom didn't suggest otherwise.
– KarlG
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Tanchnit Rhutnkzin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478682%2fpresent-perfect-tense-and-specific-time-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The signer of a legal document is not narrating a past event, as in your example
I sold my house on 10 Dec. 2018.
but testifying that he/she has very recently signed and applied an official seal to the document on a specific date.
This usage is called the present perfect of the recent past. The whereof and hereunto are also clues that legal jargon is filled with 18th and 19th century forms which have no bearing on present day English.
Jargon apart, it's still a valid and necessary structuring. Btw, this is present perfect, not past perfect. Also, rather than a recent event, it's an event that has relevence to the present (context).
– Kris
14 hours ago
Oops, past perfect of the recent past would be an interesting tense. Corrected. I disagree with your analysis, as the relevAnce of the document doesn't affect how the event is depicted. Validity also doesn't enter into the mix because simple past would be just as valid if custom didn't suggest otherwise.
– KarlG
10 hours ago
add a comment |
The signer of a legal document is not narrating a past event, as in your example
I sold my house on 10 Dec. 2018.
but testifying that he/she has very recently signed and applied an official seal to the document on a specific date.
This usage is called the present perfect of the recent past. The whereof and hereunto are also clues that legal jargon is filled with 18th and 19th century forms which have no bearing on present day English.
Jargon apart, it's still a valid and necessary structuring. Btw, this is present perfect, not past perfect. Also, rather than a recent event, it's an event that has relevence to the present (context).
– Kris
14 hours ago
Oops, past perfect of the recent past would be an interesting tense. Corrected. I disagree with your analysis, as the relevAnce of the document doesn't affect how the event is depicted. Validity also doesn't enter into the mix because simple past would be just as valid if custom didn't suggest otherwise.
– KarlG
10 hours ago
add a comment |
The signer of a legal document is not narrating a past event, as in your example
I sold my house on 10 Dec. 2018.
but testifying that he/she has very recently signed and applied an official seal to the document on a specific date.
This usage is called the present perfect of the recent past. The whereof and hereunto are also clues that legal jargon is filled with 18th and 19th century forms which have no bearing on present day English.
The signer of a legal document is not narrating a past event, as in your example
I sold my house on 10 Dec. 2018.
but testifying that he/she has very recently signed and applied an official seal to the document on a specific date.
This usage is called the present perfect of the recent past. The whereof and hereunto are also clues that legal jargon is filled with 18th and 19th century forms which have no bearing on present day English.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
KarlG
19.5k52854
19.5k52854
Jargon apart, it's still a valid and necessary structuring. Btw, this is present perfect, not past perfect. Also, rather than a recent event, it's an event that has relevence to the present (context).
– Kris
14 hours ago
Oops, past perfect of the recent past would be an interesting tense. Corrected. I disagree with your analysis, as the relevAnce of the document doesn't affect how the event is depicted. Validity also doesn't enter into the mix because simple past would be just as valid if custom didn't suggest otherwise.
– KarlG
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Jargon apart, it's still a valid and necessary structuring. Btw, this is present perfect, not past perfect. Also, rather than a recent event, it's an event that has relevence to the present (context).
– Kris
14 hours ago
Oops, past perfect of the recent past would be an interesting tense. Corrected. I disagree with your analysis, as the relevAnce of the document doesn't affect how the event is depicted. Validity also doesn't enter into the mix because simple past would be just as valid if custom didn't suggest otherwise.
– KarlG
10 hours ago
Jargon apart, it's still a valid and necessary structuring. Btw, this is present perfect, not past perfect. Also, rather than a recent event, it's an event that has relevence to the present (context).
– Kris
14 hours ago
Jargon apart, it's still a valid and necessary structuring. Btw, this is present perfect, not past perfect. Also, rather than a recent event, it's an event that has relevence to the present (context).
– Kris
14 hours ago
Oops, past perfect of the recent past would be an interesting tense. Corrected. I disagree with your analysis, as the relevAnce of the document doesn't affect how the event is depicted. Validity also doesn't enter into the mix because simple past would be just as valid if custom didn't suggest otherwise.
– KarlG
10 hours ago
Oops, past perfect of the recent past would be an interesting tense. Corrected. I disagree with your analysis, as the relevAnce of the document doesn't affect how the event is depicted. Validity also doesn't enter into the mix because simple past would be just as valid if custom didn't suggest otherwise.
– KarlG
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Tanchnit Rhutnkzin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tanchnit Rhutnkzin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tanchnit Rhutnkzin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Tanchnit Rhutnkzin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478682%2fpresent-perfect-tense-and-specific-time-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The tense seems redundant if you mention a specific date. "I sold my house on 10 December 2018" says the same thing in fewer words. In regards to the American English usage, I wouldn't say its common. The example you gave seems to be very formal, perhaps a speech or legal statement, which may bend the rules to add emotion/emphasis/flow/procedure. Also - your example seems to come from 1954, usage rules have evolved a lot since then.
– Balaz2ta
18 hours ago
We are required to show background research effort to avoid the question being closed.
– Kris
14 hours ago
This is not much of American English.
– Kris
14 hours ago