Hyphenating “Pulitzer Prize winning” as adjective












0














I'm looking for authority on hyphenating the following phrase with a compound modifier. Which is correct?



She was a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, or
She was a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, or
She was a Pulitzer-Prize-winning reporter



The Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed. at sections 5.92 and 5.93 covers some of this topic, but doesn't seem conclusive on this particular case.






compound-adjectives open-vs-closed-vs-hyhenated







share|improve this question




















  • 1




    What does the free, comprehensive CMOS pdf on hyphen usage say?
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:30










  • Also check 6.80 of the CMOS proper.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:36










  • Please include the research you’ve done. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic
    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 3 at 21:09








  • 1




    I don't have Chicago 17, but Chicago12 through 16 consistently assert that a proper name consisting of two or more words should not be hyphenated internally. Instead, all of those editions advocate using an en dash (not a hyphen) to attach the following word of the compound modifier to the proper name. So in your example, the Chicago-approved form would be Pulitzer Prize–winning (not Pulitzer Prize-winning or Pulitzer-Prize-winning).
    – Sven Yargs
    May 4 at 6:52












  • Thanks Sven. Yes, I see that now at CMOS 17 Section 6.80: "The en dash can be used in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of its elements consists of an open compound or when both elements consist of hyphenated compounds.Whereas a hyphen joins exactly two words, the en dash is intended to signal a link across two. Because this editorial nicety will go unnoticed by the majority of readers it should be used sparingly, when a more elegant solution is unavailable." It's a rule, I guess, but it seems rather arbitrary and unsatisfactory. Thanks for the tip. Also in CMOS 15 at 6.85.
    – jdscomms
    May 4 at 13:40


















0














I'm looking for authority on hyphenating the following phrase with a compound modifier. Which is correct?



She was a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, or
She was a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, or
She was a Pulitzer-Prize-winning reporter



The Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed. at sections 5.92 and 5.93 covers some of this topic, but doesn't seem conclusive on this particular case.






compound-adjectives open-vs-closed-vs-hyhenated







share|improve this question




















  • 1




    What does the free, comprehensive CMOS pdf on hyphen usage say?
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:30










  • Also check 6.80 of the CMOS proper.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:36










  • Please include the research you’ve done. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic
    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 3 at 21:09








  • 1




    I don't have Chicago 17, but Chicago12 through 16 consistently assert that a proper name consisting of two or more words should not be hyphenated internally. Instead, all of those editions advocate using an en dash (not a hyphen) to attach the following word of the compound modifier to the proper name. So in your example, the Chicago-approved form would be Pulitzer Prize–winning (not Pulitzer Prize-winning or Pulitzer-Prize-winning).
    – Sven Yargs
    May 4 at 6:52












  • Thanks Sven. Yes, I see that now at CMOS 17 Section 6.80: "The en dash can be used in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of its elements consists of an open compound or when both elements consist of hyphenated compounds.Whereas a hyphen joins exactly two words, the en dash is intended to signal a link across two. Because this editorial nicety will go unnoticed by the majority of readers it should be used sparingly, when a more elegant solution is unavailable." It's a rule, I guess, but it seems rather arbitrary and unsatisfactory. Thanks for the tip. Also in CMOS 15 at 6.85.
    – jdscomms
    May 4 at 13:40
















0












0








0


1





I'm looking for authority on hyphenating the following phrase with a compound modifier. Which is correct?



She was a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, or
She was a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, or
She was a Pulitzer-Prize-winning reporter



The Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed. at sections 5.92 and 5.93 covers some of this topic, but doesn't seem conclusive on this particular case.






compound-adjectives open-vs-closed-vs-hyhenated







share|improve this question















I'm looking for authority on hyphenating the following phrase with a compound modifier. Which is correct?



She was a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, or
She was a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, or
She was a Pulitzer-Prize-winning reporter



The Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed. at sections 5.92 and 5.93 covers some of this topic, but doesn't seem conclusive on this particular case.






compound-adjectives open-vs-closed-vs-hyhenated




compound-adjectives open-vs-closed-vs-hyhenated






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 17 hours ago









tchrist♦

108k28290463




108k28290463










asked May 2 at 22:49









jdscomms

1925




1925








  • 1




    What does the free, comprehensive CMOS pdf on hyphen usage say?
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:30










  • Also check 6.80 of the CMOS proper.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:36










  • Please include the research you’ve done. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic
    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 3 at 21:09








  • 1




    I don't have Chicago 17, but Chicago12 through 16 consistently assert that a proper name consisting of two or more words should not be hyphenated internally. Instead, all of those editions advocate using an en dash (not a hyphen) to attach the following word of the compound modifier to the proper name. So in your example, the Chicago-approved form would be Pulitzer Prize–winning (not Pulitzer Prize-winning or Pulitzer-Prize-winning).
    – Sven Yargs
    May 4 at 6:52












  • Thanks Sven. Yes, I see that now at CMOS 17 Section 6.80: "The en dash can be used in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of its elements consists of an open compound or when both elements consist of hyphenated compounds.Whereas a hyphen joins exactly two words, the en dash is intended to signal a link across two. Because this editorial nicety will go unnoticed by the majority of readers it should be used sparingly, when a more elegant solution is unavailable." It's a rule, I guess, but it seems rather arbitrary and unsatisfactory. Thanks for the tip. Also in CMOS 15 at 6.85.
    – jdscomms
    May 4 at 13:40
















  • 1




    What does the free, comprehensive CMOS pdf on hyphen usage say?
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:30










  • Also check 6.80 of the CMOS proper.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:36










  • Please include the research you’ve done. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic
    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 3 at 21:09








  • 1




    I don't have Chicago 17, but Chicago12 through 16 consistently assert that a proper name consisting of two or more words should not be hyphenated internally. Instead, all of those editions advocate using an en dash (not a hyphen) to attach the following word of the compound modifier to the proper name. So in your example, the Chicago-approved form would be Pulitzer Prize–winning (not Pulitzer Prize-winning or Pulitzer-Prize-winning).
    – Sven Yargs
    May 4 at 6:52












  • Thanks Sven. Yes, I see that now at CMOS 17 Section 6.80: "The en dash can be used in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of its elements consists of an open compound or when both elements consist of hyphenated compounds.Whereas a hyphen joins exactly two words, the en dash is intended to signal a link across two. Because this editorial nicety will go unnoticed by the majority of readers it should be used sparingly, when a more elegant solution is unavailable." It's a rule, I guess, but it seems rather arbitrary and unsatisfactory. Thanks for the tip. Also in CMOS 15 at 6.85.
    – jdscomms
    May 4 at 13:40










1




1




What does the free, comprehensive CMOS pdf on hyphen usage say?
– Let's stop villifying Iran
May 3 at 4:30




What does the free, comprehensive CMOS pdf on hyphen usage say?
– Let's stop villifying Iran
May 3 at 4:30












Also check 6.80 of the CMOS proper.
– Let's stop villifying Iran
May 3 at 4:36




Also check 6.80 of the CMOS proper.
– Let's stop villifying Iran
May 3 at 4:36












Please include the research you’ve done. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic
– Edwin Ashworth
May 3 at 21:09






Please include the research you’ve done. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic
– Edwin Ashworth
May 3 at 21:09






1




1




I don't have Chicago 17, but Chicago12 through 16 consistently assert that a proper name consisting of two or more words should not be hyphenated internally. Instead, all of those editions advocate using an en dash (not a hyphen) to attach the following word of the compound modifier to the proper name. So in your example, the Chicago-approved form would be Pulitzer Prize–winning (not Pulitzer Prize-winning or Pulitzer-Prize-winning).
– Sven Yargs
May 4 at 6:52






I don't have Chicago 17, but Chicago12 through 16 consistently assert that a proper name consisting of two or more words should not be hyphenated internally. Instead, all of those editions advocate using an en dash (not a hyphen) to attach the following word of the compound modifier to the proper name. So in your example, the Chicago-approved form would be Pulitzer Prize–winning (not Pulitzer Prize-winning or Pulitzer-Prize-winning).
– Sven Yargs
May 4 at 6:52














Thanks Sven. Yes, I see that now at CMOS 17 Section 6.80: "The en dash can be used in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of its elements consists of an open compound or when both elements consist of hyphenated compounds.Whereas a hyphen joins exactly two words, the en dash is intended to signal a link across two. Because this editorial nicety will go unnoticed by the majority of readers it should be used sparingly, when a more elegant solution is unavailable." It's a rule, I guess, but it seems rather arbitrary and unsatisfactory. Thanks for the tip. Also in CMOS 15 at 6.85.
– jdscomms
May 4 at 13:40






Thanks Sven. Yes, I see that now at CMOS 17 Section 6.80: "The en dash can be used in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of its elements consists of an open compound or when both elements consist of hyphenated compounds.Whereas a hyphen joins exactly two words, the en dash is intended to signal a link across two. Because this editorial nicety will go unnoticed by the majority of readers it should be used sparingly, when a more elegant solution is unavailable." It's a rule, I guess, but it seems rather arbitrary and unsatisfactory. Thanks for the tip. Also in CMOS 15 at 6.85.
– jdscomms
May 4 at 13:40












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














The usual way of doing this is with an en dash, which can be used like a hyphen to join terms when they comprise multiple words (or, less commonly, an already hyphenated term):




  • Pulitzer Prize–winning reporter


  • pre–Civil War era


  • ex–vice president


  • non–drug-naïve patients



That Wikipedia article quotes the Chicago Manual of Style:




Use it in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of the elements of the adjective is an open compound, or when two or more of its elements are compounds, open or hyphenated.







share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, Jon, that's interesting. It seems a bit fussy, though, expecting readers to see and absorb the difference between a hyphen and an en dash.
    – jdscomms
    May 2 at 23:25






  • 1




    @jdscomms: You can just use a hyphen if you prefer; I think it’s perfectly understandable. I use the en dash just because I like how it provides some visual separation to encourage the reader to treat the compound as having higher “precedence” than the dash, i.e., “(Pulitzer Prize)-winning”, not “Pulitzer (Prize-winning)”, but it’s rarely ambiguous to just use a hyphen—or, honestly, even no hyphen at all.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 2 at 23:37








  • 1




    Solid answer and I upvote! Proof of the pudding: google.com/search?q=%22pulitzer+prize+winning%22&ie= see how almost all sources have written Pulitzer Prize-winning as in your second option @jdscomms. Definitive proof comes from Ngrams: books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – English Student
    May 3 at 0:42










  • wikiPedia is quoting the 15th edition of the CMOS. That is two editions behind. Which is why wikipedia is not an authorative source.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:33












  • @user9825893y50932: Fair enough, but this is fairly standard and nearly general-reference—Wikipedia was just the easiest thing to link to. There are loads of citations just searching for “en dash”: The Punctuation Guide, Grammarly, Daily Writing Tips, CMOS §6.80 (which I didn’t link partly because it’s paywalled), and several questions & answers already on ELU.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 3 at 6:03











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444526%2fhyphenating-pulitzer-prize-winning-as-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














The usual way of doing this is with an en dash, which can be used like a hyphen to join terms when they comprise multiple words (or, less commonly, an already hyphenated term):




  • Pulitzer Prize–winning reporter


  • pre–Civil War era


  • ex–vice president


  • non–drug-naïve patients



That Wikipedia article quotes the Chicago Manual of Style:




Use it in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of the elements of the adjective is an open compound, or when two or more of its elements are compounds, open or hyphenated.







share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, Jon, that's interesting. It seems a bit fussy, though, expecting readers to see and absorb the difference between a hyphen and an en dash.
    – jdscomms
    May 2 at 23:25






  • 1




    @jdscomms: You can just use a hyphen if you prefer; I think it’s perfectly understandable. I use the en dash just because I like how it provides some visual separation to encourage the reader to treat the compound as having higher “precedence” than the dash, i.e., “(Pulitzer Prize)-winning”, not “Pulitzer (Prize-winning)”, but it’s rarely ambiguous to just use a hyphen—or, honestly, even no hyphen at all.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 2 at 23:37








  • 1




    Solid answer and I upvote! Proof of the pudding: google.com/search?q=%22pulitzer+prize+winning%22&ie= see how almost all sources have written Pulitzer Prize-winning as in your second option @jdscomms. Definitive proof comes from Ngrams: books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – English Student
    May 3 at 0:42










  • wikiPedia is quoting the 15th edition of the CMOS. That is two editions behind. Which is why wikipedia is not an authorative source.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:33












  • @user9825893y50932: Fair enough, but this is fairly standard and nearly general-reference—Wikipedia was just the easiest thing to link to. There are loads of citations just searching for “en dash”: The Punctuation Guide, Grammarly, Daily Writing Tips, CMOS §6.80 (which I didn’t link partly because it’s paywalled), and several questions & answers already on ELU.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 3 at 6:03
















3














The usual way of doing this is with an en dash, which can be used like a hyphen to join terms when they comprise multiple words (or, less commonly, an already hyphenated term):




  • Pulitzer Prize–winning reporter


  • pre–Civil War era


  • ex–vice president


  • non–drug-naïve patients



That Wikipedia article quotes the Chicago Manual of Style:




Use it in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of the elements of the adjective is an open compound, or when two or more of its elements are compounds, open or hyphenated.







share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks, Jon, that's interesting. It seems a bit fussy, though, expecting readers to see and absorb the difference between a hyphen and an en dash.
    – jdscomms
    May 2 at 23:25






  • 1




    @jdscomms: You can just use a hyphen if you prefer; I think it’s perfectly understandable. I use the en dash just because I like how it provides some visual separation to encourage the reader to treat the compound as having higher “precedence” than the dash, i.e., “(Pulitzer Prize)-winning”, not “Pulitzer (Prize-winning)”, but it’s rarely ambiguous to just use a hyphen—or, honestly, even no hyphen at all.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 2 at 23:37








  • 1




    Solid answer and I upvote! Proof of the pudding: google.com/search?q=%22pulitzer+prize+winning%22&ie= see how almost all sources have written Pulitzer Prize-winning as in your second option @jdscomms. Definitive proof comes from Ngrams: books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – English Student
    May 3 at 0:42










  • wikiPedia is quoting the 15th edition of the CMOS. That is two editions behind. Which is why wikipedia is not an authorative source.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:33












  • @user9825893y50932: Fair enough, but this is fairly standard and nearly general-reference—Wikipedia was just the easiest thing to link to. There are loads of citations just searching for “en dash”: The Punctuation Guide, Grammarly, Daily Writing Tips, CMOS §6.80 (which I didn’t link partly because it’s paywalled), and several questions & answers already on ELU.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 3 at 6:03














3












3








3






The usual way of doing this is with an en dash, which can be used like a hyphen to join terms when they comprise multiple words (or, less commonly, an already hyphenated term):




  • Pulitzer Prize–winning reporter


  • pre–Civil War era


  • ex–vice president


  • non–drug-naïve patients



That Wikipedia article quotes the Chicago Manual of Style:




Use it in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of the elements of the adjective is an open compound, or when two or more of its elements are compounds, open or hyphenated.







share|improve this answer












The usual way of doing this is with an en dash, which can be used like a hyphen to join terms when they comprise multiple words (or, less commonly, an already hyphenated term):




  • Pulitzer Prize–winning reporter


  • pre–Civil War era


  • ex–vice president


  • non–drug-naïve patients



That Wikipedia article quotes the Chicago Manual of Style:




Use it in place of a hyphen in a compound adjective when one of the elements of the adjective is an open compound, or when two or more of its elements are compounds, open or hyphenated.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 2 at 23:16









Jon Purdy

27.9k785134




27.9k785134












  • Thanks, Jon, that's interesting. It seems a bit fussy, though, expecting readers to see and absorb the difference between a hyphen and an en dash.
    – jdscomms
    May 2 at 23:25






  • 1




    @jdscomms: You can just use a hyphen if you prefer; I think it’s perfectly understandable. I use the en dash just because I like how it provides some visual separation to encourage the reader to treat the compound as having higher “precedence” than the dash, i.e., “(Pulitzer Prize)-winning”, not “Pulitzer (Prize-winning)”, but it’s rarely ambiguous to just use a hyphen—or, honestly, even no hyphen at all.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 2 at 23:37








  • 1




    Solid answer and I upvote! Proof of the pudding: google.com/search?q=%22pulitzer+prize+winning%22&ie= see how almost all sources have written Pulitzer Prize-winning as in your second option @jdscomms. Definitive proof comes from Ngrams: books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – English Student
    May 3 at 0:42










  • wikiPedia is quoting the 15th edition of the CMOS. That is two editions behind. Which is why wikipedia is not an authorative source.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:33












  • @user9825893y50932: Fair enough, but this is fairly standard and nearly general-reference—Wikipedia was just the easiest thing to link to. There are loads of citations just searching for “en dash”: The Punctuation Guide, Grammarly, Daily Writing Tips, CMOS §6.80 (which I didn’t link partly because it’s paywalled), and several questions & answers already on ELU.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 3 at 6:03


















  • Thanks, Jon, that's interesting. It seems a bit fussy, though, expecting readers to see and absorb the difference between a hyphen and an en dash.
    – jdscomms
    May 2 at 23:25






  • 1




    @jdscomms: You can just use a hyphen if you prefer; I think it’s perfectly understandable. I use the en dash just because I like how it provides some visual separation to encourage the reader to treat the compound as having higher “precedence” than the dash, i.e., “(Pulitzer Prize)-winning”, not “Pulitzer (Prize-winning)”, but it’s rarely ambiguous to just use a hyphen—or, honestly, even no hyphen at all.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 2 at 23:37








  • 1




    Solid answer and I upvote! Proof of the pudding: google.com/search?q=%22pulitzer+prize+winning%22&ie= see how almost all sources have written Pulitzer Prize-winning as in your second option @jdscomms. Definitive proof comes from Ngrams: books.google.com/ngrams/…
    – English Student
    May 3 at 0:42










  • wikiPedia is quoting the 15th edition of the CMOS. That is two editions behind. Which is why wikipedia is not an authorative source.
    – Let's stop villifying Iran
    May 3 at 4:33












  • @user9825893y50932: Fair enough, but this is fairly standard and nearly general-reference—Wikipedia was just the easiest thing to link to. There are loads of citations just searching for “en dash”: The Punctuation Guide, Grammarly, Daily Writing Tips, CMOS §6.80 (which I didn’t link partly because it’s paywalled), and several questions & answers already on ELU.
    – Jon Purdy
    May 3 at 6:03
















Thanks, Jon, that's interesting. It seems a bit fussy, though, expecting readers to see and absorb the difference between a hyphen and an en dash.
– jdscomms
May 2 at 23:25




Thanks, Jon, that's interesting. It seems a bit fussy, though, expecting readers to see and absorb the difference between a hyphen and an en dash.
– jdscomms
May 2 at 23:25




1




1




@jdscomms: You can just use a hyphen if you prefer; I think it’s perfectly understandable. I use the en dash just because I like how it provides some visual separation to encourage the reader to treat the compound as having higher “precedence” than the dash, i.e., “(Pulitzer Prize)-winning”, not “Pulitzer (Prize-winning)”, but it’s rarely ambiguous to just use a hyphen—or, honestly, even no hyphen at all.
– Jon Purdy
May 2 at 23:37






@jdscomms: You can just use a hyphen if you prefer; I think it’s perfectly understandable. I use the en dash just because I like how it provides some visual separation to encourage the reader to treat the compound as having higher “precedence” than the dash, i.e., “(Pulitzer Prize)-winning”, not “Pulitzer (Prize-winning)”, but it’s rarely ambiguous to just use a hyphen—or, honestly, even no hyphen at all.
– Jon Purdy
May 2 at 23:37






1




1




Solid answer and I upvote! Proof of the pudding: google.com/search?q=%22pulitzer+prize+winning%22&ie= see how almost all sources have written Pulitzer Prize-winning as in your second option @jdscomms. Definitive proof comes from Ngrams: books.google.com/ngrams/…
– English Student
May 3 at 0:42




Solid answer and I upvote! Proof of the pudding: google.com/search?q=%22pulitzer+prize+winning%22&ie= see how almost all sources have written Pulitzer Prize-winning as in your second option @jdscomms. Definitive proof comes from Ngrams: books.google.com/ngrams/…
– English Student
May 3 at 0:42












wikiPedia is quoting the 15th edition of the CMOS. That is two editions behind. Which is why wikipedia is not an authorative source.
– Let's stop villifying Iran
May 3 at 4:33






wikiPedia is quoting the 15th edition of the CMOS. That is two editions behind. Which is why wikipedia is not an authorative source.
– Let's stop villifying Iran
May 3 at 4:33














@user9825893y50932: Fair enough, but this is fairly standard and nearly general-reference—Wikipedia was just the easiest thing to link to. There are loads of citations just searching for “en dash”: The Punctuation Guide, Grammarly, Daily Writing Tips, CMOS §6.80 (which I didn’t link partly because it’s paywalled), and several questions & answers already on ELU.
– Jon Purdy
May 3 at 6:03




@user9825893y50932: Fair enough, but this is fairly standard and nearly general-reference—Wikipedia was just the easiest thing to link to. There are loads of citations just searching for “en dash”: The Punctuation Guide, Grammarly, Daily Writing Tips, CMOS §6.80 (which I didn’t link partly because it’s paywalled), and several questions & answers already on ELU.
– Jon Purdy
May 3 at 6:03


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444526%2fhyphenating-pulitzer-prize-winning-as-adjective%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Morgemoulin

Image
Morgemoulin — miejscowość i gmina — Państwo   Francja Region Grand Est Departament Moza Okręg Verdun Kod INSEE 55357 Powierzchnia 6,82 km² Populacja  (1990) • liczba ludności 75 • gęstość 11 os./km² Kod pocztowy 55400 Położenie na mapie Francji Morgemoulin 49°14′N   5°35′E / 49,233333   5,583333 Portal Francja Morgemoulin – miejscowość i gmina we Francji, w regionie Grand Est, w departamencie Moza. Według danych na rok 1990 gminę zamieszkiwało 75 osób, a gęstość zaludnienia wynosiła 11 osób/km² (wśród 2335 gmin Lotaryngii Morgemoulin plasuje się na 970. miejscu pod względem liczby ludności, natomiast pod względem powierzchni na miejscu 848.). Bibliografia | Francuski urząd statystyczny ( fr. ) . p   •   d   •   e Gminy okręgu Verdun Abaucourt-Hautecourt • Aincreville • Ambly-sur-Meuse • Amel-sur-l'Étang • Ancemont • Arrancy-sur-Crusne • Aubréville • Autré...
Read more

Scott Moir

Image
Scott Moir Tessa Virtue i Scott Moir w 2016 r. Reprezentacja   Kanada Data i miejsce urodzenia 2 września 1987 London Wzrost 180 cm Konkurencja Pary taneczne Partner sportowy Tessa Virtue Trener Marie-France Dubreuil, Patrice Lauzon, Romain Haguenauer Poprzednio: Marina Zujewa, Oleg Epstein, Igor Szpilband, Johnny Johns, Carol Moir, Paul MacIntosh, Suzanne Killing Klub Montreal International School of Skating Poprzednio: Arctic Edge FSC Ilderton Skating Club Lokalizacja treningowa Montreal Poprzednio: Canton Kitchener Rekordy życiowe ISU przed sezonem 2018/2019 Nota łączna 206,07 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Taniec krótki 83,67 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Taniec dowolny 122,40 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Dorobek medalowy Reprezentacja   Kanada Igrzyska olimpijskie Złoto Vancouver 2010 pary taneczne Złoto Pjongczang 2018 pary taneczne Złoto Pjongczang 2018 drużynowo Srebro S...
Read more

Souastre

Image
Souastre — miejscowość i gmina — Herb Państwo   Francja Region Hauts-de-France Departament Pas-de-Calais Okręg Arras Kod INSEE 62800 Powierzchnia 7,18 km² Populacja  (1990) • liczba ludności 352 • gęstość 49 os./km² Kod pocztowy 62111 Położenie na mapie Francji Souastre 50°09′N   2°34′E / 50,150000   2,566667 Portal Francja Souastre – miejscowość i gmina we Francji, w regionie Hauts-de-France, w departamencie Pas-de-Calais. Według danych na rok 1990 gminę zamieszkiwały 352 osoby, a gęstość zaludnienia wynosiła 49 osób/km² (wśród 1549 gmin regionu Nord-Pas-de-Calais Souastre plasuje się na 887. miejscu pod względem liczby ludności, natomiast pod względem powierzchni na miejscu 507.). Bibliografia | Francuski urząd statystyczny ( fr. ) . p   •   d   •   e Gminy okręgu Arras Ablain-Saint-Nazaire Ablainzevelle Acheville Achicourt Achiet-le-Grand Achiet-le-Pe...
Read more