Usage of 'not _ like you' [on hold]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
1
down vote

favorite












What do these sentence mean?




  1. Jack is not a singer like John.

  2. Jack is not a singer, like John.










share|improve this question









New contributor




user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by FumbleFingers, Hellion, Skooba, Pam, jimm101 Nov 21 at 0:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – FumbleFingers, Hellion

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • The comma in the second version indicates that like John is a sentence adverb there. So it applies to the entirety of the preceding statement (Jack is not a singer. Similarly, John is not a singer). To avoid confusion, we normally put the sentence adverb component before the main statement: Like John, Jack is not a singer.
    – FumbleFingers
    Nov 20 at 13:59








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Meaning of sentence. "He is not vigilant like you"
    – Pam
    Nov 20 at 19:29

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












What do these sentence mean?




  1. Jack is not a singer like John.

  2. Jack is not a singer, like John.










share|improve this question









New contributor




user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by FumbleFingers, Hellion, Skooba, Pam, jimm101 Nov 21 at 0:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – FumbleFingers, Hellion

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • The comma in the second version indicates that like John is a sentence adverb there. So it applies to the entirety of the preceding statement (Jack is not a singer. Similarly, John is not a singer). To avoid confusion, we normally put the sentence adverb component before the main statement: Like John, Jack is not a singer.
    – FumbleFingers
    Nov 20 at 13:59








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Meaning of sentence. "He is not vigilant like you"
    – Pam
    Nov 20 at 19:29













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











What do these sentence mean?




  1. Jack is not a singer like John.

  2. Jack is not a singer, like John.










share|improve this question









New contributor




user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











What do these sentence mean?




  1. Jack is not a singer like John.

  2. Jack is not a singer, like John.







grammar word-choice






share|improve this question









New contributor




user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 at 16:33









Laurel

29k654103




29k654103






New contributor




user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 20 at 13:40









user56036

61




61




New contributor




user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user56036 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by FumbleFingers, Hellion, Skooba, Pam, jimm101 Nov 21 at 0:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – FumbleFingers, Hellion

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by FumbleFingers, Hellion, Skooba, Pam, jimm101 Nov 21 at 0:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – FumbleFingers, Hellion

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • The comma in the second version indicates that like John is a sentence adverb there. So it applies to the entirety of the preceding statement (Jack is not a singer. Similarly, John is not a singer). To avoid confusion, we normally put the sentence adverb component before the main statement: Like John, Jack is not a singer.
    – FumbleFingers
    Nov 20 at 13:59








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Meaning of sentence. "He is not vigilant like you"
    – Pam
    Nov 20 at 19:29


















  • The comma in the second version indicates that like John is a sentence adverb there. So it applies to the entirety of the preceding statement (Jack is not a singer. Similarly, John is not a singer). To avoid confusion, we normally put the sentence adverb component before the main statement: Like John, Jack is not a singer.
    – FumbleFingers
    Nov 20 at 13:59








  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Meaning of sentence. "He is not vigilant like you"
    – Pam
    Nov 20 at 19:29
















The comma in the second version indicates that like John is a sentence adverb there. So it applies to the entirety of the preceding statement (Jack is not a singer. Similarly, John is not a singer). To avoid confusion, we normally put the sentence adverb component before the main statement: Like John, Jack is not a singer.
– FumbleFingers
Nov 20 at 13:59






The comma in the second version indicates that like John is a sentence adverb there. So it applies to the entirety of the preceding statement (Jack is not a singer. Similarly, John is not a singer). To avoid confusion, we normally put the sentence adverb component before the main statement: Like John, Jack is not a singer.
– FumbleFingers
Nov 20 at 13:59






1




1




Possible duplicate of Meaning of sentence. "He is not vigilant like you"
– Pam
Nov 20 at 19:29




Possible duplicate of Meaning of sentence. "He is not vigilant like you"
– Pam
Nov 20 at 19:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Of course context influences meaning, so the below is one interpretation, perhaps the most linguistically conservation reasonable estimate.





  1. Jack is not a singer like John.




Both Jack and John are singers, but if you were to compare their singing, Jack does not sing like John. The implication here is that John is a better singer and is more suitably referred to as a singer. The full sentence might read: "Jack is not a singer like John [is a singer]."





  1. Jack is not a singer, like John.




In this second example, the comma separates a complete clause, i.e., that Jack is not a singer. However the omitted verb from the second, dependent clause can go in two divergent ways: either (1) like Jack not being a singer, neither is John a singer. The implication here is that neither Jack Nor John are singers, at all. It is not one of their hobbies, and there is no implication of skill. However, it could also be read as (2) "Jack is not a singer, like (as an example of what a "singer" is:) John." This interpretation might sound more natural to you if you add inflection to it.It is a semantically acceptable although slightly ironic use of the word "like".






share|improve this answer




























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Of course context influences meaning, so the below is one interpretation, perhaps the most linguistically conservation reasonable estimate.





    1. Jack is not a singer like John.




    Both Jack and John are singers, but if you were to compare their singing, Jack does not sing like John. The implication here is that John is a better singer and is more suitably referred to as a singer. The full sentence might read: "Jack is not a singer like John [is a singer]."





    1. Jack is not a singer, like John.




    In this second example, the comma separates a complete clause, i.e., that Jack is not a singer. However the omitted verb from the second, dependent clause can go in two divergent ways: either (1) like Jack not being a singer, neither is John a singer. The implication here is that neither Jack Nor John are singers, at all. It is not one of their hobbies, and there is no implication of skill. However, it could also be read as (2) "Jack is not a singer, like (as an example of what a "singer" is:) John." This interpretation might sound more natural to you if you add inflection to it.It is a semantically acceptable although slightly ironic use of the word "like".






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Of course context influences meaning, so the below is one interpretation, perhaps the most linguistically conservation reasonable estimate.





      1. Jack is not a singer like John.




      Both Jack and John are singers, but if you were to compare their singing, Jack does not sing like John. The implication here is that John is a better singer and is more suitably referred to as a singer. The full sentence might read: "Jack is not a singer like John [is a singer]."





      1. Jack is not a singer, like John.




      In this second example, the comma separates a complete clause, i.e., that Jack is not a singer. However the omitted verb from the second, dependent clause can go in two divergent ways: either (1) like Jack not being a singer, neither is John a singer. The implication here is that neither Jack Nor John are singers, at all. It is not one of their hobbies, and there is no implication of skill. However, it could also be read as (2) "Jack is not a singer, like (as an example of what a "singer" is:) John." This interpretation might sound more natural to you if you add inflection to it.It is a semantically acceptable although slightly ironic use of the word "like".






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Of course context influences meaning, so the below is one interpretation, perhaps the most linguistically conservation reasonable estimate.





        1. Jack is not a singer like John.




        Both Jack and John are singers, but if you were to compare their singing, Jack does not sing like John. The implication here is that John is a better singer and is more suitably referred to as a singer. The full sentence might read: "Jack is not a singer like John [is a singer]."





        1. Jack is not a singer, like John.




        In this second example, the comma separates a complete clause, i.e., that Jack is not a singer. However the omitted verb from the second, dependent clause can go in two divergent ways: either (1) like Jack not being a singer, neither is John a singer. The implication here is that neither Jack Nor John are singers, at all. It is not one of their hobbies, and there is no implication of skill. However, it could also be read as (2) "Jack is not a singer, like (as an example of what a "singer" is:) John." This interpretation might sound more natural to you if you add inflection to it.It is a semantically acceptable although slightly ironic use of the word "like".






        share|improve this answer












        Of course context influences meaning, so the below is one interpretation, perhaps the most linguistically conservation reasonable estimate.





        1. Jack is not a singer like John.




        Both Jack and John are singers, but if you were to compare their singing, Jack does not sing like John. The implication here is that John is a better singer and is more suitably referred to as a singer. The full sentence might read: "Jack is not a singer like John [is a singer]."





        1. Jack is not a singer, like John.




        In this second example, the comma separates a complete clause, i.e., that Jack is not a singer. However the omitted verb from the second, dependent clause can go in two divergent ways: either (1) like Jack not being a singer, neither is John a singer. The implication here is that neither Jack Nor John are singers, at all. It is not one of their hobbies, and there is no implication of skill. However, it could also be read as (2) "Jack is not a singer, like (as an example of what a "singer" is:) John." This interpretation might sound more natural to you if you add inflection to it.It is a semantically acceptable although slightly ironic use of the word "like".







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 20 at 14:44









        Carly

        1,168212




        1,168212















            Popular posts from this blog

            List directoties down one level, excluding some named directories and files

            list processes belonging to a network namespace

            list systemd RuntimeDirectory mounts