Forensic Linguistics; 'Stupid people' or 'Stupid woman' - Do we know what Jeremy Corbyn said?












-4














In the UK, some of the debates in the Houses of Parliament are televised. On 18th December 2018, Jeremy Corbyn was filmed muttering something—which was interpreted by a Twitter user as "stupid woman"—to himself in response to a speech to Theresa May, the beleaguered British Prime Minister.



Later, in response to this Twitter accusation, Corbyn said that he had said stupid people, not stupid woman. A lot of media outlets said that several lip-readers that had viewed he footage thought that he had said stupid woman.



However, the other lipreaders that advised the Speaker of the House, who had to rule on whether Jeremy Corbyn had transgressed, said that it was not possible to tell which thing he had said.



If he did or did not say stupid people, how do we know? What is the LINGUISTIC evidence?



If we cannot tell, why is it that it is LINGUISTICALLY ambiguous and that we cannot tell?





Here is a video of parts of that original exchange:



Video of May and Corbyn










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    If all the experts cannot agree, it is a tall task to think this community can provide an answer. ps: not my dn vote.
    – lbf
    16 hours ago






  • 3




    Mutters are not usually carefully articulated, at the lips or anywhere else. It has to be virtually impossible to distinguish the pair of labials p..p from the pair w..m, and how much rounding does ʊ get in rapid suppressed speech?
    – StoneyB
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    @HotLicks It is completely and uttely a question about English in every way!!!
    – Araucaria
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    @Araucaria I'll leave a formal answer to someone who can speak with authority on articulatory phonetics: somebody like, oh, you for example! And sure, my upvote--and my concurrence in your defence of the question's Anglicity.
    – StoneyB
    15 hours ago








  • 3




    I downvoted because, while the question is interesting, it doesn't seem to follow the spirit of being "[a] practical, answerable question based on [an] actual problem that you face." Experts are having trouble answering the question and attest how this is unanswerable, so it doesn't seem like your question is answerable with any degree of authority. (Your recent edit may change that, though - just based on what I know - that would incur a long answer.)
    – TaliesinMerlin
    15 hours ago


















-4














In the UK, some of the debates in the Houses of Parliament are televised. On 18th December 2018, Jeremy Corbyn was filmed muttering something—which was interpreted by a Twitter user as "stupid woman"—to himself in response to a speech to Theresa May, the beleaguered British Prime Minister.



Later, in response to this Twitter accusation, Corbyn said that he had said stupid people, not stupid woman. A lot of media outlets said that several lip-readers that had viewed he footage thought that he had said stupid woman.



However, the other lipreaders that advised the Speaker of the House, who had to rule on whether Jeremy Corbyn had transgressed, said that it was not possible to tell which thing he had said.



If he did or did not say stupid people, how do we know? What is the LINGUISTIC evidence?



If we cannot tell, why is it that it is LINGUISTICALLY ambiguous and that we cannot tell?





Here is a video of parts of that original exchange:



Video of May and Corbyn










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    If all the experts cannot agree, it is a tall task to think this community can provide an answer. ps: not my dn vote.
    – lbf
    16 hours ago






  • 3




    Mutters are not usually carefully articulated, at the lips or anywhere else. It has to be virtually impossible to distinguish the pair of labials p..p from the pair w..m, and how much rounding does ʊ get in rapid suppressed speech?
    – StoneyB
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    @HotLicks It is completely and uttely a question about English in every way!!!
    – Araucaria
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    @Araucaria I'll leave a formal answer to someone who can speak with authority on articulatory phonetics: somebody like, oh, you for example! And sure, my upvote--and my concurrence in your defence of the question's Anglicity.
    – StoneyB
    15 hours ago








  • 3




    I downvoted because, while the question is interesting, it doesn't seem to follow the spirit of being "[a] practical, answerable question based on [an] actual problem that you face." Experts are having trouble answering the question and attest how this is unanswerable, so it doesn't seem like your question is answerable with any degree of authority. (Your recent edit may change that, though - just based on what I know - that would incur a long answer.)
    – TaliesinMerlin
    15 hours ago
















-4












-4








-4







In the UK, some of the debates in the Houses of Parliament are televised. On 18th December 2018, Jeremy Corbyn was filmed muttering something—which was interpreted by a Twitter user as "stupid woman"—to himself in response to a speech to Theresa May, the beleaguered British Prime Minister.



Later, in response to this Twitter accusation, Corbyn said that he had said stupid people, not stupid woman. A lot of media outlets said that several lip-readers that had viewed he footage thought that he had said stupid woman.



However, the other lipreaders that advised the Speaker of the House, who had to rule on whether Jeremy Corbyn had transgressed, said that it was not possible to tell which thing he had said.



If he did or did not say stupid people, how do we know? What is the LINGUISTIC evidence?



If we cannot tell, why is it that it is LINGUISTICALLY ambiguous and that we cannot tell?





Here is a video of parts of that original exchange:



Video of May and Corbyn










share|improve this question















In the UK, some of the debates in the Houses of Parliament are televised. On 18th December 2018, Jeremy Corbyn was filmed muttering something—which was interpreted by a Twitter user as "stupid woman"—to himself in response to a speech to Theresa May, the beleaguered British Prime Minister.



Later, in response to this Twitter accusation, Corbyn said that he had said stupid people, not stupid woman. A lot of media outlets said that several lip-readers that had viewed he footage thought that he had said stupid woman.



However, the other lipreaders that advised the Speaker of the House, who had to rule on whether Jeremy Corbyn had transgressed, said that it was not possible to tell which thing he had said.



If he did or did not say stupid people, how do we know? What is the LINGUISTIC evidence?



If we cannot tell, why is it that it is LINGUISTICALLY ambiguous and that we cannot tell?





Here is a video of parts of that original exchange:



Video of May and Corbyn







pronunciation phonology phonetics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago

























asked 16 hours ago









Araucaria

35.2k968146




35.2k968146








  • 2




    If all the experts cannot agree, it is a tall task to think this community can provide an answer. ps: not my dn vote.
    – lbf
    16 hours ago






  • 3




    Mutters are not usually carefully articulated, at the lips or anywhere else. It has to be virtually impossible to distinguish the pair of labials p..p from the pair w..m, and how much rounding does ʊ get in rapid suppressed speech?
    – StoneyB
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    @HotLicks It is completely and uttely a question about English in every way!!!
    – Araucaria
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    @Araucaria I'll leave a formal answer to someone who can speak with authority on articulatory phonetics: somebody like, oh, you for example! And sure, my upvote--and my concurrence in your defence of the question's Anglicity.
    – StoneyB
    15 hours ago








  • 3




    I downvoted because, while the question is interesting, it doesn't seem to follow the spirit of being "[a] practical, answerable question based on [an] actual problem that you face." Experts are having trouble answering the question and attest how this is unanswerable, so it doesn't seem like your question is answerable with any degree of authority. (Your recent edit may change that, though - just based on what I know - that would incur a long answer.)
    – TaliesinMerlin
    15 hours ago
















  • 2




    If all the experts cannot agree, it is a tall task to think this community can provide an answer. ps: not my dn vote.
    – lbf
    16 hours ago






  • 3




    Mutters are not usually carefully articulated, at the lips or anywhere else. It has to be virtually impossible to distinguish the pair of labials p..p from the pair w..m, and how much rounding does ʊ get in rapid suppressed speech?
    – StoneyB
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    @HotLicks It is completely and uttely a question about English in every way!!!
    – Araucaria
    15 hours ago






  • 2




    @Araucaria I'll leave a formal answer to someone who can speak with authority on articulatory phonetics: somebody like, oh, you for example! And sure, my upvote--and my concurrence in your defence of the question's Anglicity.
    – StoneyB
    15 hours ago








  • 3




    I downvoted because, while the question is interesting, it doesn't seem to follow the spirit of being "[a] practical, answerable question based on [an] actual problem that you face." Experts are having trouble answering the question and attest how this is unanswerable, so it doesn't seem like your question is answerable with any degree of authority. (Your recent edit may change that, though - just based on what I know - that would incur a long answer.)
    – TaliesinMerlin
    15 hours ago










2




2




If all the experts cannot agree, it is a tall task to think this community can provide an answer. ps: not my dn vote.
– lbf
16 hours ago




If all the experts cannot agree, it is a tall task to think this community can provide an answer. ps: not my dn vote.
– lbf
16 hours ago




3




3




Mutters are not usually carefully articulated, at the lips or anywhere else. It has to be virtually impossible to distinguish the pair of labials p..p from the pair w..m, and how much rounding does ʊ get in rapid suppressed speech?
– StoneyB
15 hours ago




Mutters are not usually carefully articulated, at the lips or anywhere else. It has to be virtually impossible to distinguish the pair of labials p..p from the pair w..m, and how much rounding does ʊ get in rapid suppressed speech?
– StoneyB
15 hours ago




2




2




@HotLicks It is completely and uttely a question about English in every way!!!
– Araucaria
15 hours ago




@HotLicks It is completely and uttely a question about English in every way!!!
– Araucaria
15 hours ago




2




2




@Araucaria I'll leave a formal answer to someone who can speak with authority on articulatory phonetics: somebody like, oh, you for example! And sure, my upvote--and my concurrence in your defence of the question's Anglicity.
– StoneyB
15 hours ago






@Araucaria I'll leave a formal answer to someone who can speak with authority on articulatory phonetics: somebody like, oh, you for example! And sure, my upvote--and my concurrence in your defence of the question's Anglicity.
– StoneyB
15 hours ago






3




3




I downvoted because, while the question is interesting, it doesn't seem to follow the spirit of being "[a] practical, answerable question based on [an] actual problem that you face." Experts are having trouble answering the question and attest how this is unanswerable, so it doesn't seem like your question is answerable with any degree of authority. (Your recent edit may change that, though - just based on what I know - that would incur a long answer.)
– TaliesinMerlin
15 hours ago






I downvoted because, while the question is interesting, it doesn't seem to follow the spirit of being "[a] practical, answerable question based on [an] actual problem that you face." Experts are having trouble answering the question and attest how this is unanswerable, so it doesn't seem like your question is answerable with any degree of authority. (Your recent edit may change that, though - just based on what I know - that would incur a long answer.)
– TaliesinMerlin
15 hours ago

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478817%2fforensic-linguistics-stupid-people-or-stupid-woman-do-we-know-what-jeremy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478817%2fforensic-linguistics-stupid-people-or-stupid-woman-do-we-know-what-jeremy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Morgemoulin

Scott Moir

Souastre