Boundary and initial conditions in quasi linear first order pde












7














I cannot understand what we are looking to find in such a problem... For example consider the pde



$u_t+u_x=u$, with $x,t>0$ (1)



and initial and boundary conditions:



$u(x,0)=1$, for $xge0$ (2)



$u(0,t)=1$, for $tge0$ (3)



Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?



Remark: I do not need a solution of the above problem, just a proper defintion or refference. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question



























    7














    I cannot understand what we are looking to find in such a problem... For example consider the pde



    $u_t+u_x=u$, with $x,t>0$ (1)



    and initial and boundary conditions:



    $u(x,0)=1$, for $xge0$ (2)



    $u(0,t)=1$, for $tge0$ (3)



    Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?



    Remark: I do not need a solution of the above problem, just a proper defintion or refference. Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      7












      7








      7


      2





      I cannot understand what we are looking to find in such a problem... For example consider the pde



      $u_t+u_x=u$, with $x,t>0$ (1)



      and initial and boundary conditions:



      $u(x,0)=1$, for $xge0$ (2)



      $u(0,t)=1$, for $tge0$ (3)



      Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?



      Remark: I do not need a solution of the above problem, just a proper defintion or refference. Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I cannot understand what we are looking to find in such a problem... For example consider the pde



      $u_t+u_x=u$, with $x,t>0$ (1)



      and initial and boundary conditions:



      $u(x,0)=1$, for $xge0$ (2)



      $u(0,t)=1$, for $tge0$ (3)



      Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?



      Remark: I do not need a solution of the above problem, just a proper defintion or refference. Thanks in advance.







      differential-equations pde






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 15 at 8:56









      dmtri

      1,3721521




      1,3721521






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          $$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
          Charpit-Legendre equations :
          $$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
          First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
          $$x-t=c_1$$
          Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
          $$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
          General solution of the PDE :
          $$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
          where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
          $$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
          Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.



          Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.



          Altogether :
          $$F(X)=
          begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
          e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
          e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
          e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
          end{cases}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 19:23








          • 1




            Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
            – JJacquelin
            Dec 16 at 7:48



















          4














          Consider the characteristics problem :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$



          Taking the first pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$



          Now, the second pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$



          Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as



          $$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
          $$Leftrightarrow$$
          $$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$



          where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.



          Now, applying the initial values, we get :



          $$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$



          $$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$



          It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$



          To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :



          $$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$



          But, that implies that :



          $$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$



          Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$



          But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.



          Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$



          Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 12:07










          • this is a weak solution, right?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 17:52



















          2















          Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
          (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?




          Yes (and yes, continously).






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 15:25










          • @dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16










          • @dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040289%2fboundary-and-initial-conditions-in-quasi-linear-first-order-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          $$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
          Charpit-Legendre equations :
          $$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
          First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
          $$x-t=c_1$$
          Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
          $$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
          General solution of the PDE :
          $$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
          where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
          $$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
          Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.



          Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.



          Altogether :
          $$F(X)=
          begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
          e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
          e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
          e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
          end{cases}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 19:23








          • 1




            Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
            – JJacquelin
            Dec 16 at 7:48
















          1














          $$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
          Charpit-Legendre equations :
          $$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
          First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
          $$x-t=c_1$$
          Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
          $$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
          General solution of the PDE :
          $$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
          where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
          $$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
          Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.



          Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.



          Altogether :
          $$F(X)=
          begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
          e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
          e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
          e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
          end{cases}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 19:23








          • 1




            Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
            – JJacquelin
            Dec 16 at 7:48














          1












          1








          1






          $$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
          Charpit-Legendre equations :
          $$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
          First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
          $$x-t=c_1$$
          Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
          $$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
          General solution of the PDE :
          $$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
          where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
          $$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
          Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.



          Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.



          Altogether :
          $$F(X)=
          begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
          e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
          e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
          e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
          end{cases}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          $$u_t+u_x=u tag 1$$
          Charpit-Legendre equations :
          $$frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}=frac{du}{u}$$
          First characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{dx}{1}$ :
          $$x-t=c_1$$
          Second characteristic curves equation from $frac{dt}{1}=frac{du}{u}$ :
          $$ue^{-t}=c_2$$
          General solution of the PDE :
          $$ue^{-t}=F(x-t)$$
          where $F$ is an arbitrary function (to be determined according to boundary conditions).
          $$u(x,t)=e^tF(x-t)$$
          Condition $u(X,0)=1=F(X)$ for $Xgeq 0$.



          Condition $u(0,t)=1=e^tF(-t)$ for $tgeq 0$. Thus $1=e^{-X}F(X)$ for $-Xgeq 0$.



          Altogether :
          $$F(X)=
          begin{cases}1quadtext{for}quad Xgeq 0.\
          e^X quadtext{for}quad Xleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          Now the function $F$ is determined. We put it into the general solution where $X=x-t$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^t1quadtext{for}quad x-tgeq 0.\
          e^te^{x-t} quadtext{for}quad x-tleq 0.
          end{cases}$$



          $$u(x,t)=begin{cases}
          e^tquadtext{for}quad xgeq t.\
          e^x quadtext{for}quad xleq t.
          end{cases}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 16 at 7:45

























          answered Dec 15 at 9:43









          JJacquelin

          42.5k21750




          42.5k21750












          • This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 19:23








          • 1




            Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
            – JJacquelin
            Dec 16 at 7:48


















          • This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 19:23








          • 1




            Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
            – JJacquelin
            Dec 16 at 7:48
















          This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
          – dmtri
          Dec 15 at 19:23






          This is a weak solution, right? as $u$ has no partial derivatives on the $x=t$ , line.
          – dmtri
          Dec 15 at 19:23






          1




          1




          Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
          – JJacquelin
          Dec 16 at 7:48




          Yes, we have to integrate separately Eq.$(1)$ above and below the line $x = t$ and use integration by parts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_solution
          – JJacquelin
          Dec 16 at 7:48











          4














          Consider the characteristics problem :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$



          Taking the first pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$



          Now, the second pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$



          Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as



          $$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
          $$Leftrightarrow$$
          $$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$



          where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.



          Now, applying the initial values, we get :



          $$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$



          $$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$



          It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$



          To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :



          $$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$



          But, that implies that :



          $$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$



          Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$



          But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.



          Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$



          Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 12:07










          • this is a weak solution, right?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 17:52
















          4














          Consider the characteristics problem :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$



          Taking the first pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$



          Now, the second pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$



          Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as



          $$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
          $$Leftrightarrow$$
          $$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$



          where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.



          Now, applying the initial values, we get :



          $$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$



          $$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$



          It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$



          To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :



          $$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$



          But, that implies that :



          $$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$



          Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$



          But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.



          Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$



          Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 12:07










          • this is a weak solution, right?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 17:52














          4












          4








          4






          Consider the characteristics problem :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$



          Taking the first pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$



          Now, the second pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$



          Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as



          $$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
          $$Leftrightarrow$$
          $$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$



          where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.



          Now, applying the initial values, we get :



          $$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$



          $$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$



          It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$



          To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :



          $$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$



          But, that implies that :



          $$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$



          Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$



          But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.



          Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$



          Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Consider the characteristics problem :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u}$$



          Taking the first pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}t}{1}=frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}t = int mathrm{d}x implies u_1 = x-t $$



          Now, the second pair, yields :



          $$frac{mathrm{d}x}{1} = frac{mathrm{d}u}{u} Leftrightarrow intmathrm{d}x = intfrac{1}{u}mathrm{d}u implies u_2 = x - ln(u) $$



          Since $u_1$ is not dependent on $u$ and $u_2$ is, the solution of the PDE can be written as



          $$u_2 = F(u_1) Rightarrow ln u = x - F(x-t) Leftrightarrow u(x,t) = expleft(x-F(x-t)right)$$
          $$Leftrightarrow$$
          $$u(x,t) = frac{e^x}{F(x-t)} equiv e^xF(x-t)$$



          where $F$ is an arbitrary function $in C^1$.



          Now, applying the initial values, we get :



          $$u(x,0) = 1 implies e^xF(x) = 1 Leftrightarrow F(x) = e^{-x}$$



          $$u(0,t) = 1 implies F(-t) = 1$$



          It is sufficient then to say that a solution $u(x,t)$ of the given Boundary Value Problem, is the function defined as such :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(x-t) quad text{where} quad begin{cases} F(x) = e^{-x} \ F(-t) = 1end{cases}$$



          To be more precise, consider letting $x := x-t$ and $t := t-x$ in the case of the boundary values. Then :



          $$F(x-t) = e^{x-t} quad text{and} quad F(x-t) = 1quad$$



          But, that implies that :



          $$e^{x-t} = 1 Leftrightarrow x = t$$



          Finally, this means that the solution of the given BVP can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = e^xF(0) equiv c_1e^x quad text{or} quad u(x,t) = c_2e^t$$



          But note that the first one holds in the case of $x - t leq 0$ thus $x leq t$ and the second one holds in the case of $x-t geq 0$ thus $t geq x$, which stems from your Boundary Value cases for the PDE variables.



          Thus, finally, the solution $u(x,t)$ can be written as :



          $$u(x,t) = begin{cases}e^t & x geq t \ e^x & x leq t end{cases}$$



          Simply substituting confirms that both of them are solutions to the initial PDE BVP.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 15 at 9:46

























          answered Dec 15 at 9:37









          Rebellos

          14.3k31245




          14.3k31245












          • Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 12:07










          • this is a weak solution, right?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 17:52


















          • Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 12:07










          • this is a weak solution, right?
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 17:52
















          Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
          – dmtri
          Dec 15 at 12:07




          Thanks for the answer, actually I do not need to solve that pde. Why do you apply (2) and (3) conditions in your general integral? The domain of (1) has nothing to do with the curves described in (2) and (3)?
          – dmtri
          Dec 15 at 12:07












          this is a weak solution, right?
          – dmtri
          Dec 15 at 17:52




          this is a weak solution, right?
          – dmtri
          Dec 15 at 17:52











          2















          Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
          (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?




          Yes (and yes, continously).






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 15:25










          • @dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16










          • @dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16
















          2















          Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
          (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?




          Yes (and yes, continously).






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 15:25










          • @dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16










          • @dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16














          2












          2








          2







          Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
          (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?




          Yes (and yes, continously).






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Are we looking for a solution of (1) which can be extended
          (continously?)in order to take values implemented by (2), (3)?




          Yes (and yes, continously).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 15 at 14:38









          Bananach

          3,74111229




          3,74111229












          • So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 15:25










          • @dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16










          • @dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16


















          • So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
            – dmtri
            Dec 15 at 15:25










          • @dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16










          • @dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
            – Bananach
            Dec 15 at 18:16
















          So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
          – dmtri
          Dec 15 at 15:25




          So if the domain of solution of (1), we may proceed as the above 2 answers - posts.Is then this solution unique? How we can proceed if the "curves" do not belong to any solution - domain of (1)? Thanks again.
          – dmtri
          Dec 15 at 15:25












          @dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
          – Bananach
          Dec 15 at 18:16




          @dmtri I don't understand your comment, can you ask your question again?
          – Bananach
          Dec 15 at 18:16












          @dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
          – Bananach
          Dec 15 at 18:16




          @dmtri Also, you might consider asking a new question
          – Bananach
          Dec 15 at 18:16


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3040289%2fboundary-and-initial-conditions-in-quasi-linear-first-order-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Morgemoulin

          Scott Moir

          Souastre