Word for “one who configures”
An editor is one who edits; a runner is one who runs.
What is a word for one who configures in the sense of a person who adjusts settings on a system?
single-word-requests
asked Aug 2 '11 at 13:01
M. Dudley
4672919
add a comment |
An editor is one who edits; a runner is one who runs.
What is a word for one who configures in the sense of a person who adjusts settings on a system?
single-word-requests
asked Aug 2 '11 at 13:01
M. Dudley
4672919
add a comment |
An editor is one who edits; a runner is one who runs.
What is a word for one who configures in the sense of a person who adjusts settings on a system?
single-word-requests
asked Aug 2 '11 at 13:01
M. Dudley
4672919
An editor is one who edits; a runner is one who runs.
What is a word for one who configures in the sense of a person who adjusts settings on a system?
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
asked Aug 2 '11 at 13:01
M. Dudley
4672919
asked Aug 2 '11 at 13:01
M. Dudley
4672919
edited Aug 2 '11 at 17:36
user2683
asked Aug 2 '11 at 13:01
M. Dudley
4672919
asked Aug 2 '11 at 13:01
M. Dudley
4672919
asked Aug 2 '11 at 13:01
M. Dudley
4672919
4672919
add a comment |
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
In practice the normal term would be installer, but configurer and configurator could be used. I think most people would understand these words, even though they don't normally use them.
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:18
FumbleFingers
119k32243423
3
Configurator is commonly used, but I don't really like it since it's a neologism.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 13:59
2
@emddudley: I wouldn't say it's a neologism. Inevitably it's more common since the 70s, simply because we now have a much more common referent in the computer age. Here's a 1951 usage earlier than that, and I'm sure it will have been used long before.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:10
Cool, thanks for the reference.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 14:15
2
+1 for installer because this is the word used for people who configure fixtures in buildings, for instance. "Air conditioning installer". Yes, this word is normally used, if not for computer users who install. The reason might be that few specialize in just installing, they way someone specializes in, say, drywall installing. It's a bit of a passing role for systems people. Those who install probably offer various forms of support so they are "customer support staff" or "field engineers".
– Kaz
Apr 25 '12 at 3:47
add a comment |
Configurer is the appropriate form, even if the double |ərər| at the end of the word seems strange. Consider other nominalisations that end in |ər| (like 'conjure' -> 'conjurer').
answered Aug 2 '11 at 14:06
Mark T
94846
I think this NGram strongly suggests that configurator, which has become far more common since the 70s IT context got going, is the word of choice for those who don't want to use installer.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:26
2
A "configurator" is different; it is a tool, usually a software tool, that the user employs in the configuration progress. It creates a configuration, hence the term. You seldom if ever hear of a person being called a configurator.
– KeithS
Aug 2 '11 at 18:13
This is the "most correct" answer, from purely logical grounds (and yes, I realize the tenuous role of logic in English).
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:21
add a comment |
I thought of one possibility: tuner
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:05
M. Dudley
4672919
2
Optimizer or fine-tuner. For the first, I was thinking of someone who tries to improve performance of a DBMS...
– mkennedy
Aug 2 '11 at 13:19
This is not a bad option for those who find configurer too awkward or obscure. I like tuner much better than installer. Except for the very first time you set something up, adjusting settings would be more aptly called tuning than installing.
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:29
add a comment |
Sheer volume of usage in the IT community, e.g. among those configuring SAP, is starting to tilt towards configurator vs. configurer.
edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:29
RegDwigнt♦
82.8k31281377
answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:09
Darryl Michael
111
add a comment |
Installer implies an initial effort, while configurer/configurator can describe individuals involved in subsequent changes to the initial configuration.
answered Jun 18 '14 at 17:04
AGM
111
1
Thank you for your contribution but these is really just a comment on an existing answer.
– Chenmunka
Jun 18 '14 at 17:56
add a comment |
I think the proper conjugation would be a Configurer as we configure things, and we do not configurate things, such as the other answers say one who conjures is a conjurer, and I would have called them a Tuner anyway.
answered Apr 21 '16 at 17:51
Motes
1234
add a comment |
It depends whether it is the first configuration. You would actually have different actions to perform. (f.e Pre-Installation, Pre-configuration ) these items are called "Readiness".
Any changes to the above would be a configuration change.
answered 7 mins ago
Daniel Chandler
1
New contributor
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
For short, I'd just go with Administrator as this embodies many responsibilities.
– Daniel Chandler
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36466%2fword-for-one-who-configures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In practice the normal term would be installer, but configurer and configurator could be used. I think most people would understand these words, even though they don't normally use them.
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:18
FumbleFingers
119k32243423
3
Configurator is commonly used, but I don't really like it since it's a neologism.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 13:59
2
@emddudley: I wouldn't say it's a neologism. Inevitably it's more common since the 70s, simply because we now have a much more common referent in the computer age. Here's a 1951 usage earlier than that, and I'm sure it will have been used long before.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:10
Cool, thanks for the reference.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 14:15
2
+1 for installer because this is the word used for people who configure fixtures in buildings, for instance. "Air conditioning installer". Yes, this word is normally used, if not for computer users who install. The reason might be that few specialize in just installing, they way someone specializes in, say, drywall installing. It's a bit of a passing role for systems people. Those who install probably offer various forms of support so they are "customer support staff" or "field engineers".
– Kaz
Apr 25 '12 at 3:47
add a comment |
In practice the normal term would be installer, but configurer and configurator could be used. I think most people would understand these words, even though they don't normally use them.
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:18
FumbleFingers
119k32243423
3
Configurator is commonly used, but I don't really like it since it's a neologism.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 13:59
2
@emddudley: I wouldn't say it's a neologism. Inevitably it's more common since the 70s, simply because we now have a much more common referent in the computer age. Here's a 1951 usage earlier than that, and I'm sure it will have been used long before.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:10
Cool, thanks for the reference.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 14:15
2
+1 for installer because this is the word used for people who configure fixtures in buildings, for instance. "Air conditioning installer". Yes, this word is normally used, if not for computer users who install. The reason might be that few specialize in just installing, they way someone specializes in, say, drywall installing. It's a bit of a passing role for systems people. Those who install probably offer various forms of support so they are "customer support staff" or "field engineers".
– Kaz
Apr 25 '12 at 3:47
add a comment |
In practice the normal term would be installer, but configurer and configurator could be used. I think most people would understand these words, even though they don't normally use them.
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:18
FumbleFingers
119k32243423
In practice the normal term would be installer, but configurer and configurator could be used. I think most people would understand these words, even though they don't normally use them.
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:18
FumbleFingers
119k32243423
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:18
FumbleFingers
119k32243423
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:18
FumbleFingers
119k32243423
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:18
FumbleFingers
119k32243423
119k32243423
3
Configurator is commonly used, but I don't really like it since it's a neologism.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 13:59
2
@emddudley: I wouldn't say it's a neologism. Inevitably it's more common since the 70s, simply because we now have a much more common referent in the computer age. Here's a 1951 usage earlier than that, and I'm sure it will have been used long before.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:10
Cool, thanks for the reference.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 14:15
2
+1 for installer because this is the word used for people who configure fixtures in buildings, for instance. "Air conditioning installer". Yes, this word is normally used, if not for computer users who install. The reason might be that few specialize in just installing, they way someone specializes in, say, drywall installing. It's a bit of a passing role for systems people. Those who install probably offer various forms of support so they are "customer support staff" or "field engineers".
– Kaz
Apr 25 '12 at 3:47
add a comment |
3
Configurator is commonly used, but I don't really like it since it's a neologism.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 13:59
2
@emddudley: I wouldn't say it's a neologism. Inevitably it's more common since the 70s, simply because we now have a much more common referent in the computer age. Here's a 1951 usage earlier than that, and I'm sure it will have been used long before.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:10
Cool, thanks for the reference.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 14:15
2
+1 for installer because this is the word used for people who configure fixtures in buildings, for instance. "Air conditioning installer". Yes, this word is normally used, if not for computer users who install. The reason might be that few specialize in just installing, they way someone specializes in, say, drywall installing. It's a bit of a passing role for systems people. Those who install probably offer various forms of support so they are "customer support staff" or "field engineers".
– Kaz
Apr 25 '12 at 3:47
3
3
Configurator is commonly used, but I don't really like it since it's a neologism.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 13:59
Configurator is commonly used, but I don't really like it since it's a neologism.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 13:59
2
2
@emddudley: I wouldn't say it's a neologism. Inevitably it's more common since the 70s, simply because we now have a much more common referent in the computer age. Here's a 1951 usage earlier than that, and I'm sure it will have been used long before.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:10
@emddudley: I wouldn't say it's a neologism. Inevitably it's more common since the 70s, simply because we now have a much more common referent in the computer age. Here's a 1951 usage earlier than that, and I'm sure it will have been used long before.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:10
Cool, thanks for the reference.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 14:15
Cool, thanks for the reference.
– M. Dudley
Aug 2 '11 at 14:15
2
2
+1 for installer because this is the word used for people who configure fixtures in buildings, for instance. "Air conditioning installer". Yes, this word is normally used, if not for computer users who install. The reason might be that few specialize in just installing, they way someone specializes in, say, drywall installing. It's a bit of a passing role for systems people. Those who install probably offer various forms of support so they are "customer support staff" or "field engineers".
– Kaz
Apr 25 '12 at 3:47
+1 for installer because this is the word used for people who configure fixtures in buildings, for instance. "Air conditioning installer". Yes, this word is normally used, if not for computer users who install. The reason might be that few specialize in just installing, they way someone specializes in, say, drywall installing. It's a bit of a passing role for systems people. Those who install probably offer various forms of support so they are "customer support staff" or "field engineers".
– Kaz
Apr 25 '12 at 3:47
add a comment |
Configurer is the appropriate form, even if the double |ərər| at the end of the word seems strange. Consider other nominalisations that end in |ər| (like 'conjure' -> 'conjurer').
answered Aug 2 '11 at 14:06
Mark T
94846
I think this NGram strongly suggests that configurator, which has become far more common since the 70s IT context got going, is the word of choice for those who don't want to use installer.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:26
2
A "configurator" is different; it is a tool, usually a software tool, that the user employs in the configuration progress. It creates a configuration, hence the term. You seldom if ever hear of a person being called a configurator.
– KeithS
Aug 2 '11 at 18:13
This is the "most correct" answer, from purely logical grounds (and yes, I realize the tenuous role of logic in English).
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:21
add a comment |
Configurer is the appropriate form, even if the double |ərər| at the end of the word seems strange. Consider other nominalisations that end in |ər| (like 'conjure' -> 'conjurer').
answered Aug 2 '11 at 14:06
Mark T
94846
I think this NGram strongly suggests that configurator, which has become far more common since the 70s IT context got going, is the word of choice for those who don't want to use installer.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:26
2
A "configurator" is different; it is a tool, usually a software tool, that the user employs in the configuration progress. It creates a configuration, hence the term. You seldom if ever hear of a person being called a configurator.
– KeithS
Aug 2 '11 at 18:13
This is the "most correct" answer, from purely logical grounds (and yes, I realize the tenuous role of logic in English).
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:21
add a comment |
Configurer is the appropriate form, even if the double |ərər| at the end of the word seems strange. Consider other nominalisations that end in |ər| (like 'conjure' -> 'conjurer').
answered Aug 2 '11 at 14:06
Mark T
94846
Configurer is the appropriate form, even if the double |ərər| at the end of the word seems strange. Consider other nominalisations that end in |ər| (like 'conjure' -> 'conjurer').
answered Aug 2 '11 at 14:06
Mark T
94846
answered Aug 2 '11 at 14:06
Mark T
94846
answered Aug 2 '11 at 14:06
Mark T
94846
answered Aug 2 '11 at 14:06
Mark T
94846
94846
I think this NGram strongly suggests that configurator, which has become far more common since the 70s IT context got going, is the word of choice for those who don't want to use installer.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:26
2
A "configurator" is different; it is a tool, usually a software tool, that the user employs in the configuration progress. It creates a configuration, hence the term. You seldom if ever hear of a person being called a configurator.
– KeithS
Aug 2 '11 at 18:13
This is the "most correct" answer, from purely logical grounds (and yes, I realize the tenuous role of logic in English).
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:21
add a comment |
I think this NGram strongly suggests that configurator, which has become far more common since the 70s IT context got going, is the word of choice for those who don't want to use installer.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:26
2
A "configurator" is different; it is a tool, usually a software tool, that the user employs in the configuration progress. It creates a configuration, hence the term. You seldom if ever hear of a person being called a configurator.
– KeithS
Aug 2 '11 at 18:13
This is the "most correct" answer, from purely logical grounds (and yes, I realize the tenuous role of logic in English).
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:21
I think this NGram strongly suggests that configurator, which has become far more common since the 70s IT context got going, is the word of choice for those who don't want to use installer.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:26
I think this NGram strongly suggests that configurator, which has become far more common since the 70s IT context got going, is the word of choice for those who don't want to use installer.
– FumbleFingers
Aug 2 '11 at 14:26
2
2
A "configurator" is different; it is a tool, usually a software tool, that the user employs in the configuration progress. It creates a configuration, hence the term. You seldom if ever hear of a person being called a configurator.
– KeithS
Aug 2 '11 at 18:13
A "configurator" is different; it is a tool, usually a software tool, that the user employs in the configuration progress. It creates a configuration, hence the term. You seldom if ever hear of a person being called a configurator.
– KeithS
Aug 2 '11 at 18:13
This is the "most correct" answer, from purely logical grounds (and yes, I realize the tenuous role of logic in English).
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:21
This is the "most correct" answer, from purely logical grounds (and yes, I realize the tenuous role of logic in English).
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:21
add a comment |
I thought of one possibility: tuner
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:05
M. Dudley
4672919
2
Optimizer or fine-tuner. For the first, I was thinking of someone who tries to improve performance of a DBMS...
– mkennedy
Aug 2 '11 at 13:19
This is not a bad option for those who find configurer too awkward or obscure. I like tuner much better than installer. Except for the very first time you set something up, adjusting settings would be more aptly called tuning than installing.
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:29
add a comment |
I thought of one possibility: tuner
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:05
M. Dudley
4672919
2
Optimizer or fine-tuner. For the first, I was thinking of someone who tries to improve performance of a DBMS...
– mkennedy
Aug 2 '11 at 13:19
This is not a bad option for those who find configurer too awkward or obscure. I like tuner much better than installer. Except for the very first time you set something up, adjusting settings would be more aptly called tuning than installing.
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:29
add a comment |
I thought of one possibility: tuner
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:05
M. Dudley
4672919
I thought of one possibility: tuner
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:05
M. Dudley
4672919
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:05
M. Dudley
4672919
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:05
M. Dudley
4672919
answered Aug 2 '11 at 13:05
M. Dudley
4672919
4672919
2
Optimizer or fine-tuner. For the first, I was thinking of someone who tries to improve performance of a DBMS...
– mkennedy
Aug 2 '11 at 13:19
This is not a bad option for those who find configurer too awkward or obscure. I like tuner much better than installer. Except for the very first time you set something up, adjusting settings would be more aptly called tuning than installing.
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:29
add a comment |
2
Optimizer or fine-tuner. For the first, I was thinking of someone who tries to improve performance of a DBMS...
– mkennedy
Aug 2 '11 at 13:19
This is not a bad option for those who find configurer too awkward or obscure. I like tuner much better than installer. Except for the very first time you set something up, adjusting settings would be more aptly called tuning than installing.
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:29
2
2
Optimizer or fine-tuner. For the first, I was thinking of someone who tries to improve performance of a DBMS...
– mkennedy
Aug 2 '11 at 13:19
Optimizer or fine-tuner. For the first, I was thinking of someone who tries to improve performance of a DBMS...
– mkennedy
Aug 2 '11 at 13:19
This is not a bad option for those who find configurer too awkward or obscure. I like tuner much better than installer. Except for the very first time you set something up, adjusting settings would be more aptly called tuning than installing.
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:29
This is not a bad option for those who find configurer too awkward or obscure. I like tuner much better than installer. Except for the very first time you set something up, adjusting settings would be more aptly called tuning than installing.
– John Y
Nov 27 '12 at 14:29
add a comment |
Sheer volume of usage in the IT community, e.g. among those configuring SAP, is starting to tilt towards configurator vs. configurer.
edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:29
RegDwigнt♦
82.8k31281377
answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:09
Darryl Michael
111
add a comment |
Sheer volume of usage in the IT community, e.g. among those configuring SAP, is starting to tilt towards configurator vs. configurer.
edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:29
RegDwigнt♦
82.8k31281377
answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:09
Darryl Michael
111
add a comment |
Sheer volume of usage in the IT community, e.g. among those configuring SAP, is starting to tilt towards configurator vs. configurer.
edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:29
RegDwigнt♦
82.8k31281377
answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:09
Darryl Michael
111
Sheer volume of usage in the IT community, e.g. among those configuring SAP, is starting to tilt towards configurator vs. configurer.
edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:29
RegDwigнt♦
82.8k31281377
answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:09
Darryl Michael
111
edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:29
RegDwigнt♦
82.8k31281377
edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:29
RegDwigнt♦
82.8k31281377
edited Mar 27 '13 at 12:29
RegDwigнt♦
82.8k31281377
82.8k31281377
answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:09
Darryl Michael
111
answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:09
Darryl Michael
111
answered Mar 27 '13 at 12:09
Darryl Michael
111
111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Installer implies an initial effort, while configurer/configurator can describe individuals involved in subsequent changes to the initial configuration.
answered Jun 18 '14 at 17:04
AGM
111
1
Thank you for your contribution but these is really just a comment on an existing answer.
– Chenmunka
Jun 18 '14 at 17:56
add a comment |
Installer implies an initial effort, while configurer/configurator can describe individuals involved in subsequent changes to the initial configuration.
answered Jun 18 '14 at 17:04
AGM
111
1
Thank you for your contribution but these is really just a comment on an existing answer.
– Chenmunka
Jun 18 '14 at 17:56
add a comment |
Installer implies an initial effort, while configurer/configurator can describe individuals involved in subsequent changes to the initial configuration.
answered Jun 18 '14 at 17:04
AGM
111
Installer implies an initial effort, while configurer/configurator can describe individuals involved in subsequent changes to the initial configuration.
answered Jun 18 '14 at 17:04
AGM
111
answered Jun 18 '14 at 17:04
AGM
111
answered Jun 18 '14 at 17:04
AGM
111
answered Jun 18 '14 at 17:04
AGM
111
111
1
Thank you for your contribution but these is really just a comment on an existing answer.
– Chenmunka
Jun 18 '14 at 17:56
add a comment |
1
Thank you for your contribution but these is really just a comment on an existing answer.
– Chenmunka
Jun 18 '14 at 17:56
1
1
Thank you for your contribution but these is really just a comment on an existing answer.
– Chenmunka
Jun 18 '14 at 17:56
Thank you for your contribution but these is really just a comment on an existing answer.
– Chenmunka
Jun 18 '14 at 17:56
add a comment |
I think the proper conjugation would be a Configurer as we configure things, and we do not configurate things, such as the other answers say one who conjures is a conjurer, and I would have called them a Tuner anyway.
answered Apr 21 '16 at 17:51
Motes
1234
add a comment |
I think the proper conjugation would be a Configurer as we configure things, and we do not configurate things, such as the other answers say one who conjures is a conjurer, and I would have called them a Tuner anyway.
answered Apr 21 '16 at 17:51
Motes
1234
add a comment |
I think the proper conjugation would be a Configurer as we configure things, and we do not configurate things, such as the other answers say one who conjures is a conjurer, and I would have called them a Tuner anyway.
answered Apr 21 '16 at 17:51
Motes
1234
I think the proper conjugation would be a Configurer as we configure things, and we do not configurate things, such as the other answers say one who conjures is a conjurer, and I would have called them a Tuner anyway.
answered Apr 21 '16 at 17:51
Motes
1234
answered Apr 21 '16 at 17:51
Motes
1234
answered Apr 21 '16 at 17:51
Motes
1234
answered Apr 21 '16 at 17:51
Motes
1234
1234
add a comment |
add a comment |
It depends whether it is the first configuration. You would actually have different actions to perform. (f.e Pre-Installation, Pre-configuration ) these items are called "Readiness".
Any changes to the above would be a configuration change.
answered 7 mins ago
Daniel Chandler
1
New contributor
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
For short, I'd just go with Administrator as this embodies many responsibilities.
– Daniel Chandler
5 mins ago
add a comment |
It depends whether it is the first configuration. You would actually have different actions to perform. (f.e Pre-Installation, Pre-configuration ) these items are called "Readiness".
Any changes to the above would be a configuration change.
answered 7 mins ago
Daniel Chandler
1
New contributor
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
For short, I'd just go with Administrator as this embodies many responsibilities.
– Daniel Chandler
5 mins ago
add a comment |
It depends whether it is the first configuration. You would actually have different actions to perform. (f.e Pre-Installation, Pre-configuration ) these items are called "Readiness".
Any changes to the above would be a configuration change.
answered 7 mins ago
Daniel Chandler
1
New contributor
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
It depends whether it is the first configuration. You would actually have different actions to perform. (f.e Pre-Installation, Pre-configuration ) these items are called "Readiness".
Any changes to the above would be a configuration change.
answered 7 mins ago
Daniel Chandler
1
New contributor
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 7 mins ago
Daniel Chandler
1
New contributor
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 7 mins ago
Daniel Chandler
1
answered 7 mins ago
Daniel Chandler
1
1
New contributor
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Daniel Chandler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
For short, I'd just go with Administrator as this embodies many responsibilities.
– Daniel Chandler
5 mins ago
add a comment |
For short, I'd just go with Administrator as this embodies many responsibilities.
– Daniel Chandler
5 mins ago
For short, I'd just go with Administrator as this embodies many responsibilities.
– Daniel Chandler
5 mins ago
For short, I'd just go with Administrator as this embodies many responsibilities.
– Daniel Chandler
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36466%2fword-for-one-who-configures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
