what is the indications from smartctl that show bad status from disk











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












when we run the smartctl -a on disk
we get a lot of output



what is the final status that indicates that disk is bad or good?



smartctl -a /dev/sdb
smartctl 6.2 2013-07-26 r3841 [x86_64-linux-3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Vendor: SEAGATE
Product: ST2000NX0433
Revision: NS02
User Capacity: 2,000,398,934,016 bytes [2.00 TB]
Logical block size: 512 bytes
Formatted with type 2 protection
Logical block provisioning type unreported, LBPME=0, LBPRZ=0
Rotation Rate: 7200 rpm
Form Factor: 2.5 inches
Logical Unit id: 0x5000c5009eaededf
Serial number: W46064KW
Device type: disk
Transport protocol: SAS
Local Time is: Thu Nov 22 10:38:35 2018 UTC
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
Temperature Warning: Disabled or Not Supported

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART Health Status: OK

Current Drive Temperature: 23 C
Drive Trip Temperature: 60 C

Manufactured in week 06 of year 2017
Specified cycle count over device lifetime: 10000
Accumulated start-stop cycles: 49
Specified load-unload count over device lifetime: 300000
Accumulated load-unload cycles: 550
Elements in grown defect list: 0

Vendor (Seagate) cache information
Blocks sent to initiator = 1986603075
Blocks received from initiator = 2165723528
Blocks read from cache and sent to initiator = 1298028358
Number of read and write commands whose size <= segment size = 201615101
Number of read and write commands whose size > segment size = 0

Vendor (Seagate/Hitachi) factory information
number of hours powered up = 12335.38
number of minutes until next internal SMART test = 26

Error counter log:
Errors Corrected by Total Correction Gigabytes Total
ECC rereads/ errors algorithm processed uncorrected
fast | delayed rewrites corrected invocations [10^9 bytes] errors
read: 26648753 0 0 26648753 0 83475.092 0
write: 0 0 2 2 2 135145.593 0
verify: 3914513941 0 0 3914513941 0 109628.879 0

Non-medium error count: 14

SMART Self-test log
Num Test Status segment LifeTime LBA_first_err [SK ASC ASQ]
Description number (hours)
# 1 Background short Completed 96 2 - [- - -]
Long (extended) Self Test duration: 20400 seconds [340.0 minutes]


dose the following are good indication ?



smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep  Completed


or



 smartctl -a /dev/sda

echo $?









share|improve this question
























  • A variety of issues is summarized by smartctl's exit status - as detailed in the EXIT STATUS section in man smartctl. So, smartctl -a /dev/sda; echo $? is probably the best way to get a synthetic indication, but it gives no guarantee about the disk's health being bad or good. You might want to refine the definition of "bad" and "good" in your question to raise the odds of getting a precise answer.
    – fra-san
    Nov 22 at 18:29















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












when we run the smartctl -a on disk
we get a lot of output



what is the final status that indicates that disk is bad or good?



smartctl -a /dev/sdb
smartctl 6.2 2013-07-26 r3841 [x86_64-linux-3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Vendor: SEAGATE
Product: ST2000NX0433
Revision: NS02
User Capacity: 2,000,398,934,016 bytes [2.00 TB]
Logical block size: 512 bytes
Formatted with type 2 protection
Logical block provisioning type unreported, LBPME=0, LBPRZ=0
Rotation Rate: 7200 rpm
Form Factor: 2.5 inches
Logical Unit id: 0x5000c5009eaededf
Serial number: W46064KW
Device type: disk
Transport protocol: SAS
Local Time is: Thu Nov 22 10:38:35 2018 UTC
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
Temperature Warning: Disabled or Not Supported

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART Health Status: OK

Current Drive Temperature: 23 C
Drive Trip Temperature: 60 C

Manufactured in week 06 of year 2017
Specified cycle count over device lifetime: 10000
Accumulated start-stop cycles: 49
Specified load-unload count over device lifetime: 300000
Accumulated load-unload cycles: 550
Elements in grown defect list: 0

Vendor (Seagate) cache information
Blocks sent to initiator = 1986603075
Blocks received from initiator = 2165723528
Blocks read from cache and sent to initiator = 1298028358
Number of read and write commands whose size <= segment size = 201615101
Number of read and write commands whose size > segment size = 0

Vendor (Seagate/Hitachi) factory information
number of hours powered up = 12335.38
number of minutes until next internal SMART test = 26

Error counter log:
Errors Corrected by Total Correction Gigabytes Total
ECC rereads/ errors algorithm processed uncorrected
fast | delayed rewrites corrected invocations [10^9 bytes] errors
read: 26648753 0 0 26648753 0 83475.092 0
write: 0 0 2 2 2 135145.593 0
verify: 3914513941 0 0 3914513941 0 109628.879 0

Non-medium error count: 14

SMART Self-test log
Num Test Status segment LifeTime LBA_first_err [SK ASC ASQ]
Description number (hours)
# 1 Background short Completed 96 2 - [- - -]
Long (extended) Self Test duration: 20400 seconds [340.0 minutes]


dose the following are good indication ?



smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep  Completed


or



 smartctl -a /dev/sda

echo $?









share|improve this question
























  • A variety of issues is summarized by smartctl's exit status - as detailed in the EXIT STATUS section in man smartctl. So, smartctl -a /dev/sda; echo $? is probably the best way to get a synthetic indication, but it gives no guarantee about the disk's health being bad or good. You might want to refine the definition of "bad" and "good" in your question to raise the odds of getting a precise answer.
    – fra-san
    Nov 22 at 18:29













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











when we run the smartctl -a on disk
we get a lot of output



what is the final status that indicates that disk is bad or good?



smartctl -a /dev/sdb
smartctl 6.2 2013-07-26 r3841 [x86_64-linux-3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Vendor: SEAGATE
Product: ST2000NX0433
Revision: NS02
User Capacity: 2,000,398,934,016 bytes [2.00 TB]
Logical block size: 512 bytes
Formatted with type 2 protection
Logical block provisioning type unreported, LBPME=0, LBPRZ=0
Rotation Rate: 7200 rpm
Form Factor: 2.5 inches
Logical Unit id: 0x5000c5009eaededf
Serial number: W46064KW
Device type: disk
Transport protocol: SAS
Local Time is: Thu Nov 22 10:38:35 2018 UTC
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
Temperature Warning: Disabled or Not Supported

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART Health Status: OK

Current Drive Temperature: 23 C
Drive Trip Temperature: 60 C

Manufactured in week 06 of year 2017
Specified cycle count over device lifetime: 10000
Accumulated start-stop cycles: 49
Specified load-unload count over device lifetime: 300000
Accumulated load-unload cycles: 550
Elements in grown defect list: 0

Vendor (Seagate) cache information
Blocks sent to initiator = 1986603075
Blocks received from initiator = 2165723528
Blocks read from cache and sent to initiator = 1298028358
Number of read and write commands whose size <= segment size = 201615101
Number of read and write commands whose size > segment size = 0

Vendor (Seagate/Hitachi) factory information
number of hours powered up = 12335.38
number of minutes until next internal SMART test = 26

Error counter log:
Errors Corrected by Total Correction Gigabytes Total
ECC rereads/ errors algorithm processed uncorrected
fast | delayed rewrites corrected invocations [10^9 bytes] errors
read: 26648753 0 0 26648753 0 83475.092 0
write: 0 0 2 2 2 135145.593 0
verify: 3914513941 0 0 3914513941 0 109628.879 0

Non-medium error count: 14

SMART Self-test log
Num Test Status segment LifeTime LBA_first_err [SK ASC ASQ]
Description number (hours)
# 1 Background short Completed 96 2 - [- - -]
Long (extended) Self Test duration: 20400 seconds [340.0 minutes]


dose the following are good indication ?



smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep  Completed


or



 smartctl -a /dev/sda

echo $?









share|improve this question















when we run the smartctl -a on disk
we get a lot of output



what is the final status that indicates that disk is bad or good?



smartctl -a /dev/sdb
smartctl 6.2 2013-07-26 r3841 [x86_64-linux-3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Vendor: SEAGATE
Product: ST2000NX0433
Revision: NS02
User Capacity: 2,000,398,934,016 bytes [2.00 TB]
Logical block size: 512 bytes
Formatted with type 2 protection
Logical block provisioning type unreported, LBPME=0, LBPRZ=0
Rotation Rate: 7200 rpm
Form Factor: 2.5 inches
Logical Unit id: 0x5000c5009eaededf
Serial number: W46064KW
Device type: disk
Transport protocol: SAS
Local Time is: Thu Nov 22 10:38:35 2018 UTC
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
Temperature Warning: Disabled or Not Supported

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART Health Status: OK

Current Drive Temperature: 23 C
Drive Trip Temperature: 60 C

Manufactured in week 06 of year 2017
Specified cycle count over device lifetime: 10000
Accumulated start-stop cycles: 49
Specified load-unload count over device lifetime: 300000
Accumulated load-unload cycles: 550
Elements in grown defect list: 0

Vendor (Seagate) cache information
Blocks sent to initiator = 1986603075
Blocks received from initiator = 2165723528
Blocks read from cache and sent to initiator = 1298028358
Number of read and write commands whose size <= segment size = 201615101
Number of read and write commands whose size > segment size = 0

Vendor (Seagate/Hitachi) factory information
number of hours powered up = 12335.38
number of minutes until next internal SMART test = 26

Error counter log:
Errors Corrected by Total Correction Gigabytes Total
ECC rereads/ errors algorithm processed uncorrected
fast | delayed rewrites corrected invocations [10^9 bytes] errors
read: 26648753 0 0 26648753 0 83475.092 0
write: 0 0 2 2 2 135145.593 0
verify: 3914513941 0 0 3914513941 0 109628.879 0

Non-medium error count: 14

SMART Self-test log
Num Test Status segment LifeTime LBA_first_err [SK ASC ASQ]
Description number (hours)
# 1 Background short Completed 96 2 - [- - -]
Long (extended) Self Test duration: 20400 seconds [340.0 minutes]


dose the following are good indication ?



smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep  Completed


or



 smartctl -a /dev/sda

echo $?






linux disk smartctl






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 14:58









Jeff Schaller

36.8k1052121




36.8k1052121










asked Nov 22 at 10:42









yael

2,3281755




2,3281755












  • A variety of issues is summarized by smartctl's exit status - as detailed in the EXIT STATUS section in man smartctl. So, smartctl -a /dev/sda; echo $? is probably the best way to get a synthetic indication, but it gives no guarantee about the disk's health being bad or good. You might want to refine the definition of "bad" and "good" in your question to raise the odds of getting a precise answer.
    – fra-san
    Nov 22 at 18:29


















  • A variety of issues is summarized by smartctl's exit status - as detailed in the EXIT STATUS section in man smartctl. So, smartctl -a /dev/sda; echo $? is probably the best way to get a synthetic indication, but it gives no guarantee about the disk's health being bad or good. You might want to refine the definition of "bad" and "good" in your question to raise the odds of getting a precise answer.
    – fra-san
    Nov 22 at 18:29
















A variety of issues is summarized by smartctl's exit status - as detailed in the EXIT STATUS section in man smartctl. So, smartctl -a /dev/sda; echo $? is probably the best way to get a synthetic indication, but it gives no guarantee about the disk's health being bad or good. You might want to refine the definition of "bad" and "good" in your question to raise the odds of getting a precise answer.
– fra-san
Nov 22 at 18:29




A variety of issues is summarized by smartctl's exit status - as detailed in the EXIT STATUS section in man smartctl. So, smartctl -a /dev/sda; echo $? is probably the best way to get a synthetic indication, but it gives no guarantee about the disk's health being bad or good. You might want to refine the definition of "bad" and "good" in your question to raise the odds of getting a precise answer.
– fra-san
Nov 22 at 18:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The overall health status is that part of the output of smartctl -a that addresses the global question




Is the drive good or bad?




best. In your cited output, that status is reported in the line




SMART Health Status: OK




which can also be obtained separately (with some header) by using the -H option of smartctl, instead of -a.



Note that this assessment does not come from the smartmontools but from the drive itself (see man page smartctl(8) on -H option) and that its meaning is rather coarse: See this quote from Wikipedia:




The S.M.A.R.T. status does not necessarily indicate the drive's past
or present reliability. If a drive has already failed
catastrophically, the S.M.A.R.T. status may be inaccessible.
Alternatively, if a drive has experienced problems in the past, but
the sensors no longer detect such problems, the S.M.A.R.T. status may,
depending on the manufacturer's programming, suggest that the drive is
now sound.




and (same source):




More detail on the health of the drive may be obtained by examining
the S.M.A.R.T. Attributes.




The overall health status is reflected by bit 3 (counting from 0) of the exit status of smartctl, which is set on failing disk. See section "RETURN VALUES" in man page smartctl(8).



Right after executing smartctl, this bit can be evaluated by the (Bash) expression $(($? & 8)) like in



if [ $(($? & 8)) -eq 0 ]; then
echo Good.
else
echo Bad.
fi


Please note that if bit 3 is set, the expression $(($? & 8)) evaluates to 8, not 1.



An exit status of zero from smartctl is sufficient for a healthy disk (as far as S.M.A.R.T. can judge), but as a condition this might be to strong: Bit 6 of this status reflects the existence of error records in the device logs, which also may refer to communication errors between drive and host (Read DMA errors). I have several drives whose logs show such errors in their logs since their first hours of lifetime, but I used these drives on a daily basis without any problems for years. So this criterion can give you a lot of false positives. Of course this is arguable since there were errors after all.



Anyhow, if you want to take all bits but that one (bit 6) into account, you can use this expression in your test: $(($? & 191)).



On the other hand, the criterion




smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep Completed




that you mentioned says nothing about the health of the drive, since it just reports that a self-test was completed, without taking its result into account.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483413%2fwhat-is-the-indications-from-smartctl-that-show-bad-status-from-disk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    The overall health status is that part of the output of smartctl -a that addresses the global question




    Is the drive good or bad?




    best. In your cited output, that status is reported in the line




    SMART Health Status: OK




    which can also be obtained separately (with some header) by using the -H option of smartctl, instead of -a.



    Note that this assessment does not come from the smartmontools but from the drive itself (see man page smartctl(8) on -H option) and that its meaning is rather coarse: See this quote from Wikipedia:




    The S.M.A.R.T. status does not necessarily indicate the drive's past
    or present reliability. If a drive has already failed
    catastrophically, the S.M.A.R.T. status may be inaccessible.
    Alternatively, if a drive has experienced problems in the past, but
    the sensors no longer detect such problems, the S.M.A.R.T. status may,
    depending on the manufacturer's programming, suggest that the drive is
    now sound.




    and (same source):




    More detail on the health of the drive may be obtained by examining
    the S.M.A.R.T. Attributes.




    The overall health status is reflected by bit 3 (counting from 0) of the exit status of smartctl, which is set on failing disk. See section "RETURN VALUES" in man page smartctl(8).



    Right after executing smartctl, this bit can be evaluated by the (Bash) expression $(($? & 8)) like in



    if [ $(($? & 8)) -eq 0 ]; then
    echo Good.
    else
    echo Bad.
    fi


    Please note that if bit 3 is set, the expression $(($? & 8)) evaluates to 8, not 1.



    An exit status of zero from smartctl is sufficient for a healthy disk (as far as S.M.A.R.T. can judge), but as a condition this might be to strong: Bit 6 of this status reflects the existence of error records in the device logs, which also may refer to communication errors between drive and host (Read DMA errors). I have several drives whose logs show such errors in their logs since their first hours of lifetime, but I used these drives on a daily basis without any problems for years. So this criterion can give you a lot of false positives. Of course this is arguable since there were errors after all.



    Anyhow, if you want to take all bits but that one (bit 6) into account, you can use this expression in your test: $(($? & 191)).



    On the other hand, the criterion




    smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep Completed




    that you mentioned says nothing about the health of the drive, since it just reports that a self-test was completed, without taking its result into account.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      The overall health status is that part of the output of smartctl -a that addresses the global question




      Is the drive good or bad?




      best. In your cited output, that status is reported in the line




      SMART Health Status: OK




      which can also be obtained separately (with some header) by using the -H option of smartctl, instead of -a.



      Note that this assessment does not come from the smartmontools but from the drive itself (see man page smartctl(8) on -H option) and that its meaning is rather coarse: See this quote from Wikipedia:




      The S.M.A.R.T. status does not necessarily indicate the drive's past
      or present reliability. If a drive has already failed
      catastrophically, the S.M.A.R.T. status may be inaccessible.
      Alternatively, if a drive has experienced problems in the past, but
      the sensors no longer detect such problems, the S.M.A.R.T. status may,
      depending on the manufacturer's programming, suggest that the drive is
      now sound.




      and (same source):




      More detail on the health of the drive may be obtained by examining
      the S.M.A.R.T. Attributes.




      The overall health status is reflected by bit 3 (counting from 0) of the exit status of smartctl, which is set on failing disk. See section "RETURN VALUES" in man page smartctl(8).



      Right after executing smartctl, this bit can be evaluated by the (Bash) expression $(($? & 8)) like in



      if [ $(($? & 8)) -eq 0 ]; then
      echo Good.
      else
      echo Bad.
      fi


      Please note that if bit 3 is set, the expression $(($? & 8)) evaluates to 8, not 1.



      An exit status of zero from smartctl is sufficient for a healthy disk (as far as S.M.A.R.T. can judge), but as a condition this might be to strong: Bit 6 of this status reflects the existence of error records in the device logs, which also may refer to communication errors between drive and host (Read DMA errors). I have several drives whose logs show such errors in their logs since their first hours of lifetime, but I used these drives on a daily basis without any problems for years. So this criterion can give you a lot of false positives. Of course this is arguable since there were errors after all.



      Anyhow, if you want to take all bits but that one (bit 6) into account, you can use this expression in your test: $(($? & 191)).



      On the other hand, the criterion




      smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep Completed




      that you mentioned says nothing about the health of the drive, since it just reports that a self-test was completed, without taking its result into account.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted






        The overall health status is that part of the output of smartctl -a that addresses the global question




        Is the drive good or bad?




        best. In your cited output, that status is reported in the line




        SMART Health Status: OK




        which can also be obtained separately (with some header) by using the -H option of smartctl, instead of -a.



        Note that this assessment does not come from the smartmontools but from the drive itself (see man page smartctl(8) on -H option) and that its meaning is rather coarse: See this quote from Wikipedia:




        The S.M.A.R.T. status does not necessarily indicate the drive's past
        or present reliability. If a drive has already failed
        catastrophically, the S.M.A.R.T. status may be inaccessible.
        Alternatively, if a drive has experienced problems in the past, but
        the sensors no longer detect such problems, the S.M.A.R.T. status may,
        depending on the manufacturer's programming, suggest that the drive is
        now sound.




        and (same source):




        More detail on the health of the drive may be obtained by examining
        the S.M.A.R.T. Attributes.




        The overall health status is reflected by bit 3 (counting from 0) of the exit status of smartctl, which is set on failing disk. See section "RETURN VALUES" in man page smartctl(8).



        Right after executing smartctl, this bit can be evaluated by the (Bash) expression $(($? & 8)) like in



        if [ $(($? & 8)) -eq 0 ]; then
        echo Good.
        else
        echo Bad.
        fi


        Please note that if bit 3 is set, the expression $(($? & 8)) evaluates to 8, not 1.



        An exit status of zero from smartctl is sufficient for a healthy disk (as far as S.M.A.R.T. can judge), but as a condition this might be to strong: Bit 6 of this status reflects the existence of error records in the device logs, which also may refer to communication errors between drive and host (Read DMA errors). I have several drives whose logs show such errors in their logs since their first hours of lifetime, but I used these drives on a daily basis without any problems for years. So this criterion can give you a lot of false positives. Of course this is arguable since there were errors after all.



        Anyhow, if you want to take all bits but that one (bit 6) into account, you can use this expression in your test: $(($? & 191)).



        On the other hand, the criterion




        smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep Completed




        that you mentioned says nothing about the health of the drive, since it just reports that a self-test was completed, without taking its result into account.






        share|improve this answer














        The overall health status is that part of the output of smartctl -a that addresses the global question




        Is the drive good or bad?




        best. In your cited output, that status is reported in the line




        SMART Health Status: OK




        which can also be obtained separately (with some header) by using the -H option of smartctl, instead of -a.



        Note that this assessment does not come from the smartmontools but from the drive itself (see man page smartctl(8) on -H option) and that its meaning is rather coarse: See this quote from Wikipedia:




        The S.M.A.R.T. status does not necessarily indicate the drive's past
        or present reliability. If a drive has already failed
        catastrophically, the S.M.A.R.T. status may be inaccessible.
        Alternatively, if a drive has experienced problems in the past, but
        the sensors no longer detect such problems, the S.M.A.R.T. status may,
        depending on the manufacturer's programming, suggest that the drive is
        now sound.




        and (same source):




        More detail on the health of the drive may be obtained by examining
        the S.M.A.R.T. Attributes.




        The overall health status is reflected by bit 3 (counting from 0) of the exit status of smartctl, which is set on failing disk. See section "RETURN VALUES" in man page smartctl(8).



        Right after executing smartctl, this bit can be evaluated by the (Bash) expression $(($? & 8)) like in



        if [ $(($? & 8)) -eq 0 ]; then
        echo Good.
        else
        echo Bad.
        fi


        Please note that if bit 3 is set, the expression $(($? & 8)) evaluates to 8, not 1.



        An exit status of zero from smartctl is sufficient for a healthy disk (as far as S.M.A.R.T. can judge), but as a condition this might be to strong: Bit 6 of this status reflects the existence of error records in the device logs, which also may refer to communication errors between drive and host (Read DMA errors). I have several drives whose logs show such errors in their logs since their first hours of lifetime, but I used these drives on a daily basis without any problems for years. So this criterion can give you a lot of false positives. Of course this is arguable since there were errors after all.



        Anyhow, if you want to take all bits but that one (bit 6) into account, you can use this expression in your test: $(($? & 191)).



        On the other hand, the criterion




        smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep Completed




        that you mentioned says nothing about the health of the drive, since it just reports that a self-test was completed, without taking its result into account.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 25 at 13:08

























        answered Nov 25 at 5:58









        Jürgen

        717




        717






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483413%2fwhat-is-the-indications-from-smartctl-that-show-bad-status-from-disk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Morgemoulin

            Scott Moir

            Souastre