What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm?
What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm? I've been told that an apocalypse is an act of God, but we seem to use it as a generic term for any grand disaster. What is the difference in original and current usage?
word-choice differences synonyms nouns
add a comment |
What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm? I've been told that an apocalypse is an act of God, but we seem to use it as a generic term for any grand disaster. What is the difference in original and current usage?
word-choice differences synonyms nouns
add a comment |
What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm? I've been told that an apocalypse is an act of God, but we seem to use it as a generic term for any grand disaster. What is the difference in original and current usage?
word-choice differences synonyms nouns
What is the difference between an apocalypse and a cataclysm? I've been told that an apocalypse is an act of God, but we seem to use it as a generic term for any grand disaster. What is the difference in original and current usage?
word-choice differences synonyms nouns
word-choice differences synonyms nouns
edited Apr 14 '11 at 8:19
RegDwigнt♦
82.7k31281377
82.7k31281377
asked Apr 9 '11 at 15:58
C. Ross
71351227
71351227
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.
Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.
Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.
4
+1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?
– Alain Pannetier Φ
Apr 9 '11 at 19:11
3
Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.
– Mitch
Apr 9 '11 at 20:24
2
@AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.
– Cerberus
Apr 13 '11 at 23:42
1
To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..
– j-g-faustus
Jun 6 '11 at 19:33
@j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591
– Cerberus
Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
add a comment |
Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.
A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.
However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.
The OED defines apocalypse as:
- (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.
- By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.
- Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.
- More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.
As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.
To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.
add a comment |
Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.
World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.
add a comment |
Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.
A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20259%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-an-apocalypse-and-a-cataclysm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.
Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.
Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.
4
+1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?
– Alain Pannetier Φ
Apr 9 '11 at 19:11
3
Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.
– Mitch
Apr 9 '11 at 20:24
2
@AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.
– Cerberus
Apr 13 '11 at 23:42
1
To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..
– j-g-faustus
Jun 6 '11 at 19:33
@j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591
– Cerberus
Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
add a comment |
Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.
Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.
Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.
4
+1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?
– Alain Pannetier Φ
Apr 9 '11 at 19:11
3
Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.
– Mitch
Apr 9 '11 at 20:24
2
@AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.
– Cerberus
Apr 13 '11 at 23:42
1
To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..
– j-g-faustus
Jun 6 '11 at 19:33
@j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591
– Cerberus
Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
add a comment |
Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.
Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.
Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.
Apocalypse means "revelation" in Greek, from Greek καλύπτω (kalupto) "hide" and ἀπό- (apo-) "un-". It was so used in the New Testament: the last book is called Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰωάννου in Greek, Revelation of John, in which the Last Judgement is revealed to John, the time when the Christian God will end human existence as we know it. From this, apocalypse gained its secondary modern sense of armageddon, the end of the world by the forces of nature or God. In this way it is now most often used. It now means a disaster so great that it will probably destroy most of mankind, and possibly the entire universe.
Cataclysm comes from Greek κατακλυσμός (kataklusmos), "deluge", from κλύζω (kluzo), "wash away, flood", and κατά- (kata-), "down". It refers to the flooding of all Earth, usually by endless rains and rising rivers, as it is told in the story of Noah's Ark in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Note that this myth also exists in many other Oriental cultures. In many cultures, possibly including Judaism, this is a recurring event, by which time is cyclically ordered in periods of growth and subsequent destruction. It now means a great, uncontrollable disaster, but not necessarily so great as to destroy civilization. It should have significant destructive impact within a certain environment. There is some overlap with apocalypse.
Armageddon (Ἁρμαγεδών in Greek) is the hill in Israel where the final battle between the Christian Messiah and Satan is to take place at the end of time, the Last Judgement. The word appears only once in the Bible, so says Wikipedia, in the book of Revelation. Similar stories about a battle on a mountain at the end of time already existed in Jewish lore before Christ, and were also adopted by Islamic prophecies. Armageddon is used as a near-synonym of apocalypse in modern English; I don't see any difference except that it has a slight connotation of violence and struggle, whereas apocalypse is slightly more abstract, "cleaner". In most contexts there is no difference.
edited Jan 12 '13 at 23:57
answered Apr 9 '11 at 16:36
Cerberus
53.8k2119205
53.8k2119205
4
+1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?
– Alain Pannetier Φ
Apr 9 '11 at 19:11
3
Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.
– Mitch
Apr 9 '11 at 20:24
2
@AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.
– Cerberus
Apr 13 '11 at 23:42
1
To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..
– j-g-faustus
Jun 6 '11 at 19:33
@j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591
– Cerberus
Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
add a comment |
4
+1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?
– Alain Pannetier Φ
Apr 9 '11 at 19:11
3
Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.
– Mitch
Apr 9 '11 at 20:24
2
@AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.
– Cerberus
Apr 13 '11 at 23:42
1
To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..
– j-g-faustus
Jun 6 '11 at 19:33
@j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591
– Cerberus
Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
4
4
+1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?
– Alain Pannetier Φ
Apr 9 '11 at 19:11
+1, The perfect answer. As for the destruction of the universe, the question is: what to do with the debris ?
– Alain Pannetier Φ
Apr 9 '11 at 19:11
3
3
Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.
– Mitch
Apr 9 '11 at 20:24
Megiddo, which Armageddon is named after, is a a small hill in the Jezreel Valley in Israel. It has been the sight of many battles over the millenia.
– Mitch
Apr 9 '11 at 20:24
2
2
@AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.
– Cerberus
Apr 13 '11 at 23:42
@AlainPannetier: There should be no debris if we do it properly.
– Cerberus
Apr 13 '11 at 23:42
1
1
To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..
– j-g-faustus
Jun 6 '11 at 19:33
To my mind, Armageddon is a specific type of apocalypse: A battle between supernatural forces at the end of the world, like Ragnarök in Norse mythology. While 'apocalypse' is "the end of civilization" by any means, including aliens, zombies, meteorites, natural disasters, nuclear war etc..
– j-g-faustus
Jun 6 '11 at 19:33
@j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591
– Cerberus
Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
@j-g-austus: Well, that is a more literal interpretation; but it is also used in a metaphorical sense, quite close to apocalypse: imdb.com/title/tt0120591
– Cerberus
Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
add a comment |
Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.
A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.
However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.
The OED defines apocalypse as:
- (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.
- By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.
- Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.
- More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.
As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.
To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.
add a comment |
Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.
A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.
However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.
The OED defines apocalypse as:
- (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.
- By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.
- Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.
- More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.
As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.
To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.
add a comment |
Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.
A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.
However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.
The OED defines apocalypse as:
- (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.
- By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.
- Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.
- More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.
As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.
To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.
Apocalypse is a Greek word for revelation and is associated especially with the end-of-days story in the Book of Revelations. While it can be used for any disaster (and has been in modern times) the implication is that an apocalyptic event is a world-ending event.
A cataclysm on the other hand has fewer religious associations and can stand in for any major disaster, although a cataclysm can also be a world ending or changing disaster.
However the words can be used as synonyms in certain cases.
The OED defines apocalypse as:
- (With capital initial.) The ‘revelation’ of the future granted to St. John in the isle of Patmos. The book of the New Testament in which this is recorded.
- By extension: Any revelation or disclosure.
- Christian Church. The events described in the revelation of St John; the Second Coming of Christ and ultimate destruction of the world.
- More generally: a disaster resulting in drastic, irreversible damage to human society or the environment, esp. on a global scale; a cataclysm. Also in weakened use.
As you can see, the primary associations are Biblical, although when used synonymously with cataclysm the implication is that a cataclysm affected humans and human society.
To give an example, the meteor strike that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago was a definitely a cataclysmic event; however it was not an apocalyptic, as it did not affect humans or destroy the world.
edited Apr 14 '11 at 0:37
Uticensis
13.2k59129229
13.2k59129229
answered Apr 9 '11 at 16:34
crasic
590411
590411
add a comment |
add a comment |
Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.
World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.
add a comment |
Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.
World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.
add a comment |
Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.
World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.
Apocalypse brings on the end of the world while cataclysm is a large-scale disaster but doesn't mean the end of the world.
World wars and nuclear disasters have been cataclysmic but not apocalyptic as the world and human life has continued.
answered Apr 9 '11 at 16:30
Karl
5,5971931
5,5971931
add a comment |
add a comment |
Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.
A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.
add a comment |
Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.
A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.
add a comment |
Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.
A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.
Going back to the Greek roots, an apocalypse refers to the lifting of a veil, a revelation. In the Bible specifically, it refers to the final battle on earth before God's kingdom is revealed. Which is important, because if you've been good, you get in. If not, you get a good look at what you'll be missing while you wail or gnash teeth or as you will in the eternal hellfire.
A cataclysm, by contrast, refers to a physical disaster. The Greek root refers particularly to a flood. A cataclysm doesn't imply divine intervention.
answered Apr 9 '11 at 16:27
mfe
1,92089
1,92089
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f20259%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-an-apocalypse-and-a-cataclysm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown