What rules or guidelines are there about when to allow a party to acquire plate mail?
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
I have heard it said that 5e does not balance its encounters with respect to magic items; in other words it does not consider possession of magic items when defining appropriately challenging encounters. But what about mundane items? Specifically, plate mail. Due to its cost, it stands out dramatically from other, mundane items.
I have read numerous forum posts discussing the "correct" rarity of such an item, and what character levels are fitting for PCs acquiring it. What troubles me about this is plate is a significant part of the Heavy Armor proficiency - if plate (and to a lesser extent, splint) is not available (either by gold restrictions or the DM saying it's hard to find) then Heavy Armor proficiency becomes much less valuable to a PC. Light Armor users easily get to 16 AC, and Medium Armor users can get to 17 at half of the cost of plate. Now, plate is 18 AC, but it comes at a great financial cost, Strength restrictions, and Stealth disadvantage. Seemingly, the only real benefit is that they can also get to 17 AC cheaper/more easily than any other armor proficiency.
Still, in many campaigns plate is out of reach for the first five (or more) levels, making the Heavy Armor proficiency relatively weak for any classes that offer it. Even once that point is reached, AC tends to be less important than raw HP or magic resistance/saves at later levels - so by the time plate becomes available, it matters less than it would have earlier.
In short, I identify that the availability of plate mail as a huge "swing factor" in the value of Heavy Armor proficiency.
Do any 5e official sources (source books, designer statements, or Adventurer's League) offer any indication on the appropriate time to allow PCs to have plate?
dnd-5e optimization equipment armor armor-class
add a comment |
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
I have heard it said that 5e does not balance its encounters with respect to magic items; in other words it does not consider possession of magic items when defining appropriately challenging encounters. But what about mundane items? Specifically, plate mail. Due to its cost, it stands out dramatically from other, mundane items.
I have read numerous forum posts discussing the "correct" rarity of such an item, and what character levels are fitting for PCs acquiring it. What troubles me about this is plate is a significant part of the Heavy Armor proficiency - if plate (and to a lesser extent, splint) is not available (either by gold restrictions or the DM saying it's hard to find) then Heavy Armor proficiency becomes much less valuable to a PC. Light Armor users easily get to 16 AC, and Medium Armor users can get to 17 at half of the cost of plate. Now, plate is 18 AC, but it comes at a great financial cost, Strength restrictions, and Stealth disadvantage. Seemingly, the only real benefit is that they can also get to 17 AC cheaper/more easily than any other armor proficiency.
Still, in many campaigns plate is out of reach for the first five (or more) levels, making the Heavy Armor proficiency relatively weak for any classes that offer it. Even once that point is reached, AC tends to be less important than raw HP or magic resistance/saves at later levels - so by the time plate becomes available, it matters less than it would have earlier.
In short, I identify that the availability of plate mail as a huge "swing factor" in the value of Heavy Armor proficiency.
Do any 5e official sources (source books, designer statements, or Adventurer's League) offer any indication on the appropriate time to allow PCs to have plate?
dnd-5e optimization equipment armor armor-class
add a comment |
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
up vote
24
down vote
favorite
I have heard it said that 5e does not balance its encounters with respect to magic items; in other words it does not consider possession of magic items when defining appropriately challenging encounters. But what about mundane items? Specifically, plate mail. Due to its cost, it stands out dramatically from other, mundane items.
I have read numerous forum posts discussing the "correct" rarity of such an item, and what character levels are fitting for PCs acquiring it. What troubles me about this is plate is a significant part of the Heavy Armor proficiency - if plate (and to a lesser extent, splint) is not available (either by gold restrictions or the DM saying it's hard to find) then Heavy Armor proficiency becomes much less valuable to a PC. Light Armor users easily get to 16 AC, and Medium Armor users can get to 17 at half of the cost of plate. Now, plate is 18 AC, but it comes at a great financial cost, Strength restrictions, and Stealth disadvantage. Seemingly, the only real benefit is that they can also get to 17 AC cheaper/more easily than any other armor proficiency.
Still, in many campaigns plate is out of reach for the first five (or more) levels, making the Heavy Armor proficiency relatively weak for any classes that offer it. Even once that point is reached, AC tends to be less important than raw HP or magic resistance/saves at later levels - so by the time plate becomes available, it matters less than it would have earlier.
In short, I identify that the availability of plate mail as a huge "swing factor" in the value of Heavy Armor proficiency.
Do any 5e official sources (source books, designer statements, or Adventurer's League) offer any indication on the appropriate time to allow PCs to have plate?
dnd-5e optimization equipment armor armor-class
I have heard it said that 5e does not balance its encounters with respect to magic items; in other words it does not consider possession of magic items when defining appropriately challenging encounters. But what about mundane items? Specifically, plate mail. Due to its cost, it stands out dramatically from other, mundane items.
I have read numerous forum posts discussing the "correct" rarity of such an item, and what character levels are fitting for PCs acquiring it. What troubles me about this is plate is a significant part of the Heavy Armor proficiency - if plate (and to a lesser extent, splint) is not available (either by gold restrictions or the DM saying it's hard to find) then Heavy Armor proficiency becomes much less valuable to a PC. Light Armor users easily get to 16 AC, and Medium Armor users can get to 17 at half of the cost of plate. Now, plate is 18 AC, but it comes at a great financial cost, Strength restrictions, and Stealth disadvantage. Seemingly, the only real benefit is that they can also get to 17 AC cheaper/more easily than any other armor proficiency.
Still, in many campaigns plate is out of reach for the first five (or more) levels, making the Heavy Armor proficiency relatively weak for any classes that offer it. Even once that point is reached, AC tends to be less important than raw HP or magic resistance/saves at later levels - so by the time plate becomes available, it matters less than it would have earlier.
In short, I identify that the availability of plate mail as a huge "swing factor" in the value of Heavy Armor proficiency.
Do any 5e official sources (source books, designer statements, or Adventurer's League) offer any indication on the appropriate time to allow PCs to have plate?
dnd-5e optimization equipment armor armor-class
dnd-5e optimization equipment armor armor-class
edited yesterday
Rubiksmoose
45.7k6229350
45.7k6229350
asked yesterday
WannabeCoder
3,07011126
3,07011126
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
RAW: Somewhere between levels 5 and 11
Six levels is a lot of variance, so let's see what we can discern. Looking over the expected results from the treasure tables in chapter 7 of the dmg and the "starting gear" table for adventures not starting at level one, a character (or party, depending on loot-sharing) should be able to obtain plate mail by around level 7; A level 5 party may be able to afford this by pooling their resources.
The tables are all somewhat imprecise, but we know that at level 5, you start with about 600GP and at level 11, you start with about 5600GP. Note that ~600GP is consistent with expected loot from CR-appropriate monsters during levels 1-4.
IF we assume that the scaling is actually linear and not tiered (meaning that a smooth-ish line can be drawn from each level's expected loot, rather than a 5th level character having 500 more gp than a 4th level character) and we use the two points mentioned above (level 5 with 600 gp and level 11 with 5600 gp), then we can find a distribution. (though, if such a graph were to exist, it would probably not be linear, but I digress)
5000GP over 6 levels is ~850 gp per level.
That gives us:
level 5 with 600GP
level 6 with 1450GP (just shy of full plate)
level 7 with 2300GP
level 8 with 3150GP
level 9 with 4000GP
level 10 with 4850GP
level 11 with 5700GP (close enough)
from which we can derive.....
Around level 7 for an individual
Around level 5 for a party
9
Linear would be an extremely surprising progression here.
– KRyan
yesterday
@KRyan I would expect it to be closer to exponential, but the way the tables are laid out makes it difficult to do any high-level calculations
– goodguy5
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The only official element that would limit acquisition of plate armor would be its exorbitant cost. Xanathar's Guide to Everything (page 135) suggests that a party should have seven rolls on the Challenge 0-4 treasure hoard table and 18 rolls on the 5-10 table as it levels up. With average treasure rolls, with a group of 4 to 5 player characters, plate armor should probably become affordable somewhere around level 7, though that will vary somewhat depending on how much money you're making outside of hoard rolls and how many people are splitting the proceeds. (This matches my personal experience, where the paladin in our party of 5 got his first set of plate just about the time we leveled up to 7.)
But I think you have it a bit backwards; even if you strike plate from the armor list completely, it doesn't really change who wants to use their Heavy proficiency, and it doesn't make heavy armor weak or undesirable. Medium armor is only particularly desirable if you have a moderately good Dexterity; if you don't, you go Heavy if you can.
In general, you want to wear the heaviest armor you have proficiency for, unless you have a very specific reason not to -- which usually means having unusual stats for your class (such as a finesse Fighter) or having unusual needs not normally associated with your class (such as stealth).
Anyone can find an armor to get to AC 16 pretty easily no matter what their stats look like, unless they've managed to submarine both their Strength and Dexterity.
AC 17, the maximum for all non-Plate armors, is pretty easily achievable if you care to go there, but it's a lot cheaper and easier for Heavy armor wearers, provided they can handle the weight (which generally means a good strength score or being a dwarf).
In other words, if you hit AC 17, you're doing well and have effectively maxed out your defense from armor. Plate is a little extra thing to stand above as the Ultimate Armor, and with a price-tag to match. But if you exclude it from your game or make it prohibitively rare, the fighter and paladin (and some clerics) are STILL going to probably wear Heavy armor, just because it's the easiest path to AC 17 and matches their usual stats well.
It might be different if stat bonuses were easy to get, but since they aren't, you usually need to focus stat increases on your core abilities, which doesn't often leave lots of space to buff your Dexterity out of the Heavy armor range; and having heavy armor available is what allows these characters to distribute their ability points elsewhere.
3
This doesn’t really answer the question—the option of AC 18 is present, and the question is how early that option is supposed to be available. The high price suggests that it is too good for 1st, perhaps, but the fact that it exists suggests that it is appropriate—and therefore AC 17 is not—at some point. The whole point of the question is figuring out when those points are.
– KRyan
yesterday
I'm addressing the idea that plate being unavailable - due to cost, level, rarity, or restriction - makes heavy armor undesirable, which is absolutely core to the question. I didn't answer "when is it appropriate to gain plate armor" because I think the premise is invalid.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
3
The question still stands: when should full-plate be made available to players? You haven’t answered it. You haven’t even suggested an answer. The question wasn’t “if I can’t get full-plate, should I bother with heavy armor?” or “with no full-plate available, are classes that gain heavy armor proficiency worse off?” The querent has already stated their opinion on the answers to those questions—and their opinion, your opinion, both of these things are irrelevant. I want to know the actual answer to this question, not to the question you’d like to answer.
– KRyan
yesterday
2
Fine, added an economics discussion before addressing the real issue.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
As early as they can afford it
1500gp is a lot of money in the beginning, later it becomes trivial.
The trade of magic items is limited in 5e, so it is very hard to spend money meaningfully, especially if you artificially restrict other pricey goods.
Balance
Dex primary classes tend to max out their AC at level 8*, so the Heavy Armor wearers should not be later either.
*) Fighters at level 6, assuming point buy
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
RAW: Somewhere between levels 5 and 11
Six levels is a lot of variance, so let's see what we can discern. Looking over the expected results from the treasure tables in chapter 7 of the dmg and the "starting gear" table for adventures not starting at level one, a character (or party, depending on loot-sharing) should be able to obtain plate mail by around level 7; A level 5 party may be able to afford this by pooling their resources.
The tables are all somewhat imprecise, but we know that at level 5, you start with about 600GP and at level 11, you start with about 5600GP. Note that ~600GP is consistent with expected loot from CR-appropriate monsters during levels 1-4.
IF we assume that the scaling is actually linear and not tiered (meaning that a smooth-ish line can be drawn from each level's expected loot, rather than a 5th level character having 500 more gp than a 4th level character) and we use the two points mentioned above (level 5 with 600 gp and level 11 with 5600 gp), then we can find a distribution. (though, if such a graph were to exist, it would probably not be linear, but I digress)
5000GP over 6 levels is ~850 gp per level.
That gives us:
level 5 with 600GP
level 6 with 1450GP (just shy of full plate)
level 7 with 2300GP
level 8 with 3150GP
level 9 with 4000GP
level 10 with 4850GP
level 11 with 5700GP (close enough)
from which we can derive.....
Around level 7 for an individual
Around level 5 for a party
9
Linear would be an extremely surprising progression here.
– KRyan
yesterday
@KRyan I would expect it to be closer to exponential, but the way the tables are laid out makes it difficult to do any high-level calculations
– goodguy5
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
RAW: Somewhere between levels 5 and 11
Six levels is a lot of variance, so let's see what we can discern. Looking over the expected results from the treasure tables in chapter 7 of the dmg and the "starting gear" table for adventures not starting at level one, a character (or party, depending on loot-sharing) should be able to obtain plate mail by around level 7; A level 5 party may be able to afford this by pooling their resources.
The tables are all somewhat imprecise, but we know that at level 5, you start with about 600GP and at level 11, you start with about 5600GP. Note that ~600GP is consistent with expected loot from CR-appropriate monsters during levels 1-4.
IF we assume that the scaling is actually linear and not tiered (meaning that a smooth-ish line can be drawn from each level's expected loot, rather than a 5th level character having 500 more gp than a 4th level character) and we use the two points mentioned above (level 5 with 600 gp and level 11 with 5600 gp), then we can find a distribution. (though, if such a graph were to exist, it would probably not be linear, but I digress)
5000GP over 6 levels is ~850 gp per level.
That gives us:
level 5 with 600GP
level 6 with 1450GP (just shy of full plate)
level 7 with 2300GP
level 8 with 3150GP
level 9 with 4000GP
level 10 with 4850GP
level 11 with 5700GP (close enough)
from which we can derive.....
Around level 7 for an individual
Around level 5 for a party
9
Linear would be an extremely surprising progression here.
– KRyan
yesterday
@KRyan I would expect it to be closer to exponential, but the way the tables are laid out makes it difficult to do any high-level calculations
– goodguy5
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
RAW: Somewhere between levels 5 and 11
Six levels is a lot of variance, so let's see what we can discern. Looking over the expected results from the treasure tables in chapter 7 of the dmg and the "starting gear" table for adventures not starting at level one, a character (or party, depending on loot-sharing) should be able to obtain plate mail by around level 7; A level 5 party may be able to afford this by pooling their resources.
The tables are all somewhat imprecise, but we know that at level 5, you start with about 600GP and at level 11, you start with about 5600GP. Note that ~600GP is consistent with expected loot from CR-appropriate monsters during levels 1-4.
IF we assume that the scaling is actually linear and not tiered (meaning that a smooth-ish line can be drawn from each level's expected loot, rather than a 5th level character having 500 more gp than a 4th level character) and we use the two points mentioned above (level 5 with 600 gp and level 11 with 5600 gp), then we can find a distribution. (though, if such a graph were to exist, it would probably not be linear, but I digress)
5000GP over 6 levels is ~850 gp per level.
That gives us:
level 5 with 600GP
level 6 with 1450GP (just shy of full plate)
level 7 with 2300GP
level 8 with 3150GP
level 9 with 4000GP
level 10 with 4850GP
level 11 with 5700GP (close enough)
from which we can derive.....
Around level 7 for an individual
Around level 5 for a party
RAW: Somewhere between levels 5 and 11
Six levels is a lot of variance, so let's see what we can discern. Looking over the expected results from the treasure tables in chapter 7 of the dmg and the "starting gear" table for adventures not starting at level one, a character (or party, depending on loot-sharing) should be able to obtain plate mail by around level 7; A level 5 party may be able to afford this by pooling their resources.
The tables are all somewhat imprecise, but we know that at level 5, you start with about 600GP and at level 11, you start with about 5600GP. Note that ~600GP is consistent with expected loot from CR-appropriate monsters during levels 1-4.
IF we assume that the scaling is actually linear and not tiered (meaning that a smooth-ish line can be drawn from each level's expected loot, rather than a 5th level character having 500 more gp than a 4th level character) and we use the two points mentioned above (level 5 with 600 gp and level 11 with 5600 gp), then we can find a distribution. (though, if such a graph were to exist, it would probably not be linear, but I digress)
5000GP over 6 levels is ~850 gp per level.
That gives us:
level 5 with 600GP
level 6 with 1450GP (just shy of full plate)
level 7 with 2300GP
level 8 with 3150GP
level 9 with 4000GP
level 10 with 4850GP
level 11 with 5700GP (close enough)
from which we can derive.....
Around level 7 for an individual
Around level 5 for a party
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
goodguy5
6,13912361
6,13912361
9
Linear would be an extremely surprising progression here.
– KRyan
yesterday
@KRyan I would expect it to be closer to exponential, but the way the tables are laid out makes it difficult to do any high-level calculations
– goodguy5
yesterday
add a comment |
9
Linear would be an extremely surprising progression here.
– KRyan
yesterday
@KRyan I would expect it to be closer to exponential, but the way the tables are laid out makes it difficult to do any high-level calculations
– goodguy5
yesterday
9
9
Linear would be an extremely surprising progression here.
– KRyan
yesterday
Linear would be an extremely surprising progression here.
– KRyan
yesterday
@KRyan I would expect it to be closer to exponential, but the way the tables are laid out makes it difficult to do any high-level calculations
– goodguy5
yesterday
@KRyan I would expect it to be closer to exponential, but the way the tables are laid out makes it difficult to do any high-level calculations
– goodguy5
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The only official element that would limit acquisition of plate armor would be its exorbitant cost. Xanathar's Guide to Everything (page 135) suggests that a party should have seven rolls on the Challenge 0-4 treasure hoard table and 18 rolls on the 5-10 table as it levels up. With average treasure rolls, with a group of 4 to 5 player characters, plate armor should probably become affordable somewhere around level 7, though that will vary somewhat depending on how much money you're making outside of hoard rolls and how many people are splitting the proceeds. (This matches my personal experience, where the paladin in our party of 5 got his first set of plate just about the time we leveled up to 7.)
But I think you have it a bit backwards; even if you strike plate from the armor list completely, it doesn't really change who wants to use their Heavy proficiency, and it doesn't make heavy armor weak or undesirable. Medium armor is only particularly desirable if you have a moderately good Dexterity; if you don't, you go Heavy if you can.
In general, you want to wear the heaviest armor you have proficiency for, unless you have a very specific reason not to -- which usually means having unusual stats for your class (such as a finesse Fighter) or having unusual needs not normally associated with your class (such as stealth).
Anyone can find an armor to get to AC 16 pretty easily no matter what their stats look like, unless they've managed to submarine both their Strength and Dexterity.
AC 17, the maximum for all non-Plate armors, is pretty easily achievable if you care to go there, but it's a lot cheaper and easier for Heavy armor wearers, provided they can handle the weight (which generally means a good strength score or being a dwarf).
In other words, if you hit AC 17, you're doing well and have effectively maxed out your defense from armor. Plate is a little extra thing to stand above as the Ultimate Armor, and with a price-tag to match. But if you exclude it from your game or make it prohibitively rare, the fighter and paladin (and some clerics) are STILL going to probably wear Heavy armor, just because it's the easiest path to AC 17 and matches their usual stats well.
It might be different if stat bonuses were easy to get, but since they aren't, you usually need to focus stat increases on your core abilities, which doesn't often leave lots of space to buff your Dexterity out of the Heavy armor range; and having heavy armor available is what allows these characters to distribute their ability points elsewhere.
3
This doesn’t really answer the question—the option of AC 18 is present, and the question is how early that option is supposed to be available. The high price suggests that it is too good for 1st, perhaps, but the fact that it exists suggests that it is appropriate—and therefore AC 17 is not—at some point. The whole point of the question is figuring out when those points are.
– KRyan
yesterday
I'm addressing the idea that plate being unavailable - due to cost, level, rarity, or restriction - makes heavy armor undesirable, which is absolutely core to the question. I didn't answer "when is it appropriate to gain plate armor" because I think the premise is invalid.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
3
The question still stands: when should full-plate be made available to players? You haven’t answered it. You haven’t even suggested an answer. The question wasn’t “if I can’t get full-plate, should I bother with heavy armor?” or “with no full-plate available, are classes that gain heavy armor proficiency worse off?” The querent has already stated their opinion on the answers to those questions—and their opinion, your opinion, both of these things are irrelevant. I want to know the actual answer to this question, not to the question you’d like to answer.
– KRyan
yesterday
2
Fine, added an economics discussion before addressing the real issue.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The only official element that would limit acquisition of plate armor would be its exorbitant cost. Xanathar's Guide to Everything (page 135) suggests that a party should have seven rolls on the Challenge 0-4 treasure hoard table and 18 rolls on the 5-10 table as it levels up. With average treasure rolls, with a group of 4 to 5 player characters, plate armor should probably become affordable somewhere around level 7, though that will vary somewhat depending on how much money you're making outside of hoard rolls and how many people are splitting the proceeds. (This matches my personal experience, where the paladin in our party of 5 got his first set of plate just about the time we leveled up to 7.)
But I think you have it a bit backwards; even if you strike plate from the armor list completely, it doesn't really change who wants to use their Heavy proficiency, and it doesn't make heavy armor weak or undesirable. Medium armor is only particularly desirable if you have a moderately good Dexterity; if you don't, you go Heavy if you can.
In general, you want to wear the heaviest armor you have proficiency for, unless you have a very specific reason not to -- which usually means having unusual stats for your class (such as a finesse Fighter) or having unusual needs not normally associated with your class (such as stealth).
Anyone can find an armor to get to AC 16 pretty easily no matter what their stats look like, unless they've managed to submarine both their Strength and Dexterity.
AC 17, the maximum for all non-Plate armors, is pretty easily achievable if you care to go there, but it's a lot cheaper and easier for Heavy armor wearers, provided they can handle the weight (which generally means a good strength score or being a dwarf).
In other words, if you hit AC 17, you're doing well and have effectively maxed out your defense from armor. Plate is a little extra thing to stand above as the Ultimate Armor, and with a price-tag to match. But if you exclude it from your game or make it prohibitively rare, the fighter and paladin (and some clerics) are STILL going to probably wear Heavy armor, just because it's the easiest path to AC 17 and matches their usual stats well.
It might be different if stat bonuses were easy to get, but since they aren't, you usually need to focus stat increases on your core abilities, which doesn't often leave lots of space to buff your Dexterity out of the Heavy armor range; and having heavy armor available is what allows these characters to distribute their ability points elsewhere.
3
This doesn’t really answer the question—the option of AC 18 is present, and the question is how early that option is supposed to be available. The high price suggests that it is too good for 1st, perhaps, but the fact that it exists suggests that it is appropriate—and therefore AC 17 is not—at some point. The whole point of the question is figuring out when those points are.
– KRyan
yesterday
I'm addressing the idea that plate being unavailable - due to cost, level, rarity, or restriction - makes heavy armor undesirable, which is absolutely core to the question. I didn't answer "when is it appropriate to gain plate armor" because I think the premise is invalid.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
3
The question still stands: when should full-plate be made available to players? You haven’t answered it. You haven’t even suggested an answer. The question wasn’t “if I can’t get full-plate, should I bother with heavy armor?” or “with no full-plate available, are classes that gain heavy armor proficiency worse off?” The querent has already stated their opinion on the answers to those questions—and their opinion, your opinion, both of these things are irrelevant. I want to know the actual answer to this question, not to the question you’d like to answer.
– KRyan
yesterday
2
Fine, added an economics discussion before addressing the real issue.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
The only official element that would limit acquisition of plate armor would be its exorbitant cost. Xanathar's Guide to Everything (page 135) suggests that a party should have seven rolls on the Challenge 0-4 treasure hoard table and 18 rolls on the 5-10 table as it levels up. With average treasure rolls, with a group of 4 to 5 player characters, plate armor should probably become affordable somewhere around level 7, though that will vary somewhat depending on how much money you're making outside of hoard rolls and how many people are splitting the proceeds. (This matches my personal experience, where the paladin in our party of 5 got his first set of plate just about the time we leveled up to 7.)
But I think you have it a bit backwards; even if you strike plate from the armor list completely, it doesn't really change who wants to use their Heavy proficiency, and it doesn't make heavy armor weak or undesirable. Medium armor is only particularly desirable if you have a moderately good Dexterity; if you don't, you go Heavy if you can.
In general, you want to wear the heaviest armor you have proficiency for, unless you have a very specific reason not to -- which usually means having unusual stats for your class (such as a finesse Fighter) or having unusual needs not normally associated with your class (such as stealth).
Anyone can find an armor to get to AC 16 pretty easily no matter what their stats look like, unless they've managed to submarine both their Strength and Dexterity.
AC 17, the maximum for all non-Plate armors, is pretty easily achievable if you care to go there, but it's a lot cheaper and easier for Heavy armor wearers, provided they can handle the weight (which generally means a good strength score or being a dwarf).
In other words, if you hit AC 17, you're doing well and have effectively maxed out your defense from armor. Plate is a little extra thing to stand above as the Ultimate Armor, and with a price-tag to match. But if you exclude it from your game or make it prohibitively rare, the fighter and paladin (and some clerics) are STILL going to probably wear Heavy armor, just because it's the easiest path to AC 17 and matches their usual stats well.
It might be different if stat bonuses were easy to get, but since they aren't, you usually need to focus stat increases on your core abilities, which doesn't often leave lots of space to buff your Dexterity out of the Heavy armor range; and having heavy armor available is what allows these characters to distribute their ability points elsewhere.
The only official element that would limit acquisition of plate armor would be its exorbitant cost. Xanathar's Guide to Everything (page 135) suggests that a party should have seven rolls on the Challenge 0-4 treasure hoard table and 18 rolls on the 5-10 table as it levels up. With average treasure rolls, with a group of 4 to 5 player characters, plate armor should probably become affordable somewhere around level 7, though that will vary somewhat depending on how much money you're making outside of hoard rolls and how many people are splitting the proceeds. (This matches my personal experience, where the paladin in our party of 5 got his first set of plate just about the time we leveled up to 7.)
But I think you have it a bit backwards; even if you strike plate from the armor list completely, it doesn't really change who wants to use their Heavy proficiency, and it doesn't make heavy armor weak or undesirable. Medium armor is only particularly desirable if you have a moderately good Dexterity; if you don't, you go Heavy if you can.
In general, you want to wear the heaviest armor you have proficiency for, unless you have a very specific reason not to -- which usually means having unusual stats for your class (such as a finesse Fighter) or having unusual needs not normally associated with your class (such as stealth).
Anyone can find an armor to get to AC 16 pretty easily no matter what their stats look like, unless they've managed to submarine both their Strength and Dexterity.
AC 17, the maximum for all non-Plate armors, is pretty easily achievable if you care to go there, but it's a lot cheaper and easier for Heavy armor wearers, provided they can handle the weight (which generally means a good strength score or being a dwarf).
In other words, if you hit AC 17, you're doing well and have effectively maxed out your defense from armor. Plate is a little extra thing to stand above as the Ultimate Armor, and with a price-tag to match. But if you exclude it from your game or make it prohibitively rare, the fighter and paladin (and some clerics) are STILL going to probably wear Heavy armor, just because it's the easiest path to AC 17 and matches their usual stats well.
It might be different if stat bonuses were easy to get, but since they aren't, you usually need to focus stat increases on your core abilities, which doesn't often leave lots of space to buff your Dexterity out of the Heavy armor range; and having heavy armor available is what allows these characters to distribute their ability points elsewhere.
edited 7 hours ago
answered yesterday
Darth Pseudonym
9,5442255
9,5442255
3
This doesn’t really answer the question—the option of AC 18 is present, and the question is how early that option is supposed to be available. The high price suggests that it is too good for 1st, perhaps, but the fact that it exists suggests that it is appropriate—and therefore AC 17 is not—at some point. The whole point of the question is figuring out when those points are.
– KRyan
yesterday
I'm addressing the idea that plate being unavailable - due to cost, level, rarity, or restriction - makes heavy armor undesirable, which is absolutely core to the question. I didn't answer "when is it appropriate to gain plate armor" because I think the premise is invalid.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
3
The question still stands: when should full-plate be made available to players? You haven’t answered it. You haven’t even suggested an answer. The question wasn’t “if I can’t get full-plate, should I bother with heavy armor?” or “with no full-plate available, are classes that gain heavy armor proficiency worse off?” The querent has already stated their opinion on the answers to those questions—and their opinion, your opinion, both of these things are irrelevant. I want to know the actual answer to this question, not to the question you’d like to answer.
– KRyan
yesterday
2
Fine, added an economics discussion before addressing the real issue.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
add a comment |
3
This doesn’t really answer the question—the option of AC 18 is present, and the question is how early that option is supposed to be available. The high price suggests that it is too good for 1st, perhaps, but the fact that it exists suggests that it is appropriate—and therefore AC 17 is not—at some point. The whole point of the question is figuring out when those points are.
– KRyan
yesterday
I'm addressing the idea that plate being unavailable - due to cost, level, rarity, or restriction - makes heavy armor undesirable, which is absolutely core to the question. I didn't answer "when is it appropriate to gain plate armor" because I think the premise is invalid.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
3
The question still stands: when should full-plate be made available to players? You haven’t answered it. You haven’t even suggested an answer. The question wasn’t “if I can’t get full-plate, should I bother with heavy armor?” or “with no full-plate available, are classes that gain heavy armor proficiency worse off?” The querent has already stated their opinion on the answers to those questions—and their opinion, your opinion, both of these things are irrelevant. I want to know the actual answer to this question, not to the question you’d like to answer.
– KRyan
yesterday
2
Fine, added an economics discussion before addressing the real issue.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
3
3
This doesn’t really answer the question—the option of AC 18 is present, and the question is how early that option is supposed to be available. The high price suggests that it is too good for 1st, perhaps, but the fact that it exists suggests that it is appropriate—and therefore AC 17 is not—at some point. The whole point of the question is figuring out when those points are.
– KRyan
yesterday
This doesn’t really answer the question—the option of AC 18 is present, and the question is how early that option is supposed to be available. The high price suggests that it is too good for 1st, perhaps, but the fact that it exists suggests that it is appropriate—and therefore AC 17 is not—at some point. The whole point of the question is figuring out when those points are.
– KRyan
yesterday
I'm addressing the idea that plate being unavailable - due to cost, level, rarity, or restriction - makes heavy armor undesirable, which is absolutely core to the question. I didn't answer "when is it appropriate to gain plate armor" because I think the premise is invalid.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
I'm addressing the idea that plate being unavailable - due to cost, level, rarity, or restriction - makes heavy armor undesirable, which is absolutely core to the question. I didn't answer "when is it appropriate to gain plate armor" because I think the premise is invalid.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
3
3
The question still stands: when should full-plate be made available to players? You haven’t answered it. You haven’t even suggested an answer. The question wasn’t “if I can’t get full-plate, should I bother with heavy armor?” or “with no full-plate available, are classes that gain heavy armor proficiency worse off?” The querent has already stated their opinion on the answers to those questions—and their opinion, your opinion, both of these things are irrelevant. I want to know the actual answer to this question, not to the question you’d like to answer.
– KRyan
yesterday
The question still stands: when should full-plate be made available to players? You haven’t answered it. You haven’t even suggested an answer. The question wasn’t “if I can’t get full-plate, should I bother with heavy armor?” or “with no full-plate available, are classes that gain heavy armor proficiency worse off?” The querent has already stated their opinion on the answers to those questions—and their opinion, your opinion, both of these things are irrelevant. I want to know the actual answer to this question, not to the question you’d like to answer.
– KRyan
yesterday
2
2
Fine, added an economics discussion before addressing the real issue.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
Fine, added an economics discussion before addressing the real issue.
– Darth Pseudonym
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
As early as they can afford it
1500gp is a lot of money in the beginning, later it becomes trivial.
The trade of magic items is limited in 5e, so it is very hard to spend money meaningfully, especially if you artificially restrict other pricey goods.
Balance
Dex primary classes tend to max out their AC at level 8*, so the Heavy Armor wearers should not be later either.
*) Fighters at level 6, assuming point buy
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
As early as they can afford it
1500gp is a lot of money in the beginning, later it becomes trivial.
The trade of magic items is limited in 5e, so it is very hard to spend money meaningfully, especially if you artificially restrict other pricey goods.
Balance
Dex primary classes tend to max out their AC at level 8*, so the Heavy Armor wearers should not be later either.
*) Fighters at level 6, assuming point buy
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
As early as they can afford it
1500gp is a lot of money in the beginning, later it becomes trivial.
The trade of magic items is limited in 5e, so it is very hard to spend money meaningfully, especially if you artificially restrict other pricey goods.
Balance
Dex primary classes tend to max out their AC at level 8*, so the Heavy Armor wearers should not be later either.
*) Fighters at level 6, assuming point buy
As early as they can afford it
1500gp is a lot of money in the beginning, later it becomes trivial.
The trade of magic items is limited in 5e, so it is very hard to spend money meaningfully, especially if you artificially restrict other pricey goods.
Balance
Dex primary classes tend to max out their AC at level 8*, so the Heavy Armor wearers should not be later either.
*) Fighters at level 6, assuming point buy
answered yesterday
András
25.3k1090184
25.3k1090184
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136901%2fwhat-rules-or-guidelines-are-there-about-when-to-allow-a-party-to-acquire-plate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown