Why doesn't mount respect the read only option for bind mounts?
On my Arch Linux system (Linux Kernel 3.14.2) bind mounts do not respect the read only option
# mkdir test
# mount --bind -o ro test/ /mnt
# touch /mnt/foo
creates the file /mnt/foo
. The relevant entry in /proc/mounts
is
/dev/sda2 /mnt ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
The mount options do not match my requested options, but do match both the read/write behaviour of the bind mount and the options used to originally mount /dev/sda2
on /
/dev/sda2 / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
If, however, I remount the mount then it respects the read only option
# mount --bind -o remount,ro test/ /mnt
# touch /mnt/bar
touch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/bar’: Read-only file system
and the relevant entry in /proc/mounts/
/dev/sda2 /mnt ext4 ro,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
looks like what I might expect (although in truth I would expect to see the full path of the test
directory). The entry in /proc/mounts/
for the orignal mount of /dev/sda2/
on /
is also unchanged and remains read/write
/dev/sda2 / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
This behaviour and the work around have been known since at least 2008 and are documented in the man page of mount
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command
Not all distributions behave the same. Arch seems to silently fail to respect the options while Debian generates a warning when the bind mount does not get mount read-only
mount: warning: /mnt seems to be mounted read-write.
There are reports that this behaviour was "fixed" in Debian Lenny and Squeeze although it does not appear to be a universal fix nor does it still work in Debian Wheezy. What is the difficultly associated with making bind mount respect the read only option on the initial mount?
linux mount readonly bind-mount
|
show 2 more comments
On my Arch Linux system (Linux Kernel 3.14.2) bind mounts do not respect the read only option
# mkdir test
# mount --bind -o ro test/ /mnt
# touch /mnt/foo
creates the file /mnt/foo
. The relevant entry in /proc/mounts
is
/dev/sda2 /mnt ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
The mount options do not match my requested options, but do match both the read/write behaviour of the bind mount and the options used to originally mount /dev/sda2
on /
/dev/sda2 / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
If, however, I remount the mount then it respects the read only option
# mount --bind -o remount,ro test/ /mnt
# touch /mnt/bar
touch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/bar’: Read-only file system
and the relevant entry in /proc/mounts/
/dev/sda2 /mnt ext4 ro,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
looks like what I might expect (although in truth I would expect to see the full path of the test
directory). The entry in /proc/mounts/
for the orignal mount of /dev/sda2/
on /
is also unchanged and remains read/write
/dev/sda2 / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
This behaviour and the work around have been known since at least 2008 and are documented in the man page of mount
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command
Not all distributions behave the same. Arch seems to silently fail to respect the options while Debian generates a warning when the bind mount does not get mount read-only
mount: warning: /mnt seems to be mounted read-write.
There are reports that this behaviour was "fixed" in Debian Lenny and Squeeze although it does not appear to be a universal fix nor does it still work in Debian Wheezy. What is the difficultly associated with making bind mount respect the read only option on the initial mount?
linux mount readonly bind-mount
Do you have an /etc/mtab?
– eyoung100
May 7 '14 at 15:58
See also thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/2979 and a workaround by usingmount -t bind
and a helper script at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/519380
– Stéphane Chazelas
May 7 '14 at 16:06
@ECarterYoung yes I have an/etc/mtab
. After the initial mount the entry says the mount is rw and after the remount it says ro, so it is reporting the state of the mount correctly. It is just the mount command that fails.
– StrongBad
May 7 '14 at 16:10
3
I tested on two Debian testing/unstable machines, one running a Debian kernel and one running a kernel.org kernel, neither work withmount --bind -o ro
, they both spit out a messagemount: warning: «mountpoint» seems to be mounted read-write.
So it seems Debian dropped or lost the patch at some point... Remount works, though.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 16:50
2
@StrongBad Tested that as requested, and it doesn't work either.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 17:09
|
show 2 more comments
On my Arch Linux system (Linux Kernel 3.14.2) bind mounts do not respect the read only option
# mkdir test
# mount --bind -o ro test/ /mnt
# touch /mnt/foo
creates the file /mnt/foo
. The relevant entry in /proc/mounts
is
/dev/sda2 /mnt ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
The mount options do not match my requested options, but do match both the read/write behaviour of the bind mount and the options used to originally mount /dev/sda2
on /
/dev/sda2 / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
If, however, I remount the mount then it respects the read only option
# mount --bind -o remount,ro test/ /mnt
# touch /mnt/bar
touch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/bar’: Read-only file system
and the relevant entry in /proc/mounts/
/dev/sda2 /mnt ext4 ro,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
looks like what I might expect (although in truth I would expect to see the full path of the test
directory). The entry in /proc/mounts/
for the orignal mount of /dev/sda2/
on /
is also unchanged and remains read/write
/dev/sda2 / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
This behaviour and the work around have been known since at least 2008 and are documented in the man page of mount
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command
Not all distributions behave the same. Arch seems to silently fail to respect the options while Debian generates a warning when the bind mount does not get mount read-only
mount: warning: /mnt seems to be mounted read-write.
There are reports that this behaviour was "fixed" in Debian Lenny and Squeeze although it does not appear to be a universal fix nor does it still work in Debian Wheezy. What is the difficultly associated with making bind mount respect the read only option on the initial mount?
linux mount readonly bind-mount
On my Arch Linux system (Linux Kernel 3.14.2) bind mounts do not respect the read only option
# mkdir test
# mount --bind -o ro test/ /mnt
# touch /mnt/foo
creates the file /mnt/foo
. The relevant entry in /proc/mounts
is
/dev/sda2 /mnt ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
The mount options do not match my requested options, but do match both the read/write behaviour of the bind mount and the options used to originally mount /dev/sda2
on /
/dev/sda2 / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
If, however, I remount the mount then it respects the read only option
# mount --bind -o remount,ro test/ /mnt
# touch /mnt/bar
touch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/bar’: Read-only file system
and the relevant entry in /proc/mounts/
/dev/sda2 /mnt ext4 ro,relatime,data=ordered 0 0
looks like what I might expect (although in truth I would expect to see the full path of the test
directory). The entry in /proc/mounts/
for the orignal mount of /dev/sda2/
on /
is also unchanged and remains read/write
/dev/sda2 / ext4 rw,noatime,data=ordered 0 0
This behaviour and the work around have been known since at least 2008 and are documented in the man page of mount
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command
Not all distributions behave the same. Arch seems to silently fail to respect the options while Debian generates a warning when the bind mount does not get mount read-only
mount: warning: /mnt seems to be mounted read-write.
There are reports that this behaviour was "fixed" in Debian Lenny and Squeeze although it does not appear to be a universal fix nor does it still work in Debian Wheezy. What is the difficultly associated with making bind mount respect the read only option on the initial mount?
linux mount readonly bind-mount
linux mount readonly bind-mount
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
1
asked May 7 '14 at 15:47
StrongBadStrongBad
2,18462654
2,18462654
Do you have an /etc/mtab?
– eyoung100
May 7 '14 at 15:58
See also thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/2979 and a workaround by usingmount -t bind
and a helper script at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/519380
– Stéphane Chazelas
May 7 '14 at 16:06
@ECarterYoung yes I have an/etc/mtab
. After the initial mount the entry says the mount is rw and after the remount it says ro, so it is reporting the state of the mount correctly. It is just the mount command that fails.
– StrongBad
May 7 '14 at 16:10
3
I tested on two Debian testing/unstable machines, one running a Debian kernel and one running a kernel.org kernel, neither work withmount --bind -o ro
, they both spit out a messagemount: warning: «mountpoint» seems to be mounted read-write.
So it seems Debian dropped or lost the patch at some point... Remount works, though.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 16:50
2
@StrongBad Tested that as requested, and it doesn't work either.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 17:09
|
show 2 more comments
Do you have an /etc/mtab?
– eyoung100
May 7 '14 at 15:58
See also thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/2979 and a workaround by usingmount -t bind
and a helper script at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/519380
– Stéphane Chazelas
May 7 '14 at 16:06
@ECarterYoung yes I have an/etc/mtab
. After the initial mount the entry says the mount is rw and after the remount it says ro, so it is reporting the state of the mount correctly. It is just the mount command that fails.
– StrongBad
May 7 '14 at 16:10
3
I tested on two Debian testing/unstable machines, one running a Debian kernel and one running a kernel.org kernel, neither work withmount --bind -o ro
, they both spit out a messagemount: warning: «mountpoint» seems to be mounted read-write.
So it seems Debian dropped or lost the patch at some point... Remount works, though.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 16:50
2
@StrongBad Tested that as requested, and it doesn't work either.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 17:09
Do you have an /etc/mtab?
– eyoung100
May 7 '14 at 15:58
Do you have an /etc/mtab?
– eyoung100
May 7 '14 at 15:58
See also thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/2979 and a workaround by using
mount -t bind
and a helper script at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/519380– Stéphane Chazelas
May 7 '14 at 16:06
See also thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/2979 and a workaround by using
mount -t bind
and a helper script at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/519380– Stéphane Chazelas
May 7 '14 at 16:06
@ECarterYoung yes I have an
/etc/mtab
. After the initial mount the entry says the mount is rw and after the remount it says ro, so it is reporting the state of the mount correctly. It is just the mount command that fails.– StrongBad
May 7 '14 at 16:10
@ECarterYoung yes I have an
/etc/mtab
. After the initial mount the entry says the mount is rw and after the remount it says ro, so it is reporting the state of the mount correctly. It is just the mount command that fails.– StrongBad
May 7 '14 at 16:10
3
3
I tested on two Debian testing/unstable machines, one running a Debian kernel and one running a kernel.org kernel, neither work with
mount --bind -o ro
, they both spit out a message mount: warning: «mountpoint» seems to be mounted read-write.
So it seems Debian dropped or lost the patch at some point... Remount works, though.– derobert
May 7 '14 at 16:50
I tested on two Debian testing/unstable machines, one running a Debian kernel and one running a kernel.org kernel, neither work with
mount --bind -o ro
, they both spit out a message mount: warning: «mountpoint» seems to be mounted read-write.
So it seems Debian dropped or lost the patch at some point... Remount works, though.– derobert
May 7 '14 at 16:50
2
2
@StrongBad Tested that as requested, and it doesn't work either.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 17:09
@StrongBad Tested that as requested, and it doesn't work either.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 17:09
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount. I.e. it's not a new mount. It just "links"/"exposes"/"considers" a subdirectory as a new mount point. As such it cannot alter the mount parameters. That's why you're getting complaints:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,ro
mount: warning: /mnt/2 seems to be mounted read-write.
But as you said a normal bind mount works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind
And then a ro remount also works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,remount,ro
However what happens is that you're changing the whole mount and not just this bind mount. If you take a look at /proc/mounts you'll see that both bind mount and the original mount change to read-only:
/dev/loop0 /mnt/1 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
/dev/loop0 /mnt/2 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
So what you're doing is like changing the initial mount to a read-only mount and then doing a bind mount which will of course be read-only.
UPDATE 2016-07-20:
The following are true for 4.5 kernels, but not true for 4.3 kernels (This is wrong. See update #2 below):
The kernel has two flags that control read-only:
- The
MS_READONLY
: Indicating whether the mount is read-only - The
MNT_READONLY
: Indicating whether the "user" wants it read-only
On a 4.5 kernel, doing a mount -o bind,ro
will actually do the trick. For example, this:
# mkdir /tmp/test
# mkdir /tmp/test/a /tmp/test/b
# mount -t tmpfs none /tmp/test/a
# mkdir /tmp/test/a/d
# mount -o bind,ro /tmp/test/a/d /tmp/test/b
will create a read-only bind mount of /tmp/test/a/d
to /tmp/test/b
, which will be visible in /proc/mounts
as:
none /tmp/test/a tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /tmp/test/b tmpfs ro,relatime 0 0
A more detailed view is visible in /proc/self/mountinfo
, which takes into consideration the user view (namespace). The relevant lines will be these:
363 74 0:49 / /tmp/test/a rw,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
368 74 0:49 /d /tmp/test/b ro,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
Where on the second line, you can see that it says both ro
(MNT_READONLY
) and rw
(!MS_READONLY
).
The end result is this:
# echo a > /tmp/test/a/d/f
# echo a > /tmp/test/b/f
-su: /tmp/test/b/f: Read-only file system
UPDATE 2016-07-20 #2:
A bit more digging into this shows that the behavior in fact depends on the version of libmount which is part of util-linux. Support for this was added with this commit and was released with version 2.27:
commit 9ac77b8a78452eab0612523d27fee52159f5016a
Author: Karel Zak
Date: Mon Aug 17 11:54:26 2015 +0200
libmount: add support for "bind,ro"
Now it's necessary t use two mount(8) calls to create a read-only
mount:
mount /foo /bar -o bind
mount /bar -o remount,ro,bind
This patch allows to specify "bind,ro" and the remount is done
automatically by libmount by additional mount(2) syscall. It's not
atomic of course.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak
which also provides the workaround. The behavior can be seen using strace on an older and a newer mount:
Old:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x222e240, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.000681>
New:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x1a8ee90, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.011492>
mount("none", "/tmp/test/b", NULL, MS_RDONLY|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.006281>
Conclusion:
To achieve the desired result one needs to run two commands (as @Thomas already said):
mount SRC DST -o bind
mount DST -o remount,ro,bind
Newer versions of mount (util-linux >=2.27) do this automatically when one runs
mount SRC DST -o bind,ro
2
Yes, but no. IIRC there is some support in the kernel for different mount points (not filesystems) to have different options. Debian used to have a patch that mademount -o bind,ro
create a read-only view of a read-write filesystem (but it no longer seems to be there in wheezy).
– Gilles
May 7 '14 at 23:07
I don't see how this contradicts the above. Hacks can allow all sorts of stuff, including things that don't make much sense. Currently the read-only remount on 3.14 kernel is eventually handled by this call: mnt_make_readonly(real_mount(mnt)), which as you can see uses real_mount(), so it practically affects the real mount and that causes bind mounts to reflect the new (read-only) mount flag. At least that's my understanding.
– V13
May 7 '14 at 23:21
So this would be a consequence of the “spread struct mount” patch (specifically this commit), first appearing in kernel 3.3. Do you know if the consequences of this patch were discussed on lkml or lwn?
– Gilles
May 8 '14 at 4:07
6
mount --bind /tmp/ /mnt/tmp/; mount -o remount,bind,ro /mnt/tmp/
... thentouch /tmp/a
is OK, buttouch /mnt/tmp/b
givestouch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/tmp/b’: Read-only file system
. That works on both Debian 3.13 and kernel.org 3.14.2. So it doesn't just change the whole mount. At least not with recent kernels.
– derobert
May 8 '14 at 5:46
1
Presumably the statement that a "Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount." is really important but means nothing to me. I also don't understand why it then works the second time with the remount option.
– StrongBad
May 8 '14 at 12:00
|
show 2 more comments
The proper solution is really to mount it twice.
On the command line:
mount -t none -o bind /source/dir /destination/dir
mount -t none -o bind,remount,ro /source/dir /destination/dir
In /etc/fstab
:
/source/dir /destination/dir none bind 0 0
/source/dir /destination/dir none remount,bind,ro 0 0
The manual (man mount
) states it that way:
The bind mounts.
Since Linux 2.4.0 it is possible to remount part of the file hierarchy somewhere else. The call is
mount --bind olddir newdir
[...]
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option
along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command, for example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro newdir
.
Note that behavior of the remount operation depends on the /etc/mtab file. The first command stores the 'bind' flag to the /etc/mtab file and the
second command reads the flag from the file. If you have a system without the /etc/mtab file or if you explicitly define source and target for the
remount command (then mount(8) does not read /etc/mtab), then you have to use bind flag (or option) for the remount command too. For example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro,bind olddir newdir
This does seem to work with at least Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and kernel 3.19.0-51-lowlatency. Nice!
– Mikko Rantalainen
Jun 2 '16 at 6:42
add a comment |
You're asking from the perspective of the mount(8)
command line (which is acceptable on this site). That command has been discussed in the other answers and in some cases, abstracts away the necessary second mount(2)
system call.
But why is the second system call needed? Why can't a single mount(2)
call create the read-only bind mount?
The mount(2)
man page explains that there are, as others have pointed out, two sets of flags being set:
- The underlying file system flags
- The VFS mount-point flags
It says:
Since Linux 2.6.16,
MS_RDONLY
can be set or cleared on a per-mount-point basis as well as on the underlying filesystem. The mounted filesystem will be writable only if neither the filesystem nor the mountpoint are flagged as read-only.
And regarding MS_REMOUNT
:
Since Linux 2.6.26, this flag can be used with
MS_BIND
to modify only the per-mount-point flags. This is particularly useful for setting or clearing the "read-only" flag on a mount point without changing the underlying filesystem. Specifying mountflags as:
MS_REMOUNT | MS_BIND | MS_RDONLY
will make access through this mountpoint read-only, without affecting other mount points.
I think the problem came about when bind mounts were first introduced:
If mountflags includes
MS_BIND
(available since Linux 2.4), then perform a bind mount. ... The remaining bits in the mountflags argument are also ignored, with the exception ofMS_REC
. (The bind mount has the same mount options as the underlying mount point.)
It seems that, instead of using MS_BIND | MS_REMOUNT
as the signal to set just the VFS flags, they could have chosen to except (and accept) MS_RDONLY
along with the initial MS_BIND
, and apply it to the mount point.
So because of the somewhat odd semantics of the mount(2)
system call:
- The first call creates the bind mount and all other flags are ignored
- The second call (with remount) sets the mount-point flags to read-only
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128336%2fwhy-doesnt-mount-respect-the-read-only-option-for-bind-mounts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount. I.e. it's not a new mount. It just "links"/"exposes"/"considers" a subdirectory as a new mount point. As such it cannot alter the mount parameters. That's why you're getting complaints:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,ro
mount: warning: /mnt/2 seems to be mounted read-write.
But as you said a normal bind mount works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind
And then a ro remount also works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,remount,ro
However what happens is that you're changing the whole mount and not just this bind mount. If you take a look at /proc/mounts you'll see that both bind mount and the original mount change to read-only:
/dev/loop0 /mnt/1 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
/dev/loop0 /mnt/2 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
So what you're doing is like changing the initial mount to a read-only mount and then doing a bind mount which will of course be read-only.
UPDATE 2016-07-20:
The following are true for 4.5 kernels, but not true for 4.3 kernels (This is wrong. See update #2 below):
The kernel has two flags that control read-only:
- The
MS_READONLY
: Indicating whether the mount is read-only - The
MNT_READONLY
: Indicating whether the "user" wants it read-only
On a 4.5 kernel, doing a mount -o bind,ro
will actually do the trick. For example, this:
# mkdir /tmp/test
# mkdir /tmp/test/a /tmp/test/b
# mount -t tmpfs none /tmp/test/a
# mkdir /tmp/test/a/d
# mount -o bind,ro /tmp/test/a/d /tmp/test/b
will create a read-only bind mount of /tmp/test/a/d
to /tmp/test/b
, which will be visible in /proc/mounts
as:
none /tmp/test/a tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /tmp/test/b tmpfs ro,relatime 0 0
A more detailed view is visible in /proc/self/mountinfo
, which takes into consideration the user view (namespace). The relevant lines will be these:
363 74 0:49 / /tmp/test/a rw,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
368 74 0:49 /d /tmp/test/b ro,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
Where on the second line, you can see that it says both ro
(MNT_READONLY
) and rw
(!MS_READONLY
).
The end result is this:
# echo a > /tmp/test/a/d/f
# echo a > /tmp/test/b/f
-su: /tmp/test/b/f: Read-only file system
UPDATE 2016-07-20 #2:
A bit more digging into this shows that the behavior in fact depends on the version of libmount which is part of util-linux. Support for this was added with this commit and was released with version 2.27:
commit 9ac77b8a78452eab0612523d27fee52159f5016a
Author: Karel Zak
Date: Mon Aug 17 11:54:26 2015 +0200
libmount: add support for "bind,ro"
Now it's necessary t use two mount(8) calls to create a read-only
mount:
mount /foo /bar -o bind
mount /bar -o remount,ro,bind
This patch allows to specify "bind,ro" and the remount is done
automatically by libmount by additional mount(2) syscall. It's not
atomic of course.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak
which also provides the workaround. The behavior can be seen using strace on an older and a newer mount:
Old:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x222e240, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.000681>
New:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x1a8ee90, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.011492>
mount("none", "/tmp/test/b", NULL, MS_RDONLY|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.006281>
Conclusion:
To achieve the desired result one needs to run two commands (as @Thomas already said):
mount SRC DST -o bind
mount DST -o remount,ro,bind
Newer versions of mount (util-linux >=2.27) do this automatically when one runs
mount SRC DST -o bind,ro
2
Yes, but no. IIRC there is some support in the kernel for different mount points (not filesystems) to have different options. Debian used to have a patch that mademount -o bind,ro
create a read-only view of a read-write filesystem (but it no longer seems to be there in wheezy).
– Gilles
May 7 '14 at 23:07
I don't see how this contradicts the above. Hacks can allow all sorts of stuff, including things that don't make much sense. Currently the read-only remount on 3.14 kernel is eventually handled by this call: mnt_make_readonly(real_mount(mnt)), which as you can see uses real_mount(), so it practically affects the real mount and that causes bind mounts to reflect the new (read-only) mount flag. At least that's my understanding.
– V13
May 7 '14 at 23:21
So this would be a consequence of the “spread struct mount” patch (specifically this commit), first appearing in kernel 3.3. Do you know if the consequences of this patch were discussed on lkml or lwn?
– Gilles
May 8 '14 at 4:07
6
mount --bind /tmp/ /mnt/tmp/; mount -o remount,bind,ro /mnt/tmp/
... thentouch /tmp/a
is OK, buttouch /mnt/tmp/b
givestouch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/tmp/b’: Read-only file system
. That works on both Debian 3.13 and kernel.org 3.14.2. So it doesn't just change the whole mount. At least not with recent kernels.
– derobert
May 8 '14 at 5:46
1
Presumably the statement that a "Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount." is really important but means nothing to me. I also don't understand why it then works the second time with the remount option.
– StrongBad
May 8 '14 at 12:00
|
show 2 more comments
Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount. I.e. it's not a new mount. It just "links"/"exposes"/"considers" a subdirectory as a new mount point. As such it cannot alter the mount parameters. That's why you're getting complaints:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,ro
mount: warning: /mnt/2 seems to be mounted read-write.
But as you said a normal bind mount works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind
And then a ro remount also works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,remount,ro
However what happens is that you're changing the whole mount and not just this bind mount. If you take a look at /proc/mounts you'll see that both bind mount and the original mount change to read-only:
/dev/loop0 /mnt/1 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
/dev/loop0 /mnt/2 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
So what you're doing is like changing the initial mount to a read-only mount and then doing a bind mount which will of course be read-only.
UPDATE 2016-07-20:
The following are true for 4.5 kernels, but not true for 4.3 kernels (This is wrong. See update #2 below):
The kernel has two flags that control read-only:
- The
MS_READONLY
: Indicating whether the mount is read-only - The
MNT_READONLY
: Indicating whether the "user" wants it read-only
On a 4.5 kernel, doing a mount -o bind,ro
will actually do the trick. For example, this:
# mkdir /tmp/test
# mkdir /tmp/test/a /tmp/test/b
# mount -t tmpfs none /tmp/test/a
# mkdir /tmp/test/a/d
# mount -o bind,ro /tmp/test/a/d /tmp/test/b
will create a read-only bind mount of /tmp/test/a/d
to /tmp/test/b
, which will be visible in /proc/mounts
as:
none /tmp/test/a tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /tmp/test/b tmpfs ro,relatime 0 0
A more detailed view is visible in /proc/self/mountinfo
, which takes into consideration the user view (namespace). The relevant lines will be these:
363 74 0:49 / /tmp/test/a rw,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
368 74 0:49 /d /tmp/test/b ro,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
Where on the second line, you can see that it says both ro
(MNT_READONLY
) and rw
(!MS_READONLY
).
The end result is this:
# echo a > /tmp/test/a/d/f
# echo a > /tmp/test/b/f
-su: /tmp/test/b/f: Read-only file system
UPDATE 2016-07-20 #2:
A bit more digging into this shows that the behavior in fact depends on the version of libmount which is part of util-linux. Support for this was added with this commit and was released with version 2.27:
commit 9ac77b8a78452eab0612523d27fee52159f5016a
Author: Karel Zak
Date: Mon Aug 17 11:54:26 2015 +0200
libmount: add support for "bind,ro"
Now it's necessary t use two mount(8) calls to create a read-only
mount:
mount /foo /bar -o bind
mount /bar -o remount,ro,bind
This patch allows to specify "bind,ro" and the remount is done
automatically by libmount by additional mount(2) syscall. It's not
atomic of course.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak
which also provides the workaround. The behavior can be seen using strace on an older and a newer mount:
Old:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x222e240, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.000681>
New:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x1a8ee90, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.011492>
mount("none", "/tmp/test/b", NULL, MS_RDONLY|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.006281>
Conclusion:
To achieve the desired result one needs to run two commands (as @Thomas already said):
mount SRC DST -o bind
mount DST -o remount,ro,bind
Newer versions of mount (util-linux >=2.27) do this automatically when one runs
mount SRC DST -o bind,ro
2
Yes, but no. IIRC there is some support in the kernel for different mount points (not filesystems) to have different options. Debian used to have a patch that mademount -o bind,ro
create a read-only view of a read-write filesystem (but it no longer seems to be there in wheezy).
– Gilles
May 7 '14 at 23:07
I don't see how this contradicts the above. Hacks can allow all sorts of stuff, including things that don't make much sense. Currently the read-only remount on 3.14 kernel is eventually handled by this call: mnt_make_readonly(real_mount(mnt)), which as you can see uses real_mount(), so it practically affects the real mount and that causes bind mounts to reflect the new (read-only) mount flag. At least that's my understanding.
– V13
May 7 '14 at 23:21
So this would be a consequence of the “spread struct mount” patch (specifically this commit), first appearing in kernel 3.3. Do you know if the consequences of this patch were discussed on lkml or lwn?
– Gilles
May 8 '14 at 4:07
6
mount --bind /tmp/ /mnt/tmp/; mount -o remount,bind,ro /mnt/tmp/
... thentouch /tmp/a
is OK, buttouch /mnt/tmp/b
givestouch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/tmp/b’: Read-only file system
. That works on both Debian 3.13 and kernel.org 3.14.2. So it doesn't just change the whole mount. At least not with recent kernels.
– derobert
May 8 '14 at 5:46
1
Presumably the statement that a "Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount." is really important but means nothing to me. I also don't understand why it then works the second time with the remount option.
– StrongBad
May 8 '14 at 12:00
|
show 2 more comments
Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount. I.e. it's not a new mount. It just "links"/"exposes"/"considers" a subdirectory as a new mount point. As such it cannot alter the mount parameters. That's why you're getting complaints:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,ro
mount: warning: /mnt/2 seems to be mounted read-write.
But as you said a normal bind mount works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind
And then a ro remount also works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,remount,ro
However what happens is that you're changing the whole mount and not just this bind mount. If you take a look at /proc/mounts you'll see that both bind mount and the original mount change to read-only:
/dev/loop0 /mnt/1 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
/dev/loop0 /mnt/2 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
So what you're doing is like changing the initial mount to a read-only mount and then doing a bind mount which will of course be read-only.
UPDATE 2016-07-20:
The following are true for 4.5 kernels, but not true for 4.3 kernels (This is wrong. See update #2 below):
The kernel has two flags that control read-only:
- The
MS_READONLY
: Indicating whether the mount is read-only - The
MNT_READONLY
: Indicating whether the "user" wants it read-only
On a 4.5 kernel, doing a mount -o bind,ro
will actually do the trick. For example, this:
# mkdir /tmp/test
# mkdir /tmp/test/a /tmp/test/b
# mount -t tmpfs none /tmp/test/a
# mkdir /tmp/test/a/d
# mount -o bind,ro /tmp/test/a/d /tmp/test/b
will create a read-only bind mount of /tmp/test/a/d
to /tmp/test/b
, which will be visible in /proc/mounts
as:
none /tmp/test/a tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /tmp/test/b tmpfs ro,relatime 0 0
A more detailed view is visible in /proc/self/mountinfo
, which takes into consideration the user view (namespace). The relevant lines will be these:
363 74 0:49 / /tmp/test/a rw,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
368 74 0:49 /d /tmp/test/b ro,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
Where on the second line, you can see that it says both ro
(MNT_READONLY
) and rw
(!MS_READONLY
).
The end result is this:
# echo a > /tmp/test/a/d/f
# echo a > /tmp/test/b/f
-su: /tmp/test/b/f: Read-only file system
UPDATE 2016-07-20 #2:
A bit more digging into this shows that the behavior in fact depends on the version of libmount which is part of util-linux. Support for this was added with this commit and was released with version 2.27:
commit 9ac77b8a78452eab0612523d27fee52159f5016a
Author: Karel Zak
Date: Mon Aug 17 11:54:26 2015 +0200
libmount: add support for "bind,ro"
Now it's necessary t use two mount(8) calls to create a read-only
mount:
mount /foo /bar -o bind
mount /bar -o remount,ro,bind
This patch allows to specify "bind,ro" and the remount is done
automatically by libmount by additional mount(2) syscall. It's not
atomic of course.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak
which also provides the workaround. The behavior can be seen using strace on an older and a newer mount:
Old:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x222e240, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.000681>
New:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x1a8ee90, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.011492>
mount("none", "/tmp/test/b", NULL, MS_RDONLY|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.006281>
Conclusion:
To achieve the desired result one needs to run two commands (as @Thomas already said):
mount SRC DST -o bind
mount DST -o remount,ro,bind
Newer versions of mount (util-linux >=2.27) do this automatically when one runs
mount SRC DST -o bind,ro
Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount. I.e. it's not a new mount. It just "links"/"exposes"/"considers" a subdirectory as a new mount point. As such it cannot alter the mount parameters. That's why you're getting complaints:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,ro
mount: warning: /mnt/2 seems to be mounted read-write.
But as you said a normal bind mount works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind
And then a ro remount also works:
# mount /mnt/1/lala /mnt/2 -o bind,remount,ro
However what happens is that you're changing the whole mount and not just this bind mount. If you take a look at /proc/mounts you'll see that both bind mount and the original mount change to read-only:
/dev/loop0 /mnt/1 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
/dev/loop0 /mnt/2 ext2 ro,relatime,errors=continue,user_xattr,acl 0 0
So what you're doing is like changing the initial mount to a read-only mount and then doing a bind mount which will of course be read-only.
UPDATE 2016-07-20:
The following are true for 4.5 kernels, but not true for 4.3 kernels (This is wrong. See update #2 below):
The kernel has two flags that control read-only:
- The
MS_READONLY
: Indicating whether the mount is read-only - The
MNT_READONLY
: Indicating whether the "user" wants it read-only
On a 4.5 kernel, doing a mount -o bind,ro
will actually do the trick. For example, this:
# mkdir /tmp/test
# mkdir /tmp/test/a /tmp/test/b
# mount -t tmpfs none /tmp/test/a
# mkdir /tmp/test/a/d
# mount -o bind,ro /tmp/test/a/d /tmp/test/b
will create a read-only bind mount of /tmp/test/a/d
to /tmp/test/b
, which will be visible in /proc/mounts
as:
none /tmp/test/a tmpfs rw,relatime 0 0
none /tmp/test/b tmpfs ro,relatime 0 0
A more detailed view is visible in /proc/self/mountinfo
, which takes into consideration the user view (namespace). The relevant lines will be these:
363 74 0:49 / /tmp/test/a rw,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
368 74 0:49 /d /tmp/test/b ro,relatime shared:273 - tmpfs none rw
Where on the second line, you can see that it says both ro
(MNT_READONLY
) and rw
(!MS_READONLY
).
The end result is this:
# echo a > /tmp/test/a/d/f
# echo a > /tmp/test/b/f
-su: /tmp/test/b/f: Read-only file system
UPDATE 2016-07-20 #2:
A bit more digging into this shows that the behavior in fact depends on the version of libmount which is part of util-linux. Support for this was added with this commit and was released with version 2.27:
commit 9ac77b8a78452eab0612523d27fee52159f5016a
Author: Karel Zak
Date: Mon Aug 17 11:54:26 2015 +0200
libmount: add support for "bind,ro"
Now it's necessary t use two mount(8) calls to create a read-only
mount:
mount /foo /bar -o bind
mount /bar -o remount,ro,bind
This patch allows to specify "bind,ro" and the remount is done
automatically by libmount by additional mount(2) syscall. It's not
atomic of course.
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak
which also provides the workaround. The behavior can be seen using strace on an older and a newer mount:
Old:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x222e240, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.000681>
New:
mount("/tmp/test/a/d", "/tmp/test/b", 0x1a8ee90, MS_MGC_VAL|MS_RDONLY|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.011492>
mount("none", "/tmp/test/b", NULL, MS_RDONLY|MS_REMOUNT|MS_BIND, NULL) = 0 <0.006281>
Conclusion:
To achieve the desired result one needs to run two commands (as @Thomas already said):
mount SRC DST -o bind
mount DST -o remount,ro,bind
Newer versions of mount (util-linux >=2.27) do this automatically when one runs
mount SRC DST -o bind,ro
edited Jul 20 '16 at 21:41
answered May 7 '14 at 22:25
V13V13
2,809613
2,809613
2
Yes, but no. IIRC there is some support in the kernel for different mount points (not filesystems) to have different options. Debian used to have a patch that mademount -o bind,ro
create a read-only view of a read-write filesystem (but it no longer seems to be there in wheezy).
– Gilles
May 7 '14 at 23:07
I don't see how this contradicts the above. Hacks can allow all sorts of stuff, including things that don't make much sense. Currently the read-only remount on 3.14 kernel is eventually handled by this call: mnt_make_readonly(real_mount(mnt)), which as you can see uses real_mount(), so it practically affects the real mount and that causes bind mounts to reflect the new (read-only) mount flag. At least that's my understanding.
– V13
May 7 '14 at 23:21
So this would be a consequence of the “spread struct mount” patch (specifically this commit), first appearing in kernel 3.3. Do you know if the consequences of this patch were discussed on lkml or lwn?
– Gilles
May 8 '14 at 4:07
6
mount --bind /tmp/ /mnt/tmp/; mount -o remount,bind,ro /mnt/tmp/
... thentouch /tmp/a
is OK, buttouch /mnt/tmp/b
givestouch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/tmp/b’: Read-only file system
. That works on both Debian 3.13 and kernel.org 3.14.2. So it doesn't just change the whole mount. At least not with recent kernels.
– derobert
May 8 '14 at 5:46
1
Presumably the statement that a "Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount." is really important but means nothing to me. I also don't understand why it then works the second time with the remount option.
– StrongBad
May 8 '14 at 12:00
|
show 2 more comments
2
Yes, but no. IIRC there is some support in the kernel for different mount points (not filesystems) to have different options. Debian used to have a patch that mademount -o bind,ro
create a read-only view of a read-write filesystem (but it no longer seems to be there in wheezy).
– Gilles
May 7 '14 at 23:07
I don't see how this contradicts the above. Hacks can allow all sorts of stuff, including things that don't make much sense. Currently the read-only remount on 3.14 kernel is eventually handled by this call: mnt_make_readonly(real_mount(mnt)), which as you can see uses real_mount(), so it practically affects the real mount and that causes bind mounts to reflect the new (read-only) mount flag. At least that's my understanding.
– V13
May 7 '14 at 23:21
So this would be a consequence of the “spread struct mount” patch (specifically this commit), first appearing in kernel 3.3. Do you know if the consequences of this patch were discussed on lkml or lwn?
– Gilles
May 8 '14 at 4:07
6
mount --bind /tmp/ /mnt/tmp/; mount -o remount,bind,ro /mnt/tmp/
... thentouch /tmp/a
is OK, buttouch /mnt/tmp/b
givestouch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/tmp/b’: Read-only file system
. That works on both Debian 3.13 and kernel.org 3.14.2. So it doesn't just change the whole mount. At least not with recent kernels.
– derobert
May 8 '14 at 5:46
1
Presumably the statement that a "Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount." is really important but means nothing to me. I also don't understand why it then works the second time with the remount option.
– StrongBad
May 8 '14 at 12:00
2
2
Yes, but no. IIRC there is some support in the kernel for different mount points (not filesystems) to have different options. Debian used to have a patch that made
mount -o bind,ro
create a read-only view of a read-write filesystem (but it no longer seems to be there in wheezy).– Gilles
May 7 '14 at 23:07
Yes, but no. IIRC there is some support in the kernel for different mount points (not filesystems) to have different options. Debian used to have a patch that made
mount -o bind,ro
create a read-only view of a read-write filesystem (but it no longer seems to be there in wheezy).– Gilles
May 7 '14 at 23:07
I don't see how this contradicts the above. Hacks can allow all sorts of stuff, including things that don't make much sense. Currently the read-only remount on 3.14 kernel is eventually handled by this call: mnt_make_readonly(real_mount(mnt)), which as you can see uses real_mount(), so it practically affects the real mount and that causes bind mounts to reflect the new (read-only) mount flag. At least that's my understanding.
– V13
May 7 '14 at 23:21
I don't see how this contradicts the above. Hacks can allow all sorts of stuff, including things that don't make much sense. Currently the read-only remount on 3.14 kernel is eventually handled by this call: mnt_make_readonly(real_mount(mnt)), which as you can see uses real_mount(), so it practically affects the real mount and that causes bind mounts to reflect the new (read-only) mount flag. At least that's my understanding.
– V13
May 7 '14 at 23:21
So this would be a consequence of the “spread struct mount” patch (specifically this commit), first appearing in kernel 3.3. Do you know if the consequences of this patch were discussed on lkml or lwn?
– Gilles
May 8 '14 at 4:07
So this would be a consequence of the “spread struct mount” patch (specifically this commit), first appearing in kernel 3.3. Do you know if the consequences of this patch were discussed on lkml or lwn?
– Gilles
May 8 '14 at 4:07
6
6
mount --bind /tmp/ /mnt/tmp/; mount -o remount,bind,ro /mnt/tmp/
... then touch /tmp/a
is OK, but touch /mnt/tmp/b
gives touch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/tmp/b’: Read-only file system
. That works on both Debian 3.13 and kernel.org 3.14.2. So it doesn't just change the whole mount. At least not with recent kernels.– derobert
May 8 '14 at 5:46
mount --bind /tmp/ /mnt/tmp/; mount -o remount,bind,ro /mnt/tmp/
... then touch /tmp/a
is OK, but touch /mnt/tmp/b
gives touch: cannot touch ‘/mnt/tmp/b’: Read-only file system
. That works on both Debian 3.13 and kernel.org 3.14.2. So it doesn't just change the whole mount. At least not with recent kernels.– derobert
May 8 '14 at 5:46
1
1
Presumably the statement that a "Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount." is really important but means nothing to me. I also don't understand why it then works the second time with the remount option.
– StrongBad
May 8 '14 at 12:00
Presumably the statement that a "Bind mount is just... well... a bind mount." is really important but means nothing to me. I also don't understand why it then works the second time with the remount option.
– StrongBad
May 8 '14 at 12:00
|
show 2 more comments
The proper solution is really to mount it twice.
On the command line:
mount -t none -o bind /source/dir /destination/dir
mount -t none -o bind,remount,ro /source/dir /destination/dir
In /etc/fstab
:
/source/dir /destination/dir none bind 0 0
/source/dir /destination/dir none remount,bind,ro 0 0
The manual (man mount
) states it that way:
The bind mounts.
Since Linux 2.4.0 it is possible to remount part of the file hierarchy somewhere else. The call is
mount --bind olddir newdir
[...]
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option
along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command, for example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro newdir
.
Note that behavior of the remount operation depends on the /etc/mtab file. The first command stores the 'bind' flag to the /etc/mtab file and the
second command reads the flag from the file. If you have a system without the /etc/mtab file or if you explicitly define source and target for the
remount command (then mount(8) does not read /etc/mtab), then you have to use bind flag (or option) for the remount command too. For example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro,bind olddir newdir
This does seem to work with at least Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and kernel 3.19.0-51-lowlatency. Nice!
– Mikko Rantalainen
Jun 2 '16 at 6:42
add a comment |
The proper solution is really to mount it twice.
On the command line:
mount -t none -o bind /source/dir /destination/dir
mount -t none -o bind,remount,ro /source/dir /destination/dir
In /etc/fstab
:
/source/dir /destination/dir none bind 0 0
/source/dir /destination/dir none remount,bind,ro 0 0
The manual (man mount
) states it that way:
The bind mounts.
Since Linux 2.4.0 it is possible to remount part of the file hierarchy somewhere else. The call is
mount --bind olddir newdir
[...]
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option
along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command, for example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro newdir
.
Note that behavior of the remount operation depends on the /etc/mtab file. The first command stores the 'bind' flag to the /etc/mtab file and the
second command reads the flag from the file. If you have a system without the /etc/mtab file or if you explicitly define source and target for the
remount command (then mount(8) does not read /etc/mtab), then you have to use bind flag (or option) for the remount command too. For example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro,bind olddir newdir
This does seem to work with at least Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and kernel 3.19.0-51-lowlatency. Nice!
– Mikko Rantalainen
Jun 2 '16 at 6:42
add a comment |
The proper solution is really to mount it twice.
On the command line:
mount -t none -o bind /source/dir /destination/dir
mount -t none -o bind,remount,ro /source/dir /destination/dir
In /etc/fstab
:
/source/dir /destination/dir none bind 0 0
/source/dir /destination/dir none remount,bind,ro 0 0
The manual (man mount
) states it that way:
The bind mounts.
Since Linux 2.4.0 it is possible to remount part of the file hierarchy somewhere else. The call is
mount --bind olddir newdir
[...]
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option
along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command, for example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro newdir
.
Note that behavior of the remount operation depends on the /etc/mtab file. The first command stores the 'bind' flag to the /etc/mtab file and the
second command reads the flag from the file. If you have a system without the /etc/mtab file or if you explicitly define source and target for the
remount command (then mount(8) does not read /etc/mtab), then you have to use bind flag (or option) for the remount command too. For example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro,bind olddir newdir
The proper solution is really to mount it twice.
On the command line:
mount -t none -o bind /source/dir /destination/dir
mount -t none -o bind,remount,ro /source/dir /destination/dir
In /etc/fstab
:
/source/dir /destination/dir none bind 0 0
/source/dir /destination/dir none remount,bind,ro 0 0
The manual (man mount
) states it that way:
The bind mounts.
Since Linux 2.4.0 it is possible to remount part of the file hierarchy somewhere else. The call is
mount --bind olddir newdir
[...]
Note that the filesystem mount options will remain the same as those on the original mount point, and cannot be changed by passing the -o option
along with --bind/--rbind. The mount options can be changed by a separate remount command, for example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro newdir
.
Note that behavior of the remount operation depends on the /etc/mtab file. The first command stores the 'bind' flag to the /etc/mtab file and the
second command reads the flag from the file. If you have a system without the /etc/mtab file or if you explicitly define source and target for the
remount command (then mount(8) does not read /etc/mtab), then you have to use bind flag (or option) for the remount command too. For example:
.
mount --bind olddir newdir
mount -o remount,ro,bind olddir newdir
answered Jun 19 '15 at 18:41
ThomasThomas
33829
33829
This does seem to work with at least Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and kernel 3.19.0-51-lowlatency. Nice!
– Mikko Rantalainen
Jun 2 '16 at 6:42
add a comment |
This does seem to work with at least Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and kernel 3.19.0-51-lowlatency. Nice!
– Mikko Rantalainen
Jun 2 '16 at 6:42
This does seem to work with at least Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and kernel 3.19.0-51-lowlatency. Nice!
– Mikko Rantalainen
Jun 2 '16 at 6:42
This does seem to work with at least Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and kernel 3.19.0-51-lowlatency. Nice!
– Mikko Rantalainen
Jun 2 '16 at 6:42
add a comment |
You're asking from the perspective of the mount(8)
command line (which is acceptable on this site). That command has been discussed in the other answers and in some cases, abstracts away the necessary second mount(2)
system call.
But why is the second system call needed? Why can't a single mount(2)
call create the read-only bind mount?
The mount(2)
man page explains that there are, as others have pointed out, two sets of flags being set:
- The underlying file system flags
- The VFS mount-point flags
It says:
Since Linux 2.6.16,
MS_RDONLY
can be set or cleared on a per-mount-point basis as well as on the underlying filesystem. The mounted filesystem will be writable only if neither the filesystem nor the mountpoint are flagged as read-only.
And regarding MS_REMOUNT
:
Since Linux 2.6.26, this flag can be used with
MS_BIND
to modify only the per-mount-point flags. This is particularly useful for setting or clearing the "read-only" flag on a mount point without changing the underlying filesystem. Specifying mountflags as:
MS_REMOUNT | MS_BIND | MS_RDONLY
will make access through this mountpoint read-only, without affecting other mount points.
I think the problem came about when bind mounts were first introduced:
If mountflags includes
MS_BIND
(available since Linux 2.4), then perform a bind mount. ... The remaining bits in the mountflags argument are also ignored, with the exception ofMS_REC
. (The bind mount has the same mount options as the underlying mount point.)
It seems that, instead of using MS_BIND | MS_REMOUNT
as the signal to set just the VFS flags, they could have chosen to except (and accept) MS_RDONLY
along with the initial MS_BIND
, and apply it to the mount point.
So because of the somewhat odd semantics of the mount(2)
system call:
- The first call creates the bind mount and all other flags are ignored
- The second call (with remount) sets the mount-point flags to read-only
add a comment |
You're asking from the perspective of the mount(8)
command line (which is acceptable on this site). That command has been discussed in the other answers and in some cases, abstracts away the necessary second mount(2)
system call.
But why is the second system call needed? Why can't a single mount(2)
call create the read-only bind mount?
The mount(2)
man page explains that there are, as others have pointed out, two sets of flags being set:
- The underlying file system flags
- The VFS mount-point flags
It says:
Since Linux 2.6.16,
MS_RDONLY
can be set or cleared on a per-mount-point basis as well as on the underlying filesystem. The mounted filesystem will be writable only if neither the filesystem nor the mountpoint are flagged as read-only.
And regarding MS_REMOUNT
:
Since Linux 2.6.26, this flag can be used with
MS_BIND
to modify only the per-mount-point flags. This is particularly useful for setting or clearing the "read-only" flag on a mount point without changing the underlying filesystem. Specifying mountflags as:
MS_REMOUNT | MS_BIND | MS_RDONLY
will make access through this mountpoint read-only, without affecting other mount points.
I think the problem came about when bind mounts were first introduced:
If mountflags includes
MS_BIND
(available since Linux 2.4), then perform a bind mount. ... The remaining bits in the mountflags argument are also ignored, with the exception ofMS_REC
. (The bind mount has the same mount options as the underlying mount point.)
It seems that, instead of using MS_BIND | MS_REMOUNT
as the signal to set just the VFS flags, they could have chosen to except (and accept) MS_RDONLY
along with the initial MS_BIND
, and apply it to the mount point.
So because of the somewhat odd semantics of the mount(2)
system call:
- The first call creates the bind mount and all other flags are ignored
- The second call (with remount) sets the mount-point flags to read-only
add a comment |
You're asking from the perspective of the mount(8)
command line (which is acceptable on this site). That command has been discussed in the other answers and in some cases, abstracts away the necessary second mount(2)
system call.
But why is the second system call needed? Why can't a single mount(2)
call create the read-only bind mount?
The mount(2)
man page explains that there are, as others have pointed out, two sets of flags being set:
- The underlying file system flags
- The VFS mount-point flags
It says:
Since Linux 2.6.16,
MS_RDONLY
can be set or cleared on a per-mount-point basis as well as on the underlying filesystem. The mounted filesystem will be writable only if neither the filesystem nor the mountpoint are flagged as read-only.
And regarding MS_REMOUNT
:
Since Linux 2.6.26, this flag can be used with
MS_BIND
to modify only the per-mount-point flags. This is particularly useful for setting or clearing the "read-only" flag on a mount point without changing the underlying filesystem. Specifying mountflags as:
MS_REMOUNT | MS_BIND | MS_RDONLY
will make access through this mountpoint read-only, without affecting other mount points.
I think the problem came about when bind mounts were first introduced:
If mountflags includes
MS_BIND
(available since Linux 2.4), then perform a bind mount. ... The remaining bits in the mountflags argument are also ignored, with the exception ofMS_REC
. (The bind mount has the same mount options as the underlying mount point.)
It seems that, instead of using MS_BIND | MS_REMOUNT
as the signal to set just the VFS flags, they could have chosen to except (and accept) MS_RDONLY
along with the initial MS_BIND
, and apply it to the mount point.
So because of the somewhat odd semantics of the mount(2)
system call:
- The first call creates the bind mount and all other flags are ignored
- The second call (with remount) sets the mount-point flags to read-only
You're asking from the perspective of the mount(8)
command line (which is acceptable on this site). That command has been discussed in the other answers and in some cases, abstracts away the necessary second mount(2)
system call.
But why is the second system call needed? Why can't a single mount(2)
call create the read-only bind mount?
The mount(2)
man page explains that there are, as others have pointed out, two sets of flags being set:
- The underlying file system flags
- The VFS mount-point flags
It says:
Since Linux 2.6.16,
MS_RDONLY
can be set or cleared on a per-mount-point basis as well as on the underlying filesystem. The mounted filesystem will be writable only if neither the filesystem nor the mountpoint are flagged as read-only.
And regarding MS_REMOUNT
:
Since Linux 2.6.26, this flag can be used with
MS_BIND
to modify only the per-mount-point flags. This is particularly useful for setting or clearing the "read-only" flag on a mount point without changing the underlying filesystem. Specifying mountflags as:
MS_REMOUNT | MS_BIND | MS_RDONLY
will make access through this mountpoint read-only, without affecting other mount points.
I think the problem came about when bind mounts were first introduced:
If mountflags includes
MS_BIND
(available since Linux 2.4), then perform a bind mount. ... The remaining bits in the mountflags argument are also ignored, with the exception ofMS_REC
. (The bind mount has the same mount options as the underlying mount point.)
It seems that, instead of using MS_BIND | MS_REMOUNT
as the signal to set just the VFS flags, they could have chosen to except (and accept) MS_RDONLY
along with the initial MS_BIND
, and apply it to the mount point.
So because of the somewhat odd semantics of the mount(2)
system call:
- The first call creates the bind mount and all other flags are ignored
- The second call (with remount) sets the mount-point flags to read-only
edited Jan 4 at 12:08
answered Jan 4 at 11:58
Jonathon ReinhartJonathon Reinhart
8301918
8301918
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128336%2fwhy-doesnt-mount-respect-the-read-only-option-for-bind-mounts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you have an /etc/mtab?
– eyoung100
May 7 '14 at 15:58
See also thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/2979 and a workaround by using
mount -t bind
and a helper script at bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/519380– Stéphane Chazelas
May 7 '14 at 16:06
@ECarterYoung yes I have an
/etc/mtab
. After the initial mount the entry says the mount is rw and after the remount it says ro, so it is reporting the state of the mount correctly. It is just the mount command that fails.– StrongBad
May 7 '14 at 16:10
3
I tested on two Debian testing/unstable machines, one running a Debian kernel and one running a kernel.org kernel, neither work with
mount --bind -o ro
, they both spit out a messagemount: warning: «mountpoint» seems to be mounted read-write.
So it seems Debian dropped or lost the patch at some point... Remount works, though.– derobert
May 7 '14 at 16:50
2
@StrongBad Tested that as requested, and it doesn't work either.
– derobert
May 7 '14 at 17:09