This sentence is weird. I do not know what it means. Please help me elaborate it [on hold]
I was reading a short story and this sentence came in. I found it weird in grammar and do not understand it.
"There was once a woman who was very, very cheerful, though she had little to make her so; for she was old, and poor, and lonely"
"She had little to make her so"→ why is there not "a noun" after "little" and what does the "so" word mean in this text?
"For she was old, and poor, and lonely" → is the "for" word equal as "because" in this text?
Thank you!!!!
sentence-structure
put on hold as off-topic by tchrist♦ 11 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I was reading a short story and this sentence came in. I found it weird in grammar and do not understand it.
"There was once a woman who was very, very cheerful, though she had little to make her so; for she was old, and poor, and lonely"
"She had little to make her so"→ why is there not "a noun" after "little" and what does the "so" word mean in this text?
"For she was old, and poor, and lonely" → is the "for" word equal as "because" in this text?
Thank you!!!!
sentence-structure
put on hold as off-topic by tchrist♦ 11 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
She did not have much to be cheerful about. 'So' refers to the previous description of her. Yes, 'for' means 'because' here.
– Kate Bunting
12 hours ago
Thank you so much . It is clearly now after reading your answer
– Tam
12 hours ago
Personally, I would have replaced the semicolon with another comma, omitted the for after it, or replaced the semicolon with a colon and omitted the for after it.
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
add a comment |
I was reading a short story and this sentence came in. I found it weird in grammar and do not understand it.
"There was once a woman who was very, very cheerful, though she had little to make her so; for she was old, and poor, and lonely"
"She had little to make her so"→ why is there not "a noun" after "little" and what does the "so" word mean in this text?
"For she was old, and poor, and lonely" → is the "for" word equal as "because" in this text?
Thank you!!!!
sentence-structure
I was reading a short story and this sentence came in. I found it weird in grammar and do not understand it.
"There was once a woman who was very, very cheerful, though she had little to make her so; for she was old, and poor, and lonely"
"She had little to make her so"→ why is there not "a noun" after "little" and what does the "so" word mean in this text?
"For she was old, and poor, and lonely" → is the "for" word equal as "because" in this text?
Thank you!!!!
sentence-structure
sentence-structure
asked 13 hours ago
Tam
111
111
put on hold as off-topic by tchrist♦ 11 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by tchrist♦ 11 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
She did not have much to be cheerful about. 'So' refers to the previous description of her. Yes, 'for' means 'because' here.
– Kate Bunting
12 hours ago
Thank you so much . It is clearly now after reading your answer
– Tam
12 hours ago
Personally, I would have replaced the semicolon with another comma, omitted the for after it, or replaced the semicolon with a colon and omitted the for after it.
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
add a comment |
1
She did not have much to be cheerful about. 'So' refers to the previous description of her. Yes, 'for' means 'because' here.
– Kate Bunting
12 hours ago
Thank you so much . It is clearly now after reading your answer
– Tam
12 hours ago
Personally, I would have replaced the semicolon with another comma, omitted the for after it, or replaced the semicolon with a colon and omitted the for after it.
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
1
1
She did not have much to be cheerful about. 'So' refers to the previous description of her. Yes, 'for' means 'because' here.
– Kate Bunting
12 hours ago
She did not have much to be cheerful about. 'So' refers to the previous description of her. Yes, 'for' means 'because' here.
– Kate Bunting
12 hours ago
Thank you so much . It is clearly now after reading your answer
– Tam
12 hours ago
Thank you so much . It is clearly now after reading your answer
– Tam
12 hours ago
Personally, I would have replaced the semicolon with another comma, omitted the for after it, or replaced the semicolon with a colon and omitted the for after it.
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
Personally, I would have replaced the semicolon with another comma, omitted the for after it, or replaced the semicolon with a colon and omitted the for after it.
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1
She did not have much to be cheerful about. 'So' refers to the previous description of her. Yes, 'for' means 'because' here.
– Kate Bunting
12 hours ago
Thank you so much . It is clearly now after reading your answer
– Tam
12 hours ago
Personally, I would have replaced the semicolon with another comma, omitted the for after it, or replaced the semicolon with a colon and omitted the for after it.
– Jason Bassford
11 hours ago