Are there any states which never had any appointed Senators?












8














In most states, the governor is able to appoint Senators on a temporary basis.



Senator Jon Kyl's appointment was the first in Arizona. Are there any states where no Senators have ever been appointed?










share|improve this question





























    8














    In most states, the governor is able to appoint Senators on a temporary basis.



    Senator Jon Kyl's appointment was the first in Arizona. Are there any states where no Senators have ever been appointed?










    share|improve this question



























      8












      8








      8







      In most states, the governor is able to appoint Senators on a temporary basis.



      Senator Jon Kyl's appointment was the first in Arizona. Are there any states where no Senators have ever been appointed?










      share|improve this question















      In most states, the governor is able to appoint Senators on a temporary basis.



      Senator Jon Kyl's appointment was the first in Arizona. Are there any states where no Senators have ever been appointed?







      united-states senate political-appointments






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 16 at 11:38









      Alexei

      15.1k1784161




      15.1k1784161










      asked Dec 16 at 10:03









      user24076

      412




      412






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          11














          Yes, according to the Senate Historical Office's list of appointed Senators since 19131. The following three states never had any appointed Senators since 1913:




          • Maryland

          • Utah

          • Wisconsin


          1913 is the year in which the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. It established means of filling vacant Senate seats and the direct election of senators.



          Furthermore, the following state legislatures currently do not empower the governor to appoint Senators:




          • North Dakota

          • Oklahoma

          • Oregon

          • Rhode Island

          • Wisconsin


          North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Rhode Island had appointed Senators before the respective state legislatures changed their laws and prevented the governors from appointing Senators on a temporary basis.



          So, there won't be any appointed Senators from Wisconsin for some time.





          1 The Senate Historical Office does not keep records of appointed Senators before 1913. See https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44781.pdf, page 13, "Senate Historical Office maintains records for Senators appointed since 1913"






          share|improve this answer























          • What process do those states have for filing vacancies then? Seems kind of odd that a state would vote to reduce its own suffrage in the Senate if one of their own leaves office for whatever reason.
            – Wes Sayeed
            Dec 16 at 22:44










          • @WesSayeed Those 5 states are a subset of the 14 states in which a special election is held to fill the vacancy. The position remains vacant in those 5 until the special election, typically in 30-90 days. For the other 9 states, the governor appoints a temporary senator until the special election. See this list. The idea is the senator is only selected through vote, never by appointment.
            – user71659
            Dec 17 at 0:21













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "475"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37154%2fare-there-any-states-which-never-had-any-appointed-senators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          11














          Yes, according to the Senate Historical Office's list of appointed Senators since 19131. The following three states never had any appointed Senators since 1913:




          • Maryland

          • Utah

          • Wisconsin


          1913 is the year in which the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. It established means of filling vacant Senate seats and the direct election of senators.



          Furthermore, the following state legislatures currently do not empower the governor to appoint Senators:




          • North Dakota

          • Oklahoma

          • Oregon

          • Rhode Island

          • Wisconsin


          North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Rhode Island had appointed Senators before the respective state legislatures changed their laws and prevented the governors from appointing Senators on a temporary basis.



          So, there won't be any appointed Senators from Wisconsin for some time.





          1 The Senate Historical Office does not keep records of appointed Senators before 1913. See https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44781.pdf, page 13, "Senate Historical Office maintains records for Senators appointed since 1913"






          share|improve this answer























          • What process do those states have for filing vacancies then? Seems kind of odd that a state would vote to reduce its own suffrage in the Senate if one of their own leaves office for whatever reason.
            – Wes Sayeed
            Dec 16 at 22:44










          • @WesSayeed Those 5 states are a subset of the 14 states in which a special election is held to fill the vacancy. The position remains vacant in those 5 until the special election, typically in 30-90 days. For the other 9 states, the governor appoints a temporary senator until the special election. See this list. The idea is the senator is only selected through vote, never by appointment.
            – user71659
            Dec 17 at 0:21


















          11














          Yes, according to the Senate Historical Office's list of appointed Senators since 19131. The following three states never had any appointed Senators since 1913:




          • Maryland

          • Utah

          • Wisconsin


          1913 is the year in which the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. It established means of filling vacant Senate seats and the direct election of senators.



          Furthermore, the following state legislatures currently do not empower the governor to appoint Senators:




          • North Dakota

          • Oklahoma

          • Oregon

          • Rhode Island

          • Wisconsin


          North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Rhode Island had appointed Senators before the respective state legislatures changed their laws and prevented the governors from appointing Senators on a temporary basis.



          So, there won't be any appointed Senators from Wisconsin for some time.





          1 The Senate Historical Office does not keep records of appointed Senators before 1913. See https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44781.pdf, page 13, "Senate Historical Office maintains records for Senators appointed since 1913"






          share|improve this answer























          • What process do those states have for filing vacancies then? Seems kind of odd that a state would vote to reduce its own suffrage in the Senate if one of their own leaves office for whatever reason.
            – Wes Sayeed
            Dec 16 at 22:44










          • @WesSayeed Those 5 states are a subset of the 14 states in which a special election is held to fill the vacancy. The position remains vacant in those 5 until the special election, typically in 30-90 days. For the other 9 states, the governor appoints a temporary senator until the special election. See this list. The idea is the senator is only selected through vote, never by appointment.
            – user71659
            Dec 17 at 0:21
















          11












          11








          11






          Yes, according to the Senate Historical Office's list of appointed Senators since 19131. The following three states never had any appointed Senators since 1913:




          • Maryland

          • Utah

          • Wisconsin


          1913 is the year in which the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. It established means of filling vacant Senate seats and the direct election of senators.



          Furthermore, the following state legislatures currently do not empower the governor to appoint Senators:




          • North Dakota

          • Oklahoma

          • Oregon

          • Rhode Island

          • Wisconsin


          North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Rhode Island had appointed Senators before the respective state legislatures changed their laws and prevented the governors from appointing Senators on a temporary basis.



          So, there won't be any appointed Senators from Wisconsin for some time.





          1 The Senate Historical Office does not keep records of appointed Senators before 1913. See https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44781.pdf, page 13, "Senate Historical Office maintains records for Senators appointed since 1913"






          share|improve this answer














          Yes, according to the Senate Historical Office's list of appointed Senators since 19131. The following three states never had any appointed Senators since 1913:




          • Maryland

          • Utah

          • Wisconsin


          1913 is the year in which the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. It established means of filling vacant Senate seats and the direct election of senators.



          Furthermore, the following state legislatures currently do not empower the governor to appoint Senators:




          • North Dakota

          • Oklahoma

          • Oregon

          • Rhode Island

          • Wisconsin


          North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Rhode Island had appointed Senators before the respective state legislatures changed their laws and prevented the governors from appointing Senators on a temporary basis.



          So, there won't be any appointed Senators from Wisconsin for some time.





          1 The Senate Historical Office does not keep records of appointed Senators before 1913. See https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44781.pdf, page 13, "Senate Historical Office maintains records for Senators appointed since 1913"







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 16 at 11:44

























          answered Dec 16 at 10:11









          Panda

          28.2k7100153




          28.2k7100153












          • What process do those states have for filing vacancies then? Seems kind of odd that a state would vote to reduce its own suffrage in the Senate if one of their own leaves office for whatever reason.
            – Wes Sayeed
            Dec 16 at 22:44










          • @WesSayeed Those 5 states are a subset of the 14 states in which a special election is held to fill the vacancy. The position remains vacant in those 5 until the special election, typically in 30-90 days. For the other 9 states, the governor appoints a temporary senator until the special election. See this list. The idea is the senator is only selected through vote, never by appointment.
            – user71659
            Dec 17 at 0:21




















          • What process do those states have for filing vacancies then? Seems kind of odd that a state would vote to reduce its own suffrage in the Senate if one of their own leaves office for whatever reason.
            – Wes Sayeed
            Dec 16 at 22:44










          • @WesSayeed Those 5 states are a subset of the 14 states in which a special election is held to fill the vacancy. The position remains vacant in those 5 until the special election, typically in 30-90 days. For the other 9 states, the governor appoints a temporary senator until the special election. See this list. The idea is the senator is only selected through vote, never by appointment.
            – user71659
            Dec 17 at 0:21


















          What process do those states have for filing vacancies then? Seems kind of odd that a state would vote to reduce its own suffrage in the Senate if one of their own leaves office for whatever reason.
          – Wes Sayeed
          Dec 16 at 22:44




          What process do those states have for filing vacancies then? Seems kind of odd that a state would vote to reduce its own suffrage in the Senate if one of their own leaves office for whatever reason.
          – Wes Sayeed
          Dec 16 at 22:44












          @WesSayeed Those 5 states are a subset of the 14 states in which a special election is held to fill the vacancy. The position remains vacant in those 5 until the special election, typically in 30-90 days. For the other 9 states, the governor appoints a temporary senator until the special election. See this list. The idea is the senator is only selected through vote, never by appointment.
          – user71659
          Dec 17 at 0:21






          @WesSayeed Those 5 states are a subset of the 14 states in which a special election is held to fill the vacancy. The position remains vacant in those 5 until the special election, typically in 30-90 days. For the other 9 states, the governor appoints a temporary senator until the special election. See this list. The idea is the senator is only selected through vote, never by appointment.
          – user71659
          Dec 17 at 0:21




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37154%2fare-there-any-states-which-never-had-any-appointed-senators%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Morgemoulin

          Scott Moir

          Souastre