Symbolic solution for the energy of potential flow











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I have a question to a physical task in Mathematica.



We have this equation of motion:



$$mcdotddot{x} = -m(omega_0^2cdot x+(epsilon x^3))=-frac{d}{dx}V(x)$$



For energy of masspoint there is the condition :



$$epsilon Ell momega_0^4$$



I have to write a procedure that uses the law of the conservation of energy for the potential $V(x)$ to calculate $t(x_1) - t(x_0)$ when there are given two points $x_0$ and $x_1.



How could I do this in Mathematica?










share|improve this question
























  • Welcome to Mathematica.SE! I hope you will become a regular contributor. To get started, 1) take the introductory tour now, 2) when you see good questions and answers, vote them up by clicking the gray triangles, because the credibility of the system is based on the reputation gained by users sharing their knowledge, 3) remember to accept the answer, if any, that solves your problem, by clicking the checkmark sign, and 4) give help too, by answering questions in your areas of expertise.
    – bbgodfrey
    Dec 3 at 1:12















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I have a question to a physical task in Mathematica.



We have this equation of motion:



$$mcdotddot{x} = -m(omega_0^2cdot x+(epsilon x^3))=-frac{d}{dx}V(x)$$



For energy of masspoint there is the condition :



$$epsilon Ell momega_0^4$$



I have to write a procedure that uses the law of the conservation of energy for the potential $V(x)$ to calculate $t(x_1) - t(x_0)$ when there are given two points $x_0$ and $x_1.



How could I do this in Mathematica?










share|improve this question
























  • Welcome to Mathematica.SE! I hope you will become a regular contributor. To get started, 1) take the introductory tour now, 2) when you see good questions and answers, vote them up by clicking the gray triangles, because the credibility of the system is based on the reputation gained by users sharing their knowledge, 3) remember to accept the answer, if any, that solves your problem, by clicking the checkmark sign, and 4) give help too, by answering questions in your areas of expertise.
    – bbgodfrey
    Dec 3 at 1:12













up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have a question to a physical task in Mathematica.



We have this equation of motion:



$$mcdotddot{x} = -m(omega_0^2cdot x+(epsilon x^3))=-frac{d}{dx}V(x)$$



For energy of masspoint there is the condition :



$$epsilon Ell momega_0^4$$



I have to write a procedure that uses the law of the conservation of energy for the potential $V(x)$ to calculate $t(x_1) - t(x_0)$ when there are given two points $x_0$ and $x_1.



How could I do this in Mathematica?










share|improve this question















I have a question to a physical task in Mathematica.



We have this equation of motion:



$$mcdotddot{x} = -m(omega_0^2cdot x+(epsilon x^3))=-frac{d}{dx}V(x)$$



For energy of masspoint there is the condition :



$$epsilon Ell momega_0^4$$



I have to write a procedure that uses the law of the conservation of energy for the potential $V(x)$ to calculate $t(x_1) - t(x_0)$ when there are given two points $x_0$ and $x_1.



How could I do this in Mathematica?







differential-equations equation-solving






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 3 at 0:17









chris

12.2k440108




12.2k440108










asked Dec 2 at 16:27









Tom

261




261












  • Welcome to Mathematica.SE! I hope you will become a regular contributor. To get started, 1) take the introductory tour now, 2) when you see good questions and answers, vote them up by clicking the gray triangles, because the credibility of the system is based on the reputation gained by users sharing their knowledge, 3) remember to accept the answer, if any, that solves your problem, by clicking the checkmark sign, and 4) give help too, by answering questions in your areas of expertise.
    – bbgodfrey
    Dec 3 at 1:12


















  • Welcome to Mathematica.SE! I hope you will become a regular contributor. To get started, 1) take the introductory tour now, 2) when you see good questions and answers, vote them up by clicking the gray triangles, because the credibility of the system is based on the reputation gained by users sharing their knowledge, 3) remember to accept the answer, if any, that solves your problem, by clicking the checkmark sign, and 4) give help too, by answering questions in your areas of expertise.
    – bbgodfrey
    Dec 3 at 1:12
















Welcome to Mathematica.SE! I hope you will become a regular contributor. To get started, 1) take the introductory tour now, 2) when you see good questions and answers, vote them up by clicking the gray triangles, because the credibility of the system is based on the reputation gained by users sharing their knowledge, 3) remember to accept the answer, if any, that solves your problem, by clicking the checkmark sign, and 4) give help too, by answering questions in your areas of expertise.
– bbgodfrey
Dec 3 at 1:12




Welcome to Mathematica.SE! I hope you will become a regular contributor. To get started, 1) take the introductory tour now, 2) when you see good questions and answers, vote them up by clicking the gray triangles, because the credibility of the system is based on the reputation gained by users sharing their knowledge, 3) remember to accept the answer, if any, that solves your problem, by clicking the checkmark sign, and 4) give help too, by answering questions in your areas of expertise.
– bbgodfrey
Dec 3 at 1:12










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













This problem can be solved symbolically as follows. Multiply the expression (m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) by x'[t] and integrate to obtain an expression for the energy of this nonlinear oscillator.



eq = Integrate[(m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) x'[t], t]
(* 1/2 m omega0^2 x[t]^2 + 1/4 eps m x[t]^4 + 1/2 m x'[t]^2 *)


with constant of integration v0, the conserved energy. Then, apply DSolve.



s = DSolve[eq == v0, x[t], t] // Last
(* {x[t] -> InverseFunction[-((I EllipticF[I ArcSinh[Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] #1], (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 +
4 eps v0)])/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[4 v0 - m #1^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps #1^2)])) &]
[t/(Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]) + C[1]]} *)


(The other solution is the negative of the first.) Since the question requests t as a function of x, s must be inverted. In the absence of a Mathematica command to accomplish this, we use the following ungainly expression.



st = Rule[(s[[1, 2, 1]] /. C[1] -> 0) Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m], 
Head[s[[1, 2]]][[1]][x[t]] Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]]
(* t -> -((I Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m] EllipticF[I ArcSinh[
Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] x[t]],
(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])/
(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(
Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
Sqrt[4 v0 - m x[t]^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps x[t]^2)])) *)


This result for various values of eps can be plotted as



st /. {m -> 1, omega0 -> 1, v0 -> 1};
Plot[Evaluate@Table[Last[%], {eps, {10^1, 1, 10^-1, 10^-10}}], {x[t], -2, 2},
AxesLabel -> {x, t}, AspectRatio -> 1, ImageSize -> Large,
LabelStyle -> {Bold, Black, 15}]


enter image description here



Decreasing eps corresponds to increasing values of x and t at the turning points.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    5
    down vote













    In a numerical model, energy is conserved with some accuracy; in this example, the deviation from the initial value is about 1.5*10^-12



    m = 1; omega0 = 1; eps = 1/100; v0 = 1;
    eq = m*x''[t] == -m*(omega0^2*x[t] + eps*x[t]^3);
    ic = {x[0] == 0, x'[0] == v0};

    X = NDSolveValue[{eq, ic}, x, {t, 0, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 30];

    Plot[m/2*X'[t]^2 + m/2*omega0^2*X[t]^2 + m/4*eps*X[t]^4 -
    m/2*v0^2, {t, 0, 10},AxesLabel -> {"t", "E-E0"}]


    fig1
    Using the law of conservation of energy, we express $x'(t) $ and then time as a function of $x$



    t=Integrate[1/Sqrt[v0^2 - omega0^2*x^2 - eps/2*x^4], x]
    (*-((I Sqrt[2 + (2 eps x^2)/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
    Sqrt[1 + (eps x^2)/(omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
    EllipticF[
    I ArcSinh[Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] x], (
    omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])/(
    omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])])/(
    Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] Sqrt[
    2 v0^2 - 2 omega0^2 x^2 - eps x^4]))*)





    share|improve this answer























    • Thank you Alex! Helps a lot
      – Tom
      Dec 2 at 18:44











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187159%2fsymbolic-solution-for-the-energy-of-potential-flow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote













    This problem can be solved symbolically as follows. Multiply the expression (m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) by x'[t] and integrate to obtain an expression for the energy of this nonlinear oscillator.



    eq = Integrate[(m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) x'[t], t]
    (* 1/2 m omega0^2 x[t]^2 + 1/4 eps m x[t]^4 + 1/2 m x'[t]^2 *)


    with constant of integration v0, the conserved energy. Then, apply DSolve.



    s = DSolve[eq == v0, x[t], t] // Last
    (* {x[t] -> InverseFunction[-((I EllipticF[I ArcSinh[Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
    Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] #1], (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 +
    4 eps v0)])/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
    /(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
    /(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
    Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[4 v0 - m #1^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps #1^2)])) &]
    [t/(Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]) + C[1]]} *)


    (The other solution is the negative of the first.) Since the question requests t as a function of x, s must be inverted. In the absence of a Mathematica command to accomplish this, we use the following ungainly expression.



    st = Rule[(s[[1, 2, 1]] /. C[1] -> 0) Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m], 
    Head[s[[1, 2]]][[1]][x[t]] Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]]
    (* t -> -((I Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m] EllipticF[I ArcSinh[
    Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] x[t]],
    (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])/
    (m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
    Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
    Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(
    Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
    Sqrt[4 v0 - m x[t]^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps x[t]^2)])) *)


    This result for various values of eps can be plotted as



    st /. {m -> 1, omega0 -> 1, v0 -> 1};
    Plot[Evaluate@Table[Last[%], {eps, {10^1, 1, 10^-1, 10^-10}}], {x[t], -2, 2},
    AxesLabel -> {x, t}, AspectRatio -> 1, ImageSize -> Large,
    LabelStyle -> {Bold, Black, 15}]


    enter image description here



    Decreasing eps corresponds to increasing values of x and t at the turning points.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      5
      down vote













      This problem can be solved symbolically as follows. Multiply the expression (m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) by x'[t] and integrate to obtain an expression for the energy of this nonlinear oscillator.



      eq = Integrate[(m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) x'[t], t]
      (* 1/2 m omega0^2 x[t]^2 + 1/4 eps m x[t]^4 + 1/2 m x'[t]^2 *)


      with constant of integration v0, the conserved energy. Then, apply DSolve.



      s = DSolve[eq == v0, x[t], t] // Last
      (* {x[t] -> InverseFunction[-((I EllipticF[I ArcSinh[Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
      Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] #1], (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 +
      4 eps v0)])/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
      /(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
      /(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
      Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[4 v0 - m #1^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps #1^2)])) &]
      [t/(Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]) + C[1]]} *)


      (The other solution is the negative of the first.) Since the question requests t as a function of x, s must be inverted. In the absence of a Mathematica command to accomplish this, we use the following ungainly expression.



      st = Rule[(s[[1, 2, 1]] /. C[1] -> 0) Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m], 
      Head[s[[1, 2]]][[1]][x[t]] Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]]
      (* t -> -((I Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m] EllipticF[I ArcSinh[
      Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] x[t]],
      (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])/
      (m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
      Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
      Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(
      Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
      Sqrt[4 v0 - m x[t]^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps x[t]^2)])) *)


      This result for various values of eps can be plotted as



      st /. {m -> 1, omega0 -> 1, v0 -> 1};
      Plot[Evaluate@Table[Last[%], {eps, {10^1, 1, 10^-1, 10^-10}}], {x[t], -2, 2},
      AxesLabel -> {x, t}, AspectRatio -> 1, ImageSize -> Large,
      LabelStyle -> {Bold, Black, 15}]


      enter image description here



      Decreasing eps corresponds to increasing values of x and t at the turning points.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote









        This problem can be solved symbolically as follows. Multiply the expression (m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) by x'[t] and integrate to obtain an expression for the energy of this nonlinear oscillator.



        eq = Integrate[(m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) x'[t], t]
        (* 1/2 m omega0^2 x[t]^2 + 1/4 eps m x[t]^4 + 1/2 m x'[t]^2 *)


        with constant of integration v0, the conserved energy. Then, apply DSolve.



        s = DSolve[eq == v0, x[t], t] // Last
        (* {x[t] -> InverseFunction[-((I EllipticF[I ArcSinh[Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
        Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] #1], (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 +
        4 eps v0)])/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
        /(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
        /(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
        Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[4 v0 - m #1^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps #1^2)])) &]
        [t/(Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]) + C[1]]} *)


        (The other solution is the negative of the first.) Since the question requests t as a function of x, s must be inverted. In the absence of a Mathematica command to accomplish this, we use the following ungainly expression.



        st = Rule[(s[[1, 2, 1]] /. C[1] -> 0) Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m], 
        Head[s[[1, 2]]][[1]][x[t]] Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]]
        (* t -> -((I Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m] EllipticF[I ArcSinh[
        Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] x[t]],
        (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])/
        (m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
        Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
        Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(
        Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
        Sqrt[4 v0 - m x[t]^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps x[t]^2)])) *)


        This result for various values of eps can be plotted as



        st /. {m -> 1, omega0 -> 1, v0 -> 1};
        Plot[Evaluate@Table[Last[%], {eps, {10^1, 1, 10^-1, 10^-10}}], {x[t], -2, 2},
        AxesLabel -> {x, t}, AspectRatio -> 1, ImageSize -> Large,
        LabelStyle -> {Bold, Black, 15}]


        enter image description here



        Decreasing eps corresponds to increasing values of x and t at the turning points.






        share|improve this answer












        This problem can be solved symbolically as follows. Multiply the expression (m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) by x'[t] and integrate to obtain an expression for the energy of this nonlinear oscillator.



        eq = Integrate[(m (omega0^2 x[t] + eps x[t]^3) + m x''[t]) x'[t], t]
        (* 1/2 m omega0^2 x[t]^2 + 1/4 eps m x[t]^4 + 1/2 m x'[t]^2 *)


        with constant of integration v0, the conserved energy. Then, apply DSolve.



        s = DSolve[eq == v0, x[t], t] // Last
        (* {x[t] -> InverseFunction[-((I EllipticF[I ArcSinh[Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
        Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] #1], (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 +
        4 eps v0)])/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
        /(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[1 + (eps m #1^2)
        /(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 -
        Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] Sqrt[4 v0 - m #1^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps #1^2)])) &]
        [t/(Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]) + C[1]]} *)


        (The other solution is the negative of the first.) Since the question requests t as a function of x, s must be inverted. In the absence of a Mathematica command to accomplish this, we use the following ungainly expression.



        st = Rule[(s[[1, 2, 1]] /. C[1] -> 0) Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m], 
        Head[s[[1, 2]]][[1]][x[t]] Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m]]
        (* t -> -((I Sqrt[2] Sqrt[m] EllipticF[I ArcSinh[
        Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])] x[t]],
        (m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])/
        (m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
        Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
        Sqrt[1 + (eps m x[t]^2)/(m omega0^2 + Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])])/(
        Sqrt[(eps m)/(m omega0^2 - Sqrt[m (m omega0^4 + 4 eps v0)])]
        Sqrt[4 v0 - m x[t]^2 (2 omega0^2 + eps x[t]^2)])) *)


        This result for various values of eps can be plotted as



        st /. {m -> 1, omega0 -> 1, v0 -> 1};
        Plot[Evaluate@Table[Last[%], {eps, {10^1, 1, 10^-1, 10^-10}}], {x[t], -2, 2},
        AxesLabel -> {x, t}, AspectRatio -> 1, ImageSize -> Large,
        LabelStyle -> {Bold, Black, 15}]


        enter image description here



        Decreasing eps corresponds to increasing values of x and t at the turning points.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 2 at 22:55









        bbgodfrey

        43.9k857108




        43.9k857108






















            up vote
            5
            down vote













            In a numerical model, energy is conserved with some accuracy; in this example, the deviation from the initial value is about 1.5*10^-12



            m = 1; omega0 = 1; eps = 1/100; v0 = 1;
            eq = m*x''[t] == -m*(omega0^2*x[t] + eps*x[t]^3);
            ic = {x[0] == 0, x'[0] == v0};

            X = NDSolveValue[{eq, ic}, x, {t, 0, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 30];

            Plot[m/2*X'[t]^2 + m/2*omega0^2*X[t]^2 + m/4*eps*X[t]^4 -
            m/2*v0^2, {t, 0, 10},AxesLabel -> {"t", "E-E0"}]


            fig1
            Using the law of conservation of energy, we express $x'(t) $ and then time as a function of $x$



            t=Integrate[1/Sqrt[v0^2 - omega0^2*x^2 - eps/2*x^4], x]
            (*-((I Sqrt[2 + (2 eps x^2)/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
            Sqrt[1 + (eps x^2)/(omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
            EllipticF[
            I ArcSinh[Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] x], (
            omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])/(
            omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])])/(
            Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] Sqrt[
            2 v0^2 - 2 omega0^2 x^2 - eps x^4]))*)





            share|improve this answer























            • Thank you Alex! Helps a lot
              – Tom
              Dec 2 at 18:44















            up vote
            5
            down vote













            In a numerical model, energy is conserved with some accuracy; in this example, the deviation from the initial value is about 1.5*10^-12



            m = 1; omega0 = 1; eps = 1/100; v0 = 1;
            eq = m*x''[t] == -m*(omega0^2*x[t] + eps*x[t]^3);
            ic = {x[0] == 0, x'[0] == v0};

            X = NDSolveValue[{eq, ic}, x, {t, 0, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 30];

            Plot[m/2*X'[t]^2 + m/2*omega0^2*X[t]^2 + m/4*eps*X[t]^4 -
            m/2*v0^2, {t, 0, 10},AxesLabel -> {"t", "E-E0"}]


            fig1
            Using the law of conservation of energy, we express $x'(t) $ and then time as a function of $x$



            t=Integrate[1/Sqrt[v0^2 - omega0^2*x^2 - eps/2*x^4], x]
            (*-((I Sqrt[2 + (2 eps x^2)/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
            Sqrt[1 + (eps x^2)/(omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
            EllipticF[
            I ArcSinh[Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] x], (
            omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])/(
            omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])])/(
            Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] Sqrt[
            2 v0^2 - 2 omega0^2 x^2 - eps x^4]))*)





            share|improve this answer























            • Thank you Alex! Helps a lot
              – Tom
              Dec 2 at 18:44













            up vote
            5
            down vote










            up vote
            5
            down vote









            In a numerical model, energy is conserved with some accuracy; in this example, the deviation from the initial value is about 1.5*10^-12



            m = 1; omega0 = 1; eps = 1/100; v0 = 1;
            eq = m*x''[t] == -m*(omega0^2*x[t] + eps*x[t]^3);
            ic = {x[0] == 0, x'[0] == v0};

            X = NDSolveValue[{eq, ic}, x, {t, 0, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 30];

            Plot[m/2*X'[t]^2 + m/2*omega0^2*X[t]^2 + m/4*eps*X[t]^4 -
            m/2*v0^2, {t, 0, 10},AxesLabel -> {"t", "E-E0"}]


            fig1
            Using the law of conservation of energy, we express $x'(t) $ and then time as a function of $x$



            t=Integrate[1/Sqrt[v0^2 - omega0^2*x^2 - eps/2*x^4], x]
            (*-((I Sqrt[2 + (2 eps x^2)/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
            Sqrt[1 + (eps x^2)/(omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
            EllipticF[
            I ArcSinh[Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] x], (
            omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])/(
            omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])])/(
            Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] Sqrt[
            2 v0^2 - 2 omega0^2 x^2 - eps x^4]))*)





            share|improve this answer














            In a numerical model, energy is conserved with some accuracy; in this example, the deviation from the initial value is about 1.5*10^-12



            m = 1; omega0 = 1; eps = 1/100; v0 = 1;
            eq = m*x''[t] == -m*(omega0^2*x[t] + eps*x[t]^3);
            ic = {x[0] == 0, x'[0] == v0};

            X = NDSolveValue[{eq, ic}, x, {t, 0, 10}, WorkingPrecision -> 30];

            Plot[m/2*X'[t]^2 + m/2*omega0^2*X[t]^2 + m/4*eps*X[t]^4 -
            m/2*v0^2, {t, 0, 10},AxesLabel -> {"t", "E-E0"}]


            fig1
            Using the law of conservation of energy, we express $x'(t) $ and then time as a function of $x$



            t=Integrate[1/Sqrt[v0^2 - omega0^2*x^2 - eps/2*x^4], x]
            (*-((I Sqrt[2 + (2 eps x^2)/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
            Sqrt[1 + (eps x^2)/(omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])]
            EllipticF[
            I ArcSinh[Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] x], (
            omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])/(
            omega0^2 + Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])])/(
            Sqrt[eps/(omega0^2 - Sqrt[omega0^4 + 2 eps v0^2])] Sqrt[
            2 v0^2 - 2 omega0^2 x^2 - eps x^4]))*)






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Dec 3 at 0:58

























            answered Dec 2 at 17:07









            Alex Trounev

            5,6251419




            5,6251419












            • Thank you Alex! Helps a lot
              – Tom
              Dec 2 at 18:44


















            • Thank you Alex! Helps a lot
              – Tom
              Dec 2 at 18:44
















            Thank you Alex! Helps a lot
            – Tom
            Dec 2 at 18:44




            Thank you Alex! Helps a lot
            – Tom
            Dec 2 at 18:44


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187159%2fsymbolic-solution-for-the-energy-of-potential-flow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Morgemoulin

            Scott Moir

            Souastre