Boundary and initial conditions in quasi linear first order pde
I cannot understand what we are looking to find in such a problem... For example consider the pde
$u_t+u_x=u$, with $x,t>0$ (1)
and initial and boundary conditions:
$u(x,0)=1$, for $xge0$ (2)
$u(0,t)=1$, for $tge0$ (3)
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Remark: I do not need a solution of the above problem, just a proper defintion or refference. Thanks in advance.
differential-equations pde
add a comment |
I cannot understand what we are looking to find in such a problem... For example consider the pde
$u_t+u_x=u$, with $x,t>0$ (1)
and initial and boundary conditions:
$u(x,0)=1$, for $xge0$ (2)
$u(0,t)=1$, for $tge0$ (3)
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Remark: I do not need a solution of the above problem, just a proper defintion or refference. Thanks in advance.
differential-equations pde
add a comment |
I cannot understand what we are looking to find in such a problem... For example consider the pde
$u_t+u_x=u$, with $x,t>0$ (1)
and initial and boundary conditions:
$u(x,0)=1$, for $xge0$ (2)
$u(0,t)=1$, for $tge0$ (3)
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Remark: I do not need a solution of the above problem, just a proper defintion or refference. Thanks in advance.
differential-equations pde
I cannot understand what we are looking to find in such a problem... For example consider the pde
$u_t+u_x=u$, with $x,t>0$ (1)
and initial and boundary conditions:
$u(x,0)=1$, for $xge0$ (2)
$u(0,t)=1$, for $tge0$ (3)
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Remark: I do not need a solution of the above problem, just a proper defintion or refference. Thanks in advance.
differential-equations pde
differential-equations pde
asked Dec 15 at 8:56
dmtri
1,3721521
1,3721521
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
Charpit-Legendre equations :
$$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
$$x-t=c_1$$
Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
$$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
General solution of the PDE :
$$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
$$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.
Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.
Altogether :
$$F(X)=
begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
end{cases}$$
Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
end{cases}$$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
end{cases}$$
This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 19:23
1
Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
– JJacquelin
Dec 16 at 7:48
add a comment |
Consider the characteristics problem :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$
Taking the first pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$
Now, the second pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$
Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as
$$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
$$Leftrightarrow$$
$$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.
Now, applying the initial values, we get :
$$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$
$$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$
It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$
To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :
$$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$
But, that implies that :
$$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$
Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$
But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.
Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$
Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.
Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 12:07
this is a weak solution, right?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 17:52
add a comment |
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
(continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Yes (and yes, continously).
So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 15:25
@dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
@dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040289%2fboundary-and-initial-conditions-in-quasi-linear-first-order-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
Charpit-Legendre equations :
$$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
$$x-t=c_1$$
Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
$$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
General solution of the PDE :
$$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
$$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.
Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.
Altogether :
$$F(X)=
begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
end{cases}$$
Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
end{cases}$$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
end{cases}$$
This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 19:23
1
Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
– JJacquelin
Dec 16 at 7:48
add a comment |
$$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
Charpit-Legendre equations :
$$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
$$x-t=c_1$$
Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
$$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
General solution of the PDE :
$$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
$$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.
Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.
Altogether :
$$F(X)=
begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
end{cases}$$
Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
end{cases}$$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
end{cases}$$
This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 19:23
1
Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
– JJacquelin
Dec 16 at 7:48
add a comment |
$$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
Charpit-Legendre equations :
$$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
$$x-t=c_1$$
Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
$$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
General solution of the PDE :
$$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
$$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.
Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.
Altogether :
$$F(X)=
begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
end{cases}$$
Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
end{cases}$$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
end{cases}$$
$$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
Charpit-Legendre equations :
$$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
$$x-t=c_1$$
Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
$$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
General solution of the PDE :
$$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
$$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.
Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.
Altogether :
$$F(X)=
begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
end{cases}$$
Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
end{cases}$$
$$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
end{cases}$$
edited Dec 16 at 7:45
answered Dec 15 at 9:43
JJacquelin
42.5k21750
42.5k21750
This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 19:23
1
Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
– JJacquelin
Dec 16 at 7:48
add a comment |
This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 19:23
1
Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
– JJacquelin
Dec 16 at 7:48
This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 19:23
This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 19:23
1
1
Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
– JJacquelin
Dec 16 at 7:48
Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
– JJacquelin
Dec 16 at 7:48
add a comment |
Consider the characteristics problem :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$
Taking the first pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$
Now, the second pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$
Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as
$$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
$$Leftrightarrow$$
$$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.
Now, applying the initial values, we get :
$$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$
$$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$
It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$
To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :
$$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$
But, that implies that :
$$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$
Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$
But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.
Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$
Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.
Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 12:07
this is a weak solution, right?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 17:52
add a comment |
Consider the characteristics problem :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$
Taking the first pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$
Now, the second pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$
Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as
$$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
$$Leftrightarrow$$
$$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.
Now, applying the initial values, we get :
$$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$
$$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$
It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$
To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :
$$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$
But, that implies that :
$$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$
Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$
But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.
Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$
Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.
Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 12:07
this is a weak solution, right?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 17:52
add a comment |
Consider the characteristics problem :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$
Taking the first pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$
Now, the second pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$
Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as
$$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
$$Leftrightarrow$$
$$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.
Now, applying the initial values, we get :
$$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$
$$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$
It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$
To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :
$$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$
But, that implies that :
$$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$
Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$
But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.
Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$
Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.
Consider the characteristics problem :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$
Taking the first pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$
Now, the second pair, yields :
$$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$
Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as
$$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
$$Leftrightarrow$$
$$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$
where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.
Now, applying the initial values, we get :
$$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$
$$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$
It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$
To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :
$$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$
But, that implies that :
$$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$
Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$
But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.
Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :
$$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$
Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.
edited Dec 15 at 9:46
answered Dec 15 at 9:37
Rebellos
14.3k31245
14.3k31245
Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 12:07
this is a weak solution, right?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 17:52
add a comment |
Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 12:07
this is a weak solution, right?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 17:52
Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 12:07
Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 12:07
this is a weak solution, right?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 17:52
this is a weak solution, right?
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 17:52
add a comment |
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
(continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Yes (and yes, continously).
So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 15:25
@dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
@dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
add a comment |
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
(continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Yes (and yes, continously).
So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 15:25
@dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
@dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
add a comment |
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
(continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Yes (and yes, continously).
Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
(continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?
Yes (and yes, continously).
answered Dec 15 at 14:38
Bananach
3,74111229
3,74111229
So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 15:25
@dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
@dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
add a comment |
So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 15:25
@dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
@dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 15:25
So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
– dmtri
Dec 15 at 15:25
@dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
@dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
@dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
@dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
– Bananach
Dec 15 at 18:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040289%2fboundary-and-initial-conditions-in-quasi-linear-first-order-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown