One word for that describes “making things nobody wants”












0














What would be a good word to describe "making things nobody wants"? If any.



I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?



A single word so after you have spoken about various examples and you want to end with a strong exit that will be remembered. Say big on a slide on its own or after you have written about it and want to repeat going back to that 'feeling' in the article by repetition of a single word.



Portmanteaus are allowed.



I have been searching synonyms for useless and obsolete but that doesn't capture the "making" part. Also, I have been thinking on non-existent options like combining obsolete and useless with engineering but that wasn't quite it either.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Though it's a phrase not a single word ... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coals_to_Newcastle Don't bring coals to Newcastle. Or Don't try to sell ice to Eskimos.
    – k1eran
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:01










  • "big on a slide" is not context.
    – michael.hor257k
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:08










  • Have you tried mathoming?
    – tchrist
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:54










  • @michael.hor257k You are right. Edited the answer.
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:38










  • It's still not clear, I am afraid. Perhaps you're thinking of chindogu?
    – michael.hor257k
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:50


















0














What would be a good word to describe "making things nobody wants"? If any.



I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?



A single word so after you have spoken about various examples and you want to end with a strong exit that will be remembered. Say big on a slide on its own or after you have written about it and want to repeat going back to that 'feeling' in the article by repetition of a single word.



Portmanteaus are allowed.



I have been searching synonyms for useless and obsolete but that doesn't capture the "making" part. Also, I have been thinking on non-existent options like combining obsolete and useless with engineering but that wasn't quite it either.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    Though it's a phrase not a single word ... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coals_to_Newcastle Don't bring coals to Newcastle. Or Don't try to sell ice to Eskimos.
    – k1eran
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:01










  • "big on a slide" is not context.
    – michael.hor257k
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:08










  • Have you tried mathoming?
    – tchrist
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:54










  • @michael.hor257k You are right. Edited the answer.
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:38










  • It's still not clear, I am afraid. Perhaps you're thinking of chindogu?
    – michael.hor257k
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:50
















0












0








0







What would be a good word to describe "making things nobody wants"? If any.



I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?



A single word so after you have spoken about various examples and you want to end with a strong exit that will be remembered. Say big on a slide on its own or after you have written about it and want to repeat going back to that 'feeling' in the article by repetition of a single word.



Portmanteaus are allowed.



I have been searching synonyms for useless and obsolete but that doesn't capture the "making" part. Also, I have been thinking on non-existent options like combining obsolete and useless with engineering but that wasn't quite it either.










share|improve this question















What would be a good word to describe "making things nobody wants"? If any.



I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?



A single word so after you have spoken about various examples and you want to end with a strong exit that will be remembered. Say big on a slide on its own or after you have written about it and want to repeat going back to that 'feeling' in the article by repetition of a single word.



Portmanteaus are allowed.



I have been searching synonyms for useless and obsolete but that doesn't capture the "making" part. Also, I have been thinking on non-existent options like combining obsolete and useless with engineering but that wasn't quite it either.







single-word-requests






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 6 '17 at 6:39

























asked Aug 5 '17 at 22:24









bastijn

1064




1064








  • 1




    Though it's a phrase not a single word ... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coals_to_Newcastle Don't bring coals to Newcastle. Or Don't try to sell ice to Eskimos.
    – k1eran
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:01










  • "big on a slide" is not context.
    – michael.hor257k
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:08










  • Have you tried mathoming?
    – tchrist
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:54










  • @michael.hor257k You are right. Edited the answer.
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:38










  • It's still not clear, I am afraid. Perhaps you're thinking of chindogu?
    – michael.hor257k
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:50
















  • 1




    Though it's a phrase not a single word ... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coals_to_Newcastle Don't bring coals to Newcastle. Or Don't try to sell ice to Eskimos.
    – k1eran
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:01










  • "big on a slide" is not context.
    – michael.hor257k
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:08










  • Have you tried mathoming?
    – tchrist
    Aug 6 '17 at 1:54










  • @michael.hor257k You are right. Edited the answer.
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:38










  • It's still not clear, I am afraid. Perhaps you're thinking of chindogu?
    – michael.hor257k
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:50










1




1




Though it's a phrase not a single word ... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coals_to_Newcastle Don't bring coals to Newcastle. Or Don't try to sell ice to Eskimos.
– k1eran
Aug 6 '17 at 1:01




Though it's a phrase not a single word ... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coals_to_Newcastle Don't bring coals to Newcastle. Or Don't try to sell ice to Eskimos.
– k1eran
Aug 6 '17 at 1:01












"big on a slide" is not context.
– michael.hor257k
Aug 6 '17 at 1:08




"big on a slide" is not context.
– michael.hor257k
Aug 6 '17 at 1:08












Have you tried mathoming?
– tchrist
Aug 6 '17 at 1:54




Have you tried mathoming?
– tchrist
Aug 6 '17 at 1:54












@michael.hor257k You are right. Edited the answer.
– bastijn
Aug 6 '17 at 6:38




@michael.hor257k You are right. Edited the answer.
– bastijn
Aug 6 '17 at 6:38












It's still not clear, I am afraid. Perhaps you're thinking of chindogu?
– michael.hor257k
Aug 6 '17 at 6:50






It's still not clear, I am afraid. Perhaps you're thinking of chindogu?
– michael.hor257k
Aug 6 '17 at 6:50












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














It seems like you want to load the verb with the judgemental aspect, but the context is always going to be that the making is in itself succesful and therefore positive, even if the product made is not going to be wanted. Because of this you are not going to find one word that does the trick. Two words is easier:



Gimcrack-fabricator.



Originator of tat / purveyor of tat.



There is a verb "to mangle" which can be used in the context of "to mangle a tune" which is making a noise nobody wants.



Proliferating redundancy and breeding degeneracy?



There are words that can refer to the thing nobody wants: gimcrack refers to something that is made but is of little value and has a quite negative context:



https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gimcrack.



Tat is an English word meaning things made of low quatlity, which is often used in the context of stuff that is new but nobody would want - there are lots of shops on English high streets that sell gifts and memorabilia, and most of this is referred to as pointless tat.



http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/tat



In respect of the making part then "mocking up", "faking up", "bodging", "cobbling together", could all refer in a negative connotation to making stuff nobody would want: e.g. "cobbled together a load of tat".



But none of these match the pure phrase you are looking for. Inherent in the question is a contradiction, because if someone makes something then at least one person wants it, otherwise they would not have made it. If there are these kinds of semantic conradictions then it is not possible to find one word to cover both sides of the contradiction.



If it is in terms of a more passive type of making such as "making" babies, then there might be some verbs appropriate to that.



An important factor is whether or not there is a negative or positive connotation. For instance, if someone is making face masks in order to prevent infection then you could say these were things that were made that nobody wants to see, or to think about, but would that necessarily have a negative connotation? Of course nobody wants to be infected, so the fact they don't want to be used would connotate a positive outcome which the grammar would respond to, and so there is unlikely to be one word that can be used, there will always be a defining context and this will require extra words to set that context.






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your elaborate answer. I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Better context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:37






  • 1




    Ah, like the torch that is also s calculator with a bottle opener in the handle, and flashes, and bleeps, and all you want is a torch to see in the dark on your walk from the car to the house. Or the Surf board with an ipad embedded in it - although that might be a good idea... "supererogatory" is closer, but not quite it.
    – David E Butler
    Aug 6 '17 at 8:57






  • 1




    Actually, in the sense you have it, where the item is performing extra functions but in the same field as its primary function - like the hairbrush that also tests your hair when all you want is a hairbruish then they would be "supererogatory" - but this is an adjective about the features of the thing, not the making of the thing itself.
    – David E Butler
    Aug 6 '17 at 9:01










  • I had the same problem. Capturing the making part, not only the item itself, is hard if not impossible in a single word. Gimcrack-fabricator is still nice, although for the use in mind I might go with a 'degeneration' (sorry, can't find the right word as English is not my main language) of supererogatory like supererogatoring. Food for thought.
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 11:23



















0














To qualify as a chindogu, an article must physically exist and function: there are no conceptual chindogu. Thus every chindogu has to be made. We might describe the making of such a product as chindogumaking, along the lines of shoemaking or breadmaking. Unfortunately, though, this term has no currency, and is not to be found in any dictionary. However, chindogu-making (with a hyphen) is arguably a legitimate construction.



The above link to YouTube is suggested because watching the videos gives a better initial idea of what chindogu are about than reading the (also recommended) Wikipedia article.






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404458%2fone-word-for-that-describes-making-things-nobody-wants%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    It seems like you want to load the verb with the judgemental aspect, but the context is always going to be that the making is in itself succesful and therefore positive, even if the product made is not going to be wanted. Because of this you are not going to find one word that does the trick. Two words is easier:



    Gimcrack-fabricator.



    Originator of tat / purveyor of tat.



    There is a verb "to mangle" which can be used in the context of "to mangle a tune" which is making a noise nobody wants.



    Proliferating redundancy and breeding degeneracy?



    There are words that can refer to the thing nobody wants: gimcrack refers to something that is made but is of little value and has a quite negative context:



    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gimcrack.



    Tat is an English word meaning things made of low quatlity, which is often used in the context of stuff that is new but nobody would want - there are lots of shops on English high streets that sell gifts and memorabilia, and most of this is referred to as pointless tat.



    http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/tat



    In respect of the making part then "mocking up", "faking up", "bodging", "cobbling together", could all refer in a negative connotation to making stuff nobody would want: e.g. "cobbled together a load of tat".



    But none of these match the pure phrase you are looking for. Inherent in the question is a contradiction, because if someone makes something then at least one person wants it, otherwise they would not have made it. If there are these kinds of semantic conradictions then it is not possible to find one word to cover both sides of the contradiction.



    If it is in terms of a more passive type of making such as "making" babies, then there might be some verbs appropriate to that.



    An important factor is whether or not there is a negative or positive connotation. For instance, if someone is making face masks in order to prevent infection then you could say these were things that were made that nobody wants to see, or to think about, but would that necessarily have a negative connotation? Of course nobody wants to be infected, so the fact they don't want to be used would connotate a positive outcome which the grammar would respond to, and so there is unlikely to be one word that can be used, there will always be a defining context and this will require extra words to set that context.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you for your elaborate answer. I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Better context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?
      – bastijn
      Aug 6 '17 at 6:37






    • 1




      Ah, like the torch that is also s calculator with a bottle opener in the handle, and flashes, and bleeps, and all you want is a torch to see in the dark on your walk from the car to the house. Or the Surf board with an ipad embedded in it - although that might be a good idea... "supererogatory" is closer, but not quite it.
      – David E Butler
      Aug 6 '17 at 8:57






    • 1




      Actually, in the sense you have it, where the item is performing extra functions but in the same field as its primary function - like the hairbrush that also tests your hair when all you want is a hairbruish then they would be "supererogatory" - but this is an adjective about the features of the thing, not the making of the thing itself.
      – David E Butler
      Aug 6 '17 at 9:01










    • I had the same problem. Capturing the making part, not only the item itself, is hard if not impossible in a single word. Gimcrack-fabricator is still nice, although for the use in mind I might go with a 'degeneration' (sorry, can't find the right word as English is not my main language) of supererogatory like supererogatoring. Food for thought.
      – bastijn
      Aug 6 '17 at 11:23
















    2














    It seems like you want to load the verb with the judgemental aspect, but the context is always going to be that the making is in itself succesful and therefore positive, even if the product made is not going to be wanted. Because of this you are not going to find one word that does the trick. Two words is easier:



    Gimcrack-fabricator.



    Originator of tat / purveyor of tat.



    There is a verb "to mangle" which can be used in the context of "to mangle a tune" which is making a noise nobody wants.



    Proliferating redundancy and breeding degeneracy?



    There are words that can refer to the thing nobody wants: gimcrack refers to something that is made but is of little value and has a quite negative context:



    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gimcrack.



    Tat is an English word meaning things made of low quatlity, which is often used in the context of stuff that is new but nobody would want - there are lots of shops on English high streets that sell gifts and memorabilia, and most of this is referred to as pointless tat.



    http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/tat



    In respect of the making part then "mocking up", "faking up", "bodging", "cobbling together", could all refer in a negative connotation to making stuff nobody would want: e.g. "cobbled together a load of tat".



    But none of these match the pure phrase you are looking for. Inherent in the question is a contradiction, because if someone makes something then at least one person wants it, otherwise they would not have made it. If there are these kinds of semantic conradictions then it is not possible to find one word to cover both sides of the contradiction.



    If it is in terms of a more passive type of making such as "making" babies, then there might be some verbs appropriate to that.



    An important factor is whether or not there is a negative or positive connotation. For instance, if someone is making face masks in order to prevent infection then you could say these were things that were made that nobody wants to see, or to think about, but would that necessarily have a negative connotation? Of course nobody wants to be infected, so the fact they don't want to be used would connotate a positive outcome which the grammar would respond to, and so there is unlikely to be one word that can be used, there will always be a defining context and this will require extra words to set that context.






    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you for your elaborate answer. I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Better context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?
      – bastijn
      Aug 6 '17 at 6:37






    • 1




      Ah, like the torch that is also s calculator with a bottle opener in the handle, and flashes, and bleeps, and all you want is a torch to see in the dark on your walk from the car to the house. Or the Surf board with an ipad embedded in it - although that might be a good idea... "supererogatory" is closer, but not quite it.
      – David E Butler
      Aug 6 '17 at 8:57






    • 1




      Actually, in the sense you have it, where the item is performing extra functions but in the same field as its primary function - like the hairbrush that also tests your hair when all you want is a hairbruish then they would be "supererogatory" - but this is an adjective about the features of the thing, not the making of the thing itself.
      – David E Butler
      Aug 6 '17 at 9:01










    • I had the same problem. Capturing the making part, not only the item itself, is hard if not impossible in a single word. Gimcrack-fabricator is still nice, although for the use in mind I might go with a 'degeneration' (sorry, can't find the right word as English is not my main language) of supererogatory like supererogatoring. Food for thought.
      – bastijn
      Aug 6 '17 at 11:23














    2












    2








    2






    It seems like you want to load the verb with the judgemental aspect, but the context is always going to be that the making is in itself succesful and therefore positive, even if the product made is not going to be wanted. Because of this you are not going to find one word that does the trick. Two words is easier:



    Gimcrack-fabricator.



    Originator of tat / purveyor of tat.



    There is a verb "to mangle" which can be used in the context of "to mangle a tune" which is making a noise nobody wants.



    Proliferating redundancy and breeding degeneracy?



    There are words that can refer to the thing nobody wants: gimcrack refers to something that is made but is of little value and has a quite negative context:



    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gimcrack.



    Tat is an English word meaning things made of low quatlity, which is often used in the context of stuff that is new but nobody would want - there are lots of shops on English high streets that sell gifts and memorabilia, and most of this is referred to as pointless tat.



    http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/tat



    In respect of the making part then "mocking up", "faking up", "bodging", "cobbling together", could all refer in a negative connotation to making stuff nobody would want: e.g. "cobbled together a load of tat".



    But none of these match the pure phrase you are looking for. Inherent in the question is a contradiction, because if someone makes something then at least one person wants it, otherwise they would not have made it. If there are these kinds of semantic conradictions then it is not possible to find one word to cover both sides of the contradiction.



    If it is in terms of a more passive type of making such as "making" babies, then there might be some verbs appropriate to that.



    An important factor is whether or not there is a negative or positive connotation. For instance, if someone is making face masks in order to prevent infection then you could say these were things that were made that nobody wants to see, or to think about, but would that necessarily have a negative connotation? Of course nobody wants to be infected, so the fact they don't want to be used would connotate a positive outcome which the grammar would respond to, and so there is unlikely to be one word that can be used, there will always be a defining context and this will require extra words to set that context.






    share|improve this answer














    It seems like you want to load the verb with the judgemental aspect, but the context is always going to be that the making is in itself succesful and therefore positive, even if the product made is not going to be wanted. Because of this you are not going to find one word that does the trick. Two words is easier:



    Gimcrack-fabricator.



    Originator of tat / purveyor of tat.



    There is a verb "to mangle" which can be used in the context of "to mangle a tune" which is making a noise nobody wants.



    Proliferating redundancy and breeding degeneracy?



    There are words that can refer to the thing nobody wants: gimcrack refers to something that is made but is of little value and has a quite negative context:



    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gimcrack.



    Tat is an English word meaning things made of low quatlity, which is often used in the context of stuff that is new but nobody would want - there are lots of shops on English high streets that sell gifts and memorabilia, and most of this is referred to as pointless tat.



    http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/tat



    In respect of the making part then "mocking up", "faking up", "bodging", "cobbling together", could all refer in a negative connotation to making stuff nobody would want: e.g. "cobbled together a load of tat".



    But none of these match the pure phrase you are looking for. Inherent in the question is a contradiction, because if someone makes something then at least one person wants it, otherwise they would not have made it. If there are these kinds of semantic conradictions then it is not possible to find one word to cover both sides of the contradiction.



    If it is in terms of a more passive type of making such as "making" babies, then there might be some verbs appropriate to that.



    An important factor is whether or not there is a negative or positive connotation. For instance, if someone is making face masks in order to prevent infection then you could say these were things that were made that nobody wants to see, or to think about, but would that necessarily have a negative connotation? Of course nobody wants to be infected, so the fact they don't want to be used would connotate a positive outcome which the grammar would respond to, and so there is unlikely to be one word that can be used, there will always be a defining context and this will require extra words to set that context.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 6 '17 at 0:03

























    answered Aug 5 '17 at 23:58









    David E Butler

    746




    746












    • Thank you for your elaborate answer. I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Better context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?
      – bastijn
      Aug 6 '17 at 6:37






    • 1




      Ah, like the torch that is also s calculator with a bottle opener in the handle, and flashes, and bleeps, and all you want is a torch to see in the dark on your walk from the car to the house. Or the Surf board with an ipad embedded in it - although that might be a good idea... "supererogatory" is closer, but not quite it.
      – David E Butler
      Aug 6 '17 at 8:57






    • 1




      Actually, in the sense you have it, where the item is performing extra functions but in the same field as its primary function - like the hairbrush that also tests your hair when all you want is a hairbruish then they would be "supererogatory" - but this is an adjective about the features of the thing, not the making of the thing itself.
      – David E Butler
      Aug 6 '17 at 9:01










    • I had the same problem. Capturing the making part, not only the item itself, is hard if not impossible in a single word. Gimcrack-fabricator is still nice, although for the use in mind I might go with a 'degeneration' (sorry, can't find the right word as English is not my main language) of supererogatory like supererogatoring. Food for thought.
      – bastijn
      Aug 6 '17 at 11:23


















    • Thank you for your elaborate answer. I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Better context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?
      – bastijn
      Aug 6 '17 at 6:37






    • 1




      Ah, like the torch that is also s calculator with a bottle opener in the handle, and flashes, and bleeps, and all you want is a torch to see in the dark on your walk from the car to the house. Or the Surf board with an ipad embedded in it - although that might be a good idea... "supererogatory" is closer, but not quite it.
      – David E Butler
      Aug 6 '17 at 8:57






    • 1




      Actually, in the sense you have it, where the item is performing extra functions but in the same field as its primary function - like the hairbrush that also tests your hair when all you want is a hairbruish then they would be "supererogatory" - but this is an adjective about the features of the thing, not the making of the thing itself.
      – David E Butler
      Aug 6 '17 at 9:01










    • I had the same problem. Capturing the making part, not only the item itself, is hard if not impossible in a single word. Gimcrack-fabricator is still nice, although for the use in mind I might go with a 'degeneration' (sorry, can't find the right word as English is not my main language) of supererogatory like supererogatoring. Food for thought.
      – bastijn
      Aug 6 '17 at 11:23
















    Thank you for your elaborate answer. I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Better context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:37




    Thank you for your elaborate answer. I'm searching for a word to describe a negative connotation. Better context: the current trend is to fabricate "everything connected", "internet-of-things". There are numerous examples that make no sense (and a few that do). How to capture the fabrication of the connected shaver that tells you you have to shave, the connected hairbrush that tells you your hair health score, and the bluetooth socks that tell left from right?
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 6:37




    1




    1




    Ah, like the torch that is also s calculator with a bottle opener in the handle, and flashes, and bleeps, and all you want is a torch to see in the dark on your walk from the car to the house. Or the Surf board with an ipad embedded in it - although that might be a good idea... "supererogatory" is closer, but not quite it.
    – David E Butler
    Aug 6 '17 at 8:57




    Ah, like the torch that is also s calculator with a bottle opener in the handle, and flashes, and bleeps, and all you want is a torch to see in the dark on your walk from the car to the house. Or the Surf board with an ipad embedded in it - although that might be a good idea... "supererogatory" is closer, but not quite it.
    – David E Butler
    Aug 6 '17 at 8:57




    1




    1




    Actually, in the sense you have it, where the item is performing extra functions but in the same field as its primary function - like the hairbrush that also tests your hair when all you want is a hairbruish then they would be "supererogatory" - but this is an adjective about the features of the thing, not the making of the thing itself.
    – David E Butler
    Aug 6 '17 at 9:01




    Actually, in the sense you have it, where the item is performing extra functions but in the same field as its primary function - like the hairbrush that also tests your hair when all you want is a hairbruish then they would be "supererogatory" - but this is an adjective about the features of the thing, not the making of the thing itself.
    – David E Butler
    Aug 6 '17 at 9:01












    I had the same problem. Capturing the making part, not only the item itself, is hard if not impossible in a single word. Gimcrack-fabricator is still nice, although for the use in mind I might go with a 'degeneration' (sorry, can't find the right word as English is not my main language) of supererogatory like supererogatoring. Food for thought.
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 11:23




    I had the same problem. Capturing the making part, not only the item itself, is hard if not impossible in a single word. Gimcrack-fabricator is still nice, although for the use in mind I might go with a 'degeneration' (sorry, can't find the right word as English is not my main language) of supererogatory like supererogatoring. Food for thought.
    – bastijn
    Aug 6 '17 at 11:23













    0














    To qualify as a chindogu, an article must physically exist and function: there are no conceptual chindogu. Thus every chindogu has to be made. We might describe the making of such a product as chindogumaking, along the lines of shoemaking or breadmaking. Unfortunately, though, this term has no currency, and is not to be found in any dictionary. However, chindogu-making (with a hyphen) is arguably a legitimate construction.



    The above link to YouTube is suggested because watching the videos gives a better initial idea of what chindogu are about than reading the (also recommended) Wikipedia article.






    share|improve this answer


























      0














      To qualify as a chindogu, an article must physically exist and function: there are no conceptual chindogu. Thus every chindogu has to be made. We might describe the making of such a product as chindogumaking, along the lines of shoemaking or breadmaking. Unfortunately, though, this term has no currency, and is not to be found in any dictionary. However, chindogu-making (with a hyphen) is arguably a legitimate construction.



      The above link to YouTube is suggested because watching the videos gives a better initial idea of what chindogu are about than reading the (also recommended) Wikipedia article.






      share|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        To qualify as a chindogu, an article must physically exist and function: there are no conceptual chindogu. Thus every chindogu has to be made. We might describe the making of such a product as chindogumaking, along the lines of shoemaking or breadmaking. Unfortunately, though, this term has no currency, and is not to be found in any dictionary. However, chindogu-making (with a hyphen) is arguably a legitimate construction.



        The above link to YouTube is suggested because watching the videos gives a better initial idea of what chindogu are about than reading the (also recommended) Wikipedia article.






        share|improve this answer












        To qualify as a chindogu, an article must physically exist and function: there are no conceptual chindogu. Thus every chindogu has to be made. We might describe the making of such a product as chindogumaking, along the lines of shoemaking or breadmaking. Unfortunately, though, this term has no currency, and is not to be found in any dictionary. However, chindogu-making (with a hyphen) is arguably a legitimate construction.



        The above link to YouTube is suggested because watching the videos gives a better initial idea of what chindogu are about than reading the (also recommended) Wikipedia article.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 12 hours ago









        John Bentin

        76948




        76948






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f404458%2fone-word-for-that-describes-making-things-nobody-wants%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Morgemoulin

            Scott Moir

            Souastre