Awk doesn't exit despite “exit 0” command
I have the following command:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'
From what I understand, awk should find the first line that matches the pattern, print the correct column, and exit. However, this does not always happen: most the time it simply prints the correct column and hangs, although occasionally it exits correctly.
I've tried
$ sudo stdbuf -i0 -o0 -e0 docker logs ... # hangs
$ sudo docker logs ... | cat | awk ... # hangs
In trying to produce a minimal example, I also tried making a pipe using mkfifo
, and using cat foo | awk ...
but that doesn't hang.
The output from docker logs -f <id>
is
Listening on 172.17.0.2/16
...
and then it remains open, but doesn't write any thing else.
I don't understand what's going on--does anyone have any ideas?
awk pipe docker coreutils
add a comment |
I have the following command:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'
From what I understand, awk should find the first line that matches the pattern, print the correct column, and exit. However, this does not always happen: most the time it simply prints the correct column and hangs, although occasionally it exits correctly.
I've tried
$ sudo stdbuf -i0 -o0 -e0 docker logs ... # hangs
$ sudo docker logs ... | cat | awk ... # hangs
In trying to produce a minimal example, I also tried making a pipe using mkfifo
, and using cat foo | awk ...
but that doesn't hang.
The output from docker logs -f <id>
is
Listening on 172.17.0.2/16
...
and then it remains open, but doesn't write any thing else.
I don't understand what's going on--does anyone have any ideas?
awk pipe docker coreutils
Unable to replicate:for i in {10..20}; do echo $i; done | awk '{ exit 0} END { print NR}'
works as apparently intended.
– DopeGhoti
Dec 17 at 22:43
1
Similar: How to print only one match of grep when tail -f? or Grep slow to exit after finding match? or make tail -f exit on a broken pipe. Most likelyawk
exits but your shell is waiting for all processes in the pipeline.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Dec 17 at 22:44
Your output above indicates docker logs is emitting terminal sequences; are you certain that it isn’t when you pipe it to awk? Maybe pipe it into hexdump just to have a peek.
– mevets
Dec 17 at 23:31
@mevets I assume you're referring to the syntax highlighting? StackExchange is doing that, the output is plain text.
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:23
add a comment |
I have the following command:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'
From what I understand, awk should find the first line that matches the pattern, print the correct column, and exit. However, this does not always happen: most the time it simply prints the correct column and hangs, although occasionally it exits correctly.
I've tried
$ sudo stdbuf -i0 -o0 -e0 docker logs ... # hangs
$ sudo docker logs ... | cat | awk ... # hangs
In trying to produce a minimal example, I also tried making a pipe using mkfifo
, and using cat foo | awk ...
but that doesn't hang.
The output from docker logs -f <id>
is
Listening on 172.17.0.2/16
...
and then it remains open, but doesn't write any thing else.
I don't understand what's going on--does anyone have any ideas?
awk pipe docker coreutils
I have the following command:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'
From what I understand, awk should find the first line that matches the pattern, print the correct column, and exit. However, this does not always happen: most the time it simply prints the correct column and hangs, although occasionally it exits correctly.
I've tried
$ sudo stdbuf -i0 -o0 -e0 docker logs ... # hangs
$ sudo docker logs ... | cat | awk ... # hangs
In trying to produce a minimal example, I also tried making a pipe using mkfifo
, and using cat foo | awk ...
but that doesn't hang.
The output from docker logs -f <id>
is
Listening on 172.17.0.2/16
...
and then it remains open, but doesn't write any thing else.
I don't understand what's going on--does anyone have any ideas?
awk pipe docker coreutils
awk pipe docker coreutils
edited Dec 17 at 22:51
Jeff Schaller
38.7k1053125
38.7k1053125
asked Dec 17 at 22:07
user60561
1355
1355
Unable to replicate:for i in {10..20}; do echo $i; done | awk '{ exit 0} END { print NR}'
works as apparently intended.
– DopeGhoti
Dec 17 at 22:43
1
Similar: How to print only one match of grep when tail -f? or Grep slow to exit after finding match? or make tail -f exit on a broken pipe. Most likelyawk
exits but your shell is waiting for all processes in the pipeline.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Dec 17 at 22:44
Your output above indicates docker logs is emitting terminal sequences; are you certain that it isn’t when you pipe it to awk? Maybe pipe it into hexdump just to have a peek.
– mevets
Dec 17 at 23:31
@mevets I assume you're referring to the syntax highlighting? StackExchange is doing that, the output is plain text.
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:23
add a comment |
Unable to replicate:for i in {10..20}; do echo $i; done | awk '{ exit 0} END { print NR}'
works as apparently intended.
– DopeGhoti
Dec 17 at 22:43
1
Similar: How to print only one match of grep when tail -f? or Grep slow to exit after finding match? or make tail -f exit on a broken pipe. Most likelyawk
exits but your shell is waiting for all processes in the pipeline.
– Stéphane Chazelas
Dec 17 at 22:44
Your output above indicates docker logs is emitting terminal sequences; are you certain that it isn’t when you pipe it to awk? Maybe pipe it into hexdump just to have a peek.
– mevets
Dec 17 at 23:31
@mevets I assume you're referring to the syntax highlighting? StackExchange is doing that, the output is plain text.
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:23
Unable to replicate:
for i in {10..20}; do echo $i; done | awk '{ exit 0} END { print NR}'
works as apparently intended.– DopeGhoti
Dec 17 at 22:43
Unable to replicate:
for i in {10..20}; do echo $i; done | awk '{ exit 0} END { print NR}'
works as apparently intended.– DopeGhoti
Dec 17 at 22:43
1
1
Similar: How to print only one match of grep when tail -f? or Grep slow to exit after finding match? or make tail -f exit on a broken pipe. Most likely
awk
exits but your shell is waiting for all processes in the pipeline.– Stéphane Chazelas
Dec 17 at 22:44
Similar: How to print only one match of grep when tail -f? or Grep slow to exit after finding match? or make tail -f exit on a broken pipe. Most likely
awk
exits but your shell is waiting for all processes in the pipeline.– Stéphane Chazelas
Dec 17 at 22:44
Your output above indicates docker logs is emitting terminal sequences; are you certain that it isn’t when you pipe it to awk? Maybe pipe it into hexdump just to have a peek.
– mevets
Dec 17 at 23:31
Your output above indicates docker logs is emitting terminal sequences; are you certain that it isn’t when you pipe it to awk? Maybe pipe it into hexdump just to have a peek.
– mevets
Dec 17 at 23:31
@mevets I assume you're referring to the syntax highlighting? StackExchange is doing that, the output is plain text.
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:23
@mevets I assume you're referring to the syntax highlighting? StackExchange is doing that, the output is plain text.
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:23
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
From man bash
:
The shell waits for all commands in the pipeline to terminate before
returning a value.
I don't have docker installed but maybe try this:
awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}' <( sudo docker logs -f <id> )
Or you could try this:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | (awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'; pkill -P $$ )
So perhaps an explanation of what is going on would help. I'm assuming that the 'docker logs' command does not normally exit (the -f == follow?).
The original problem arises because the pipeline is not exiting on awk's termination - this is because the pipeline is still waiting on the docker program (see my extract above from the bash man page).
The pkill simply kills anything that has parent id $$ - ie at that moment, that is just docker.
Obviously, it would not be a good idea to chuck that command into background with '&' and then run other things - they would also get killed!
Yup, this is exactly it! This behavior is surprising, although not unexpected--the only way it could work otherwise is if bash sent SIGINT or SIGQUIT to the other programs in the pipe, and I've never seen that happen. Thank you!
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489576%2fawk-doesnt-exit-despite-exit-0-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From man bash
:
The shell waits for all commands in the pipeline to terminate before
returning a value.
I don't have docker installed but maybe try this:
awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}' <( sudo docker logs -f <id> )
Or you could try this:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | (awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'; pkill -P $$ )
So perhaps an explanation of what is going on would help. I'm assuming that the 'docker logs' command does not normally exit (the -f == follow?).
The original problem arises because the pipeline is not exiting on awk's termination - this is because the pipeline is still waiting on the docker program (see my extract above from the bash man page).
The pkill simply kills anything that has parent id $$ - ie at that moment, that is just docker.
Obviously, it would not be a good idea to chuck that command into background with '&' and then run other things - they would also get killed!
Yup, this is exactly it! This behavior is surprising, although not unexpected--the only way it could work otherwise is if bash sent SIGINT or SIGQUIT to the other programs in the pipe, and I've never seen that happen. Thank you!
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:25
add a comment |
From man bash
:
The shell waits for all commands in the pipeline to terminate before
returning a value.
I don't have docker installed but maybe try this:
awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}' <( sudo docker logs -f <id> )
Or you could try this:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | (awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'; pkill -P $$ )
So perhaps an explanation of what is going on would help. I'm assuming that the 'docker logs' command does not normally exit (the -f == follow?).
The original problem arises because the pipeline is not exiting on awk's termination - this is because the pipeline is still waiting on the docker program (see my extract above from the bash man page).
The pkill simply kills anything that has parent id $$ - ie at that moment, that is just docker.
Obviously, it would not be a good idea to chuck that command into background with '&' and then run other things - they would also get killed!
Yup, this is exactly it! This behavior is surprising, although not unexpected--the only way it could work otherwise is if bash sent SIGINT or SIGQUIT to the other programs in the pipe, and I've never seen that happen. Thank you!
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:25
add a comment |
From man bash
:
The shell waits for all commands in the pipeline to terminate before
returning a value.
I don't have docker installed but maybe try this:
awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}' <( sudo docker logs -f <id> )
Or you could try this:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | (awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'; pkill -P $$ )
So perhaps an explanation of what is going on would help. I'm assuming that the 'docker logs' command does not normally exit (the -f == follow?).
The original problem arises because the pipeline is not exiting on awk's termination - this is because the pipeline is still waiting on the docker program (see my extract above from the bash man page).
The pkill simply kills anything that has parent id $$ - ie at that moment, that is just docker.
Obviously, it would not be a good idea to chuck that command into background with '&' and then run other things - they would also get killed!
From man bash
:
The shell waits for all commands in the pipeline to terminate before
returning a value.
I don't have docker installed but maybe try this:
awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}' <( sudo docker logs -f <id> )
Or you could try this:
sudo docker logs -f <id> | (awk '/Listening on / {print $3; exit 0;}'; pkill -P $$ )
So perhaps an explanation of what is going on would help. I'm assuming that the 'docker logs' command does not normally exit (the -f == follow?).
The original problem arises because the pipeline is not exiting on awk's termination - this is because the pipeline is still waiting on the docker program (see my extract above from the bash man page).
The pkill simply kills anything that has parent id $$ - ie at that moment, that is just docker.
Obviously, it would not be a good idea to chuck that command into background with '&' and then run other things - they would also get killed!
edited Dec 18 at 1:24
answered Dec 17 at 23:13
wef
913
913
Yup, this is exactly it! This behavior is surprising, although not unexpected--the only way it could work otherwise is if bash sent SIGINT or SIGQUIT to the other programs in the pipe, and I've never seen that happen. Thank you!
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:25
add a comment |
Yup, this is exactly it! This behavior is surprising, although not unexpected--the only way it could work otherwise is if bash sent SIGINT or SIGQUIT to the other programs in the pipe, and I've never seen that happen. Thank you!
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:25
Yup, this is exactly it! This behavior is surprising, although not unexpected--the only way it could work otherwise is if bash sent SIGINT or SIGQUIT to the other programs in the pipe, and I've never seen that happen. Thank you!
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:25
Yup, this is exactly it! This behavior is surprising, although not unexpected--the only way it could work otherwise is if bash sent SIGINT or SIGQUIT to the other programs in the pipe, and I've never seen that happen. Thank you!
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489576%2fawk-doesnt-exit-despite-exit-0-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Unable to replicate:
for i in {10..20}; do echo $i; done | awk '{ exit 0} END { print NR}'
works as apparently intended.– DopeGhoti
Dec 17 at 22:43
1
Similar: How to print only one match of grep when tail -f? or Grep slow to exit after finding match? or make tail -f exit on a broken pipe. Most likely
awk
exits but your shell is waiting for all processes in the pipeline.– Stéphane Chazelas
Dec 17 at 22:44
Your output above indicates docker logs is emitting terminal sequences; are you certain that it isn’t when you pipe it to awk? Maybe pipe it into hexdump just to have a peek.
– mevets
Dec 17 at 23:31
@mevets I assume you're referring to the syntax highlighting? StackExchange is doing that, the output is plain text.
– user60561
Dec 18 at 14:23