What does “molecules to the atom” mean?
I am translating a book and I am confused with this sentence:
When Madame Curie started out in search of radium, when nobody knew what radium was like, they did not know how many molecules to the atom,...
Success Habits: Proven Principles for Greater Wealth, Health, and Happiness
Napoleon Hill, pub Pan Macmillan 2019
What does it mean by "molecules to the atom"?
expressions
New contributor
add a comment |
I am translating a book and I am confused with this sentence:
When Madame Curie started out in search of radium, when nobody knew what radium was like, they did not know how many molecules to the atom,...
Success Habits: Proven Principles for Greater Wealth, Health, and Happiness
Napoleon Hill, pub Pan Macmillan 2019
What does it mean by "molecules to the atom"?
expressions
New contributor
3
Might need more context. As is, it seems like the author has the terms reversed and it should have been 'atoms to the molecule.
– Jeeped
7 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it’s asking about science not English
– Jim
7 hours ago
1
It might mean "particles" rather than molecules.
– Pam
6 hours ago
It may be sarcastic, or referring to the Aristotelian version of "atom". Or both.
– Hot Licks
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I am translating a book and I am confused with this sentence:
When Madame Curie started out in search of radium, when nobody knew what radium was like, they did not know how many molecules to the atom,...
Success Habits: Proven Principles for Greater Wealth, Health, and Happiness
Napoleon Hill, pub Pan Macmillan 2019
What does it mean by "molecules to the atom"?
expressions
New contributor
I am translating a book and I am confused with this sentence:
When Madame Curie started out in search of radium, when nobody knew what radium was like, they did not know how many molecules to the atom,...
Success Habits: Proven Principles for Greater Wealth, Health, and Happiness
Napoleon Hill, pub Pan Macmillan 2019
What does it mean by "molecules to the atom"?
expressions
expressions
New contributor
New contributor
edited 6 hours ago
Andrew Leach♦
79.5k8150256
79.5k8150256
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
Phuong Trang Galaxykontum
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
3
Might need more context. As is, it seems like the author has the terms reversed and it should have been 'atoms to the molecule.
– Jeeped
7 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it’s asking about science not English
– Jim
7 hours ago
1
It might mean "particles" rather than molecules.
– Pam
6 hours ago
It may be sarcastic, or referring to the Aristotelian version of "atom". Or both.
– Hot Licks
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3
Might need more context. As is, it seems like the author has the terms reversed and it should have been 'atoms to the molecule.
– Jeeped
7 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it’s asking about science not English
– Jim
7 hours ago
1
It might mean "particles" rather than molecules.
– Pam
6 hours ago
It may be sarcastic, or referring to the Aristotelian version of "atom". Or both.
– Hot Licks
2 hours ago
3
3
Might need more context. As is, it seems like the author has the terms reversed and it should have been 'atoms to the molecule.
– Jeeped
7 hours ago
Might need more context. As is, it seems like the author has the terms reversed and it should have been 'atoms to the molecule.
– Jeeped
7 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it’s asking about science not English
– Jim
7 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it’s asking about science not English
– Jim
7 hours ago
1
1
It might mean "particles" rather than molecules.
– Pam
6 hours ago
It might mean "particles" rather than molecules.
– Pam
6 hours ago
It may be sarcastic, or referring to the Aristotelian version of "atom". Or both.
– Hot Licks
2 hours ago
It may be sarcastic, or referring to the Aristotelian version of "atom". Or both.
– Hot Licks
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It means "how many molecules were contained in an atom": "molecules to the atom" is an expression of a ratio, and by convention the larger quantity is put last.
Now, this is nonsense, as molecules consist of atoms, not the other way round. However, it does appear to be what the author wrote (if the representation in Google Books is anything to go by): if you're translating it, presumably you should represent that nonsense accurately in your own language.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Phuong Trang Galaxykontum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479355%2fwhat-does-molecules-to-the-atom-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It means "how many molecules were contained in an atom": "molecules to the atom" is an expression of a ratio, and by convention the larger quantity is put last.
Now, this is nonsense, as molecules consist of atoms, not the other way round. However, it does appear to be what the author wrote (if the representation in Google Books is anything to go by): if you're translating it, presumably you should represent that nonsense accurately in your own language.
add a comment |
It means "how many molecules were contained in an atom": "molecules to the atom" is an expression of a ratio, and by convention the larger quantity is put last.
Now, this is nonsense, as molecules consist of atoms, not the other way round. However, it does appear to be what the author wrote (if the representation in Google Books is anything to go by): if you're translating it, presumably you should represent that nonsense accurately in your own language.
add a comment |
It means "how many molecules were contained in an atom": "molecules to the atom" is an expression of a ratio, and by convention the larger quantity is put last.
Now, this is nonsense, as molecules consist of atoms, not the other way round. However, it does appear to be what the author wrote (if the representation in Google Books is anything to go by): if you're translating it, presumably you should represent that nonsense accurately in your own language.
It means "how many molecules were contained in an atom": "molecules to the atom" is an expression of a ratio, and by convention the larger quantity is put last.
Now, this is nonsense, as molecules consist of atoms, not the other way round. However, it does appear to be what the author wrote (if the representation in Google Books is anything to go by): if you're translating it, presumably you should represent that nonsense accurately in your own language.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Andrew Leach♦
79.5k8150256
79.5k8150256
add a comment |
add a comment |
Phuong Trang Galaxykontum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Phuong Trang Galaxykontum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Phuong Trang Galaxykontum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Phuong Trang Galaxykontum is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479355%2fwhat-does-molecules-to-the-atom-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
Might need more context. As is, it seems like the author has the terms reversed and it should have been 'atoms to the molecule.
– Jeeped
7 hours ago
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it’s asking about science not English
– Jim
7 hours ago
1
It might mean "particles" rather than molecules.
– Pam
6 hours ago
It may be sarcastic, or referring to the Aristotelian version of "atom". Or both.
– Hot Licks
2 hours ago