What is Ve in mosfet
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
asked 2 days ago
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
asked 2 days ago
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
asked 2 days ago
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
transistors mosfet
asked 2 days ago
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Gh-B
264
asked 2 days ago
Gh-B
264
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
2 days ago
add a comment |
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
2 days ago
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
2 days ago
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered 2 days ago
Andy aka
236k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
2 days ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered 2 days ago
Felthry
3,368929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
2 days ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
2 days ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered 2 days ago
Andy aka
236k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
2 days ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered 2 days ago
Andy aka
236k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
2 days ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered 2 days ago
Andy aka
236k10173401
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered 2 days ago
Andy aka
236k10173401
answered 2 days ago
Andy aka
236k10173401
answered 2 days ago
Andy aka
236k10173401
answered 2 days ago
Andy aka
236k10173401
236k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
2 days ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
2 days ago
add a comment |
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
2 days ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
2 days ago
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
2 days ago
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Felthry
2 days ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
2 days ago
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered 2 days ago
Felthry
3,368929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
2 days ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
2 days ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered 2 days ago
Felthry
3,368929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
2 days ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
2 days ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered 2 days ago
Felthry
3,368929
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered 2 days ago
Felthry
3,368929
answered 2 days ago
Felthry
3,368929
answered 2 days ago
Felthry
3,368929
answered 2 days ago
Felthry
3,368929
3,368929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
2 days ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
2 days ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
2 days ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
2 days ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
2 days ago
2
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
2 days ago
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Felthry
2 days ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
2 days ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
2 days ago
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Felthry
2 days ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
2 days ago
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
2 days ago
add a comment |
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f408914%2fwhat-is-ve-in-mosfet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
2 days ago