Is it possible for a multiclassed monk/rogue to use Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack on the same attack,...
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
I've made a character that is going to eventually put 17 levels into Monk's Way of the Shadow and 3 levels into Rogue's Assassin.
I was looking at some of the abilities I get for attacking, such as Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack. Would it be possible to use both of these abilities in one attack before I used my extra attack? (Gained at 5th level, Monk).
I've looked and I haven't seen anything related to the question. Is it possible?
Can a multi-classed Monk/Rogue use Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack before using the second monk attack?
dnd-5e monk multi-classing rogue sneak-attack
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
I've made a character that is going to eventually put 17 levels into Monk's Way of the Shadow and 3 levels into Rogue's Assassin.
I was looking at some of the abilities I get for attacking, such as Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack. Would it be possible to use both of these abilities in one attack before I used my extra attack? (Gained at 5th level, Monk).
I've looked and I haven't seen anything related to the question. Is it possible?
Can a multi-classed Monk/Rogue use Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack before using the second monk attack?
dnd-5e monk multi-classing rogue sneak-attack
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
up vote
14
down vote
favorite
I've made a character that is going to eventually put 17 levels into Monk's Way of the Shadow and 3 levels into Rogue's Assassin.
I was looking at some of the abilities I get for attacking, such as Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack. Would it be possible to use both of these abilities in one attack before I used my extra attack? (Gained at 5th level, Monk).
I've looked and I haven't seen anything related to the question. Is it possible?
Can a multi-classed Monk/Rogue use Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack before using the second monk attack?
dnd-5e monk multi-classing rogue sneak-attack
New contributor
I've made a character that is going to eventually put 17 levels into Monk's Way of the Shadow and 3 levels into Rogue's Assassin.
I was looking at some of the abilities I get for attacking, such as Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack. Would it be possible to use both of these abilities in one attack before I used my extra attack? (Gained at 5th level, Monk).
I've looked and I haven't seen anything related to the question. Is it possible?
Can a multi-classed Monk/Rogue use Stunning Strike and Sneak Attack before using the second monk attack?
dnd-5e monk multi-classing rogue sneak-attack
dnd-5e monk multi-classing rogue sneak-attack
New contributor
New contributor
edited 23 hours ago
V2Blast
18.7k251116
18.7k251116
New contributor
asked yesterday
TribalBearWarrior
838
838
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
Yes, though it requires a melee weapon attack with a finesse weapon that hits. So it won't work with either a ranged weapon or unarmed strike.
Stunning the target is also a good way to gain advantage in order to apply Sneak Attack on a second attack.
5
You are correct, but you should say that it requires a "melee weapon" rather than a "melee weapon attack" because an unarmed strike does count as a "melee weapon attack" even though it doesnt count as a "melee weapon". rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/58158/…
– Nacht
21 hours ago
3
@Nacht Would say that that's unnecessary, as an unarmed strike does not count as a "finesse weapon" either.
– Rogem
17 hours ago
1
A dagger is a melee weapon, but if it's thrown it cannot apply stunning strike.
– bvstuart
12 hours ago
1
@bvstuart Oh I see, you are correct! My bad.
– Nacht
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Yes. Abilities like sneak attack don't consume any action resources (like needing to use your bonus action etc.) so you can use as many together as you wish. Some have a limited number of uses per turn (eg. sneak attack) but that is the only limitation on them. You could even add some paladin levels and use divine smite at the same time as the other two.
You can't sneak attack at all with an unarmed strike. In order to smite + stunning strike + sneak attack all on one hit, you would need an actual finesse melee weapon.
– Seth R. Feldman
12 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
Yes, though it requires a melee weapon attack with a finesse weapon that hits. So it won't work with either a ranged weapon or unarmed strike.
Stunning the target is also a good way to gain advantage in order to apply Sneak Attack on a second attack.
5
You are correct, but you should say that it requires a "melee weapon" rather than a "melee weapon attack" because an unarmed strike does count as a "melee weapon attack" even though it doesnt count as a "melee weapon". rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/58158/…
– Nacht
21 hours ago
3
@Nacht Would say that that's unnecessary, as an unarmed strike does not count as a "finesse weapon" either.
– Rogem
17 hours ago
1
A dagger is a melee weapon, but if it's thrown it cannot apply stunning strike.
– bvstuart
12 hours ago
1
@bvstuart Oh I see, you are correct! My bad.
– Nacht
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
Yes, though it requires a melee weapon attack with a finesse weapon that hits. So it won't work with either a ranged weapon or unarmed strike.
Stunning the target is also a good way to gain advantage in order to apply Sneak Attack on a second attack.
5
You are correct, but you should say that it requires a "melee weapon" rather than a "melee weapon attack" because an unarmed strike does count as a "melee weapon attack" even though it doesnt count as a "melee weapon". rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/58158/…
– Nacht
21 hours ago
3
@Nacht Would say that that's unnecessary, as an unarmed strike does not count as a "finesse weapon" either.
– Rogem
17 hours ago
1
A dagger is a melee weapon, but if it's thrown it cannot apply stunning strike.
– bvstuart
12 hours ago
1
@bvstuart Oh I see, you are correct! My bad.
– Nacht
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
Yes, though it requires a melee weapon attack with a finesse weapon that hits. So it won't work with either a ranged weapon or unarmed strike.
Stunning the target is also a good way to gain advantage in order to apply Sneak Attack on a second attack.
Yes, though it requires a melee weapon attack with a finesse weapon that hits. So it won't work with either a ranged weapon or unarmed strike.
Stunning the target is also a good way to gain advantage in order to apply Sneak Attack on a second attack.
edited 22 hours ago
V2Blast
18.7k251116
18.7k251116
answered 23 hours ago
bvstuart
81137
81137
5
You are correct, but you should say that it requires a "melee weapon" rather than a "melee weapon attack" because an unarmed strike does count as a "melee weapon attack" even though it doesnt count as a "melee weapon". rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/58158/…
– Nacht
21 hours ago
3
@Nacht Would say that that's unnecessary, as an unarmed strike does not count as a "finesse weapon" either.
– Rogem
17 hours ago
1
A dagger is a melee weapon, but if it's thrown it cannot apply stunning strike.
– bvstuart
12 hours ago
1
@bvstuart Oh I see, you are correct! My bad.
– Nacht
5 hours ago
add a comment |
5
You are correct, but you should say that it requires a "melee weapon" rather than a "melee weapon attack" because an unarmed strike does count as a "melee weapon attack" even though it doesnt count as a "melee weapon". rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/58158/…
– Nacht
21 hours ago
3
@Nacht Would say that that's unnecessary, as an unarmed strike does not count as a "finesse weapon" either.
– Rogem
17 hours ago
1
A dagger is a melee weapon, but if it's thrown it cannot apply stunning strike.
– bvstuart
12 hours ago
1
@bvstuart Oh I see, you are correct! My bad.
– Nacht
5 hours ago
5
5
You are correct, but you should say that it requires a "melee weapon" rather than a "melee weapon attack" because an unarmed strike does count as a "melee weapon attack" even though it doesnt count as a "melee weapon". rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/58158/…
– Nacht
21 hours ago
You are correct, but you should say that it requires a "melee weapon" rather than a "melee weapon attack" because an unarmed strike does count as a "melee weapon attack" even though it doesnt count as a "melee weapon". rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/58158/…
– Nacht
21 hours ago
3
3
@Nacht Would say that that's unnecessary, as an unarmed strike does not count as a "finesse weapon" either.
– Rogem
17 hours ago
@Nacht Would say that that's unnecessary, as an unarmed strike does not count as a "finesse weapon" either.
– Rogem
17 hours ago
1
1
A dagger is a melee weapon, but if it's thrown it cannot apply stunning strike.
– bvstuart
12 hours ago
A dagger is a melee weapon, but if it's thrown it cannot apply stunning strike.
– bvstuart
12 hours ago
1
1
@bvstuart Oh I see, you are correct! My bad.
– Nacht
5 hours ago
@bvstuart Oh I see, you are correct! My bad.
– Nacht
5 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Yes. Abilities like sneak attack don't consume any action resources (like needing to use your bonus action etc.) so you can use as many together as you wish. Some have a limited number of uses per turn (eg. sneak attack) but that is the only limitation on them. You could even add some paladin levels and use divine smite at the same time as the other two.
You can't sneak attack at all with an unarmed strike. In order to smite + stunning strike + sneak attack all on one hit, you would need an actual finesse melee weapon.
– Seth R. Feldman
12 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Yes. Abilities like sneak attack don't consume any action resources (like needing to use your bonus action etc.) so you can use as many together as you wish. Some have a limited number of uses per turn (eg. sneak attack) but that is the only limitation on them. You could even add some paladin levels and use divine smite at the same time as the other two.
You can't sneak attack at all with an unarmed strike. In order to smite + stunning strike + sneak attack all on one hit, you would need an actual finesse melee weapon.
– Seth R. Feldman
12 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Yes. Abilities like sneak attack don't consume any action resources (like needing to use your bonus action etc.) so you can use as many together as you wish. Some have a limited number of uses per turn (eg. sneak attack) but that is the only limitation on them. You could even add some paladin levels and use divine smite at the same time as the other two.
Yes. Abilities like sneak attack don't consume any action resources (like needing to use your bonus action etc.) so you can use as many together as you wish. Some have a limited number of uses per turn (eg. sneak attack) but that is the only limitation on them. You could even add some paladin levels and use divine smite at the same time as the other two.
answered 23 hours ago
Allan Mills
713
713
You can't sneak attack at all with an unarmed strike. In order to smite + stunning strike + sneak attack all on one hit, you would need an actual finesse melee weapon.
– Seth R. Feldman
12 hours ago
add a comment |
You can't sneak attack at all with an unarmed strike. In order to smite + stunning strike + sneak attack all on one hit, you would need an actual finesse melee weapon.
– Seth R. Feldman
12 hours ago
You can't sneak attack at all with an unarmed strike. In order to smite + stunning strike + sneak attack all on one hit, you would need an actual finesse melee weapon.
– Seth R. Feldman
12 hours ago
You can't sneak attack at all with an unarmed strike. In order to smite + stunning strike + sneak attack all on one hit, you would need an actual finesse melee weapon.
– Seth R. Feldman
12 hours ago
add a comment |
TribalBearWarrior is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TribalBearWarrior is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TribalBearWarrior is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TribalBearWarrior is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137063%2fis-it-possible-for-a-multiclassed-monk-rogue-to-use-stunning-strike-and-sneak-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown