Never-ending string kebab for a dystopian future












4














For a Matrix-type future I want to feed people via solid food. This is to keep all their internal organs working properly.



The idea is to feed them an endless kebab that is held together along its length with a string. They aren't aware of this as they are living in a fantasy simulated world.



There is no need to chew the kebab as it is digestible as is.



Waste is expelled in the normal way and happens autonomously although it may be arranged to coincide with bowel movements in the simulated world.



The string supporting the kebab is continuously pulled at a slow rate through the digestive system to allow digestion to take place.



Question



Will the string that is threaded through the gut from mouth to anus actually be practicable or will it interfere with anything along the way? Are there any other drawbacks? Is there an easy way to balance the feed-through speed with the amount of nutrition per unit length of string?



Note



The string is on a never-ending loop so it is cleaned in disinfectant before it comes around again to the mouth once more coated in kebabulite.










share|improve this question





























    4














    For a Matrix-type future I want to feed people via solid food. This is to keep all their internal organs working properly.



    The idea is to feed them an endless kebab that is held together along its length with a string. They aren't aware of this as they are living in a fantasy simulated world.



    There is no need to chew the kebab as it is digestible as is.



    Waste is expelled in the normal way and happens autonomously although it may be arranged to coincide with bowel movements in the simulated world.



    The string supporting the kebab is continuously pulled at a slow rate through the digestive system to allow digestion to take place.



    Question



    Will the string that is threaded through the gut from mouth to anus actually be practicable or will it interfere with anything along the way? Are there any other drawbacks? Is there an easy way to balance the feed-through speed with the amount of nutrition per unit length of string?



    Note



    The string is on a never-ending loop so it is cleaned in disinfectant before it comes around again to the mouth once more coated in kebabulite.










    share|improve this question



























      4












      4








      4







      For a Matrix-type future I want to feed people via solid food. This is to keep all their internal organs working properly.



      The idea is to feed them an endless kebab that is held together along its length with a string. They aren't aware of this as they are living in a fantasy simulated world.



      There is no need to chew the kebab as it is digestible as is.



      Waste is expelled in the normal way and happens autonomously although it may be arranged to coincide with bowel movements in the simulated world.



      The string supporting the kebab is continuously pulled at a slow rate through the digestive system to allow digestion to take place.



      Question



      Will the string that is threaded through the gut from mouth to anus actually be practicable or will it interfere with anything along the way? Are there any other drawbacks? Is there an easy way to balance the feed-through speed with the amount of nutrition per unit length of string?



      Note



      The string is on a never-ending loop so it is cleaned in disinfectant before it comes around again to the mouth once more coated in kebabulite.










      share|improve this question















      For a Matrix-type future I want to feed people via solid food. This is to keep all their internal organs working properly.



      The idea is to feed them an endless kebab that is held together along its length with a string. They aren't aware of this as they are living in a fantasy simulated world.



      There is no need to chew the kebab as it is digestible as is.



      Waste is expelled in the normal way and happens autonomously although it may be arranged to coincide with bowel movements in the simulated world.



      The string supporting the kebab is continuously pulled at a slow rate through the digestive system to allow digestion to take place.



      Question



      Will the string that is threaded through the gut from mouth to anus actually be practicable or will it interfere with anything along the way? Are there any other drawbacks? Is there an easy way to balance the feed-through speed with the amount of nutrition per unit length of string?



      Note



      The string is on a never-ending loop so it is cleaned in disinfectant before it comes around again to the mouth once more coated in kebabulite.







      reality-check biology dystopia






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago

























      asked 7 hours ago









      chasly from UK

      12.6k356112




      12.6k356112






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15














          The bowels are not straight: they have several U turns in their abdominal deployment.



          If you pull a wire it will tend to straighten up. If the wire is in the bowels, it means some unpleasant stress and almost sure intestinal cuts, unless you place some fixed pulleys.



          Bowel movements take care of moving the food from start to end. Just feed the slurry into the esophagus, the rest will be taken care by nature.






          share|improve this answer





















          • If I just pipe the stuff in there's a real danger of choking. I can't afford expensive monitoring equipment. However if the movement is continuous by keeping the string moving then, even if it doesn't get fully digested, at least there won't be a build-up.
            – chasly from UK
            6 hours ago








          • 3




            Look up "ng tube" or "og tube". Basically, shove a feeding tube through the victim's nose and down into their stomach. Problem solved.
            – elemtilas
            6 hours ago










          • @elemtilas - Okay but I'm still worried about it being fed in at the wrong speed. I want the mechanism to be left unattended so too little and the subject will starve, too much and the food will presumably regurgitate and choke them.
            – chasly from UK
            5 hours ago








          • 1




            @chasly and the kebab mechanism is going to regulate the intake... how, exactly, other than preventing the subject from throwing up by obstructing the passage?
            – John Dvorak
            4 hours ago










          • @John Dvorak - well tbh I'm beginning to think my idea won't work, but the idea was it would be set a little too fast to be digested. That way the subject wouldn't starve and if some kebab exited undigested it could be discarded.
            – chasly from UK
            3 hours ago



















          6














          There are all kinds of ugly here.




          • If your string isn't digestable (or digestable in the time allotted for pulling the kebab through the body), it will decay, leading to bacteria and infection and a whole lot of ugly.


          • One assumes the body wants to breathe, but a kebab being pulled through the body pretty much guarantees that breathing either won't occur or that fluid will enter the lungs. Fluid in the lungs is a whole lot of ugly. Not breathing is a whole lot more ugly.


          • Metabolism is neither uniform nor linear. Part of the process of digestion is to store energy, not simply convert it. In other words, the body will expect the kebab to periodically stop moving. If it stops moving while food is still in the esophagus, the gag reflex will be invoked and the body will choke. As you can imagine, choking is a whole lot of ugly.


          • And heaven help you if your matrix personality decided to start a religious fast. Oh, yeah. A whole lota ugly.


          • I'm going to ignore the fact that the string is passing through orifaces that are expected to open and close at specific times, allowing the potential for material to pass when and where it shouldn't. I'm doing so because I can believe that despite being uncomfortable (and probably leading itself to gagging, see above), the body's fluids would likely keep the orifices sealed even with the string passing through. But, it would look ugly, so there's a whole lotta ugly here, too.


          • Finally, I upvoted L.Dutch's answer (and you should, too) because the nature of a string is to be pulled straight and there's enough squishy in the body that it would try really hard to do so. Add to that the fact that a moving string (or wire or anything else) has the inconvenient nature of cutting through things and the amount of ugly just went off the chart.



          I don't see the use of an endless kebab as practical. It would be more believable to have the body enter a semi-concious state associated with the act of eating in the Matrix and have it ingest the proverbial protein cubes while the mind believes it's enjoying a juicy steak.






          share|improve this answer





























            3














            Try to swallow and breathe at the same time and you will see where the problem is. The people would at least all need a tracheostomy, so you can basically put a lid on the wind pipe so food and saliva cannot get into the lungs (this is not something theoretical, I am currently sitting next to my wife who lives with exactly that arrangement ever since a doctor screwed up during surgery).



            Unless you are writing a satirical or humorous novel you should probably not invent stupid and/or grotesque solutions for problems that have practical solutions in the real world (but then I don't know what you are writing, and that kind of detail certainly sets a certain tone).






            share|improve this answer





















            • I'm certainly not trying to make fun of any individual. My mother died of bowel cancer and had a colostomy bag for quite a while. I just found myself wondering about the practical implications of the science-fiction cliché of people in suspended animation. Incidentally I have health problems myself and I'd rather laugh about them than get depressed! Better a single than a double whammy.
              – chasly from UK
              1 hour ago










            • I am not offended, even if I may have sounded like it. I just don't think this is a very practical idea.
              – Eike Pierstorff
              1 hour ago



















            0














            Why don’t you just run a tube down to the stomach? Waste is processed automatically by the body as usual, and the tubes can be removed, disinfected, and reinserted during a normal daily maintenance procedure that needs to be done anyway to keep the body from getting sores, etc.






            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "579"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135194%2fnever-ending-string-kebab-for-a-dystopian-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              15














              The bowels are not straight: they have several U turns in their abdominal deployment.



              If you pull a wire it will tend to straighten up. If the wire is in the bowels, it means some unpleasant stress and almost sure intestinal cuts, unless you place some fixed pulleys.



              Bowel movements take care of moving the food from start to end. Just feed the slurry into the esophagus, the rest will be taken care by nature.






              share|improve this answer





















              • If I just pipe the stuff in there's a real danger of choking. I can't afford expensive monitoring equipment. However if the movement is continuous by keeping the string moving then, even if it doesn't get fully digested, at least there won't be a build-up.
                – chasly from UK
                6 hours ago








              • 3




                Look up "ng tube" or "og tube". Basically, shove a feeding tube through the victim's nose and down into their stomach. Problem solved.
                – elemtilas
                6 hours ago










              • @elemtilas - Okay but I'm still worried about it being fed in at the wrong speed. I want the mechanism to be left unattended so too little and the subject will starve, too much and the food will presumably regurgitate and choke them.
                – chasly from UK
                5 hours ago








              • 1




                @chasly and the kebab mechanism is going to regulate the intake... how, exactly, other than preventing the subject from throwing up by obstructing the passage?
                – John Dvorak
                4 hours ago










              • @John Dvorak - well tbh I'm beginning to think my idea won't work, but the idea was it would be set a little too fast to be digested. That way the subject wouldn't starve and if some kebab exited undigested it could be discarded.
                – chasly from UK
                3 hours ago
















              15














              The bowels are not straight: they have several U turns in their abdominal deployment.



              If you pull a wire it will tend to straighten up. If the wire is in the bowels, it means some unpleasant stress and almost sure intestinal cuts, unless you place some fixed pulleys.



              Bowel movements take care of moving the food from start to end. Just feed the slurry into the esophagus, the rest will be taken care by nature.






              share|improve this answer





















              • If I just pipe the stuff in there's a real danger of choking. I can't afford expensive monitoring equipment. However if the movement is continuous by keeping the string moving then, even if it doesn't get fully digested, at least there won't be a build-up.
                – chasly from UK
                6 hours ago








              • 3




                Look up "ng tube" or "og tube". Basically, shove a feeding tube through the victim's nose and down into their stomach. Problem solved.
                – elemtilas
                6 hours ago










              • @elemtilas - Okay but I'm still worried about it being fed in at the wrong speed. I want the mechanism to be left unattended so too little and the subject will starve, too much and the food will presumably regurgitate and choke them.
                – chasly from UK
                5 hours ago








              • 1




                @chasly and the kebab mechanism is going to regulate the intake... how, exactly, other than preventing the subject from throwing up by obstructing the passage?
                – John Dvorak
                4 hours ago










              • @John Dvorak - well tbh I'm beginning to think my idea won't work, but the idea was it would be set a little too fast to be digested. That way the subject wouldn't starve and if some kebab exited undigested it could be discarded.
                – chasly from UK
                3 hours ago














              15












              15








              15






              The bowels are not straight: they have several U turns in their abdominal deployment.



              If you pull a wire it will tend to straighten up. If the wire is in the bowels, it means some unpleasant stress and almost sure intestinal cuts, unless you place some fixed pulleys.



              Bowel movements take care of moving the food from start to end. Just feed the slurry into the esophagus, the rest will be taken care by nature.






              share|improve this answer












              The bowels are not straight: they have several U turns in their abdominal deployment.



              If you pull a wire it will tend to straighten up. If the wire is in the bowels, it means some unpleasant stress and almost sure intestinal cuts, unless you place some fixed pulleys.



              Bowel movements take care of moving the food from start to end. Just feed the slurry into the esophagus, the rest will be taken care by nature.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 7 hours ago









              L.Dutch

              76.5k25182373




              76.5k25182373












              • If I just pipe the stuff in there's a real danger of choking. I can't afford expensive monitoring equipment. However if the movement is continuous by keeping the string moving then, even if it doesn't get fully digested, at least there won't be a build-up.
                – chasly from UK
                6 hours ago








              • 3




                Look up "ng tube" or "og tube". Basically, shove a feeding tube through the victim's nose and down into their stomach. Problem solved.
                – elemtilas
                6 hours ago










              • @elemtilas - Okay but I'm still worried about it being fed in at the wrong speed. I want the mechanism to be left unattended so too little and the subject will starve, too much and the food will presumably regurgitate and choke them.
                – chasly from UK
                5 hours ago








              • 1




                @chasly and the kebab mechanism is going to regulate the intake... how, exactly, other than preventing the subject from throwing up by obstructing the passage?
                – John Dvorak
                4 hours ago










              • @John Dvorak - well tbh I'm beginning to think my idea won't work, but the idea was it would be set a little too fast to be digested. That way the subject wouldn't starve and if some kebab exited undigested it could be discarded.
                – chasly from UK
                3 hours ago


















              • If I just pipe the stuff in there's a real danger of choking. I can't afford expensive monitoring equipment. However if the movement is continuous by keeping the string moving then, even if it doesn't get fully digested, at least there won't be a build-up.
                – chasly from UK
                6 hours ago








              • 3




                Look up "ng tube" or "og tube". Basically, shove a feeding tube through the victim's nose and down into their stomach. Problem solved.
                – elemtilas
                6 hours ago










              • @elemtilas - Okay but I'm still worried about it being fed in at the wrong speed. I want the mechanism to be left unattended so too little and the subject will starve, too much and the food will presumably regurgitate and choke them.
                – chasly from UK
                5 hours ago








              • 1




                @chasly and the kebab mechanism is going to regulate the intake... how, exactly, other than preventing the subject from throwing up by obstructing the passage?
                – John Dvorak
                4 hours ago










              • @John Dvorak - well tbh I'm beginning to think my idea won't work, but the idea was it would be set a little too fast to be digested. That way the subject wouldn't starve and if some kebab exited undigested it could be discarded.
                – chasly from UK
                3 hours ago
















              If I just pipe the stuff in there's a real danger of choking. I can't afford expensive monitoring equipment. However if the movement is continuous by keeping the string moving then, even if it doesn't get fully digested, at least there won't be a build-up.
              – chasly from UK
              6 hours ago






              If I just pipe the stuff in there's a real danger of choking. I can't afford expensive monitoring equipment. However if the movement is continuous by keeping the string moving then, even if it doesn't get fully digested, at least there won't be a build-up.
              – chasly from UK
              6 hours ago






              3




              3




              Look up "ng tube" or "og tube". Basically, shove a feeding tube through the victim's nose and down into their stomach. Problem solved.
              – elemtilas
              6 hours ago




              Look up "ng tube" or "og tube". Basically, shove a feeding tube through the victim's nose and down into their stomach. Problem solved.
              – elemtilas
              6 hours ago












              @elemtilas - Okay but I'm still worried about it being fed in at the wrong speed. I want the mechanism to be left unattended so too little and the subject will starve, too much and the food will presumably regurgitate and choke them.
              – chasly from UK
              5 hours ago






              @elemtilas - Okay but I'm still worried about it being fed in at the wrong speed. I want the mechanism to be left unattended so too little and the subject will starve, too much and the food will presumably regurgitate and choke them.
              – chasly from UK
              5 hours ago






              1




              1




              @chasly and the kebab mechanism is going to regulate the intake... how, exactly, other than preventing the subject from throwing up by obstructing the passage?
              – John Dvorak
              4 hours ago




              @chasly and the kebab mechanism is going to regulate the intake... how, exactly, other than preventing the subject from throwing up by obstructing the passage?
              – John Dvorak
              4 hours ago












              @John Dvorak - well tbh I'm beginning to think my idea won't work, but the idea was it would be set a little too fast to be digested. That way the subject wouldn't starve and if some kebab exited undigested it could be discarded.
              – chasly from UK
              3 hours ago




              @John Dvorak - well tbh I'm beginning to think my idea won't work, but the idea was it would be set a little too fast to be digested. That way the subject wouldn't starve and if some kebab exited undigested it could be discarded.
              – chasly from UK
              3 hours ago











              6














              There are all kinds of ugly here.




              • If your string isn't digestable (or digestable in the time allotted for pulling the kebab through the body), it will decay, leading to bacteria and infection and a whole lot of ugly.


              • One assumes the body wants to breathe, but a kebab being pulled through the body pretty much guarantees that breathing either won't occur or that fluid will enter the lungs. Fluid in the lungs is a whole lot of ugly. Not breathing is a whole lot more ugly.


              • Metabolism is neither uniform nor linear. Part of the process of digestion is to store energy, not simply convert it. In other words, the body will expect the kebab to periodically stop moving. If it stops moving while food is still in the esophagus, the gag reflex will be invoked and the body will choke. As you can imagine, choking is a whole lot of ugly.


              • And heaven help you if your matrix personality decided to start a religious fast. Oh, yeah. A whole lota ugly.


              • I'm going to ignore the fact that the string is passing through orifaces that are expected to open and close at specific times, allowing the potential for material to pass when and where it shouldn't. I'm doing so because I can believe that despite being uncomfortable (and probably leading itself to gagging, see above), the body's fluids would likely keep the orifices sealed even with the string passing through. But, it would look ugly, so there's a whole lotta ugly here, too.


              • Finally, I upvoted L.Dutch's answer (and you should, too) because the nature of a string is to be pulled straight and there's enough squishy in the body that it would try really hard to do so. Add to that the fact that a moving string (or wire or anything else) has the inconvenient nature of cutting through things and the amount of ugly just went off the chart.



              I don't see the use of an endless kebab as practical. It would be more believable to have the body enter a semi-concious state associated with the act of eating in the Matrix and have it ingest the proverbial protein cubes while the mind believes it's enjoying a juicy steak.






              share|improve this answer


























                6














                There are all kinds of ugly here.




                • If your string isn't digestable (or digestable in the time allotted for pulling the kebab through the body), it will decay, leading to bacteria and infection and a whole lot of ugly.


                • One assumes the body wants to breathe, but a kebab being pulled through the body pretty much guarantees that breathing either won't occur or that fluid will enter the lungs. Fluid in the lungs is a whole lot of ugly. Not breathing is a whole lot more ugly.


                • Metabolism is neither uniform nor linear. Part of the process of digestion is to store energy, not simply convert it. In other words, the body will expect the kebab to periodically stop moving. If it stops moving while food is still in the esophagus, the gag reflex will be invoked and the body will choke. As you can imagine, choking is a whole lot of ugly.


                • And heaven help you if your matrix personality decided to start a religious fast. Oh, yeah. A whole lota ugly.


                • I'm going to ignore the fact that the string is passing through orifaces that are expected to open and close at specific times, allowing the potential for material to pass when and where it shouldn't. I'm doing so because I can believe that despite being uncomfortable (and probably leading itself to gagging, see above), the body's fluids would likely keep the orifices sealed even with the string passing through. But, it would look ugly, so there's a whole lotta ugly here, too.


                • Finally, I upvoted L.Dutch's answer (and you should, too) because the nature of a string is to be pulled straight and there's enough squishy in the body that it would try really hard to do so. Add to that the fact that a moving string (or wire or anything else) has the inconvenient nature of cutting through things and the amount of ugly just went off the chart.



                I don't see the use of an endless kebab as practical. It would be more believable to have the body enter a semi-concious state associated with the act of eating in the Matrix and have it ingest the proverbial protein cubes while the mind believes it's enjoying a juicy steak.






                share|improve this answer
























                  6












                  6








                  6






                  There are all kinds of ugly here.




                  • If your string isn't digestable (or digestable in the time allotted for pulling the kebab through the body), it will decay, leading to bacteria and infection and a whole lot of ugly.


                  • One assumes the body wants to breathe, but a kebab being pulled through the body pretty much guarantees that breathing either won't occur or that fluid will enter the lungs. Fluid in the lungs is a whole lot of ugly. Not breathing is a whole lot more ugly.


                  • Metabolism is neither uniform nor linear. Part of the process of digestion is to store energy, not simply convert it. In other words, the body will expect the kebab to periodically stop moving. If it stops moving while food is still in the esophagus, the gag reflex will be invoked and the body will choke. As you can imagine, choking is a whole lot of ugly.


                  • And heaven help you if your matrix personality decided to start a religious fast. Oh, yeah. A whole lota ugly.


                  • I'm going to ignore the fact that the string is passing through orifaces that are expected to open and close at specific times, allowing the potential for material to pass when and where it shouldn't. I'm doing so because I can believe that despite being uncomfortable (and probably leading itself to gagging, see above), the body's fluids would likely keep the orifices sealed even with the string passing through. But, it would look ugly, so there's a whole lotta ugly here, too.


                  • Finally, I upvoted L.Dutch's answer (and you should, too) because the nature of a string is to be pulled straight and there's enough squishy in the body that it would try really hard to do so. Add to that the fact that a moving string (or wire or anything else) has the inconvenient nature of cutting through things and the amount of ugly just went off the chart.



                  I don't see the use of an endless kebab as practical. It would be more believable to have the body enter a semi-concious state associated with the act of eating in the Matrix and have it ingest the proverbial protein cubes while the mind believes it's enjoying a juicy steak.






                  share|improve this answer












                  There are all kinds of ugly here.




                  • If your string isn't digestable (or digestable in the time allotted for pulling the kebab through the body), it will decay, leading to bacteria and infection and a whole lot of ugly.


                  • One assumes the body wants to breathe, but a kebab being pulled through the body pretty much guarantees that breathing either won't occur or that fluid will enter the lungs. Fluid in the lungs is a whole lot of ugly. Not breathing is a whole lot more ugly.


                  • Metabolism is neither uniform nor linear. Part of the process of digestion is to store energy, not simply convert it. In other words, the body will expect the kebab to periodically stop moving. If it stops moving while food is still in the esophagus, the gag reflex will be invoked and the body will choke. As you can imagine, choking is a whole lot of ugly.


                  • And heaven help you if your matrix personality decided to start a religious fast. Oh, yeah. A whole lota ugly.


                  • I'm going to ignore the fact that the string is passing through orifaces that are expected to open and close at specific times, allowing the potential for material to pass when and where it shouldn't. I'm doing so because I can believe that despite being uncomfortable (and probably leading itself to gagging, see above), the body's fluids would likely keep the orifices sealed even with the string passing through. But, it would look ugly, so there's a whole lotta ugly here, too.


                  • Finally, I upvoted L.Dutch's answer (and you should, too) because the nature of a string is to be pulled straight and there's enough squishy in the body that it would try really hard to do so. Add to that the fact that a moving string (or wire or anything else) has the inconvenient nature of cutting through things and the amount of ugly just went off the chart.



                  I don't see the use of an endless kebab as practical. It would be more believable to have the body enter a semi-concious state associated with the act of eating in the Matrix and have it ingest the proverbial protein cubes while the mind believes it's enjoying a juicy steak.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  JBH

                  39.5k588190




                  39.5k588190























                      3














                      Try to swallow and breathe at the same time and you will see where the problem is. The people would at least all need a tracheostomy, so you can basically put a lid on the wind pipe so food and saliva cannot get into the lungs (this is not something theoretical, I am currently sitting next to my wife who lives with exactly that arrangement ever since a doctor screwed up during surgery).



                      Unless you are writing a satirical or humorous novel you should probably not invent stupid and/or grotesque solutions for problems that have practical solutions in the real world (but then I don't know what you are writing, and that kind of detail certainly sets a certain tone).






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • I'm certainly not trying to make fun of any individual. My mother died of bowel cancer and had a colostomy bag for quite a while. I just found myself wondering about the practical implications of the science-fiction cliché of people in suspended animation. Incidentally I have health problems myself and I'd rather laugh about them than get depressed! Better a single than a double whammy.
                        – chasly from UK
                        1 hour ago










                      • I am not offended, even if I may have sounded like it. I just don't think this is a very practical idea.
                        – Eike Pierstorff
                        1 hour ago
















                      3














                      Try to swallow and breathe at the same time and you will see where the problem is. The people would at least all need a tracheostomy, so you can basically put a lid on the wind pipe so food and saliva cannot get into the lungs (this is not something theoretical, I am currently sitting next to my wife who lives with exactly that arrangement ever since a doctor screwed up during surgery).



                      Unless you are writing a satirical or humorous novel you should probably not invent stupid and/or grotesque solutions for problems that have practical solutions in the real world (but then I don't know what you are writing, and that kind of detail certainly sets a certain tone).






                      share|improve this answer





















                      • I'm certainly not trying to make fun of any individual. My mother died of bowel cancer and had a colostomy bag for quite a while. I just found myself wondering about the practical implications of the science-fiction cliché of people in suspended animation. Incidentally I have health problems myself and I'd rather laugh about them than get depressed! Better a single than a double whammy.
                        – chasly from UK
                        1 hour ago










                      • I am not offended, even if I may have sounded like it. I just don't think this is a very practical idea.
                        – Eike Pierstorff
                        1 hour ago














                      3












                      3








                      3






                      Try to swallow and breathe at the same time and you will see where the problem is. The people would at least all need a tracheostomy, so you can basically put a lid on the wind pipe so food and saliva cannot get into the lungs (this is not something theoretical, I am currently sitting next to my wife who lives with exactly that arrangement ever since a doctor screwed up during surgery).



                      Unless you are writing a satirical or humorous novel you should probably not invent stupid and/or grotesque solutions for problems that have practical solutions in the real world (but then I don't know what you are writing, and that kind of detail certainly sets a certain tone).






                      share|improve this answer












                      Try to swallow and breathe at the same time and you will see where the problem is. The people would at least all need a tracheostomy, so you can basically put a lid on the wind pipe so food and saliva cannot get into the lungs (this is not something theoretical, I am currently sitting next to my wife who lives with exactly that arrangement ever since a doctor screwed up during surgery).



                      Unless you are writing a satirical or humorous novel you should probably not invent stupid and/or grotesque solutions for problems that have practical solutions in the real world (but then I don't know what you are writing, and that kind of detail certainly sets a certain tone).







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 2 hours ago









                      Eike Pierstorff

                      36116




                      36116












                      • I'm certainly not trying to make fun of any individual. My mother died of bowel cancer and had a colostomy bag for quite a while. I just found myself wondering about the practical implications of the science-fiction cliché of people in suspended animation. Incidentally I have health problems myself and I'd rather laugh about them than get depressed! Better a single than a double whammy.
                        – chasly from UK
                        1 hour ago










                      • I am not offended, even if I may have sounded like it. I just don't think this is a very practical idea.
                        – Eike Pierstorff
                        1 hour ago


















                      • I'm certainly not trying to make fun of any individual. My mother died of bowel cancer and had a colostomy bag for quite a while. I just found myself wondering about the practical implications of the science-fiction cliché of people in suspended animation. Incidentally I have health problems myself and I'd rather laugh about them than get depressed! Better a single than a double whammy.
                        – chasly from UK
                        1 hour ago










                      • I am not offended, even if I may have sounded like it. I just don't think this is a very practical idea.
                        – Eike Pierstorff
                        1 hour ago
















                      I'm certainly not trying to make fun of any individual. My mother died of bowel cancer and had a colostomy bag for quite a while. I just found myself wondering about the practical implications of the science-fiction cliché of people in suspended animation. Incidentally I have health problems myself and I'd rather laugh about them than get depressed! Better a single than a double whammy.
                      – chasly from UK
                      1 hour ago




                      I'm certainly not trying to make fun of any individual. My mother died of bowel cancer and had a colostomy bag for quite a while. I just found myself wondering about the practical implications of the science-fiction cliché of people in suspended animation. Incidentally I have health problems myself and I'd rather laugh about them than get depressed! Better a single than a double whammy.
                      – chasly from UK
                      1 hour ago












                      I am not offended, even if I may have sounded like it. I just don't think this is a very practical idea.
                      – Eike Pierstorff
                      1 hour ago




                      I am not offended, even if I may have sounded like it. I just don't think this is a very practical idea.
                      – Eike Pierstorff
                      1 hour ago











                      0














                      Why don’t you just run a tube down to the stomach? Waste is processed automatically by the body as usual, and the tubes can be removed, disinfected, and reinserted during a normal daily maintenance procedure that needs to be done anyway to keep the body from getting sores, etc.






                      share|improve this answer


























                        0














                        Why don’t you just run a tube down to the stomach? Waste is processed automatically by the body as usual, and the tubes can be removed, disinfected, and reinserted during a normal daily maintenance procedure that needs to be done anyway to keep the body from getting sores, etc.






                        share|improve this answer
























                          0












                          0








                          0






                          Why don’t you just run a tube down to the stomach? Waste is processed automatically by the body as usual, and the tubes can be removed, disinfected, and reinserted during a normal daily maintenance procedure that needs to be done anyway to keep the body from getting sores, etc.






                          share|improve this answer












                          Why don’t you just run a tube down to the stomach? Waste is processed automatically by the body as usual, and the tubes can be removed, disinfected, and reinserted during a normal daily maintenance procedure that needs to be done anyway to keep the body from getting sores, etc.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 3 hours ago









                          Rodrigo A. Pérez

                          53527




                          53527






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135194%2fnever-ending-string-kebab-for-a-dystopian-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Morgemoulin

                              Scott Moir

                              Souastre