What does Google do with multiple canonical links on one page?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Facing a weird issue. Something in the latest Magento 1.x update caused a few pages on our site to have 2 canonical links. Seems to just be pagination pages include both the unpaginated url and the paginated url.
Does Google just ignore the first link, ignore the second link, or ignore both links?
canonical-url
asked 12 hours ago
Octoxan
1183
New contributor
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Facing a weird issue. Something in the latest Magento 1.x update caused a few pages on our site to have 2 canonical links. Seems to just be pagination pages include both the unpaginated url and the paginated url.
Does Google just ignore the first link, ignore the second link, or ignore both links?
canonical-url
asked 12 hours ago
Octoxan
1183
New contributor
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Facing a weird issue. Something in the latest Magento 1.x update caused a few pages on our site to have 2 canonical links. Seems to just be pagination pages include both the unpaginated url and the paginated url.
Does Google just ignore the first link, ignore the second link, or ignore both links?
canonical-url
asked 12 hours ago
Octoxan
1183
New contributor
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Facing a weird issue. Something in the latest Magento 1.x update caused a few pages on our site to have 2 canonical links. Seems to just be pagination pages include both the unpaginated url and the paginated url.
Does Google just ignore the first link, ignore the second link, or ignore both links?
canonical-url
canonical-url
asked 12 hours ago
Octoxan
1183
New contributor
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 12 hours ago
Octoxan
1183
New contributor
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 12 hours ago
Octoxan
1183
New contributor
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 12 hours ago
Octoxan
1183
asked 12 hours ago
Octoxan
1183
1183
New contributor
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Octoxan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
If you specify multiple canonical tags, Google will ignore all the canonical tags.
Having multiple canonical tags would be a reason that Google would choose to ignore canonical tags. Google also chooses to ignore canonical tags in other cases where they are malformed:
- All the tags point to the home page
- The tags are implemented in the
<body>rather than the<head>
- The tags use relative rather than absolute links
- The canonical page does not appear to be a duplicate page.
Google only sees canonical tags as a "strong hint" that one page is your preferred page. When Google finds a canonical tag it often chooses to ignore it. Google now has the concepts of "user chosen canonical" and "Google chosen canonical" that it shows you in Google search console.
Google also seems to be ignoring canonical tags for other unknown reasons recently. I've seen cases where Google chooses to index http:// pages even when all the canonical point to the https:// versions. It seems to take Google as much as a year to "trust" the user chosen canonical version enough to index it over the version that Google already has indexed.
answered 12 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
66.4k1390240
That's exactly what I needed to know. If I should dive into the Magento core to figure out why it's spitting out two tags, or just ignore it. Time to dive!
– Octoxan
12 hours ago
Here's the primary source: webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/…
– Maximillian Laumeister
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
If you specify multiple canonical tags, Google will ignore all the canonical tags.
Having multiple canonical tags would be a reason that Google would choose to ignore canonical tags. Google also chooses to ignore canonical tags in other cases where they are malformed:
- All the tags point to the home page
- The tags are implemented in the
<body>rather than the<head>
- The tags use relative rather than absolute links
- The canonical page does not appear to be a duplicate page.
Google only sees canonical tags as a "strong hint" that one page is your preferred page. When Google finds a canonical tag it often chooses to ignore it. Google now has the concepts of "user chosen canonical" and "Google chosen canonical" that it shows you in Google search console.
Google also seems to be ignoring canonical tags for other unknown reasons recently. I've seen cases where Google chooses to index http:// pages even when all the canonical point to the https:// versions. It seems to take Google as much as a year to "trust" the user chosen canonical version enough to index it over the version that Google already has indexed.
answered 12 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
66.4k1390240
That's exactly what I needed to know. If I should dive into the Magento core to figure out why it's spitting out two tags, or just ignore it. Time to dive!
– Octoxan
12 hours ago
Here's the primary source: webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/…
– Maximillian Laumeister
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
If you specify multiple canonical tags, Google will ignore all the canonical tags.
Having multiple canonical tags would be a reason that Google would choose to ignore canonical tags. Google also chooses to ignore canonical tags in other cases where they are malformed:
- All the tags point to the home page
- The tags are implemented in the
<body>rather than the<head>
- The tags use relative rather than absolute links
- The canonical page does not appear to be a duplicate page.
Google only sees canonical tags as a "strong hint" that one page is your preferred page. When Google finds a canonical tag it often chooses to ignore it. Google now has the concepts of "user chosen canonical" and "Google chosen canonical" that it shows you in Google search console.
Google also seems to be ignoring canonical tags for other unknown reasons recently. I've seen cases where Google chooses to index http:// pages even when all the canonical point to the https:// versions. It seems to take Google as much as a year to "trust" the user chosen canonical version enough to index it over the version that Google already has indexed.
answered 12 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
66.4k1390240
That's exactly what I needed to know. If I should dive into the Magento core to figure out why it's spitting out two tags, or just ignore it. Time to dive!
– Octoxan
12 hours ago
Here's the primary source: webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/…
– Maximillian Laumeister
9 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
If you specify multiple canonical tags, Google will ignore all the canonical tags.
Having multiple canonical tags would be a reason that Google would choose to ignore canonical tags. Google also chooses to ignore canonical tags in other cases where they are malformed:
- All the tags point to the home page
- The tags are implemented in the
<body>rather than the<head>
- The tags use relative rather than absolute links
- The canonical page does not appear to be a duplicate page.
Google only sees canonical tags as a "strong hint" that one page is your preferred page. When Google finds a canonical tag it often chooses to ignore it. Google now has the concepts of "user chosen canonical" and "Google chosen canonical" that it shows you in Google search console.
Google also seems to be ignoring canonical tags for other unknown reasons recently. I've seen cases where Google chooses to index http:// pages even when all the canonical point to the https:// versions. It seems to take Google as much as a year to "trust" the user chosen canonical version enough to index it over the version that Google already has indexed.
answered 12 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
66.4k1390240
If you specify multiple canonical tags, Google will ignore all the canonical tags.
Having multiple canonical tags would be a reason that Google would choose to ignore canonical tags. Google also chooses to ignore canonical tags in other cases where they are malformed:
- All the tags point to the home page
- The tags are implemented in the
<body>rather than the<head>
- The tags use relative rather than absolute links
- The canonical page does not appear to be a duplicate page.
Google only sees canonical tags as a "strong hint" that one page is your preferred page. When Google finds a canonical tag it often chooses to ignore it. Google now has the concepts of "user chosen canonical" and "Google chosen canonical" that it shows you in Google search console.
Google also seems to be ignoring canonical tags for other unknown reasons recently. I've seen cases where Google chooses to index http:// pages even when all the canonical point to the https:// versions. It seems to take Google as much as a year to "trust" the user chosen canonical version enough to index it over the version that Google already has indexed.
answered 12 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
66.4k1390240
answered 12 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
66.4k1390240
answered 12 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
66.4k1390240
answered 12 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
66.4k1390240
66.4k1390240
That's exactly what I needed to know. If I should dive into the Magento core to figure out why it's spitting out two tags, or just ignore it. Time to dive!
– Octoxan
12 hours ago
Here's the primary source: webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/…
– Maximillian Laumeister
9 hours ago
add a comment |
That's exactly what I needed to know. If I should dive into the Magento core to figure out why it's spitting out two tags, or just ignore it. Time to dive!
– Octoxan
12 hours ago
Here's the primary source: webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/…
– Maximillian Laumeister
9 hours ago
That's exactly what I needed to know. If I should dive into the Magento core to figure out why it's spitting out two tags, or just ignore it. Time to dive!
– Octoxan
12 hours ago
That's exactly what I needed to know. If I should dive into the Magento core to figure out why it's spitting out two tags, or just ignore it. Time to dive!
– Octoxan
12 hours ago
Here's the primary source: webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/…
– Maximillian Laumeister
9 hours ago
Here's the primary source: webmasters.googleblog.com/2013/04/…
– Maximillian Laumeister
9 hours ago
add a comment |
Octoxan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Octoxan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Octoxan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Octoxan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Webmasters Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwebmasters.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119557%2fwhat-does-google-do-with-multiple-canonical-links-on-one-page%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
