SCP works, but SSH doesn't (over wifi)
When I'm using wifi at my office, I'm able to copy files to and from my server using SCP, but for some reason SSH is non-responsive. It just hangs, doesn't print anything, and I can't ctrl-c
to end it; I have to close the terminal window.
When I'm plugged in on the LAN, everything works fine. Any ideas how to figure out what's going on?
linux ssh scp wifi
add a comment |
When I'm using wifi at my office, I'm able to copy files to and from my server using SCP, but for some reason SSH is non-responsive. It just hangs, doesn't print anything, and I can't ctrl-c
to end it; I have to close the terminal window.
When I'm plugged in on the LAN, everything works fine. Any ideas how to figure out what's going on?
linux ssh scp wifi
1
If it helps, here is the output from myssh -vv
(IP addresses and keys redacted): pastie.org/2723594
– Dave
Oct 19 '11 at 12:37
3
Compare the IPs you get when you connect via WiFi vs wire. Are they from the same subnet? If not, confront this with/etc/ssh/sshd_config
on the SSH server.
– rozcietrzewiacz
Oct 19 '11 at 14:27
1
How does it look like on the server-side?$(which sshd) -d
– Nils
Oct 19 '11 at 18:42
Thanks, this helped diagnose the problem, but it seems to have been with the PTY allocation, and not an IP address issue. (See my response below.)
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:31
add a comment |
When I'm using wifi at my office, I'm able to copy files to and from my server using SCP, but for some reason SSH is non-responsive. It just hangs, doesn't print anything, and I can't ctrl-c
to end it; I have to close the terminal window.
When I'm plugged in on the LAN, everything works fine. Any ideas how to figure out what's going on?
linux ssh scp wifi
When I'm using wifi at my office, I'm able to copy files to and from my server using SCP, but for some reason SSH is non-responsive. It just hangs, doesn't print anything, and I can't ctrl-c
to end it; I have to close the terminal window.
When I'm plugged in on the LAN, everything works fine. Any ideas how to figure out what's going on?
linux ssh scp wifi
linux ssh scp wifi
edited Dec 20 '18 at 0:23
Rui F Ribeiro
39k1479130
39k1479130
asked Oct 19 '11 at 12:25
Dave
17117
17117
1
If it helps, here is the output from myssh -vv
(IP addresses and keys redacted): pastie.org/2723594
– Dave
Oct 19 '11 at 12:37
3
Compare the IPs you get when you connect via WiFi vs wire. Are they from the same subnet? If not, confront this with/etc/ssh/sshd_config
on the SSH server.
– rozcietrzewiacz
Oct 19 '11 at 14:27
1
How does it look like on the server-side?$(which sshd) -d
– Nils
Oct 19 '11 at 18:42
Thanks, this helped diagnose the problem, but it seems to have been with the PTY allocation, and not an IP address issue. (See my response below.)
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:31
add a comment |
1
If it helps, here is the output from myssh -vv
(IP addresses and keys redacted): pastie.org/2723594
– Dave
Oct 19 '11 at 12:37
3
Compare the IPs you get when you connect via WiFi vs wire. Are they from the same subnet? If not, confront this with/etc/ssh/sshd_config
on the SSH server.
– rozcietrzewiacz
Oct 19 '11 at 14:27
1
How does it look like on the server-side?$(which sshd) -d
– Nils
Oct 19 '11 at 18:42
Thanks, this helped diagnose the problem, but it seems to have been with the PTY allocation, and not an IP address issue. (See my response below.)
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:31
1
1
If it helps, here is the output from my
ssh -vv
(IP addresses and keys redacted): pastie.org/2723594– Dave
Oct 19 '11 at 12:37
If it helps, here is the output from my
ssh -vv
(IP addresses and keys redacted): pastie.org/2723594– Dave
Oct 19 '11 at 12:37
3
3
Compare the IPs you get when you connect via WiFi vs wire. Are they from the same subnet? If not, confront this with
/etc/ssh/sshd_config
on the SSH server.– rozcietrzewiacz
Oct 19 '11 at 14:27
Compare the IPs you get when you connect via WiFi vs wire. Are they from the same subnet? If not, confront this with
/etc/ssh/sshd_config
on the SSH server.– rozcietrzewiacz
Oct 19 '11 at 14:27
1
1
How does it look like on the server-side?
$(which sshd) -d
– Nils
Oct 19 '11 at 18:42
How does it look like on the server-side?
$(which sshd) -d
– Nils
Oct 19 '11 at 18:42
Thanks, this helped diagnose the problem, but it seems to have been with the PTY allocation, and not an IP address issue. (See my response below.)
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:31
Thanks, this helped diagnose the problem, but it seems to have been with the PTY allocation, and not an IP address issue. (See my response below.)
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:31
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I finally found what was causing the issue. This was due to my router blocking TCP keepalive messages when I connected wirelessly (go figure).
ssh my_server -o TCPKeepAlive=no
solved all my problems. Yay!
From the documentation:
TCPKeepAlive
Specifies whether the system should send TCP keepalive messages
to the other side. If they are sent, death of the connection or
crash of one of the machines will be properly noticed. However,
this means that connections will die if the route is down tem-
porarily, and some people find it annoying. On the other hand,
if TCP keepalives are not sent, sessions may hang indefinitely on
the server, leaving "ghost" users and consuming server resources.
The default is "yes" (to send TCP keepalive messages), and the
server will notice if the network goes down or the client host
crashes. This avoids infinitely hanging sessions.
To disable TCP keepalive messages, the value should be set to
"no".
add a comment |
From your pastie it is clear that your public key gets accepted. I have a feeling it might have to do with PTY allocation, as I do not see this in your -vv:
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
Could you make 2 outputs from wired + wireless and diff
them?
Sorry for the delayed response, been busy with many things. Okay, so it turns out this was exactly the problem. For some reason, SSH doesn't want to allocate a PTY when I connect over the wireless. The solution (workaround) to my problem then it seems is to runssh my_server -T 'bash -i'
which gives me an interactive shell, but doesn't fail on the PTY allocation step.
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
Out of interest, the diff between my logs showed that wireless connection froze at a point, where the wired had the following lines:debug2: channel_input_status_confirm: type 99 id 0
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:30
@Dave did you ever figure the source of this issue out? Having the same thing here, 3 years later!
– Scott
Jun 30 '15 at 20:51
add a comment |
Verify /etc/ssh/sshd_config for server side and /etc/ssh/ssh_config for client side. (don't forget client side)
The only difference between wifi and ethernet are IP addresses.
If you have TX/RX error with wifi, It's can be also a problem. (rarely)
add a comment |
This is 6 years later, but I've been struggling with a problem that seems similar, but that ultimately was not. But I provide this in the hope someone finds it useful.
I could perform scp, but not ssh. Then I realized that I could perform commands over ssh, such as ssh user@server 'ls -l'.
The problem was in the .bashrc: It contained the following lines:
HISTSIZE=-1
HISTFILESIZE=-1
Disabling unlimited history seemed to fix it.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22929%2fscp-works-but-ssh-doesnt-over-wifi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I finally found what was causing the issue. This was due to my router blocking TCP keepalive messages when I connected wirelessly (go figure).
ssh my_server -o TCPKeepAlive=no
solved all my problems. Yay!
From the documentation:
TCPKeepAlive
Specifies whether the system should send TCP keepalive messages
to the other side. If they are sent, death of the connection or
crash of one of the machines will be properly noticed. However,
this means that connections will die if the route is down tem-
porarily, and some people find it annoying. On the other hand,
if TCP keepalives are not sent, sessions may hang indefinitely on
the server, leaving "ghost" users and consuming server resources.
The default is "yes" (to send TCP keepalive messages), and the
server will notice if the network goes down or the client host
crashes. This avoids infinitely hanging sessions.
To disable TCP keepalive messages, the value should be set to
"no".
add a comment |
I finally found what was causing the issue. This was due to my router blocking TCP keepalive messages when I connected wirelessly (go figure).
ssh my_server -o TCPKeepAlive=no
solved all my problems. Yay!
From the documentation:
TCPKeepAlive
Specifies whether the system should send TCP keepalive messages
to the other side. If they are sent, death of the connection or
crash of one of the machines will be properly noticed. However,
this means that connections will die if the route is down tem-
porarily, and some people find it annoying. On the other hand,
if TCP keepalives are not sent, sessions may hang indefinitely on
the server, leaving "ghost" users and consuming server resources.
The default is "yes" (to send TCP keepalive messages), and the
server will notice if the network goes down or the client host
crashes. This avoids infinitely hanging sessions.
To disable TCP keepalive messages, the value should be set to
"no".
add a comment |
I finally found what was causing the issue. This was due to my router blocking TCP keepalive messages when I connected wirelessly (go figure).
ssh my_server -o TCPKeepAlive=no
solved all my problems. Yay!
From the documentation:
TCPKeepAlive
Specifies whether the system should send TCP keepalive messages
to the other side. If they are sent, death of the connection or
crash of one of the machines will be properly noticed. However,
this means that connections will die if the route is down tem-
porarily, and some people find it annoying. On the other hand,
if TCP keepalives are not sent, sessions may hang indefinitely on
the server, leaving "ghost" users and consuming server resources.
The default is "yes" (to send TCP keepalive messages), and the
server will notice if the network goes down or the client host
crashes. This avoids infinitely hanging sessions.
To disable TCP keepalive messages, the value should be set to
"no".
I finally found what was causing the issue. This was due to my router blocking TCP keepalive messages when I connected wirelessly (go figure).
ssh my_server -o TCPKeepAlive=no
solved all my problems. Yay!
From the documentation:
TCPKeepAlive
Specifies whether the system should send TCP keepalive messages
to the other side. If they are sent, death of the connection or
crash of one of the machines will be properly noticed. However,
this means that connections will die if the route is down tem-
porarily, and some people find it annoying. On the other hand,
if TCP keepalives are not sent, sessions may hang indefinitely on
the server, leaving "ghost" users and consuming server resources.
The default is "yes" (to send TCP keepalive messages), and the
server will notice if the network goes down or the client host
crashes. This avoids infinitely hanging sessions.
To disable TCP keepalive messages, the value should be set to
"no".
edited Nov 8 '11 at 13:47
answered Nov 8 '11 at 13:36
Dave
17117
17117
add a comment |
add a comment |
From your pastie it is clear that your public key gets accepted. I have a feeling it might have to do with PTY allocation, as I do not see this in your -vv:
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
Could you make 2 outputs from wired + wireless and diff
them?
Sorry for the delayed response, been busy with many things. Okay, so it turns out this was exactly the problem. For some reason, SSH doesn't want to allocate a PTY when I connect over the wireless. The solution (workaround) to my problem then it seems is to runssh my_server -T 'bash -i'
which gives me an interactive shell, but doesn't fail on the PTY allocation step.
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
Out of interest, the diff between my logs showed that wireless connection froze at a point, where the wired had the following lines:debug2: channel_input_status_confirm: type 99 id 0
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:30
@Dave did you ever figure the source of this issue out? Having the same thing here, 3 years later!
– Scott
Jun 30 '15 at 20:51
add a comment |
From your pastie it is clear that your public key gets accepted. I have a feeling it might have to do with PTY allocation, as I do not see this in your -vv:
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
Could you make 2 outputs from wired + wireless and diff
them?
Sorry for the delayed response, been busy with many things. Okay, so it turns out this was exactly the problem. For some reason, SSH doesn't want to allocate a PTY when I connect over the wireless. The solution (workaround) to my problem then it seems is to runssh my_server -T 'bash -i'
which gives me an interactive shell, but doesn't fail on the PTY allocation step.
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
Out of interest, the diff between my logs showed that wireless connection froze at a point, where the wired had the following lines:debug2: channel_input_status_confirm: type 99 id 0
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:30
@Dave did you ever figure the source of this issue out? Having the same thing here, 3 years later!
– Scott
Jun 30 '15 at 20:51
add a comment |
From your pastie it is clear that your public key gets accepted. I have a feeling it might have to do with PTY allocation, as I do not see this in your -vv:
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
Could you make 2 outputs from wired + wireless and diff
them?
From your pastie it is clear that your public key gets accepted. I have a feeling it might have to do with PTY allocation, as I do not see this in your -vv:
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
Could you make 2 outputs from wired + wireless and diff
them?
answered Oct 19 '11 at 15:42
Ole Tange
12k1451105
12k1451105
Sorry for the delayed response, been busy with many things. Okay, so it turns out this was exactly the problem. For some reason, SSH doesn't want to allocate a PTY when I connect over the wireless. The solution (workaround) to my problem then it seems is to runssh my_server -T 'bash -i'
which gives me an interactive shell, but doesn't fail on the PTY allocation step.
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
Out of interest, the diff between my logs showed that wireless connection froze at a point, where the wired had the following lines:debug2: channel_input_status_confirm: type 99 id 0
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:30
@Dave did you ever figure the source of this issue out? Having the same thing here, 3 years later!
– Scott
Jun 30 '15 at 20:51
add a comment |
Sorry for the delayed response, been busy with many things. Okay, so it turns out this was exactly the problem. For some reason, SSH doesn't want to allocate a PTY when I connect over the wireless. The solution (workaround) to my problem then it seems is to runssh my_server -T 'bash -i'
which gives me an interactive shell, but doesn't fail on the PTY allocation step.
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
Out of interest, the diff between my logs showed that wireless connection froze at a point, where the wired had the following lines:debug2: channel_input_status_confirm: type 99 id 0
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:30
@Dave did you ever figure the source of this issue out? Having the same thing here, 3 years later!
– Scott
Jun 30 '15 at 20:51
Sorry for the delayed response, been busy with many things. Okay, so it turns out this was exactly the problem. For some reason, SSH doesn't want to allocate a PTY when I connect over the wireless. The solution (workaround) to my problem then it seems is to run
ssh my_server -T 'bash -i'
which gives me an interactive shell, but doesn't fail on the PTY allocation step.– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
Sorry for the delayed response, been busy with many things. Okay, so it turns out this was exactly the problem. For some reason, SSH doesn't want to allocate a PTY when I connect over the wireless. The solution (workaround) to my problem then it seems is to run
ssh my_server -T 'bash -i'
which gives me an interactive shell, but doesn't fail on the PTY allocation step.– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:28
Out of interest, the diff between my logs showed that wireless connection froze at a point, where the wired had the following lines:
debug2: channel_input_status_confirm: type 99 id 0
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:30
Out of interest, the diff between my logs showed that wireless connection froze at a point, where the wired had the following lines:
debug2: channel_input_status_confirm: type 99 id 0
debug2: PTY allocation request accepted on channel 0
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:30
@Dave did you ever figure the source of this issue out? Having the same thing here, 3 years later!
– Scott
Jun 30 '15 at 20:51
@Dave did you ever figure the source of this issue out? Having the same thing here, 3 years later!
– Scott
Jun 30 '15 at 20:51
add a comment |
Verify /etc/ssh/sshd_config for server side and /etc/ssh/ssh_config for client side. (don't forget client side)
The only difference between wifi and ethernet are IP addresses.
If you have TX/RX error with wifi, It's can be also a problem. (rarely)
add a comment |
Verify /etc/ssh/sshd_config for server side and /etc/ssh/ssh_config for client side. (don't forget client side)
The only difference between wifi and ethernet are IP addresses.
If you have TX/RX error with wifi, It's can be also a problem. (rarely)
add a comment |
Verify /etc/ssh/sshd_config for server side and /etc/ssh/ssh_config for client side. (don't forget client side)
The only difference between wifi and ethernet are IP addresses.
If you have TX/RX error with wifi, It's can be also a problem. (rarely)
Verify /etc/ssh/sshd_config for server side and /etc/ssh/ssh_config for client side. (don't forget client side)
The only difference between wifi and ethernet are IP addresses.
If you have TX/RX error with wifi, It's can be also a problem. (rarely)
answered Oct 19 '11 at 19:37
boup
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
This is 6 years later, but I've been struggling with a problem that seems similar, but that ultimately was not. But I provide this in the hope someone finds it useful.
I could perform scp, but not ssh. Then I realized that I could perform commands over ssh, such as ssh user@server 'ls -l'.
The problem was in the .bashrc: It contained the following lines:
HISTSIZE=-1
HISTFILESIZE=-1
Disabling unlimited history seemed to fix it.
add a comment |
This is 6 years later, but I've been struggling with a problem that seems similar, but that ultimately was not. But I provide this in the hope someone finds it useful.
I could perform scp, but not ssh. Then I realized that I could perform commands over ssh, such as ssh user@server 'ls -l'.
The problem was in the .bashrc: It contained the following lines:
HISTSIZE=-1
HISTFILESIZE=-1
Disabling unlimited history seemed to fix it.
add a comment |
This is 6 years later, but I've been struggling with a problem that seems similar, but that ultimately was not. But I provide this in the hope someone finds it useful.
I could perform scp, but not ssh. Then I realized that I could perform commands over ssh, such as ssh user@server 'ls -l'.
The problem was in the .bashrc: It contained the following lines:
HISTSIZE=-1
HISTFILESIZE=-1
Disabling unlimited history seemed to fix it.
This is 6 years later, but I've been struggling with a problem that seems similar, but that ultimately was not. But I provide this in the hope someone finds it useful.
I could perform scp, but not ssh. Then I realized that I could perform commands over ssh, such as ssh user@server 'ls -l'.
The problem was in the .bashrc: It contained the following lines:
HISTSIZE=-1
HISTFILESIZE=-1
Disabling unlimited history seemed to fix it.
answered May 19 '17 at 16:48
Toon
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22929%2fscp-works-but-ssh-doesnt-over-wifi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
If it helps, here is the output from my
ssh -vv
(IP addresses and keys redacted): pastie.org/2723594– Dave
Oct 19 '11 at 12:37
3
Compare the IPs you get when you connect via WiFi vs wire. Are they from the same subnet? If not, confront this with
/etc/ssh/sshd_config
on the SSH server.– rozcietrzewiacz
Oct 19 '11 at 14:27
1
How does it look like on the server-side?
$(which sshd) -d
– Nils
Oct 19 '11 at 18:42
Thanks, this helped diagnose the problem, but it seems to have been with the PTY allocation, and not an IP address issue. (See my response below.)
– Dave
Nov 2 '11 at 15:31