Determine if this specific sequence is a Cauchy sequence











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I have the following sequence:
$$a_n =sum_{k = 1}^n (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2} $$
And the hint is that I have to prove that:
$$ {1over k^2} < {1over k-1} - {1over k} $$



So assuming $m>n$, I have to prove that:
$$forall epsilon >0, exists N in mathbb{N},$$ so that $$ forall m,n > N Rightarrow lvert a_m - a_nrvert < epsilon $$



What I gathered so far:
$ lvert a_m - a_nrvert = lvert sum_{k = n+1}^m (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2}rvert $



$b_k$ is a sequence of natural numbers ${1,2,3.....}$, so in absolute value, $(-1)^{b_k} $ is $1$.
Therefore:



$ lvert a_m - a_nrvert = lvert sum_{k = n+1}^m (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2}rvert leq sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}. $



From here on, its not so clear to me as to how to proceed.
What should be my next steps?






calculus sequences-and-series limits cauchy-sequences







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Note that (as suggested in one of the edits) the last equality in the last line should be an inequality $leq$.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:50










  • Just saw it, fixed, thanks a lot :)
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:51















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I have the following sequence:
$$a_n =sum_{k = 1}^n (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2} $$
And the hint is that I have to prove that:
$$ {1over k^2} < {1over k-1} - {1over k} $$



So assuming $m>n$, I have to prove that:
$$forall epsilon >0, exists N in mathbb{N},$$ so that $$ forall m,n > N Rightarrow lvert a_m - a_nrvert < epsilon $$



What I gathered so far:
$ lvert a_m - a_nrvert = lvert sum_{k = n+1}^m (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2}rvert $



$b_k$ is a sequence of natural numbers ${1,2,3.....}$, so in absolute value, $(-1)^{b_k} $ is $1$.
Therefore:



$ lvert a_m - a_nrvert = lvert sum_{k = n+1}^m (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2}rvert leq sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}. $



From here on, its not so clear to me as to how to proceed.
What should be my next steps?






calculus sequences-and-series limits cauchy-sequences







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Note that (as suggested in one of the edits) the last equality in the last line should be an inequality $leq$.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:50










  • Just saw it, fixed, thanks a lot :)
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:51













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I have the following sequence:
$$a_n =sum_{k = 1}^n (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2} $$
And the hint is that I have to prove that:
$$ {1over k^2} < {1over k-1} - {1over k} $$



So assuming $m>n$, I have to prove that:
$$forall epsilon >0, exists N in mathbb{N},$$ so that $$ forall m,n > N Rightarrow lvert a_m - a_nrvert < epsilon $$



What I gathered so far:
$ lvert a_m - a_nrvert = lvert sum_{k = n+1}^m (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2}rvert $



$b_k$ is a sequence of natural numbers ${1,2,3.....}$, so in absolute value, $(-1)^{b_k} $ is $1$.
Therefore:



$ lvert a_m - a_nrvert = lvert sum_{k = n+1}^m (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2}rvert leq sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}. $



From here on, its not so clear to me as to how to proceed.
What should be my next steps?






calculus sequences-and-series limits cauchy-sequences







share|cite|improve this question















I have the following sequence:
$$a_n =sum_{k = 1}^n (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2} $$
And the hint is that I have to prove that:
$$ {1over k^2} < {1over k-1} - {1over k} $$



So assuming $m>n$, I have to prove that:
$$forall epsilon >0, exists N in mathbb{N},$$ so that $$ forall m,n > N Rightarrow lvert a_m - a_nrvert < epsilon $$



What I gathered so far:
$ lvert a_m - a_nrvert = lvert sum_{k = n+1}^m (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2}rvert $



$b_k$ is a sequence of natural numbers ${1,2,3.....}$, so in absolute value, $(-1)^{b_k} $ is $1$.
Therefore:



$ lvert a_m - a_nrvert = lvert sum_{k = n+1}^m (-1)^{b_k} {1over k^2}rvert leq sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}. $



From here on, its not so clear to me as to how to proceed.
What should be my next steps?






calculus sequences-and-series limits cauchy-sequences




calculus sequences-and-series limits cauchy-sequences






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 9 at 10:51









Jonas Lenz

505212




505212










asked Dec 9 at 10:28









Tegernako

596




596








  • 1




    Note that (as suggested in one of the edits) the last equality in the last line should be an inequality $leq$.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:50










  • Just saw it, fixed, thanks a lot :)
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:51














  • 1




    Note that (as suggested in one of the edits) the last equality in the last line should be an inequality $leq$.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:50










  • Just saw it, fixed, thanks a lot :)
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:51








1




1




Note that (as suggested in one of the edits) the last equality in the last line should be an inequality $leq$.
– Yanko
Dec 9 at 10:50




Note that (as suggested in one of the edits) the last equality in the last line should be an inequality $leq$.
– Yanko
Dec 9 at 10:50












Just saw it, fixed, thanks a lot :)
– Tegernako
Dec 9 at 10:51




Just saw it, fixed, thanks a lot :)
– Tegernako
Dec 9 at 10:51










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










You're almost done. Since $frac{1}{k^2} leq frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}$ you have that



$$sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}leqsum_{k=n+1}^m left[frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}right]$$ This is a telescoping series which is equal to $frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{m}$. It converges to zero as $n,mrightarrow 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Exactly! Thanks.
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:41


















up vote
5
down vote













Now, use the fact that$$sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1k-frac1{k-1}=frac1n-frac1m.$$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:39










  • Seems like I went into paralysis by analysis trying to over-express the sum I had. Thanks!
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:40






  • 1




    Why do we need the hint? Can't we simply say that as $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ is convergent, we know that that $sum_{k=n}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ converges to $0$ as $n to infty$ which shows the claim, too.
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 9 at 10:44








  • 1




    In order to prove that, for each $varepsilon>0$, $sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<varepsilon$, if $m$ and $n$ are large enough.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:46








  • 1




    @JonasLenz I guess that is how one shows that $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ convergent.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:49











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032238%2fdetermine-if-this-specific-sequence-is-a-cauchy-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
5
down vote



accepted










You're almost done. Since $frac{1}{k^2} leq frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}$ you have that



$$sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}leqsum_{k=n+1}^m left[frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}right]$$ This is a telescoping series which is equal to $frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{m}$. It converges to zero as $n,mrightarrow 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Exactly! Thanks.
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:41















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










You're almost done. Since $frac{1}{k^2} leq frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}$ you have that



$$sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}leqsum_{k=n+1}^m left[frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}right]$$ This is a telescoping series which is equal to $frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{m}$. It converges to zero as $n,mrightarrow 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Exactly! Thanks.
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:41













up vote
5
down vote



accepted







up vote
5
down vote



accepted






You're almost done. Since $frac{1}{k^2} leq frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}$ you have that



$$sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}leqsum_{k=n+1}^m left[frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}right]$$ This is a telescoping series which is equal to $frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{m}$. It converges to zero as $n,mrightarrow 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer














You're almost done. Since $frac{1}{k^2} leq frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}$ you have that



$$sum_{k = n+1}^m {1over k^2}leqsum_{k=n+1}^m left[frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k}right]$$ This is a telescoping series which is equal to $frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{m}$. It converges to zero as $n,mrightarrow 0$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 9 at 10:51

























answered Dec 9 at 10:35









Yanko

5,362722




5,362722












  • Exactly! Thanks.
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:41


















  • Exactly! Thanks.
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:41
















Exactly! Thanks.
– Tegernako
Dec 9 at 10:41




Exactly! Thanks.
– Tegernako
Dec 9 at 10:41










up vote
5
down vote













Now, use the fact that$$sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1k-frac1{k-1}=frac1n-frac1m.$$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:39










  • Seems like I went into paralysis by analysis trying to over-express the sum I had. Thanks!
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:40






  • 1




    Why do we need the hint? Can't we simply say that as $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ is convergent, we know that that $sum_{k=n}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ converges to $0$ as $n to infty$ which shows the claim, too.
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 9 at 10:44








  • 1




    In order to prove that, for each $varepsilon>0$, $sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<varepsilon$, if $m$ and $n$ are large enough.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:46








  • 1




    @JonasLenz I guess that is how one shows that $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ convergent.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:49















up vote
5
down vote













Now, use the fact that$$sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1k-frac1{k-1}=frac1n-frac1m.$$






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:39










  • Seems like I went into paralysis by analysis trying to over-express the sum I had. Thanks!
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:40






  • 1




    Why do we need the hint? Can't we simply say that as $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ is convergent, we know that that $sum_{k=n}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ converges to $0$ as $n to infty$ which shows the claim, too.
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 9 at 10:44








  • 1




    In order to prove that, for each $varepsilon>0$, $sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<varepsilon$, if $m$ and $n$ are large enough.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:46








  • 1




    @JonasLenz I guess that is how one shows that $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ convergent.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:49













up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









Now, use the fact that$$sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1k-frac1{k-1}=frac1n-frac1m.$$






share|cite|improve this answer














Now, use the fact that$$sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1k-frac1{k-1}=frac1n-frac1m.$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 9 at 10:39

























answered Dec 9 at 10:36









José Carlos Santos

146k22116215




146k22116215








  • 1




    I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:39










  • Seems like I went into paralysis by analysis trying to over-express the sum I had. Thanks!
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:40






  • 1




    Why do we need the hint? Can't we simply say that as $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ is convergent, we know that that $sum_{k=n}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ converges to $0$ as $n to infty$ which shows the claim, too.
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 9 at 10:44








  • 1




    In order to prove that, for each $varepsilon>0$, $sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<varepsilon$, if $m$ and $n$ are large enough.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:46








  • 1




    @JonasLenz I guess that is how one shows that $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ convergent.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:49














  • 1




    I've edited my answer. Thank you.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:39










  • Seems like I went into paralysis by analysis trying to over-express the sum I had. Thanks!
    – Tegernako
    Dec 9 at 10:40






  • 1




    Why do we need the hint? Can't we simply say that as $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ is convergent, we know that that $sum_{k=n}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ converges to $0$ as $n to infty$ which shows the claim, too.
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 9 at 10:44








  • 1




    In order to prove that, for each $varepsilon>0$, $sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<varepsilon$, if $m$ and $n$ are large enough.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 9 at 10:46








  • 1




    @JonasLenz I guess that is how one shows that $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ convergent.
    – Yanko
    Dec 9 at 10:49








1




1




I've edited my answer. Thank you.
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 9 at 10:39




I've edited my answer. Thank you.
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 9 at 10:39












Seems like I went into paralysis by analysis trying to over-express the sum I had. Thanks!
– Tegernako
Dec 9 at 10:40




Seems like I went into paralysis by analysis trying to over-express the sum I had. Thanks!
– Tegernako
Dec 9 at 10:40




1




1




Why do we need the hint? Can't we simply say that as $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ is convergent, we know that that $sum_{k=n}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ converges to $0$ as $n to infty$ which shows the claim, too.
– Jonas Lenz
Dec 9 at 10:44






Why do we need the hint? Can't we simply say that as $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ is convergent, we know that that $sum_{k=n}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ converges to $0$ as $n to infty$ which shows the claim, too.
– Jonas Lenz
Dec 9 at 10:44






1




1




In order to prove that, for each $varepsilon>0$, $sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<varepsilon$, if $m$ and $n$ are large enough.
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 9 at 10:46






In order to prove that, for each $varepsilon>0$, $sum_{k=n+1}^mfrac1{k^2}<varepsilon$, if $m$ and $n$ are large enough.
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 9 at 10:46






1




1




@JonasLenz I guess that is how one shows that $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ convergent.
– Yanko
Dec 9 at 10:49




@JonasLenz I guess that is how one shows that $sum_{k=1}^infty frac{1}{k^2}$ convergent.
– Yanko
Dec 9 at 10:49


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032238%2fdetermine-if-this-specific-sequence-is-a-cauchy-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Morgemoulin

Image
Morgemoulin — miejscowość i gmina — Państwo   Francja Region Grand Est Departament Moza Okręg Verdun Kod INSEE 55357 Powierzchnia 6,82 km² Populacja  (1990) • liczba ludności 75 • gęstość 11 os./km² Kod pocztowy 55400 Położenie na mapie Francji Morgemoulin 49°14′N   5°35′E / 49,233333   5,583333 Portal Francja Morgemoulin – miejscowość i gmina we Francji, w regionie Grand Est, w departamencie Moza. Według danych na rok 1990 gminę zamieszkiwało 75 osób, a gęstość zaludnienia wynosiła 11 osób/km² (wśród 2335 gmin Lotaryngii Morgemoulin plasuje się na 970. miejscu pod względem liczby ludności, natomiast pod względem powierzchni na miejscu 848.). Bibliografia | Francuski urząd statystyczny ( fr. ) . p   •   d   •   e Gminy okręgu Verdun Abaucourt-Hautecourt • Aincreville • Ambly-sur-Meuse • Amel-sur-l'Étang • Ancemont • Arrancy-sur-Crusne • Aubréville • Autré
Read more

Scott Moir

Image
Scott Moir Tessa Virtue i Scott Moir w 2016 r. Reprezentacja   Kanada Data i miejsce urodzenia 2 września 1987 London Wzrost 180 cm Konkurencja Pary taneczne Partner sportowy Tessa Virtue Trener Marie-France Dubreuil, Patrice Lauzon, Romain Haguenauer Poprzednio: Marina Zujewa, Oleg Epstein, Igor Szpilband, Johnny Johns, Carol Moir, Paul MacIntosh, Suzanne Killing Klub Montreal International School of Skating Poprzednio: Arctic Edge FSC Ilderton Skating Club Lokalizacja treningowa Montreal Poprzednio: Canton Kitchener Rekordy życiowe ISU przed sezonem 2018/2019 Nota łączna 206,07 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Taniec krótki 83,67 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Taniec dowolny 122,40 Igrzyska Olimpijskie 2018 Dorobek medalowy Reprezentacja   Kanada Igrzyska olimpijskie Złoto Vancouver 2010 pary taneczne Złoto Pjongczang 2018 pary taneczne Złoto Pjongczang 2018 drużynowo Srebro S
Read more

Souastre

Image
Souastre — miejscowość i gmina — Herb Państwo   Francja Region Hauts-de-France Departament Pas-de-Calais Okręg Arras Kod INSEE 62800 Powierzchnia 7,18 km² Populacja  (1990) • liczba ludności 352 • gęstość 49 os./km² Kod pocztowy 62111 Położenie na mapie Francji Souastre 50°09′N   2°34′E / 50,150000   2,566667 Portal Francja Souastre – miejscowość i gmina we Francji, w regionie Hauts-de-France, w departamencie Pas-de-Calais. Według danych na rok 1990 gminę zamieszkiwały 352 osoby, a gęstość zaludnienia wynosiła 49 osób/km² (wśród 1549 gmin regionu Nord-Pas-de-Calais Souastre plasuje się na 887. miejscu pod względem liczby ludności, natomiast pod względem powierzchni na miejscu 507.). Bibliografia | Francuski urząd statystyczny ( fr. ) . p   •   d   •   e Gminy okręgu Arras Ablain-Saint-Nazaire Ablainzevelle Acheville Achicourt Achiet-le-Grand Achiet-le-Pe
Read more