Creating .deb with systemd service but without SysV init scripts
I'm trying to add a systemd service file to an existing Debian package. I followed https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-systemd/Packaging, so I created debian/packagename.service
. Because my debhelper
is version 9.x, I also:
- added
dh-systemd
toBuild-Depends
indebian/control
- added
--with systemd
to thedh
command indebian/rules
.
Now when I rebuild the package with debuild -i -us -uc -b
, it fails with this output:
Now running lintian...
[...]
W: packagename: init.d-script-not-marked-as-conffile etc/init.d/packagename
E: packagename: init.d-script-not-included-in-package etc/init.d/packagename
It seems like the build script expects an init.d script if there is a .service
file. And indeed, the generated DEBIAN/postinst
includes this section:
# Automatically added by dh_installinit
if [ -x "/etc/init.d/infinoted" ]; then
update-rc.d infinoted defaults >/dev/null
invoke-rc.d infinoted start || exit $?
fi
# End automatically added section
Is this expected behavior? Should I always include SysV init scripts when I include a .service
file? If not, what is the recommended way to prevent the generation of this section?
My system is Debian Jessie.
debian systemd init.d packaging deb
add a comment |
I'm trying to add a systemd service file to an existing Debian package. I followed https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-systemd/Packaging, so I created debian/packagename.service
. Because my debhelper
is version 9.x, I also:
- added
dh-systemd
toBuild-Depends
indebian/control
- added
--with systemd
to thedh
command indebian/rules
.
Now when I rebuild the package with debuild -i -us -uc -b
, it fails with this output:
Now running lintian...
[...]
W: packagename: init.d-script-not-marked-as-conffile etc/init.d/packagename
E: packagename: init.d-script-not-included-in-package etc/init.d/packagename
It seems like the build script expects an init.d script if there is a .service
file. And indeed, the generated DEBIAN/postinst
includes this section:
# Automatically added by dh_installinit
if [ -x "/etc/init.d/infinoted" ]; then
update-rc.d infinoted defaults >/dev/null
invoke-rc.d infinoted start || exit $?
fi
# End automatically added section
Is this expected behavior? Should I always include SysV init scripts when I include a .service
file? If not, what is the recommended way to prevent the generation of this section?
My system is Debian Jessie.
debian systemd init.d packaging deb
add a comment |
I'm trying to add a systemd service file to an existing Debian package. I followed https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-systemd/Packaging, so I created debian/packagename.service
. Because my debhelper
is version 9.x, I also:
- added
dh-systemd
toBuild-Depends
indebian/control
- added
--with systemd
to thedh
command indebian/rules
.
Now when I rebuild the package with debuild -i -us -uc -b
, it fails with this output:
Now running lintian...
[...]
W: packagename: init.d-script-not-marked-as-conffile etc/init.d/packagename
E: packagename: init.d-script-not-included-in-package etc/init.d/packagename
It seems like the build script expects an init.d script if there is a .service
file. And indeed, the generated DEBIAN/postinst
includes this section:
# Automatically added by dh_installinit
if [ -x "/etc/init.d/infinoted" ]; then
update-rc.d infinoted defaults >/dev/null
invoke-rc.d infinoted start || exit $?
fi
# End automatically added section
Is this expected behavior? Should I always include SysV init scripts when I include a .service
file? If not, what is the recommended way to prevent the generation of this section?
My system is Debian Jessie.
debian systemd init.d packaging deb
I'm trying to add a systemd service file to an existing Debian package. I followed https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-systemd/Packaging, so I created debian/packagename.service
. Because my debhelper
is version 9.x, I also:
- added
dh-systemd
toBuild-Depends
indebian/control
- added
--with systemd
to thedh
command indebian/rules
.
Now when I rebuild the package with debuild -i -us -uc -b
, it fails with this output:
Now running lintian...
[...]
W: packagename: init.d-script-not-marked-as-conffile etc/init.d/packagename
E: packagename: init.d-script-not-included-in-package etc/init.d/packagename
It seems like the build script expects an init.d script if there is a .service
file. And indeed, the generated DEBIAN/postinst
includes this section:
# Automatically added by dh_installinit
if [ -x "/etc/init.d/infinoted" ]; then
update-rc.d infinoted defaults >/dev/null
invoke-rc.d infinoted start || exit $?
fi
# End automatically added section
Is this expected behavior? Should I always include SysV init scripts when I include a .service
file? If not, what is the recommended way to prevent the generation of this section?
My system is Debian Jessie.
debian systemd init.d packaging deb
debian systemd init.d packaging deb
asked Feb 19 '17 at 14:20
segfault
162
162
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Overriding dh_installinit
worked for me. I just added this to debian/rules
:
override_dh_installinit:
true
It still installs the systemd unit and everything seems to work as expected.
But I still don't know if this is expected behavior or a bug. Note that I did not test this on Debian Stretch or Sid, only on Jessie.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f346109%2fcreating-deb-with-systemd-service-but-without-sysv-init-scripts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Overriding dh_installinit
worked for me. I just added this to debian/rules
:
override_dh_installinit:
true
It still installs the systemd unit and everything seems to work as expected.
But I still don't know if this is expected behavior or a bug. Note that I did not test this on Debian Stretch or Sid, only on Jessie.
add a comment |
Overriding dh_installinit
worked for me. I just added this to debian/rules
:
override_dh_installinit:
true
It still installs the systemd unit and everything seems to work as expected.
But I still don't know if this is expected behavior or a bug. Note that I did not test this on Debian Stretch or Sid, only on Jessie.
add a comment |
Overriding dh_installinit
worked for me. I just added this to debian/rules
:
override_dh_installinit:
true
It still installs the systemd unit and everything seems to work as expected.
But I still don't know if this is expected behavior or a bug. Note that I did not test this on Debian Stretch or Sid, only on Jessie.
Overriding dh_installinit
worked for me. I just added this to debian/rules
:
override_dh_installinit:
true
It still installs the systemd unit and everything seems to work as expected.
But I still don't know if this is expected behavior or a bug. Note that I did not test this on Debian Stretch or Sid, only on Jessie.
answered Feb 19 '17 at 14:32
segfault
162
162
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f346109%2fcreating-deb-with-systemd-service-but-without-sysv-init-scripts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown