Subordinate who has a good reputation may be breaking company policies





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I work in big engineering organization. I have a very efficient, dutiful and experienced supervisor working under me. He has gained a great respect for his longtime services in the organization. By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization.



A few days ago I learned of a few complaints against him




  1. He claims overtime for more hours than he has actually done.


  2. He accepts delivery of substandard items from some vendors in return for financial benefit.


  3. He promotes favoritism among our staff, giving unauthorized benefits to some workers including extra leave, overtime etc.



Considering his services and the mandatory requirements for our organization, I decided not to take disciplinary action against him. At the same time, I want to communicate to him that he should not dare to repeat such practices in the future. By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office.



How can I address this issue effectively and in the best interest of the organization? I cannot afford to expel him from our team, and at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in the future.










share|improve this question




















  • 8




    "I cannot afford to expel him out from our team" - why not?
    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 21




    "By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office." - I don't understand. If you are this person's boss, it is your obligation to talk to him.
    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 6




    He's stealing money via overtime and manipulating vendors for his own personal benefit. You can't possibly claim he is "valuable" for the company. Sorry, but no amount of experience or knowledge is worth someone who will blatantly act so destructively. Any worker can be replaced.
    – dwizum
    2 days ago








  • 6




    If you "cannot afford to expel him" then you first need to re-structure your team in a way that no member holds you hostage in this manner. After that, you can easily address any problematic employee.
    – sf02
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Nobody is indispensable - or rather, nobody should be allowed to be indispensable. That's effectively a hostage situation. If you show him that he will receive no consequences for his actions, what exactly makes you think he won't just continue with them? You have to be able to discipline any subordinate, up to and including termination. Otherwise your organization is dysfunctional.
    – TheSoundDefense
    2 days ago

















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I work in big engineering organization. I have a very efficient, dutiful and experienced supervisor working under me. He has gained a great respect for his longtime services in the organization. By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization.



A few days ago I learned of a few complaints against him




  1. He claims overtime for more hours than he has actually done.


  2. He accepts delivery of substandard items from some vendors in return for financial benefit.


  3. He promotes favoritism among our staff, giving unauthorized benefits to some workers including extra leave, overtime etc.



Considering his services and the mandatory requirements for our organization, I decided not to take disciplinary action against him. At the same time, I want to communicate to him that he should not dare to repeat such practices in the future. By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office.



How can I address this issue effectively and in the best interest of the organization? I cannot afford to expel him from our team, and at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in the future.










share|improve this question




















  • 8




    "I cannot afford to expel him out from our team" - why not?
    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 21




    "By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office." - I don't understand. If you are this person's boss, it is your obligation to talk to him.
    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 6




    He's stealing money via overtime and manipulating vendors for his own personal benefit. You can't possibly claim he is "valuable" for the company. Sorry, but no amount of experience or knowledge is worth someone who will blatantly act so destructively. Any worker can be replaced.
    – dwizum
    2 days ago








  • 6




    If you "cannot afford to expel him" then you first need to re-structure your team in a way that no member holds you hostage in this manner. After that, you can easily address any problematic employee.
    – sf02
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Nobody is indispensable - or rather, nobody should be allowed to be indispensable. That's effectively a hostage situation. If you show him that he will receive no consequences for his actions, what exactly makes you think he won't just continue with them? You have to be able to discipline any subordinate, up to and including termination. Otherwise your organization is dysfunctional.
    – TheSoundDefense
    2 days ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I work in big engineering organization. I have a very efficient, dutiful and experienced supervisor working under me. He has gained a great respect for his longtime services in the organization. By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization.



A few days ago I learned of a few complaints against him




  1. He claims overtime for more hours than he has actually done.


  2. He accepts delivery of substandard items from some vendors in return for financial benefit.


  3. He promotes favoritism among our staff, giving unauthorized benefits to some workers including extra leave, overtime etc.



Considering his services and the mandatory requirements for our organization, I decided not to take disciplinary action against him. At the same time, I want to communicate to him that he should not dare to repeat such practices in the future. By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office.



How can I address this issue effectively and in the best interest of the organization? I cannot afford to expel him from our team, and at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in the future.










share|improve this question















I work in big engineering organization. I have a very efficient, dutiful and experienced supervisor working under me. He has gained a great respect for his longtime services in the organization. By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization.



A few days ago I learned of a few complaints against him




  1. He claims overtime for more hours than he has actually done.


  2. He accepts delivery of substandard items from some vendors in return for financial benefit.


  3. He promotes favoritism among our staff, giving unauthorized benefits to some workers including extra leave, overtime etc.



Considering his services and the mandatory requirements for our organization, I decided not to take disciplinary action against him. At the same time, I want to communicate to him that he should not dare to repeat such practices in the future. By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office.



How can I address this issue effectively and in the best interest of the organization? I cannot afford to expel him from our team, and at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in the future.







teamwork behavior complaint company-norms






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Community

1




1










asked 2 days ago









Ahmad Raza

1744




1744








  • 8




    "I cannot afford to expel him out from our team" - why not?
    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 21




    "By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office." - I don't understand. If you are this person's boss, it is your obligation to talk to him.
    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 6




    He's stealing money via overtime and manipulating vendors for his own personal benefit. You can't possibly claim he is "valuable" for the company. Sorry, but no amount of experience or knowledge is worth someone who will blatantly act so destructively. Any worker can be replaced.
    – dwizum
    2 days ago








  • 6




    If you "cannot afford to expel him" then you first need to re-structure your team in a way that no member holds you hostage in this manner. After that, you can easily address any problematic employee.
    – sf02
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Nobody is indispensable - or rather, nobody should be allowed to be indispensable. That's effectively a hostage situation. If you show him that he will receive no consequences for his actions, what exactly makes you think he won't just continue with them? You have to be able to discipline any subordinate, up to and including termination. Otherwise your organization is dysfunctional.
    – TheSoundDefense
    2 days ago














  • 8




    "I cannot afford to expel him out from our team" - why not?
    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 21




    "By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office." - I don't understand. If you are this person's boss, it is your obligation to talk to him.
    – Joe Strazzere
    2 days ago






  • 6




    He's stealing money via overtime and manipulating vendors for his own personal benefit. You can't possibly claim he is "valuable" for the company. Sorry, but no amount of experience or knowledge is worth someone who will blatantly act so destructively. Any worker can be replaced.
    – dwizum
    2 days ago








  • 6




    If you "cannot afford to expel him" then you first need to re-structure your team in a way that no member holds you hostage in this manner. After that, you can easily address any problematic employee.
    – sf02
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Nobody is indispensable - or rather, nobody should be allowed to be indispensable. That's effectively a hostage situation. If you show him that he will receive no consequences for his actions, what exactly makes you think he won't just continue with them? You have to be able to discipline any subordinate, up to and including termination. Otherwise your organization is dysfunctional.
    – TheSoundDefense
    2 days ago








8




8




"I cannot afford to expel him out from our team" - why not?
– Joe Strazzere
2 days ago




"I cannot afford to expel him out from our team" - why not?
– Joe Strazzere
2 days ago




21




21




"By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office." - I don't understand. If you are this person's boss, it is your obligation to talk to him.
– Joe Strazzere
2 days ago




"By virtue of his experience, age & services, I don't want to tell him personally by calling him in my office." - I don't understand. If you are this person's boss, it is your obligation to talk to him.
– Joe Strazzere
2 days ago




6




6




He's stealing money via overtime and manipulating vendors for his own personal benefit. You can't possibly claim he is "valuable" for the company. Sorry, but no amount of experience or knowledge is worth someone who will blatantly act so destructively. Any worker can be replaced.
– dwizum
2 days ago






He's stealing money via overtime and manipulating vendors for his own personal benefit. You can't possibly claim he is "valuable" for the company. Sorry, but no amount of experience or knowledge is worth someone who will blatantly act so destructively. Any worker can be replaced.
– dwizum
2 days ago






6




6




If you "cannot afford to expel him" then you first need to re-structure your team in a way that no member holds you hostage in this manner. After that, you can easily address any problematic employee.
– sf02
2 days ago




If you "cannot afford to expel him" then you first need to re-structure your team in a way that no member holds you hostage in this manner. After that, you can easily address any problematic employee.
– sf02
2 days ago




5




5




Nobody is indispensable - or rather, nobody should be allowed to be indispensable. That's effectively a hostage situation. If you show him that he will receive no consequences for his actions, what exactly makes you think he won't just continue with them? You have to be able to discipline any subordinate, up to and including termination. Otherwise your organization is dysfunctional.
– TheSoundDefense
2 days ago




Nobody is indispensable - or rather, nobody should be allowed to be indispensable. That's effectively a hostage situation. If you show him that he will receive no consequences for his actions, what exactly makes you think he won't just continue with them? You have to be able to discipline any subordinate, up to and including termination. Otherwise your organization is dysfunctional.
– TheSoundDefense
2 days ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
12
down vote













The only thing worse than someone with selfish, blatant disregard for company policies is someone who behaves that way, yet masquerades as a good employee and hopes that their positive reputation will get them out of trouble.



Validate the rumors, then seek help from your employer to make sure you understand the proper methods to deal with the facts, once you actually have them. The accusations you've collected (lying about overtime, receiving personal financial benefit from business relationships with vendors) are very serious and could be putting him, you, and/or your employer in a bad legal position if they're not dealt with.



You say you want to do what's best for your organization, yet you also seem unwilling to enforce company policy. Consider that the company has put policies in place because it views them as the best way to handle certain situations. In other words: If you truly do want what's best for the company, enforce it's policies. Or, seek help/guidance from someone in a position to change or interpret them for you.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Yes you are right that company has clear policy to tackle these cases but in exceptional case few decisions are taken otherwise in the best intrest of organization running affairs. If you have not suitable backup to replace such persons than only option left is to retain him by adopting requisite corrective action.
    – Ahmad Raza
    2 days ago






  • 3




    If there was a fox getting in your hen house and killing your chickens, would you evict the fox? Or just leave him a nice note asking him not to eat your birds? Sometimes you just have to rip the bandaid off. Firing him will sting in the short term, but every day he sits there stealing from the company with a big smile on his face, you're gushing blood.
    – dwizum
    2 days ago










  • I have also thought seriously on these line of action. In such cases immediate corrective action is to eliminate him to make example for others. It is slightly different for us the person has full grip on all technical processes by virtue of his experience and knowledge. Till the time we have no suitable replacement for him we have no other option than to go ahead with him by taking requisite corrective action
    – Ahmad Raza
    2 days ago






  • 3




    Terminating this employee is done to cut them off and stop the problem they're causing by stealing from your employer. It's not done to "make him an example for others." You keep mentioning "requisite corrective action." If you're unwilling to fire him, and you're unwilling to even speak to him face to face, what exactly do you mean by "requisite corrective action?"
    – dwizum
    2 days ago










  • One of the corrective action is to communicate him that I know his mistakes. In this he will at least not repeat the same. Till the time I have suitable backup I can continue to go ahead with him and after sometime when suitable person as backup of him available, a disciplinary action can be attempted against him
    – Ahmad Raza
    2 days ago


















up vote
8
down vote













The first thing you should do is verify those complaints by whatever means is possible, and document carefully everything about them. You cannot accuse someone of things so serious without serious backup. And you should do this no matter what you decide to do about him.



Are you sure he's indispensable to your organization? Can you make it a project to collect most of the knowledge he has that you really need? Consider that he is setting a bad example for the entire organization, and may be the source of a lot more you don't know about, from him directly or his from the friends/followers who see what he's getting away with.






share|improve this answer





















  • For the time being I cannot afford to expel him out but as long term measures I have decided to trained at least two more supervisor as a backup to tackle such issues
    – Ahmad Raza
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes, it seems wise to train replacements. But then I wouldn't necessarily tell him about it, as he can do even more damage if he's not feeling secure. And you should cover yourself both legally and with higher management by gathering cast-iron documentation of his offenses, past and future.
    – George M
    2 days ago










  • This is only reason that I cannot tell him personaly in this way he will feel himself un secure. Till the time I have no suitable replacement I have to go ahead with him with requisite corrective action
    – Ahmad Raza
    2 days ago










  • You should be very careful with corrective action too, as he will likely perceive that he's been found out. If I were you I'd make myself a written plan of what needs to be corrected, and announce it all at once as I announce he's been dismissed. Then it will be clear to everyone why he's been dismissed, and that you're trying to redress it all. More might come out then, so be prepared to act further.
    – George M
    2 days ago










  • Exactly right. .. I have noted your valuable opinion to implement.
    – Ahmad Raza
    yesterday


















up vote
4
down vote














How can I go through this issue effectively and in best interest of
the organization? I cannot afford to expel him out from our team, and
at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in
the future.




You have a manager/supervisor that you report to, let them know.



The employee is an insider threat. They do some great things and some things that are destructive to the organization. You are letting their strengths let them get away with destructive behavior.



Imagine that the person who reported them to you, goes over your head. When your company finds out that you protected somebody who was stealing from them, they might not accept excuses from you. Expect to be disciplined, but you might end-up fired - or charged.



Also letting them keep their job could cause the employee to shift how they are stealing, or they might accelerate their action.






share|improve this answer





















  • I respect your opionon , despite availability of all legal and disciplinary action to tackle such issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately we have not suitable backup for him who can be well known of technical process ess like him. In the long run I have decided to trained at least two supervisor like his caliber as backup to tackle such issues
    – Ahmad Raza
    2 days ago






  • 1




    But does your boss know?
    – mhoran_psprep
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Yes I have already told him with all details of evidence bcos if he will come to know from other sources than it will shatter my confidence
    – Ahmad Raza
    2 days ago










  • The last paragraph is important, it can certainly lead to a shift or acceleration.
    – Kilisi
    yesterday










  • Rightly said. ..
    – Ahmad Raza
    yesterday


















up vote
4
down vote













"By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization"



Fix that problem immediately. Locate employees who are keen to learn the domain knowledge that he has, and work with them to get them trained up.



Then (or probably sooner), get concrete evidence of the employees activity - not just gossip - and then fire him. He is a thief, and his activities - and your acceptance of them - may reflect on you. Make sure that HR is involved at all stages, so that due process is followed.



This is an opportunity to show your mettle as a manager. Take it.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    I think George M's answer is good and I agree: you should do everything you can to investigate, substantiate and document these alleged violations by your subordinate.



    I think violation number 2 is potentially very serious. If he has been taking 'back-handers' from vendors to accept poor quality product, then that is a conflict of interest. Many large organizations have very strict, zero-tolerance policies towards this and if you try to sweep it under the carpet, then it may have some serious implications for you.



    Regarding that matter, I think you have a responsibility to bring it up with your superiors and probably your company's Legal department. If this conflict of interest is serious and has been going on for a long time, then he may simply need to be let go, regardless of his experience or value to the company. I would let the more senior Management and Legal guide you on that.



    If your leadership and Legal team agree that his 'sins' can be forgiven, then at the very least I think you would need to call him into your office and have a private, face-to-face discussion about it. You should explain very clearly that these violations are in breach of company policy and unacceptable. In that scenario, you can say that, in light of his experience and service to the company, the company is willing to give him a second chance; however, if there is any repeat of these violations, then you will have no choice but to resort to disciplinary action or terminate his employment. If it is a private conversation, then there should be no risk in terms of harming his reputation within the company.



    If you are his boss, then it is your responsibility to ensure he is complying with company policies and procedures, and it is your responsibility to discipline him, if necessary. If you try to avoid confronting him on this face-to-face, then I am afraid that is just going to make you come across as a weak Manager, and you may give him the impression that he will be able to get away with breaking the rules in future.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Thanks for your comments, I am 100% agree that such cases must not be tolerated as these can produce bad name for organization and product as well. Despite availability of these legal and disciplinary action to tackle the issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately presently I have not suitable backup to replace him. By virtue of his experience he had vast knowledge of technical processes. So in present circumstances only option left is to go ahead with him with requisite corrective actions. In the long run I have decided
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago










    • Most large corporations I have come across would not see it that way. They would take the view that no one employee is so indispensable as to justify taking a risk with legal exposure or damage to the company's reputation. Again, I strongly recommend that you take guidance from higher Management and/or Legal.
      – Time4Tea
      2 days ago






    • 1




      Exactly right. It is our mistake that we cannot trained backup of his caliber. I have also discussed the issue with my executive manager and told him my exception. He has also same opionon that by necessary corrective action we have to go ahead with him till the time we have suitable replacement.
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago


















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    In my view the main point is that several of the things he supposedly does are not just "against company policies" but outright criminal on the personal level (Fraud, corruption etc) and place huge liabilities to your company (e.g. if the substandard products hurt/kill a customer).



    I am assuming that these things turn out to be true (after investigating these by sufficient means, e.g. hiring an private investigator)




    • Realize your losses: You have to fire him. His knowledge will be lost, and you have to replace him.


    • Work on minimizing the damage - make sure that you find employees in his team who have been cut out by his favoritism and make sure they know that you are on their side, so that you have people available to take over the team who are not somehow depending on him


    • Do not go to the police now. The offer on your behalf to the guy not to go to the police if he does as he is told may be a valuable bargaining chip. The same hold for all other employees who profited from the guy and looked the other way then he did what he did


    • Figure out how good his connections to the customers are. Did he bribe customers? If so, you may have to prepare for loosing business (or paying up). Talk informally to the most important customers he worked directly with about his work - go to the next level, not the technical contact level. You can dress this as a management-managment follow up in the style of "what can we do better".


    • Figure out if he managed to put liabilities for you or others into the books covering up his responsibility


    • Once the person in question realizes that you investigate/plan to replace him, the gloves have to be taken off. In that moment you have be ready to hit him with everything you got, fair or unfair, honest or lying, treating civil+criminal lawsuits, disciplinary action, public destruction of his reputation, and potentially even thing on the border of legality (e.g. exposing things your PI found out accidentally), and that hast to happen visibly enough that everybody in the company knows that he has to choose sides. Those who do not choose sides with you have to be walked off the premises the next day.







    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "423"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: false,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123746%2fsubordinate-who-has-a-good-reputation-may-be-breaking-company-policies%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown




















      StackExchange.ready(function () {
      $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
      var showEditor = function() {
      $("#show-editor-button").hide();
      $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
      StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
      };

      var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
      if(useFancy == 'True') {
      var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
      var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
      var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

      $(this).loadPopup({
      url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
      loaded: function(popup) {
      var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
      var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
      var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

      pTitle.text(popupTitle);
      pBody.html(popupBody);
      pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
      }
      })
      } else{
      var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
      if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
      showEditor();
      }
      }
      });
      });






      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      12
      down vote













      The only thing worse than someone with selfish, blatant disregard for company policies is someone who behaves that way, yet masquerades as a good employee and hopes that their positive reputation will get them out of trouble.



      Validate the rumors, then seek help from your employer to make sure you understand the proper methods to deal with the facts, once you actually have them. The accusations you've collected (lying about overtime, receiving personal financial benefit from business relationships with vendors) are very serious and could be putting him, you, and/or your employer in a bad legal position if they're not dealt with.



      You say you want to do what's best for your organization, yet you also seem unwilling to enforce company policy. Consider that the company has put policies in place because it views them as the best way to handle certain situations. In other words: If you truly do want what's best for the company, enforce it's policies. Or, seek help/guidance from someone in a position to change or interpret them for you.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        Yes you are right that company has clear policy to tackle these cases but in exceptional case few decisions are taken otherwise in the best intrest of organization running affairs. If you have not suitable backup to replace such persons than only option left is to retain him by adopting requisite corrective action.
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 3




        If there was a fox getting in your hen house and killing your chickens, would you evict the fox? Or just leave him a nice note asking him not to eat your birds? Sometimes you just have to rip the bandaid off. Firing him will sting in the short term, but every day he sits there stealing from the company with a big smile on his face, you're gushing blood.
        – dwizum
        2 days ago










      • I have also thought seriously on these line of action. In such cases immediate corrective action is to eliminate him to make example for others. It is slightly different for us the person has full grip on all technical processes by virtue of his experience and knowledge. Till the time we have no suitable replacement for him we have no other option than to go ahead with him by taking requisite corrective action
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 3




        Terminating this employee is done to cut them off and stop the problem they're causing by stealing from your employer. It's not done to "make him an example for others." You keep mentioning "requisite corrective action." If you're unwilling to fire him, and you're unwilling to even speak to him face to face, what exactly do you mean by "requisite corrective action?"
        – dwizum
        2 days ago










      • One of the corrective action is to communicate him that I know his mistakes. In this he will at least not repeat the same. Till the time I have suitable backup I can continue to go ahead with him and after sometime when suitable person as backup of him available, a disciplinary action can be attempted against him
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago















      up vote
      12
      down vote













      The only thing worse than someone with selfish, blatant disregard for company policies is someone who behaves that way, yet masquerades as a good employee and hopes that their positive reputation will get them out of trouble.



      Validate the rumors, then seek help from your employer to make sure you understand the proper methods to deal with the facts, once you actually have them. The accusations you've collected (lying about overtime, receiving personal financial benefit from business relationships with vendors) are very serious and could be putting him, you, and/or your employer in a bad legal position if they're not dealt with.



      You say you want to do what's best for your organization, yet you also seem unwilling to enforce company policy. Consider that the company has put policies in place because it views them as the best way to handle certain situations. In other words: If you truly do want what's best for the company, enforce it's policies. Or, seek help/guidance from someone in a position to change or interpret them for you.






      share|improve this answer

















      • 1




        Yes you are right that company has clear policy to tackle these cases but in exceptional case few decisions are taken otherwise in the best intrest of organization running affairs. If you have not suitable backup to replace such persons than only option left is to retain him by adopting requisite corrective action.
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 3




        If there was a fox getting in your hen house and killing your chickens, would you evict the fox? Or just leave him a nice note asking him not to eat your birds? Sometimes you just have to rip the bandaid off. Firing him will sting in the short term, but every day he sits there stealing from the company with a big smile on his face, you're gushing blood.
        – dwizum
        2 days ago










      • I have also thought seriously on these line of action. In such cases immediate corrective action is to eliminate him to make example for others. It is slightly different for us the person has full grip on all technical processes by virtue of his experience and knowledge. Till the time we have no suitable replacement for him we have no other option than to go ahead with him by taking requisite corrective action
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 3




        Terminating this employee is done to cut them off and stop the problem they're causing by stealing from your employer. It's not done to "make him an example for others." You keep mentioning "requisite corrective action." If you're unwilling to fire him, and you're unwilling to even speak to him face to face, what exactly do you mean by "requisite corrective action?"
        – dwizum
        2 days ago










      • One of the corrective action is to communicate him that I know his mistakes. In this he will at least not repeat the same. Till the time I have suitable backup I can continue to go ahead with him and after sometime when suitable person as backup of him available, a disciplinary action can be attempted against him
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago













      up vote
      12
      down vote










      up vote
      12
      down vote









      The only thing worse than someone with selfish, blatant disregard for company policies is someone who behaves that way, yet masquerades as a good employee and hopes that their positive reputation will get them out of trouble.



      Validate the rumors, then seek help from your employer to make sure you understand the proper methods to deal with the facts, once you actually have them. The accusations you've collected (lying about overtime, receiving personal financial benefit from business relationships with vendors) are very serious and could be putting him, you, and/or your employer in a bad legal position if they're not dealt with.



      You say you want to do what's best for your organization, yet you also seem unwilling to enforce company policy. Consider that the company has put policies in place because it views them as the best way to handle certain situations. In other words: If you truly do want what's best for the company, enforce it's policies. Or, seek help/guidance from someone in a position to change or interpret them for you.






      share|improve this answer












      The only thing worse than someone with selfish, blatant disregard for company policies is someone who behaves that way, yet masquerades as a good employee and hopes that their positive reputation will get them out of trouble.



      Validate the rumors, then seek help from your employer to make sure you understand the proper methods to deal with the facts, once you actually have them. The accusations you've collected (lying about overtime, receiving personal financial benefit from business relationships with vendors) are very serious and could be putting him, you, and/or your employer in a bad legal position if they're not dealt with.



      You say you want to do what's best for your organization, yet you also seem unwilling to enforce company policy. Consider that the company has put policies in place because it views them as the best way to handle certain situations. In other words: If you truly do want what's best for the company, enforce it's policies. Or, seek help/guidance from someone in a position to change or interpret them for you.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      dwizum

      8,64821939




      8,64821939








      • 1




        Yes you are right that company has clear policy to tackle these cases but in exceptional case few decisions are taken otherwise in the best intrest of organization running affairs. If you have not suitable backup to replace such persons than only option left is to retain him by adopting requisite corrective action.
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 3




        If there was a fox getting in your hen house and killing your chickens, would you evict the fox? Or just leave him a nice note asking him not to eat your birds? Sometimes you just have to rip the bandaid off. Firing him will sting in the short term, but every day he sits there stealing from the company with a big smile on his face, you're gushing blood.
        – dwizum
        2 days ago










      • I have also thought seriously on these line of action. In such cases immediate corrective action is to eliminate him to make example for others. It is slightly different for us the person has full grip on all technical processes by virtue of his experience and knowledge. Till the time we have no suitable replacement for him we have no other option than to go ahead with him by taking requisite corrective action
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 3




        Terminating this employee is done to cut them off and stop the problem they're causing by stealing from your employer. It's not done to "make him an example for others." You keep mentioning "requisite corrective action." If you're unwilling to fire him, and you're unwilling to even speak to him face to face, what exactly do you mean by "requisite corrective action?"
        – dwizum
        2 days ago










      • One of the corrective action is to communicate him that I know his mistakes. In this he will at least not repeat the same. Till the time I have suitable backup I can continue to go ahead with him and after sometime when suitable person as backup of him available, a disciplinary action can be attempted against him
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago














      • 1




        Yes you are right that company has clear policy to tackle these cases but in exceptional case few decisions are taken otherwise in the best intrest of organization running affairs. If you have not suitable backup to replace such persons than only option left is to retain him by adopting requisite corrective action.
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 3




        If there was a fox getting in your hen house and killing your chickens, would you evict the fox? Or just leave him a nice note asking him not to eat your birds? Sometimes you just have to rip the bandaid off. Firing him will sting in the short term, but every day he sits there stealing from the company with a big smile on his face, you're gushing blood.
        – dwizum
        2 days ago










      • I have also thought seriously on these line of action. In such cases immediate corrective action is to eliminate him to make example for others. It is slightly different for us the person has full grip on all technical processes by virtue of his experience and knowledge. Till the time we have no suitable replacement for him we have no other option than to go ahead with him by taking requisite corrective action
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 3




        Terminating this employee is done to cut them off and stop the problem they're causing by stealing from your employer. It's not done to "make him an example for others." You keep mentioning "requisite corrective action." If you're unwilling to fire him, and you're unwilling to even speak to him face to face, what exactly do you mean by "requisite corrective action?"
        – dwizum
        2 days ago










      • One of the corrective action is to communicate him that I know his mistakes. In this he will at least not repeat the same. Till the time I have suitable backup I can continue to go ahead with him and after sometime when suitable person as backup of him available, a disciplinary action can be attempted against him
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago








      1




      1




      Yes you are right that company has clear policy to tackle these cases but in exceptional case few decisions are taken otherwise in the best intrest of organization running affairs. If you have not suitable backup to replace such persons than only option left is to retain him by adopting requisite corrective action.
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      Yes you are right that company has clear policy to tackle these cases but in exceptional case few decisions are taken otherwise in the best intrest of organization running affairs. If you have not suitable backup to replace such persons than only option left is to retain him by adopting requisite corrective action.
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      3




      3




      If there was a fox getting in your hen house and killing your chickens, would you evict the fox? Or just leave him a nice note asking him not to eat your birds? Sometimes you just have to rip the bandaid off. Firing him will sting in the short term, but every day he sits there stealing from the company with a big smile on his face, you're gushing blood.
      – dwizum
      2 days ago




      If there was a fox getting in your hen house and killing your chickens, would you evict the fox? Or just leave him a nice note asking him not to eat your birds? Sometimes you just have to rip the bandaid off. Firing him will sting in the short term, but every day he sits there stealing from the company with a big smile on his face, you're gushing blood.
      – dwizum
      2 days ago












      I have also thought seriously on these line of action. In such cases immediate corrective action is to eliminate him to make example for others. It is slightly different for us the person has full grip on all technical processes by virtue of his experience and knowledge. Till the time we have no suitable replacement for him we have no other option than to go ahead with him by taking requisite corrective action
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      I have also thought seriously on these line of action. In such cases immediate corrective action is to eliminate him to make example for others. It is slightly different for us the person has full grip on all technical processes by virtue of his experience and knowledge. Till the time we have no suitable replacement for him we have no other option than to go ahead with him by taking requisite corrective action
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      3




      3




      Terminating this employee is done to cut them off and stop the problem they're causing by stealing from your employer. It's not done to "make him an example for others." You keep mentioning "requisite corrective action." If you're unwilling to fire him, and you're unwilling to even speak to him face to face, what exactly do you mean by "requisite corrective action?"
      – dwizum
      2 days ago




      Terminating this employee is done to cut them off and stop the problem they're causing by stealing from your employer. It's not done to "make him an example for others." You keep mentioning "requisite corrective action." If you're unwilling to fire him, and you're unwilling to even speak to him face to face, what exactly do you mean by "requisite corrective action?"
      – dwizum
      2 days ago












      One of the corrective action is to communicate him that I know his mistakes. In this he will at least not repeat the same. Till the time I have suitable backup I can continue to go ahead with him and after sometime when suitable person as backup of him available, a disciplinary action can be attempted against him
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      One of the corrective action is to communicate him that I know his mistakes. In this he will at least not repeat the same. Till the time I have suitable backup I can continue to go ahead with him and after sometime when suitable person as backup of him available, a disciplinary action can be attempted against him
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago












      up vote
      8
      down vote













      The first thing you should do is verify those complaints by whatever means is possible, and document carefully everything about them. You cannot accuse someone of things so serious without serious backup. And you should do this no matter what you decide to do about him.



      Are you sure he's indispensable to your organization? Can you make it a project to collect most of the knowledge he has that you really need? Consider that he is setting a bad example for the entire organization, and may be the source of a lot more you don't know about, from him directly or his from the friends/followers who see what he's getting away with.






      share|improve this answer





















      • For the time being I cannot afford to expel him out but as long term measures I have decided to trained at least two more supervisor as a backup to tackle such issues
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 1




        Yes, it seems wise to train replacements. But then I wouldn't necessarily tell him about it, as he can do even more damage if he's not feeling secure. And you should cover yourself both legally and with higher management by gathering cast-iron documentation of his offenses, past and future.
        – George M
        2 days ago










      • This is only reason that I cannot tell him personaly in this way he will feel himself un secure. Till the time I have no suitable replacement I have to go ahead with him with requisite corrective action
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago










      • You should be very careful with corrective action too, as he will likely perceive that he's been found out. If I were you I'd make myself a written plan of what needs to be corrected, and announce it all at once as I announce he's been dismissed. Then it will be clear to everyone why he's been dismissed, and that you're trying to redress it all. More might come out then, so be prepared to act further.
        – George M
        2 days ago










      • Exactly right. .. I have noted your valuable opinion to implement.
        – Ahmad Raza
        yesterday















      up vote
      8
      down vote













      The first thing you should do is verify those complaints by whatever means is possible, and document carefully everything about them. You cannot accuse someone of things so serious without serious backup. And you should do this no matter what you decide to do about him.



      Are you sure he's indispensable to your organization? Can you make it a project to collect most of the knowledge he has that you really need? Consider that he is setting a bad example for the entire organization, and may be the source of a lot more you don't know about, from him directly or his from the friends/followers who see what he's getting away with.






      share|improve this answer





















      • For the time being I cannot afford to expel him out but as long term measures I have decided to trained at least two more supervisor as a backup to tackle such issues
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 1




        Yes, it seems wise to train replacements. But then I wouldn't necessarily tell him about it, as he can do even more damage if he's not feeling secure. And you should cover yourself both legally and with higher management by gathering cast-iron documentation of his offenses, past and future.
        – George M
        2 days ago










      • This is only reason that I cannot tell him personaly in this way he will feel himself un secure. Till the time I have no suitable replacement I have to go ahead with him with requisite corrective action
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago










      • You should be very careful with corrective action too, as he will likely perceive that he's been found out. If I were you I'd make myself a written plan of what needs to be corrected, and announce it all at once as I announce he's been dismissed. Then it will be clear to everyone why he's been dismissed, and that you're trying to redress it all. More might come out then, so be prepared to act further.
        – George M
        2 days ago










      • Exactly right. .. I have noted your valuable opinion to implement.
        – Ahmad Raza
        yesterday













      up vote
      8
      down vote










      up vote
      8
      down vote









      The first thing you should do is verify those complaints by whatever means is possible, and document carefully everything about them. You cannot accuse someone of things so serious without serious backup. And you should do this no matter what you decide to do about him.



      Are you sure he's indispensable to your organization? Can you make it a project to collect most of the knowledge he has that you really need? Consider that he is setting a bad example for the entire organization, and may be the source of a lot more you don't know about, from him directly or his from the friends/followers who see what he's getting away with.






      share|improve this answer












      The first thing you should do is verify those complaints by whatever means is possible, and document carefully everything about them. You cannot accuse someone of things so serious without serious backup. And you should do this no matter what you decide to do about him.



      Are you sure he's indispensable to your organization? Can you make it a project to collect most of the knowledge he has that you really need? Consider that he is setting a bad example for the entire organization, and may be the source of a lot more you don't know about, from him directly or his from the friends/followers who see what he's getting away with.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      George M

      2035




      2035












      • For the time being I cannot afford to expel him out but as long term measures I have decided to trained at least two more supervisor as a backup to tackle such issues
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 1




        Yes, it seems wise to train replacements. But then I wouldn't necessarily tell him about it, as he can do even more damage if he's not feeling secure. And you should cover yourself both legally and with higher management by gathering cast-iron documentation of his offenses, past and future.
        – George M
        2 days ago










      • This is only reason that I cannot tell him personaly in this way he will feel himself un secure. Till the time I have no suitable replacement I have to go ahead with him with requisite corrective action
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago










      • You should be very careful with corrective action too, as he will likely perceive that he's been found out. If I were you I'd make myself a written plan of what needs to be corrected, and announce it all at once as I announce he's been dismissed. Then it will be clear to everyone why he's been dismissed, and that you're trying to redress it all. More might come out then, so be prepared to act further.
        – George M
        2 days ago










      • Exactly right. .. I have noted your valuable opinion to implement.
        – Ahmad Raza
        yesterday


















      • For the time being I cannot afford to expel him out but as long term measures I have decided to trained at least two more supervisor as a backup to tackle such issues
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 1




        Yes, it seems wise to train replacements. But then I wouldn't necessarily tell him about it, as he can do even more damage if he's not feeling secure. And you should cover yourself both legally and with higher management by gathering cast-iron documentation of his offenses, past and future.
        – George M
        2 days ago










      • This is only reason that I cannot tell him personaly in this way he will feel himself un secure. Till the time I have no suitable replacement I have to go ahead with him with requisite corrective action
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago










      • You should be very careful with corrective action too, as he will likely perceive that he's been found out. If I were you I'd make myself a written plan of what needs to be corrected, and announce it all at once as I announce he's been dismissed. Then it will be clear to everyone why he's been dismissed, and that you're trying to redress it all. More might come out then, so be prepared to act further.
        – George M
        2 days ago










      • Exactly right. .. I have noted your valuable opinion to implement.
        – Ahmad Raza
        yesterday
















      For the time being I cannot afford to expel him out but as long term measures I have decided to trained at least two more supervisor as a backup to tackle such issues
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      For the time being I cannot afford to expel him out but as long term measures I have decided to trained at least two more supervisor as a backup to tackle such issues
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      1




      1




      Yes, it seems wise to train replacements. But then I wouldn't necessarily tell him about it, as he can do even more damage if he's not feeling secure. And you should cover yourself both legally and with higher management by gathering cast-iron documentation of his offenses, past and future.
      – George M
      2 days ago




      Yes, it seems wise to train replacements. But then I wouldn't necessarily tell him about it, as he can do even more damage if he's not feeling secure. And you should cover yourself both legally and with higher management by gathering cast-iron documentation of his offenses, past and future.
      – George M
      2 days ago












      This is only reason that I cannot tell him personaly in this way he will feel himself un secure. Till the time I have no suitable replacement I have to go ahead with him with requisite corrective action
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      This is only reason that I cannot tell him personaly in this way he will feel himself un secure. Till the time I have no suitable replacement I have to go ahead with him with requisite corrective action
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago












      You should be very careful with corrective action too, as he will likely perceive that he's been found out. If I were you I'd make myself a written plan of what needs to be corrected, and announce it all at once as I announce he's been dismissed. Then it will be clear to everyone why he's been dismissed, and that you're trying to redress it all. More might come out then, so be prepared to act further.
      – George M
      2 days ago




      You should be very careful with corrective action too, as he will likely perceive that he's been found out. If I were you I'd make myself a written plan of what needs to be corrected, and announce it all at once as I announce he's been dismissed. Then it will be clear to everyone why he's been dismissed, and that you're trying to redress it all. More might come out then, so be prepared to act further.
      – George M
      2 days ago












      Exactly right. .. I have noted your valuable opinion to implement.
      – Ahmad Raza
      yesterday




      Exactly right. .. I have noted your valuable opinion to implement.
      – Ahmad Raza
      yesterday










      up vote
      4
      down vote














      How can I go through this issue effectively and in best interest of
      the organization? I cannot afford to expel him out from our team, and
      at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in
      the future.




      You have a manager/supervisor that you report to, let them know.



      The employee is an insider threat. They do some great things and some things that are destructive to the organization. You are letting their strengths let them get away with destructive behavior.



      Imagine that the person who reported them to you, goes over your head. When your company finds out that you protected somebody who was stealing from them, they might not accept excuses from you. Expect to be disciplined, but you might end-up fired - or charged.



      Also letting them keep their job could cause the employee to shift how they are stealing, or they might accelerate their action.






      share|improve this answer





















      • I respect your opionon , despite availability of all legal and disciplinary action to tackle such issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately we have not suitable backup for him who can be well known of technical process ess like him. In the long run I have decided to trained at least two supervisor like his caliber as backup to tackle such issues
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 1




        But does your boss know?
        – mhoran_psprep
        2 days ago






      • 1




        Yes I have already told him with all details of evidence bcos if he will come to know from other sources than it will shatter my confidence
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago










      • The last paragraph is important, it can certainly lead to a shift or acceleration.
        – Kilisi
        yesterday










      • Rightly said. ..
        – Ahmad Raza
        yesterday















      up vote
      4
      down vote














      How can I go through this issue effectively and in best interest of
      the organization? I cannot afford to expel him out from our team, and
      at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in
      the future.




      You have a manager/supervisor that you report to, let them know.



      The employee is an insider threat. They do some great things and some things that are destructive to the organization. You are letting their strengths let them get away with destructive behavior.



      Imagine that the person who reported them to you, goes over your head. When your company finds out that you protected somebody who was stealing from them, they might not accept excuses from you. Expect to be disciplined, but you might end-up fired - or charged.



      Also letting them keep their job could cause the employee to shift how they are stealing, or they might accelerate their action.






      share|improve this answer





















      • I respect your opionon , despite availability of all legal and disciplinary action to tackle such issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately we have not suitable backup for him who can be well known of technical process ess like him. In the long run I have decided to trained at least two supervisor like his caliber as backup to tackle such issues
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 1




        But does your boss know?
        – mhoran_psprep
        2 days ago






      • 1




        Yes I have already told him with all details of evidence bcos if he will come to know from other sources than it will shatter my confidence
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago










      • The last paragraph is important, it can certainly lead to a shift or acceleration.
        – Kilisi
        yesterday










      • Rightly said. ..
        – Ahmad Raza
        yesterday













      up vote
      4
      down vote










      up vote
      4
      down vote










      How can I go through this issue effectively and in best interest of
      the organization? I cannot afford to expel him out from our team, and
      at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in
      the future.




      You have a manager/supervisor that you report to, let them know.



      The employee is an insider threat. They do some great things and some things that are destructive to the organization. You are letting their strengths let them get away with destructive behavior.



      Imagine that the person who reported them to you, goes over your head. When your company finds out that you protected somebody who was stealing from them, they might not accept excuses from you. Expect to be disciplined, but you might end-up fired - or charged.



      Also letting them keep their job could cause the employee to shift how they are stealing, or they might accelerate their action.






      share|improve this answer













      How can I go through this issue effectively and in best interest of
      the organization? I cannot afford to expel him out from our team, and
      at the same time I do not want him to repeat these bad practices in
      the future.




      You have a manager/supervisor that you report to, let them know.



      The employee is an insider threat. They do some great things and some things that are destructive to the organization. You are letting their strengths let them get away with destructive behavior.



      Imagine that the person who reported them to you, goes over your head. When your company finds out that you protected somebody who was stealing from them, they might not accept excuses from you. Expect to be disciplined, but you might end-up fired - or charged.



      Also letting them keep their job could cause the employee to shift how they are stealing, or they might accelerate their action.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      mhoran_psprep

      42.6k566152




      42.6k566152












      • I respect your opionon , despite availability of all legal and disciplinary action to tackle such issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately we have not suitable backup for him who can be well known of technical process ess like him. In the long run I have decided to trained at least two supervisor like his caliber as backup to tackle such issues
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 1




        But does your boss know?
        – mhoran_psprep
        2 days ago






      • 1




        Yes I have already told him with all details of evidence bcos if he will come to know from other sources than it will shatter my confidence
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago










      • The last paragraph is important, it can certainly lead to a shift or acceleration.
        – Kilisi
        yesterday










      • Rightly said. ..
        – Ahmad Raza
        yesterday


















      • I respect your opionon , despite availability of all legal and disciplinary action to tackle such issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately we have not suitable backup for him who can be well known of technical process ess like him. In the long run I have decided to trained at least two supervisor like his caliber as backup to tackle such issues
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago






      • 1




        But does your boss know?
        – mhoran_psprep
        2 days ago






      • 1




        Yes I have already told him with all details of evidence bcos if he will come to know from other sources than it will shatter my confidence
        – Ahmad Raza
        2 days ago










      • The last paragraph is important, it can certainly lead to a shift or acceleration.
        – Kilisi
        yesterday










      • Rightly said. ..
        – Ahmad Raza
        yesterday
















      I respect your opionon , despite availability of all legal and disciplinary action to tackle such issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately we have not suitable backup for him who can be well known of technical process ess like him. In the long run I have decided to trained at least two supervisor like his caliber as backup to tackle such issues
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      I respect your opionon , despite availability of all legal and disciplinary action to tackle such issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately we have not suitable backup for him who can be well known of technical process ess like him. In the long run I have decided to trained at least two supervisor like his caliber as backup to tackle such issues
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      1




      1




      But does your boss know?
      – mhoran_psprep
      2 days ago




      But does your boss know?
      – mhoran_psprep
      2 days ago




      1




      1




      Yes I have already told him with all details of evidence bcos if he will come to know from other sources than it will shatter my confidence
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago




      Yes I have already told him with all details of evidence bcos if he will come to know from other sources than it will shatter my confidence
      – Ahmad Raza
      2 days ago












      The last paragraph is important, it can certainly lead to a shift or acceleration.
      – Kilisi
      yesterday




      The last paragraph is important, it can certainly lead to a shift or acceleration.
      – Kilisi
      yesterday












      Rightly said. ..
      – Ahmad Raza
      yesterday




      Rightly said. ..
      – Ahmad Raza
      yesterday










      up vote
      4
      down vote













      "By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization"



      Fix that problem immediately. Locate employees who are keen to learn the domain knowledge that he has, and work with them to get them trained up.



      Then (or probably sooner), get concrete evidence of the employees activity - not just gossip - and then fire him. He is a thief, and his activities - and your acceptance of them - may reflect on you. Make sure that HR is involved at all stages, so that due process is followed.



      This is an opportunity to show your mettle as a manager. Take it.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote













        "By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization"



        Fix that problem immediately. Locate employees who are keen to learn the domain knowledge that he has, and work with them to get them trained up.



        Then (or probably sooner), get concrete evidence of the employees activity - not just gossip - and then fire him. He is a thief, and his activities - and your acceptance of them - may reflect on you. Make sure that HR is involved at all stages, so that due process is followed.



        This is an opportunity to show your mettle as a manager. Take it.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          "By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization"



          Fix that problem immediately. Locate employees who are keen to learn the domain knowledge that he has, and work with them to get them trained up.



          Then (or probably sooner), get concrete evidence of the employees activity - not just gossip - and then fire him. He is a thief, and his activities - and your acceptance of them - may reflect on you. Make sure that HR is involved at all stages, so that due process is followed.



          This is an opportunity to show your mettle as a manager. Take it.






          share|improve this answer












          "By virtue of his experience and knowledge, he is important for our organization"



          Fix that problem immediately. Locate employees who are keen to learn the domain knowledge that he has, and work with them to get them trained up.



          Then (or probably sooner), get concrete evidence of the employees activity - not just gossip - and then fire him. He is a thief, and his activities - and your acceptance of them - may reflect on you. Make sure that HR is involved at all stages, so that due process is followed.



          This is an opportunity to show your mettle as a manager. Take it.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          PeteCon

          14k43757




          14k43757






















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              I think George M's answer is good and I agree: you should do everything you can to investigate, substantiate and document these alleged violations by your subordinate.



              I think violation number 2 is potentially very serious. If he has been taking 'back-handers' from vendors to accept poor quality product, then that is a conflict of interest. Many large organizations have very strict, zero-tolerance policies towards this and if you try to sweep it under the carpet, then it may have some serious implications for you.



              Regarding that matter, I think you have a responsibility to bring it up with your superiors and probably your company's Legal department. If this conflict of interest is serious and has been going on for a long time, then he may simply need to be let go, regardless of his experience or value to the company. I would let the more senior Management and Legal guide you on that.



              If your leadership and Legal team agree that his 'sins' can be forgiven, then at the very least I think you would need to call him into your office and have a private, face-to-face discussion about it. You should explain very clearly that these violations are in breach of company policy and unacceptable. In that scenario, you can say that, in light of his experience and service to the company, the company is willing to give him a second chance; however, if there is any repeat of these violations, then you will have no choice but to resort to disciplinary action or terminate his employment. If it is a private conversation, then there should be no risk in terms of harming his reputation within the company.



              If you are his boss, then it is your responsibility to ensure he is complying with company policies and procedures, and it is your responsibility to discipline him, if necessary. If you try to avoid confronting him on this face-to-face, then I am afraid that is just going to make you come across as a weak Manager, and you may give him the impression that he will be able to get away with breaking the rules in future.






              share|improve this answer





















              • Thanks for your comments, I am 100% agree that such cases must not be tolerated as these can produce bad name for organization and product as well. Despite availability of these legal and disciplinary action to tackle the issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately presently I have not suitable backup to replace him. By virtue of his experience he had vast knowledge of technical processes. So in present circumstances only option left is to go ahead with him with requisite corrective actions. In the long run I have decided
                – Ahmad Raza
                2 days ago










              • Most large corporations I have come across would not see it that way. They would take the view that no one employee is so indispensable as to justify taking a risk with legal exposure or damage to the company's reputation. Again, I strongly recommend that you take guidance from higher Management and/or Legal.
                – Time4Tea
                2 days ago






              • 1




                Exactly right. It is our mistake that we cannot trained backup of his caliber. I have also discussed the issue with my executive manager and told him my exception. He has also same opionon that by necessary corrective action we have to go ahead with him till the time we have suitable replacement.
                – Ahmad Raza
                2 days ago















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              I think George M's answer is good and I agree: you should do everything you can to investigate, substantiate and document these alleged violations by your subordinate.



              I think violation number 2 is potentially very serious. If he has been taking 'back-handers' from vendors to accept poor quality product, then that is a conflict of interest. Many large organizations have very strict, zero-tolerance policies towards this and if you try to sweep it under the carpet, then it may have some serious implications for you.



              Regarding that matter, I think you have a responsibility to bring it up with your superiors and probably your company's Legal department. If this conflict of interest is serious and has been going on for a long time, then he may simply need to be let go, regardless of his experience or value to the company. I would let the more senior Management and Legal guide you on that.



              If your leadership and Legal team agree that his 'sins' can be forgiven, then at the very least I think you would need to call him into your office and have a private, face-to-face discussion about it. You should explain very clearly that these violations are in breach of company policy and unacceptable. In that scenario, you can say that, in light of his experience and service to the company, the company is willing to give him a second chance; however, if there is any repeat of these violations, then you will have no choice but to resort to disciplinary action or terminate his employment. If it is a private conversation, then there should be no risk in terms of harming his reputation within the company.



              If you are his boss, then it is your responsibility to ensure he is complying with company policies and procedures, and it is your responsibility to discipline him, if necessary. If you try to avoid confronting him on this face-to-face, then I am afraid that is just going to make you come across as a weak Manager, and you may give him the impression that he will be able to get away with breaking the rules in future.






              share|improve this answer





















              • Thanks for your comments, I am 100% agree that such cases must not be tolerated as these can produce bad name for organization and product as well. Despite availability of these legal and disciplinary action to tackle the issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately presently I have not suitable backup to replace him. By virtue of his experience he had vast knowledge of technical processes. So in present circumstances only option left is to go ahead with him with requisite corrective actions. In the long run I have decided
                – Ahmad Raza
                2 days ago










              • Most large corporations I have come across would not see it that way. They would take the view that no one employee is so indispensable as to justify taking a risk with legal exposure or damage to the company's reputation. Again, I strongly recommend that you take guidance from higher Management and/or Legal.
                – Time4Tea
                2 days ago






              • 1




                Exactly right. It is our mistake that we cannot trained backup of his caliber. I have also discussed the issue with my executive manager and told him my exception. He has also same opionon that by necessary corrective action we have to go ahead with him till the time we have suitable replacement.
                – Ahmad Raza
                2 days ago













              up vote
              2
              down vote










              up vote
              2
              down vote









              I think George M's answer is good and I agree: you should do everything you can to investigate, substantiate and document these alleged violations by your subordinate.



              I think violation number 2 is potentially very serious. If he has been taking 'back-handers' from vendors to accept poor quality product, then that is a conflict of interest. Many large organizations have very strict, zero-tolerance policies towards this and if you try to sweep it under the carpet, then it may have some serious implications for you.



              Regarding that matter, I think you have a responsibility to bring it up with your superiors and probably your company's Legal department. If this conflict of interest is serious and has been going on for a long time, then he may simply need to be let go, regardless of his experience or value to the company. I would let the more senior Management and Legal guide you on that.



              If your leadership and Legal team agree that his 'sins' can be forgiven, then at the very least I think you would need to call him into your office and have a private, face-to-face discussion about it. You should explain very clearly that these violations are in breach of company policy and unacceptable. In that scenario, you can say that, in light of his experience and service to the company, the company is willing to give him a second chance; however, if there is any repeat of these violations, then you will have no choice but to resort to disciplinary action or terminate his employment. If it is a private conversation, then there should be no risk in terms of harming his reputation within the company.



              If you are his boss, then it is your responsibility to ensure he is complying with company policies and procedures, and it is your responsibility to discipline him, if necessary. If you try to avoid confronting him on this face-to-face, then I am afraid that is just going to make you come across as a weak Manager, and you may give him the impression that he will be able to get away with breaking the rules in future.






              share|improve this answer












              I think George M's answer is good and I agree: you should do everything you can to investigate, substantiate and document these alleged violations by your subordinate.



              I think violation number 2 is potentially very serious. If he has been taking 'back-handers' from vendors to accept poor quality product, then that is a conflict of interest. Many large organizations have very strict, zero-tolerance policies towards this and if you try to sweep it under the carpet, then it may have some serious implications for you.



              Regarding that matter, I think you have a responsibility to bring it up with your superiors and probably your company's Legal department. If this conflict of interest is serious and has been going on for a long time, then he may simply need to be let go, regardless of his experience or value to the company. I would let the more senior Management and Legal guide you on that.



              If your leadership and Legal team agree that his 'sins' can be forgiven, then at the very least I think you would need to call him into your office and have a private, face-to-face discussion about it. You should explain very clearly that these violations are in breach of company policy and unacceptable. In that scenario, you can say that, in light of his experience and service to the company, the company is willing to give him a second chance; however, if there is any repeat of these violations, then you will have no choice but to resort to disciplinary action or terminate his employment. If it is a private conversation, then there should be no risk in terms of harming his reputation within the company.



              If you are his boss, then it is your responsibility to ensure he is complying with company policies and procedures, and it is your responsibility to discipline him, if necessary. If you try to avoid confronting him on this face-to-face, then I am afraid that is just going to make you come across as a weak Manager, and you may give him the impression that he will be able to get away with breaking the rules in future.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 2 days ago









              Time4Tea

              2,97231027




              2,97231027












              • Thanks for your comments, I am 100% agree that such cases must not be tolerated as these can produce bad name for organization and product as well. Despite availability of these legal and disciplinary action to tackle the issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately presently I have not suitable backup to replace him. By virtue of his experience he had vast knowledge of technical processes. So in present circumstances only option left is to go ahead with him with requisite corrective actions. In the long run I have decided
                – Ahmad Raza
                2 days ago










              • Most large corporations I have come across would not see it that way. They would take the view that no one employee is so indispensable as to justify taking a risk with legal exposure or damage to the company's reputation. Again, I strongly recommend that you take guidance from higher Management and/or Legal.
                – Time4Tea
                2 days ago






              • 1




                Exactly right. It is our mistake that we cannot trained backup of his caliber. I have also discussed the issue with my executive manager and told him my exception. He has also same opionon that by necessary corrective action we have to go ahead with him till the time we have suitable replacement.
                – Ahmad Raza
                2 days ago


















              • Thanks for your comments, I am 100% agree that such cases must not be tolerated as these can produce bad name for organization and product as well. Despite availability of these legal and disciplinary action to tackle the issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately presently I have not suitable backup to replace him. By virtue of his experience he had vast knowledge of technical processes. So in present circumstances only option left is to go ahead with him with requisite corrective actions. In the long run I have decided
                – Ahmad Raza
                2 days ago










              • Most large corporations I have come across would not see it that way. They would take the view that no one employee is so indispensable as to justify taking a risk with legal exposure or damage to the company's reputation. Again, I strongly recommend that you take guidance from higher Management and/or Legal.
                – Time4Tea
                2 days ago






              • 1




                Exactly right. It is our mistake that we cannot trained backup of his caliber. I have also discussed the issue with my executive manager and told him my exception. He has also same opionon that by necessary corrective action we have to go ahead with him till the time we have suitable replacement.
                – Ahmad Raza
                2 days ago
















              Thanks for your comments, I am 100% agree that such cases must not be tolerated as these can produce bad name for organization and product as well. Despite availability of these legal and disciplinary action to tackle the issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately presently I have not suitable backup to replace him. By virtue of his experience he had vast knowledge of technical processes. So in present circumstances only option left is to go ahead with him with requisite corrective actions. In the long run I have decided
              – Ahmad Raza
              2 days ago




              Thanks for your comments, I am 100% agree that such cases must not be tolerated as these can produce bad name for organization and product as well. Despite availability of these legal and disciplinary action to tackle the issue, sometimes in the best intrest of organization running affairs you have to decide otherwise. Unfortunately presently I have not suitable backup to replace him. By virtue of his experience he had vast knowledge of technical processes. So in present circumstances only option left is to go ahead with him with requisite corrective actions. In the long run I have decided
              – Ahmad Raza
              2 days ago












              Most large corporations I have come across would not see it that way. They would take the view that no one employee is so indispensable as to justify taking a risk with legal exposure or damage to the company's reputation. Again, I strongly recommend that you take guidance from higher Management and/or Legal.
              – Time4Tea
              2 days ago




              Most large corporations I have come across would not see it that way. They would take the view that no one employee is so indispensable as to justify taking a risk with legal exposure or damage to the company's reputation. Again, I strongly recommend that you take guidance from higher Management and/or Legal.
              – Time4Tea
              2 days ago




              1




              1




              Exactly right. It is our mistake that we cannot trained backup of his caliber. I have also discussed the issue with my executive manager and told him my exception. He has also same opionon that by necessary corrective action we have to go ahead with him till the time we have suitable replacement.
              – Ahmad Raza
              2 days ago




              Exactly right. It is our mistake that we cannot trained backup of his caliber. I have also discussed the issue with my executive manager and told him my exception. He has also same opionon that by necessary corrective action we have to go ahead with him till the time we have suitable replacement.
              – Ahmad Raza
              2 days ago










              up vote
              2
              down vote













              In my view the main point is that several of the things he supposedly does are not just "against company policies" but outright criminal on the personal level (Fraud, corruption etc) and place huge liabilities to your company (e.g. if the substandard products hurt/kill a customer).



              I am assuming that these things turn out to be true (after investigating these by sufficient means, e.g. hiring an private investigator)




              • Realize your losses: You have to fire him. His knowledge will be lost, and you have to replace him.


              • Work on minimizing the damage - make sure that you find employees in his team who have been cut out by his favoritism and make sure they know that you are on their side, so that you have people available to take over the team who are not somehow depending on him


              • Do not go to the police now. The offer on your behalf to the guy not to go to the police if he does as he is told may be a valuable bargaining chip. The same hold for all other employees who profited from the guy and looked the other way then he did what he did


              • Figure out how good his connections to the customers are. Did he bribe customers? If so, you may have to prepare for loosing business (or paying up). Talk informally to the most important customers he worked directly with about his work - go to the next level, not the technical contact level. You can dress this as a management-managment follow up in the style of "what can we do better".


              • Figure out if he managed to put liabilities for you or others into the books covering up his responsibility


              • Once the person in question realizes that you investigate/plan to replace him, the gloves have to be taken off. In that moment you have be ready to hit him with everything you got, fair or unfair, honest or lying, treating civil+criminal lawsuits, disciplinary action, public destruction of his reputation, and potentially even thing on the border of legality (e.g. exposing things your PI found out accidentally), and that hast to happen visibly enough that everybody in the company knows that he has to choose sides. Those who do not choose sides with you have to be walked off the premises the next day.







              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                In my view the main point is that several of the things he supposedly does are not just "against company policies" but outright criminal on the personal level (Fraud, corruption etc) and place huge liabilities to your company (e.g. if the substandard products hurt/kill a customer).



                I am assuming that these things turn out to be true (after investigating these by sufficient means, e.g. hiring an private investigator)




                • Realize your losses: You have to fire him. His knowledge will be lost, and you have to replace him.


                • Work on minimizing the damage - make sure that you find employees in his team who have been cut out by his favoritism and make sure they know that you are on their side, so that you have people available to take over the team who are not somehow depending on him


                • Do not go to the police now. The offer on your behalf to the guy not to go to the police if he does as he is told may be a valuable bargaining chip. The same hold for all other employees who profited from the guy and looked the other way then he did what he did


                • Figure out how good his connections to the customers are. Did he bribe customers? If so, you may have to prepare for loosing business (or paying up). Talk informally to the most important customers he worked directly with about his work - go to the next level, not the technical contact level. You can dress this as a management-managment follow up in the style of "what can we do better".


                • Figure out if he managed to put liabilities for you or others into the books covering up his responsibility


                • Once the person in question realizes that you investigate/plan to replace him, the gloves have to be taken off. In that moment you have be ready to hit him with everything you got, fair or unfair, honest or lying, treating civil+criminal lawsuits, disciplinary action, public destruction of his reputation, and potentially even thing on the border of legality (e.g. exposing things your PI found out accidentally), and that hast to happen visibly enough that everybody in the company knows that he has to choose sides. Those who do not choose sides with you have to be walked off the premises the next day.







                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  In my view the main point is that several of the things he supposedly does are not just "against company policies" but outright criminal on the personal level (Fraud, corruption etc) and place huge liabilities to your company (e.g. if the substandard products hurt/kill a customer).



                  I am assuming that these things turn out to be true (after investigating these by sufficient means, e.g. hiring an private investigator)




                  • Realize your losses: You have to fire him. His knowledge will be lost, and you have to replace him.


                  • Work on minimizing the damage - make sure that you find employees in his team who have been cut out by his favoritism and make sure they know that you are on their side, so that you have people available to take over the team who are not somehow depending on him


                  • Do not go to the police now. The offer on your behalf to the guy not to go to the police if he does as he is told may be a valuable bargaining chip. The same hold for all other employees who profited from the guy and looked the other way then he did what he did


                  • Figure out how good his connections to the customers are. Did he bribe customers? If so, you may have to prepare for loosing business (or paying up). Talk informally to the most important customers he worked directly with about his work - go to the next level, not the technical contact level. You can dress this as a management-managment follow up in the style of "what can we do better".


                  • Figure out if he managed to put liabilities for you or others into the books covering up his responsibility


                  • Once the person in question realizes that you investigate/plan to replace him, the gloves have to be taken off. In that moment you have be ready to hit him with everything you got, fair or unfair, honest or lying, treating civil+criminal lawsuits, disciplinary action, public destruction of his reputation, and potentially even thing on the border of legality (e.g. exposing things your PI found out accidentally), and that hast to happen visibly enough that everybody in the company knows that he has to choose sides. Those who do not choose sides with you have to be walked off the premises the next day.







                  share|improve this answer












                  In my view the main point is that several of the things he supposedly does are not just "against company policies" but outright criminal on the personal level (Fraud, corruption etc) and place huge liabilities to your company (e.g. if the substandard products hurt/kill a customer).



                  I am assuming that these things turn out to be true (after investigating these by sufficient means, e.g. hiring an private investigator)




                  • Realize your losses: You have to fire him. His knowledge will be lost, and you have to replace him.


                  • Work on minimizing the damage - make sure that you find employees in his team who have been cut out by his favoritism and make sure they know that you are on their side, so that you have people available to take over the team who are not somehow depending on him


                  • Do not go to the police now. The offer on your behalf to the guy not to go to the police if he does as he is told may be a valuable bargaining chip. The same hold for all other employees who profited from the guy and looked the other way then he did what he did


                  • Figure out how good his connections to the customers are. Did he bribe customers? If so, you may have to prepare for loosing business (or paying up). Talk informally to the most important customers he worked directly with about his work - go to the next level, not the technical contact level. You can dress this as a management-managment follow up in the style of "what can we do better".


                  • Figure out if he managed to put liabilities for you or others into the books covering up his responsibility


                  • Once the person in question realizes that you investigate/plan to replace him, the gloves have to be taken off. In that moment you have be ready to hit him with everything you got, fair or unfair, honest or lying, treating civil+criminal lawsuits, disciplinary action, public destruction of his reputation, and potentially even thing on the border of legality (e.g. exposing things your PI found out accidentally), and that hast to happen visibly enough that everybody in the company knows that he has to choose sides. Those who do not choose sides with you have to be walked off the premises the next day.








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 19 hours ago









                  Sascha

                  6,80221432




                  6,80221432






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123746%2fsubordinate-who-has-a-good-reputation-may-be-breaking-company-policies%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown











                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Morgemoulin

                      Scott Moir

                      Souastre