CentOs 7 Python Issue “-bash: python: command not found”
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I asked this at stackoverflow, but just realized it might be best here. If I need to delete it over there or should not have posted here, please let me know. I am still new to this site. Thanks in advance!
I'm using centos 7 and was trying to install python 3.4 alongside python 2.6 (2.7?) the default install. I was attempting to change my bashrc file with an alias to make python 3.4 the default from the shell. It did not work, and I commented out the script, resourced bashrc, and now the system acts as if it can no longer find python, default or otherwise.
Just typing "python" returns:
-bash: python: command not found
which python gives:
/usr/bin/which: no python in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin)
However there is a python install in both /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.
alternatives --list | grep -i python yields:
python auto /usr/bin/python3.4
-v python returns nothing.
type -a python gives:
-bash: type: python: not found
declare -p PATH outputs
declare -x PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin"
I am not entirely sure where to go from here, and any help would be much appreciated.
I do seem to have /usr/bin/python:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 25 15:39 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python
but:
$ ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python) gives:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
I do not know if this is relevant, but /etc/alternatives/python was pink looking in the terminal.
Edit 2:
ls -l /usr/local/bin/ prints -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 101 Sep 4 2014 2to3-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 241 Sep 4 2014 easy_install-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 Sep 4 2014 idle3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213 Sep 4 2014 pip3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84 Sep 4 2014 pydoc3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3066 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 236 Sep 4 2014 pyvenv-3.4
So perhaps a linking error still?
Edit 3:
This is the series of commands which I used to install python 3.
yum install scl-utils
sudo yum install scl-utils
sudo wget https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python33/epel-7-x86_64/download/rhscl-python33-epel-7-x86_64.noarch.rpm
sudo yum install rhscl-python33-*.noarch.rpm
centos python path python3
asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23
Aerdowaith
1114
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I asked this at stackoverflow, but just realized it might be best here. If I need to delete it over there or should not have posted here, please let me know. I am still new to this site. Thanks in advance!
I'm using centos 7 and was trying to install python 3.4 alongside python 2.6 (2.7?) the default install. I was attempting to change my bashrc file with an alias to make python 3.4 the default from the shell. It did not work, and I commented out the script, resourced bashrc, and now the system acts as if it can no longer find python, default or otherwise.
Just typing "python" returns:
-bash: python: command not found
which python gives:
/usr/bin/which: no python in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin)
However there is a python install in both /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.
alternatives --list | grep -i python yields:
python auto /usr/bin/python3.4
-v python returns nothing.
type -a python gives:
-bash: type: python: not found
declare -p PATH outputs
declare -x PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin"
I am not entirely sure where to go from here, and any help would be much appreciated.
I do seem to have /usr/bin/python:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 25 15:39 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python
but:
$ ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python) gives:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
I do not know if this is relevant, but /etc/alternatives/python was pink looking in the terminal.
Edit 2:
ls -l /usr/local/bin/ prints -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 101 Sep 4 2014 2to3-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 241 Sep 4 2014 easy_install-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 Sep 4 2014 idle3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213 Sep 4 2014 pip3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84 Sep 4 2014 pydoc3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3066 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 236 Sep 4 2014 pyvenv-3.4
So perhaps a linking error still?
Edit 3:
This is the series of commands which I used to install python 3.
yum install scl-utils
sudo yum install scl-utils
sudo wget https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python33/epel-7-x86_64/download/rhscl-python33-epel-7-x86_64.noarch.rpm
sudo yum install rhscl-python33-*.noarch.rpm
centos python path python3
asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23
Aerdowaith
1114
Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
– terdon♦
Jun 29 '15 at 23:26
Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:25
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I asked this at stackoverflow, but just realized it might be best here. If I need to delete it over there or should not have posted here, please let me know. I am still new to this site. Thanks in advance!
I'm using centos 7 and was trying to install python 3.4 alongside python 2.6 (2.7?) the default install. I was attempting to change my bashrc file with an alias to make python 3.4 the default from the shell. It did not work, and I commented out the script, resourced bashrc, and now the system acts as if it can no longer find python, default or otherwise.
Just typing "python" returns:
-bash: python: command not found
which python gives:
/usr/bin/which: no python in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin)
However there is a python install in both /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.
alternatives --list | grep -i python yields:
python auto /usr/bin/python3.4
-v python returns nothing.
type -a python gives:
-bash: type: python: not found
declare -p PATH outputs
declare -x PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin"
I am not entirely sure where to go from here, and any help would be much appreciated.
I do seem to have /usr/bin/python:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 25 15:39 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python
but:
$ ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python) gives:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
I do not know if this is relevant, but /etc/alternatives/python was pink looking in the terminal.
Edit 2:
ls -l /usr/local/bin/ prints -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 101 Sep 4 2014 2to3-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 241 Sep 4 2014 easy_install-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 Sep 4 2014 idle3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213 Sep 4 2014 pip3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84 Sep 4 2014 pydoc3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3066 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 236 Sep 4 2014 pyvenv-3.4
So perhaps a linking error still?
Edit 3:
This is the series of commands which I used to install python 3.
yum install scl-utils
sudo yum install scl-utils
sudo wget https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python33/epel-7-x86_64/download/rhscl-python33-epel-7-x86_64.noarch.rpm
sudo yum install rhscl-python33-*.noarch.rpm
centos python path python3
asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23
Aerdowaith
1114
I asked this at stackoverflow, but just realized it might be best here. If I need to delete it over there or should not have posted here, please let me know. I am still new to this site. Thanks in advance!
I'm using centos 7 and was trying to install python 3.4 alongside python 2.6 (2.7?) the default install. I was attempting to change my bashrc file with an alias to make python 3.4 the default from the shell. It did not work, and I commented out the script, resourced bashrc, and now the system acts as if it can no longer find python, default or otherwise.
Just typing "python" returns:
-bash: python: command not found
which python gives:
/usr/bin/which: no python in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin)
However there is a python install in both /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.
alternatives --list | grep -i python yields:
python auto /usr/bin/python3.4
-v python returns nothing.
type -a python gives:
-bash: type: python: not found
declare -p PATH outputs
declare -x PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin"
I am not entirely sure where to go from here, and any help would be much appreciated.
I do seem to have /usr/bin/python:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 25 15:39 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python
but:
$ ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python) gives:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
I do not know if this is relevant, but /etc/alternatives/python was pink looking in the terminal.
Edit 2:
ls -l /usr/local/bin/ prints -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 101 Sep 4 2014 2to3-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 241 Sep 4 2014 easy_install-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 Sep 4 2014 idle3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213 Sep 4 2014 pip3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84 Sep 4 2014 pydoc3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3066 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 236 Sep 4 2014 pyvenv-3.4
So perhaps a linking error still?
Edit 3:
This is the series of commands which I used to install python 3.
yum install scl-utils
sudo yum install scl-utils
sudo wget https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python33/epel-7-x86_64/download/rhscl-python33-epel-7-x86_64.noarch.rpm
sudo yum install rhscl-python33-*.noarch.rpm
centos python path python3
centos python path python3
asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23
Aerdowaith
1114
asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23
Aerdowaith
1114
edited Jun 30 '15 at 16:12
asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23
Aerdowaith
1114
asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23
Aerdowaith
1114
asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23
Aerdowaith
1114
1114
Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
– terdon♦
Jun 29 '15 at 23:26
Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:25
add a comment |
Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
– terdon♦
Jun 29 '15 at 23:26
Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:25
Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
– terdon♦
Jun 29 '15 at 23:26
Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
– terdon♦
Jun 29 '15 at 23:26
Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:25
Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.
answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38
terdon♦
127k31244421
I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26
Bash returned:ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File existsSo apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29
@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output ofls -l /usr/bin/pythonandls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41
Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52
@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
-1
down vote
You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.
Enabling a Software Collection
answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
feeble
191
Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14
Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30
:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.
answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38
terdon♦
127k31244421
I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26
Bash returned:ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File existsSo apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29
@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output ofls -l /usr/bin/pythonandls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41
Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52
@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.
answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38
terdon♦
127k31244421
I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26
Bash returned:ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File existsSo apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29
@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output ofls -l /usr/bin/pythonandls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41
Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52
@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.
answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38
terdon♦
127k31244421
It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory
So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.
answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38
terdon♦
127k31244421
edited Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38
terdon♦
127k31244421
answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38
terdon♦
127k31244421
answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38
terdon♦
127k31244421
127k31244421
I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26
Bash returned:ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File existsSo apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29
@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output ofls -l /usr/bin/pythonandls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41
Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52
@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
|
show 3 more comments
I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26
Bash returned:ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File existsSo apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29
@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output ofls -l /usr/bin/pythonandls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41
Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52
@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26
I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26
Bash returned:
ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29
Bash returned:
ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29
@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of
ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41
@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of
ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41
Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52
Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52
@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
-1
down vote
You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.
Enabling a Software Collection
answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
feeble
191
Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14
Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30
:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.
Enabling a Software Collection
answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
feeble
191
Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14
Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30
:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.
Enabling a Software Collection
answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
feeble
191
You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.
Enabling a Software Collection
answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
feeble
191
answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
feeble
191
answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
feeble
191
answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
feeble
191
191
Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14
Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30
:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34
add a comment |
Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14
Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30
:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34
Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14
Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14
Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30
Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30
:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34
:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212961%2fcentos-7-python-issue-bash-python-command-not-found%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
– terdon♦
Jun 29 '15 at 23:26
Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:25