How to squeeze a long equation?












3














I am writing in IEEEtran two-column environment and has a display formula like this sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222. Before the first equal sign is a long square root. This square root is just a little bit wider than the column. Is there a way I can squeeze the square root within the column as a first line and put the rest beginning with the "=" as a second line?



enter image description here










share|improve this question




















  • 3




    Can't you write 0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2) ?
    – Ulrike Fischer
    4 hours ago










  • I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
    – nanjun
    2 hours ago










  • @nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
    – egreg
    2 hours ago
















3














I am writing in IEEEtran two-column environment and has a display formula like this sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222. Before the first equal sign is a long square root. This square root is just a little bit wider than the column. Is there a way I can squeeze the square root within the column as a first line and put the rest beginning with the "=" as a second line?



enter image description here










share|improve this question




















  • 3




    Can't you write 0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2) ?
    – Ulrike Fischer
    4 hours ago










  • I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
    – nanjun
    2 hours ago










  • @nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
    – egreg
    2 hours ago














3












3








3







I am writing in IEEEtran two-column environment and has a display formula like this sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222. Before the first equal sign is a long square root. This square root is just a little bit wider than the column. Is there a way I can squeeze the square root within the column as a first line and put the rest beginning with the "=" as a second line?



enter image description here










share|improve this question















I am writing in IEEEtran two-column environment and has a display formula like this sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222. Before the first equal sign is a long square root. This square root is just a little bit wider than the column. Is there a way I can squeeze the square root within the column as a first line and put the rest beginning with the "=" as a second line?



enter image description here







math-mode equations






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 56 mins ago









Circumscribe

4,6611432




4,6611432










asked 4 hours ago









nanjun

14016




14016








  • 3




    Can't you write 0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2) ?
    – Ulrike Fischer
    4 hours ago










  • I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
    – nanjun
    2 hours ago










  • @nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
    – egreg
    2 hours ago














  • 3




    Can't you write 0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2) ?
    – Ulrike Fischer
    4 hours ago










  • I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
    – nanjun
    2 hours ago










  • @nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
    – egreg
    2 hours ago








3




3




Can't you write 0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2) ?
– Ulrike Fischer
4 hours ago




Can't you write 0.111222 times (1.111163+0.066987^2) ?
– Ulrike Fischer
4 hours ago












I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
– nanjun
2 hours ago




I did not notice that, but those are meant to be random numbers, not necessarily the same.
– nanjun
2 hours ago












@nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
– egreg
2 hours ago




@nanjun A general solution doesn't exist, it would be better to have a “real world” example.
– egreg
2 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















1














The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).



documentclass{IEEEtran}

usepackage{amsmath}

newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
scriptspace=#1scriptspace
}
newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
} %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366

begin{document}

This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Unaltered vv
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
= sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
[ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
(0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
$}
\&
= sqrt{0.111222}
\& %% <- leave this out if you want
= 0.111222
end{split}
]
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation

end{document}


output



I've done the following:




  1. I've used the split environment from amsmath to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second \&.


  2. To place the anchor (&) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it with kern 4em & kern-4em.



  3. The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters: thickmuskip (; and space around e.g. =), medmuskip (: and space around e.g. +), thinmuskip (, and space around e.g. sum and sin), nulldelimiterspace (space around e.g. fractions) and scriptspace (space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths using squeezespaces{0.5} (which is defined in the preamble).



    Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside split, so I've put the square root inside an mbox{$<…>$} and used squeezespaces{0.5} in the inner math environment. You can replace 0.5 by another number between 0 and 1 if you want.




  4. A side-effect of putting the sqrt in a box is that it is set in textstyle, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by using tfrac instead of frac or by inserting textstyle right before sqrt (or at the beginning of its first argument).



    If you don't want text style fractions you should use mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}.








share|improve this answer























  • This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair [ and ] do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
    – nanjun
    1 hour ago












  • 1. The & in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the & directly in front of the mbox the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em, then inserting a & and then moving the cursor left by 4em, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the & is placed 4em to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em after the & on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
    – Circumscribe
    1 hour ago












  • 2. [ is equivalent to begin{equation*} and ] is equivalent to end{equation*}.
    – Circumscribe
    1 hour ago












  • @nanjun: I've improved the definition of squeezespaces slightly, though you probably won't notice any difference. (It now preserves stretchability of these skips.)
    – Circumscribe
    1 hour ago



















3














For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the = symbol fit in a column; then, use an align* environment to split the full expression across two lines.



enter image description here



documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.

begin{document}
hrule % just to illustrate width of column
begin{align*}
&sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
&quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
end{align*}
end{document}





share|improve this answer





























    2














    Try using split or multiline in the amsmath package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".



    Try:



    documentclass{IEEEtran}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    begin{document}

    begin{equation}
    begin{split}
    sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
    overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
    =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
    end{split}
    end{equation}

    begin{multline}
    sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
    overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
    =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
    end{multline}

    end{document}


    and adjust the 5mm in rule to get the overline spacing to look right.



    Some other options to adjust the overline spacing






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      I think this is more a comment than an answer
      – CarLaTeX
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
      – xerxes25
      3 hours ago










    • Ok, don't worry, you can edit it
      – CarLaTeX
      3 hours ago










    • It would be better if your code employed the IEEEtran document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
      – Mico
      3 hours ago










    • @Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
      – xerxes25
      3 hours ago



















    1














    documentclass{IEEEtran}
    usepackage{amsmath}
    begin{document}

    hrule

    begin{align*}
    &begin{aligned}[t]
    Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222&times1.111163 \
    &+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
    end{aligned}\
    &= sqrt{0.111222} \
    &= 0.111222
    end{align*}

    hrule

    end{document}


    enter image description here



    Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.



    begin{align*}
    &sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
    &quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
    &quad = 0.1112
    end{align*}


    enter image description here



    A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z to these values:



    begin{align*}
    &sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
    &quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
    &quad = 0.340074
    end{align*}
    %
    with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
      – nanjun
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
      – AboAmmar
      2 hours ago



















    0














    Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac command from mathtools combined with mfrac (medium-sized fractions) from nccmath:



    documentclass{IEEEtran}
    usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

    usepackage{lipsum}

    begin{document}

    lipsum[11]
    begin{equation*}
    sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
    {+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
    end{equation*}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467942%2fhow-to-squeeze-a-long-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).



      documentclass{IEEEtran}

      usepackage{amsmath}

      newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
      thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
      medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
      thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
      nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
      scriptspace=#1scriptspace
      }
      newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
      muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
      } %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366

      begin{document}

      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      [ %% vv Unaltered vv
      sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
      (0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
      = sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
      ]
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      [ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
      begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
      kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
      mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
      sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
      (0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
      $}
      \&
      = sqrt{0.111222}
      \& %% <- leave this out if you want
      = 0.111222
      end{split}
      ]
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation

      end{document}


      output



      I've done the following:




      1. I've used the split environment from amsmath to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second \&.


      2. To place the anchor (&) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it with kern 4em & kern-4em.



      3. The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters: thickmuskip (; and space around e.g. =), medmuskip (: and space around e.g. +), thinmuskip (, and space around e.g. sum and sin), nulldelimiterspace (space around e.g. fractions) and scriptspace (space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths using squeezespaces{0.5} (which is defined in the preamble).



        Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside split, so I've put the square root inside an mbox{$<…>$} and used squeezespaces{0.5} in the inner math environment. You can replace 0.5 by another number between 0 and 1 if you want.




      4. A side-effect of putting the sqrt in a box is that it is set in textstyle, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by using tfrac instead of frac or by inserting textstyle right before sqrt (or at the beginning of its first argument).



        If you don't want text style fractions you should use mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}.








      share|improve this answer























      • This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair [ and ] do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
        – nanjun
        1 hour ago












      • 1. The & in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the & directly in front of the mbox the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em, then inserting a & and then moving the cursor left by 4em, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the & is placed 4em to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em after the & on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago












      • 2. [ is equivalent to begin{equation*} and ] is equivalent to end{equation*}.
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago












      • @nanjun: I've improved the definition of squeezespaces slightly, though you probably won't notice any difference. (It now preserves stretchability of these skips.)
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago
















      1














      The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).



      documentclass{IEEEtran}

      usepackage{amsmath}

      newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
      thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
      medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
      thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
      nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
      scriptspace=#1scriptspace
      }
      newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
      muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
      } %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366

      begin{document}

      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      [ %% vv Unaltered vv
      sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
      (0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
      = sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
      ]
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      [ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
      begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
      kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
      mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
      sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
      (0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
      $}
      \&
      = sqrt{0.111222}
      \& %% <- leave this out if you want
      = 0.111222
      end{split}
      ]
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation

      end{document}


      output



      I've done the following:




      1. I've used the split environment from amsmath to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second \&.


      2. To place the anchor (&) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it with kern 4em & kern-4em.



      3. The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters: thickmuskip (; and space around e.g. =), medmuskip (: and space around e.g. +), thinmuskip (, and space around e.g. sum and sin), nulldelimiterspace (space around e.g. fractions) and scriptspace (space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths using squeezespaces{0.5} (which is defined in the preamble).



        Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside split, so I've put the square root inside an mbox{$<…>$} and used squeezespaces{0.5} in the inner math environment. You can replace 0.5 by another number between 0 and 1 if you want.




      4. A side-effect of putting the sqrt in a box is that it is set in textstyle, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by using tfrac instead of frac or by inserting textstyle right before sqrt (or at the beginning of its first argument).



        If you don't want text style fractions you should use mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}.








      share|improve this answer























      • This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair [ and ] do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
        – nanjun
        1 hour ago












      • 1. The & in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the & directly in front of the mbox the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em, then inserting a & and then moving the cursor left by 4em, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the & is placed 4em to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em after the & on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago












      • 2. [ is equivalent to begin{equation*} and ] is equivalent to end{equation*}.
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago












      • @nanjun: I've improved the definition of squeezespaces slightly, though you probably won't notice any difference. (It now preserves stretchability of these skips.)
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago














      1












      1








      1






      The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).



      documentclass{IEEEtran}

      usepackage{amsmath}

      newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
      thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
      medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
      thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
      nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
      scriptspace=#1scriptspace
      }
      newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
      muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
      } %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366

      begin{document}

      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      [ %% vv Unaltered vv
      sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
      (0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
      = sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
      ]
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      [ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
      begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
      kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
      mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
      sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
      (0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
      $}
      \&
      = sqrt{0.111222}
      \& %% <- leave this out if you want
      = 0.111222
      end{split}
      ]
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation

      end{document}


      output



      I've done the following:




      1. I've used the split environment from amsmath to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second \&.


      2. To place the anchor (&) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it with kern 4em & kern-4em.



      3. The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters: thickmuskip (; and space around e.g. =), medmuskip (: and space around e.g. +), thinmuskip (, and space around e.g. sum and sin), nulldelimiterspace (space around e.g. fractions) and scriptspace (space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths using squeezespaces{0.5} (which is defined in the preamble).



        Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside split, so I've put the square root inside an mbox{$<…>$} and used squeezespaces{0.5} in the inner math environment. You can replace 0.5 by another number between 0 and 1 if you want.




      4. A side-effect of putting the sqrt in a box is that it is set in textstyle, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by using tfrac instead of frac or by inserting textstyle right before sqrt (or at the beginning of its first argument).



        If you don't want text style fractions you should use mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}.








      share|improve this answer














      The answer is yes. Here's an illustration (followed by an explanation).



      documentclass{IEEEtran}

      usepackage{amsmath}

      newcommand*squeezespaces[1]{% %% <- #1 is a number between 0 and 1
      thickmuskip=scalemuskip{thickmuskip}{#1}%
      medmuskip=scalemuskip{medmuskip}{#1}%
      thinmuskip=scalemuskip{thinmuskip}{#1}%
      nulldelimiterspace=#1nulldelimiterspace
      scriptspace=#1scriptspace
      }
      newcommand*scalemuskip[2]{%
      muexpr #1*numexprdimexpr#2ptrelaxrelax/65536relax
      } %% <- based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/198966/156366

      begin{document}

      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      [ %% vv Unaltered vv
      sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
      (0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
      = sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
      ]
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      [ %% vv Squeezed and split vv
      begin{split} %% <- split up equation, &'s will be aligned
      kern 4em & kern-4em %% <- move anchor right by 4em
      mbox{$squeezespaces{0.5} %% <- reduce whitespace, switch to textstyle
      sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}
      (0.111222times1.111163+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}
      $}
      \&
      = sqrt{0.111222}
      \& %% <- leave this out if you want
      = 0.111222
      end{split}
      ]
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation
      This is a long equation This is a long equation This is a long equation

      end{document}


      output



      I've done the following:




      1. I've used the split environment from amsmath to split up the equation in three lines. You can reduce this to two lines by removing the second \&.


      2. To place the anchor (&) at the right spot, I've inserted a horizontal space in front of it and a negative horizontal space of equal magnitude after it with kern 4em & kern-4em.



      3. The amount of whitespace inserted at several places in an equation is governed by the following paramters: thickmuskip (; and space around e.g. =), medmuskip (: and space around e.g. +), thinmuskip (, and space around e.g. sum and sin), nulldelimiterspace (space around e.g. fractions) and scriptspace (space after sub-/superscripts). I've halved each of these lengths using squeezespaces{0.5} (which is defined in the preamble).



        Doing this affects an entire equation and it can't be done inside split, so I've put the square root inside an mbox{$<…>$} and used squeezespaces{0.5} in the inner math environment. You can replace 0.5 by another number between 0 and 1 if you want.




      4. A side-effect of putting the sqrt in a box is that it is set in textstyle, which also saves space because it makes e.g. fractions smaller. You could also have accomplished this by using tfrac instead of frac or by inserting textstyle right before sqrt (or at the beginning of its first argument).



        If you don't want text style fractions you should use mbox{$displaystyle<…>$}.









      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 1 hour ago

























      answered 3 hours ago









      Circumscribe

      4,6611432




      4,6611432












      • This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair [ and ] do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
        – nanjun
        1 hour ago












      • 1. The & in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the & directly in front of the mbox the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em, then inserting a & and then moving the cursor left by 4em, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the & is placed 4em to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em after the & on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago












      • 2. [ is equivalent to begin{equation*} and ] is equivalent to end{equation*}.
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago












      • @nanjun: I've improved the definition of squeezespaces slightly, though you probably won't notice any difference. (It now preserves stretchability of these skips.)
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago


















      • This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair [ and ] do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
        – nanjun
        1 hour ago












      • 1. The & in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the & directly in front of the mbox the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em, then inserting a & and then moving the cursor left by 4em, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the & is placed 4em to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em after the & on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago












      • 2. [ is equivalent to begin{equation*} and ] is equivalent to end{equation*}.
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago












      • @nanjun: I've improved the definition of squeezespaces slightly, though you probably won't notice any difference. (It now preserves stretchability of these skips.)
        – Circumscribe
        1 hour ago
















      This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair [ and ] do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
      – nanjun
      1 hour ago






      This looks great. I like how it could be fine-tuned. I have accepted it. Just a couple of questions. 1. Why the anchor has to be moved before the 1st line while it affects the alignment of the 2nd and 3rd lines? And why an equal amount of negative space is also necessary after the anchor? 2. What does the pair [ and ] do? It seems the code does not work properly without them.
      – nanjun
      1 hour ago














      1. The & in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the & directly in front of the mbox the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em, then inserting a & and then moving the cursor left by 4em, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the & is placed 4em to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em after the & on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
      – Circumscribe
      1 hour ago






      1. The & in each line will be aligned, so if you placed the & directly in front of the mbox the leftmost point of the = would line up with the leftmost point of the √. You can think of it like this: I'm first moving the cursor right by 4em, then inserting a & and then moving the cursor left by 4em, so it'll end up back where it started. The net effect is that the & is placed 4em to the right of the start of the √. Inserting kern4em after the & on both the second and third line would have the same effect.
      – Circumscribe
      1 hour ago














      2. [ is equivalent to begin{equation*} and ] is equivalent to end{equation*}.
      – Circumscribe
      1 hour ago






      2. [ is equivalent to begin{equation*} and ] is equivalent to end{equation*}.
      – Circumscribe
      1 hour ago














      @nanjun: I've improved the definition of squeezespaces slightly, though you probably won't notice any difference. (It now preserves stretchability of these skips.)
      – Circumscribe
      1 hour ago




      @nanjun: I've improved the definition of squeezespaces slightly, though you probably won't notice any difference. (It now preserves stretchability of these skips.)
      – Circumscribe
      1 hour ago











      3














      For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the = symbol fit in a column; then, use an align* environment to split the full expression across two lines.



      enter image description here



      documentclass{IEEEtran}
      usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.

      begin{document}
      hrule % just to illustrate width of column
      begin{align*}
      &sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
      +0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
      &quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
      end{align*}
      end{document}





      share|improve this answer


























        3














        For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the = symbol fit in a column; then, use an align* environment to split the full expression across two lines.



        enter image description here



        documentclass{IEEEtran}
        usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.

        begin{document}
        hrule % just to illustrate width of column
        begin{align*}
        &sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
        +0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
        &quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
        end{align*}
        end{document}





        share|improve this answer
























          3












          3








          3






          For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the = symbol fit in a column; then, use an align* environment to split the full expression across two lines.



          enter image description here



          documentclass{IEEEtran}
          usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.

          begin{document}
          hrule % just to illustrate width of column
          begin{align*}
          &sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
          +0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
          &quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
          end{align*}
          end{document}





          share|improve this answer












          For the math expression you provided -- I have no idea how representative it is of the real material in your document -- it suffices to rearrange the position of the denominator in order to make the material before the = symbol fit in a column; then, use an align* environment to split the full expression across two lines.



          enter image description here



          documentclass{IEEEtran}
          usepackage{amsmath} % for 'align*' env.

          begin{document}
          hrule % just to illustrate width of column
          begin{align*}
          &sqrt{frac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163
          +0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}{0.111222}-1}\
          &quad=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
          end{align*}
          end{document}






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Mico

          273k30369756




          273k30369756























              2














              Try using split or multiline in the amsmath package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".



              Try:



              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{amsmath}

              begin{document}

              begin{equation}
              begin{split}
              sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
              overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
              =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
              end{split}
              end{equation}

              begin{multline}
              sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
              overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
              =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
              end{multline}

              end{document}


              and adjust the 5mm in rule to get the overline spacing to look right.



              Some other options to adjust the overline spacing






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1




                I think this is more a comment than an answer
                – CarLaTeX
                3 hours ago






              • 1




                Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
                – xerxes25
                3 hours ago










              • Ok, don't worry, you can edit it
                – CarLaTeX
                3 hours ago










              • It would be better if your code employed the IEEEtran document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
                – Mico
                3 hours ago










              • @Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
                – xerxes25
                3 hours ago
















              2














              Try using split or multiline in the amsmath package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".



              Try:



              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{amsmath}

              begin{document}

              begin{equation}
              begin{split}
              sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
              overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
              =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
              end{split}
              end{equation}

              begin{multline}
              sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
              overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
              =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
              end{multline}

              end{document}


              and adjust the 5mm in rule to get the overline spacing to look right.



              Some other options to adjust the overline spacing






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1




                I think this is more a comment than an answer
                – CarLaTeX
                3 hours ago






              • 1




                Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
                – xerxes25
                3 hours ago










              • Ok, don't worry, you can edit it
                – CarLaTeX
                3 hours ago










              • It would be better if your code employed the IEEEtran document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
                – Mico
                3 hours ago










              • @Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
                – xerxes25
                3 hours ago














              2












              2








              2






              Try using split or multiline in the amsmath package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".



              Try:



              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{amsmath}

              begin{document}

              begin{equation}
              begin{split}
              sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
              overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
              =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
              end{split}
              end{equation}

              begin{multline}
              sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
              overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
              =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
              end{multline}

              end{document}


              and adjust the 5mm in rule to get the overline spacing to look right.



              Some other options to adjust the overline spacing






              share|improve this answer














              Try using split or multiline in the amsmath package. There are a couple of examples on page 2 of "Short Math Guide".



              Try:



              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{amsmath}

              begin{document}

              begin{equation}
              begin{split}
              sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}&\
              overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}&\
              =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222&
              end{split}
              end{equation}

              begin{multline}
              sqrt{frac{1^{2}}{0.111222}(0.111222times1.111163}\
              overline{rule{0pt}{5mm}{}+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1}\
              =sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222
              end{multline}

              end{document}


              and adjust the 5mm in rule to get the overline spacing to look right.



              Some other options to adjust the overline spacing







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 2 hours ago

























              answered 4 hours ago









              xerxes25

              538




              538








              • 1




                I think this is more a comment than an answer
                – CarLaTeX
                3 hours ago






              • 1




                Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
                – xerxes25
                3 hours ago










              • Ok, don't worry, you can edit it
                – CarLaTeX
                3 hours ago










              • It would be better if your code employed the IEEEtran document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
                – Mico
                3 hours ago










              • @Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
                – xerxes25
                3 hours ago














              • 1




                I think this is more a comment than an answer
                – CarLaTeX
                3 hours ago






              • 1




                Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
                – xerxes25
                3 hours ago










              • Ok, don't worry, you can edit it
                – CarLaTeX
                3 hours ago










              • It would be better if your code employed the IEEEtran document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
                – Mico
                3 hours ago










              • @Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
                – xerxes25
                3 hours ago








              1




              1




              I think this is more a comment than an answer
              – CarLaTeX
              3 hours ago




              I think this is more a comment than an answer
              – CarLaTeX
              3 hours ago




              1




              1




              Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
              – xerxes25
              3 hours ago




              Sorry, I don't have enough rep to comment on the post. I'm working on a more complete answer at the moment.
              – xerxes25
              3 hours ago












              Ok, don't worry, you can edit it
              – CarLaTeX
              3 hours ago




              Ok, don't worry, you can edit it
              – CarLaTeX
              3 hours ago












              It would be better if your code employed the IEEEtran document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
              – Mico
              3 hours ago




              It would be better if your code employed the IEEEtran document class, which is employed by the OP, in order to demonstrate that your solution meets the OP's objective of fitting everything inside the width of a column.
              – Mico
              3 hours ago












              @Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
              – xerxes25
              3 hours ago




              @Mico thanks, fixed it. I was using 'multicol' in my test doc but removed it for simplicity when I posted the answer. Your suggestion makes more sense. Still new to this and learning something new every day!
              – xerxes25
              3 hours ago











              1














              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{amsmath}
              begin{document}

              hrule

              begin{align*}
              &begin{aligned}[t]
              Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222&times1.111163 \
              &+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
              end{aligned}\
              &= sqrt{0.111222} \
              &= 0.111222
              end{align*}

              hrule

              end{document}


              enter image description here



              Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.



              begin{align*}
              &sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
              &quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
              &quad = 0.1112
              end{align*}


              enter image description here



              A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z to these values:



              begin{align*}
              &sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
              &quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
              &quad = 0.340074
              end{align*}
              %
              with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1




                Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
                – nanjun
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
                – AboAmmar
                2 hours ago
















              1














              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{amsmath}
              begin{document}

              hrule

              begin{align*}
              &begin{aligned}[t]
              Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222&times1.111163 \
              &+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
              end{aligned}\
              &= sqrt{0.111222} \
              &= 0.111222
              end{align*}

              hrule

              end{document}


              enter image description here



              Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.



              begin{align*}
              &sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
              &quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
              &quad = 0.1112
              end{align*}


              enter image description here



              A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z to these values:



              begin{align*}
              &sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
              &quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
              &quad = 0.340074
              end{align*}
              %
              with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer



















              • 1




                Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
                – nanjun
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
                – AboAmmar
                2 hours ago














              1












              1








              1






              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{amsmath}
              begin{document}

              hrule

              begin{align*}
              &begin{aligned}[t]
              Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222&times1.111163 \
              &+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
              end{aligned}\
              &= sqrt{0.111222} \
              &= 0.111222
              end{align*}

              hrule

              end{document}


              enter image description here



              Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.



              begin{align*}
              &sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
              &quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
              &quad = 0.1112
              end{align*}


              enter image description here



              A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z to these values:



              begin{align*}
              &sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
              &quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
              &quad = 0.340074
              end{align*}
              %
              with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer














              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{amsmath}
              begin{document}

              hrule

              begin{align*}
              &begin{aligned}[t]
              Bigl[frac{1^2}{0.111222}(0.111222&times1.111163 \
              &+ 0.066987^{2}times0.111222)-1Bigr]^{frac12}
              end{aligned}\
              &= sqrt{0.111222} \
              &= 0.111222
              end{align*}

              hrule

              end{document}


              enter image description here



              Another option is to use 4 decimal-digits numbers (this is quite a standard in some software like MATLAB) unless these extra digits are very important.



              begin{align*}
              &sqrt{frac{1^2}{0.1112}(0.1112times1.1112 + 0.0670^2times0.1112)-1} \
              &quad = sqrt{0.1112} \
              &quad = 0.1112
              end{align*}


              enter image description here



              A third option would be to give variable names like x,y,z to these values:



              begin{align*}
              &sqrt{frac{1^2}{x}(xtimes y + z^2times x)-1} \
              &quad = sqrt{0.115650} \
              &quad = 0.340074
              end{align*}
              %
              with $x=0.111222$, $y=1.111163$, and $z=0.066987$.


              enter image description here







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 1 hour ago

























              answered 2 hours ago









              AboAmmar

              33k22882




              33k22882








              • 1




                Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
                – nanjun
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
                – AboAmmar
                2 hours ago














              • 1




                Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
                – nanjun
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
                – AboAmmar
                2 hours ago








              1




              1




              Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
              – nanjun
              2 hours ago




              Thanks. Would prefer to still keep the "square root sign" instead of writing to the power of 1/2.
              – nanjun
              2 hours ago




              1




              1




              Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
              – AboAmmar
              2 hours ago




              Then, Mico's answer is the way to go, IMO.
              – AboAmmar
              2 hours ago











              0














              Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac command from mathtools combined with mfrac (medium-sized fractions) from nccmath:



              documentclass{IEEEtran}
              usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

              usepackage{lipsum}

              begin{document}

              lipsum[11]
              begin{equation*}
              sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
              {+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
              end{equation*}

              end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer


























                0














                Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac command from mathtools combined with mfrac (medium-sized fractions) from nccmath:



                documentclass{IEEEtran}
                usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

                usepackage{lipsum}

                begin{document}

                lipsum[11]
                begin{equation*}
                sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
                {+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
                end{equation*}

                end{document}


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac command from mathtools combined with mfrac (medium-sized fractions) from nccmath:



                  documentclass{IEEEtran}
                  usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

                  usepackage{lipsum}

                  begin{document}

                  lipsum[11]
                  begin{equation*}
                  sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
                  {+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
                  end{equation*}

                  end{document}


                  enter image description here






                  share|improve this answer












                  Another solution: you can make it fit a single line with the splitfrac command from mathtools combined with mfrac (medium-sized fractions) from nccmath:



                  documentclass{IEEEtran}
                  usepackage{mathtools, nccmath}

                  usepackage{lipsum}

                  begin{document}

                  lipsum[11]
                  begin{equation*}
                  sqrt{mfrac{splitfrac{1^{2}(0.111222times1.111163}
                  {+0.066987^{2}times0.111222)}}{0.111222}-1}=sqrt{0.111222}=0.111222 % place remaining material on 2nd line
                  end{equation*}

                  end{document}


                  enter image description here







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Bernard

                  165k769193




                  165k769193






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467942%2fhow-to-squeeze-a-long-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Morgemoulin

                      Scott Moir

                      Souastre