Cfrtjryk

Is it possible to create variables that can be defined using integers. I would create an example to work with but I have no idea how to start. Hopefully the snippet I have included makes sense.

% creates variables wk[1], wk[2], ... , wk[10]

foreach i in {1,2,...,10}{newcommandwk[i]{}} 



% stores the value 'this is week 2' into wk[2]

wk[2]{this is week 2}



% outputs 'this is week 2'

wk[2]

Variables?

(La)TeX is a macro language with macro-expansion/replacement.

You have macros, registers and parameters.

You can use macros that don't process arguments as variables.

In any case you need to be aware of how macro-expansion works and about the order in time in which single expansion-steps and assignments are carried out.

I'd just use a macro name which takes a sequence of tokens nested in curly braces for the name of a control-sequence-token and via csname..endcsname constructs/delivers that control-sequence-token while leaving things in place that possibly occur between name and the opening-curly-brace.

That control-sequence-token in turn can be (re)defined to be a macro or can be expanded, just as you like:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{pgffor}



newcommandname{}longdefname#1#{romannumeral0innername{#1}}%

newcommandinnername[2]{%

  expandafterexchangeexpandafter{csname #2endcsname}{0 #1}%

}%

newcommandexchange[2]{#2#1}%



% This loop defines macros/control-word-tokens wk[1], wk[2], ... , wk[10] 

% with "empty" replacement-text:

foreach i in {1,2,...,10}{%

   namenewcommand*{wk[i]}{}%

   % foreach opens up a local scope. 

   % Thus we need to turn assignments restricted to that scope into global 

   % assignments:

   namenamegloballet{wk[i]}={wk[i]}%

} %



begin{document}



% This "stores the value 'this is week 2' into wk[2]".

% Better: This redefines the macro wk[2] to expand to the phrase "this is week 2".

namerenewcommand*{wk[2]}{this is week 2}



% As there is nothing between name and the opening brace, this just delivers the

% control-sequence-token wk[2] which in turn gets expanded as usual while that

% expansion yields 'this is week 2':

name{wk[2]}



% If eTeX-extensions are available, you can use numbernumexpr.. for calculations:

name{wk[numbernumexpr(2*3)-5+1relax]}



% this shows the definition/meaning of wk[2] on the screen/in the .log-file:

%nameshow{wk[2]}



% this prints the meaning of wk[2]

texttt{namestring{wk[2]}: namemeaning{wk[2]}}



end{document}

Here's a simple version that makes use of the xparse package to define a new array-like command with a first parameter in square brackets and an optional second parameter in braces:

documentclass{article}

usepackage{xparse}

usepackage{pgffor}



newcommandmakearray[1]{%

    expandafterNewDocumentCommandcsname#1endcsname{rg}{%

        IfValueTF{##2}{%

            expandafterdefcsname #1@##1endcsname{##2}%

        }{%

            csname #1@##1endcsname

        }%

    }

}



begin{document}

makearray{wk}



wk[1]{this is week 1}

wk[3]{this is week 3}



foreach i in {1,2,3} {wk[i]par}

end{document}

You use it like

makearray{name}

to define a new array command name. Then your can use

name[key]{value}

to set a value at position key, and

name[key]

to output the stored value at position key. If no key was set before, the result is empty (or equal to relax, to be more precise).

Thus, the output for the above example is

this is week 1

this is week 3

Since you seem to want it in contexts of loops, here's an implementation that allows arithmetic expressions in the argument.

I distinguish between the phases of setting and retrieving values. The syntax you propose disallows wk being expandable, because one would have to check whether it is used for setting a value.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{xparse}



ExplSyntaxOn

NewExpandableDocumentCommand{wk}{m}

 {

  prop_item:Nf g_garth_week_prop { int_eval:n { #1 } }

 }

NewDocumentCommand{setwk}{mm}

 {

  prop_gput:Nfn g_garth_week_prop { int_eval:n { #1 } } { #2 }

 }



cs_generate_variant:Nn prop_item:Nn { Nf }

cs_generate_variant:Nn prop_gput:Nnn { Nf }



prop_new:N g_garth_week_prop



ExplSyntaxOff



setwk{2}{This is week two}

setwk{2+1}{This is week three}



begin{document}



wk{2}



wk{7-2*2}



end{document}

Here is an abstraction layer that allows to define as many arrays as you want.

documentclass{article}

usepackage{xparse}



ExplSyntaxOn

NewDocumentCommand{NewArray}{m}

 {

  prop_new:c { g_garth_#1_prop }

  cs_new_protected:cpn { set#1 } ##1 ##2

   {

    prop_gput:cfn { g_garth_#1_prop } { int_eval:n { ##1 } } { ##2 }

   }

  cs_new:cpn { #1 } ##1

   {

    prop_item:cf { g_garth_#1_prop } { int_eval:n { ##1 } }

   }

 }



cs_generate_variant:Nn prop_item:Nn { cf }

cs_generate_variant:Nn prop_gput:Nnn { cf }



ExplSyntaxOff



NewArray{wk}



setwk{2}{This is week two}

setwk{2+1}{This is week three}



begin{document}



wk{2}



wk{7-2*2}



end{document}