Probability concepts - how can balls of same colour be distinguishable?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite













An urn contains $6$ white and $4$ black balls. A fair die is rolled
and that number of balls are chosen from the urn. Find the probability
that the balls selected are white.




I know the basic way to go about solving the problem.



Let $W$ be the event of finally drawing all white balls. Let $P(n)$ denote the probability of appearance of $n$ on the die.



We want:
$$P(W) = P(1)P(Wmid 1)+ P(2)P(Wmid 2)+dots implies P(W) = dfrac{1}{6}left(sum_{i=1}^6P(Wmid i)right)$$



Now, I am actually facing trouble in computing $P(W/i)$. I saw author's method and in it he has used $P(Wmid i) = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$



but I fail to understand how that can be true when all white balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Doesn't it look pretty much as a Hypergeometric distribution were the number of draws is a rv? $K=6$, $N=10$, $n=k$ is a random variable. Does it make any sense to you?
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:13










  • I don't know what's a hypergeometric distribution @RamiroScorolli
    – Abcd
    Nov 14 at 8:13










  • Basically you have $N$ balls(10 balls in total), $K$ represent success (6 white balls), you draw $n$ balls (where n is the number obtained with the dice) and you are expecting $k$ successes. (basically n cause you want all to be white). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:20










  • I'm not completely sure but I think that this could be the $P(W/I)$ you are looking for
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:20










  • How about something similar with a smaller amount of balls? If you have two identical black balls and an otherwise similar but white ball in a bag, and you pull out one in random, what's the probability of getting a black ball? Is it 1/2 because there are only two colors (and you couldn't tell the black ones apart)?
    – ilkkachu
    Nov 14 at 14:43















up vote
3
down vote

favorite













An urn contains $6$ white and $4$ black balls. A fair die is rolled
and that number of balls are chosen from the urn. Find the probability
that the balls selected are white.




I know the basic way to go about solving the problem.



Let $W$ be the event of finally drawing all white balls. Let $P(n)$ denote the probability of appearance of $n$ on the die.



We want:
$$P(W) = P(1)P(Wmid 1)+ P(2)P(Wmid 2)+dots implies P(W) = dfrac{1}{6}left(sum_{i=1}^6P(Wmid i)right)$$



Now, I am actually facing trouble in computing $P(W/i)$. I saw author's method and in it he has used $P(Wmid i) = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$



but I fail to understand how that can be true when all white balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Doesn't it look pretty much as a Hypergeometric distribution were the number of draws is a rv? $K=6$, $N=10$, $n=k$ is a random variable. Does it make any sense to you?
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:13










  • I don't know what's a hypergeometric distribution @RamiroScorolli
    – Abcd
    Nov 14 at 8:13










  • Basically you have $N$ balls(10 balls in total), $K$ represent success (6 white balls), you draw $n$ balls (where n is the number obtained with the dice) and you are expecting $k$ successes. (basically n cause you want all to be white). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:20










  • I'm not completely sure but I think that this could be the $P(W/I)$ you are looking for
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:20










  • How about something similar with a smaller amount of balls? If you have two identical black balls and an otherwise similar but white ball in a bag, and you pull out one in random, what's the probability of getting a black ball? Is it 1/2 because there are only two colors (and you couldn't tell the black ones apart)?
    – ilkkachu
    Nov 14 at 14:43













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite












An urn contains $6$ white and $4$ black balls. A fair die is rolled
and that number of balls are chosen from the urn. Find the probability
that the balls selected are white.




I know the basic way to go about solving the problem.



Let $W$ be the event of finally drawing all white balls. Let $P(n)$ denote the probability of appearance of $n$ on the die.



We want:
$$P(W) = P(1)P(Wmid 1)+ P(2)P(Wmid 2)+dots implies P(W) = dfrac{1}{6}left(sum_{i=1}^6P(Wmid i)right)$$



Now, I am actually facing trouble in computing $P(W/i)$. I saw author's method and in it he has used $P(Wmid i) = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$



but I fail to understand how that can be true when all white balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?










share|cite|improve this question
















An urn contains $6$ white and $4$ black balls. A fair die is rolled
and that number of balls are chosen from the urn. Find the probability
that the balls selected are white.




I know the basic way to go about solving the problem.



Let $W$ be the event of finally drawing all white balls. Let $P(n)$ denote the probability of appearance of $n$ on the die.



We want:
$$P(W) = P(1)P(Wmid 1)+ P(2)P(Wmid 2)+dots implies P(W) = dfrac{1}{6}left(sum_{i=1}^6P(Wmid i)right)$$



Now, I am actually facing trouble in computing $P(W/i)$. I saw author's method and in it he has used $P(Wmid i) = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$



but I fail to understand how that can be true when all white balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?







probability combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 14 at 16:27









Aloizio Macedo

23.2k23485




23.2k23485










asked Nov 14 at 7:52









Abcd

2,87311130




2,87311130












  • Doesn't it look pretty much as a Hypergeometric distribution were the number of draws is a rv? $K=6$, $N=10$, $n=k$ is a random variable. Does it make any sense to you?
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:13










  • I don't know what's a hypergeometric distribution @RamiroScorolli
    – Abcd
    Nov 14 at 8:13










  • Basically you have $N$ balls(10 balls in total), $K$ represent success (6 white balls), you draw $n$ balls (where n is the number obtained with the dice) and you are expecting $k$ successes. (basically n cause you want all to be white). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:20










  • I'm not completely sure but I think that this could be the $P(W/I)$ you are looking for
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:20










  • How about something similar with a smaller amount of balls? If you have two identical black balls and an otherwise similar but white ball in a bag, and you pull out one in random, what's the probability of getting a black ball? Is it 1/2 because there are only two colors (and you couldn't tell the black ones apart)?
    – ilkkachu
    Nov 14 at 14:43


















  • Doesn't it look pretty much as a Hypergeometric distribution were the number of draws is a rv? $K=6$, $N=10$, $n=k$ is a random variable. Does it make any sense to you?
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:13










  • I don't know what's a hypergeometric distribution @RamiroScorolli
    – Abcd
    Nov 14 at 8:13










  • Basically you have $N$ balls(10 balls in total), $K$ represent success (6 white balls), you draw $n$ balls (where n is the number obtained with the dice) and you are expecting $k$ successes. (basically n cause you want all to be white). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:20










  • I'm not completely sure but I think that this could be the $P(W/I)$ you are looking for
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 14 at 8:20










  • How about something similar with a smaller amount of balls? If you have two identical black balls and an otherwise similar but white ball in a bag, and you pull out one in random, what's the probability of getting a black ball? Is it 1/2 because there are only two colors (and you couldn't tell the black ones apart)?
    – ilkkachu
    Nov 14 at 14:43
















Doesn't it look pretty much as a Hypergeometric distribution were the number of draws is a rv? $K=6$, $N=10$, $n=k$ is a random variable. Does it make any sense to you?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 14 at 8:13




Doesn't it look pretty much as a Hypergeometric distribution were the number of draws is a rv? $K=6$, $N=10$, $n=k$ is a random variable. Does it make any sense to you?
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 14 at 8:13












I don't know what's a hypergeometric distribution @RamiroScorolli
– Abcd
Nov 14 at 8:13




I don't know what's a hypergeometric distribution @RamiroScorolli
– Abcd
Nov 14 at 8:13












Basically you have $N$ balls(10 balls in total), $K$ represent success (6 white balls), you draw $n$ balls (where n is the number obtained with the dice) and you are expecting $k$ successes. (basically n cause you want all to be white). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 14 at 8:20




Basically you have $N$ balls(10 balls in total), $K$ represent success (6 white balls), you draw $n$ balls (where n is the number obtained with the dice) and you are expecting $k$ successes. (basically n cause you want all to be white). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergeometric_distribution
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 14 at 8:20












I'm not completely sure but I think that this could be the $P(W/I)$ you are looking for
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 14 at 8:20




I'm not completely sure but I think that this could be the $P(W/I)$ you are looking for
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 14 at 8:20












How about something similar with a smaller amount of balls? If you have two identical black balls and an otherwise similar but white ball in a bag, and you pull out one in random, what's the probability of getting a black ball? Is it 1/2 because there are only two colors (and you couldn't tell the black ones apart)?
– ilkkachu
Nov 14 at 14:43




How about something similar with a smaller amount of balls? If you have two identical black balls and an otherwise similar but white ball in a bag, and you pull out one in random, what's the probability of getting a black ball? Is it 1/2 because there are only two colors (and you couldn't tell the black ones apart)?
– ilkkachu
Nov 14 at 14:43










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote














  • The probability of drawing $i$ white balls is the probability of drawing a white ball and then (without replacement) drawing a second white ball, and so on up to $i$


  • The first ball drawn has a probability of $frac{6}{10}$ of being white


  • Given that the first ball drawn is white, the second ball drawn has a probability of $frac{5}{9}$ of being white


  • An so on up to the $i$th ball having a probability of $frac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$ of being white


  • So the probability all $i$ balls drawn are white is $$frac{6 times 5 times cdots times(6-i+1)}{10 times 9 times cdots times(10-i+1)} = dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!} }= dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!i!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!i!}} = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$$







share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Wow, this is amazing.
    – Abcd
    Nov 14 at 8:18










  • So does this also imply that considering them as distinct is a sort of "trick" that is always going to work?
    – Abcd
    Nov 14 at 8:22










  • @Abcd If you are going to use a counting calculation, then you want each event to be of equal probability, and treating the balls as physically distinct even when they look the same does this. Otherwise you risk saying that the probability of all white when $i=6$ might be higher than when $i=4$, since when $i=6$ you can get $4$, $5$ or $6$ white balls while with $i=4$ you can get $0$, $1$, $2$, $3$ or $4$ white balls; you need to be able say what the differing probabilities of the various possible outcomes are
    – Henry
    Nov 14 at 8:55


















up vote
4
down vote













If you draw the $i$ balls sequentially $$P(Wmid i)=frac{6}{10}cdotfrac{5}{9}cdotsfrac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$$
If you draw the $i$ balls simultaneously
$$P(Wmid i)=frac{dbinom{6}{i}cdotdbinom{4}{0}}{dbinom{10}{i}}$$ Now, can you convince yourself that these two are equivalent?






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Since I don't see it anywhere, let me address this part of your question, rather than specific case:




    how that can be true when all blue balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



    Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?




    Let's make a simple thought experiment. Let's say that rather than having indistinguishable white and black balls you have 10 balls numbered 1 to 10. Balls numbered 1 to 6 are white and those numbered 7 to 10 are black.



    Now you have 6 white balls and 4 black balls that are distinguishable. How does that change your probability?



    The numbers on balls change nothing in probability as long as the only thing you're concerned is ball colour. The resulting probability has to be the same as if there were no numbers. We may simply ignore the numbers on the balls and follow the original problem. We still have 6 white balls and 4 black balls so the old approach holds. Whatever other way you count the probability it has to provide the same result.



    But now your balls are distinguishable so you can apply methods specific to distinguishable balls, specifically use combination. The results, as shown earlier will be the same.



    This is why to indistinguishable balls you can always apply approach "Let's assume the balls are distinguishable..."






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Let me answer from a different direction.



      The reason you must use the equations which treat the balls as distinguishable is that thousands of repeated experiments have shown that the statistical behavior of all macroscopic objects is that of distinguishable items. There is no "proof" of this, since it's a physical reality. (by comparison, Bosons often do act as indistinguishable, leading to cool stuff in the super-cold regime).



      Now, in all statistics, the wording of the question is critical (see arguments about the Monty Hall problem!). If your teacher says "Assume all balls of a given color are truly indistinguishable," then it's a theoretical problem and you basically divide by the number of permutations of distinguishable objects. But unless indistinguishability is specifically given as a premise, objects are distinguishable.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997942%2fprobability-concepts-how-can-balls-of-same-colour-be-distinguishable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        6
        down vote














        • The probability of drawing $i$ white balls is the probability of drawing a white ball and then (without replacement) drawing a second white ball, and so on up to $i$


        • The first ball drawn has a probability of $frac{6}{10}$ of being white


        • Given that the first ball drawn is white, the second ball drawn has a probability of $frac{5}{9}$ of being white


        • An so on up to the $i$th ball having a probability of $frac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$ of being white


        • So the probability all $i$ balls drawn are white is $$frac{6 times 5 times cdots times(6-i+1)}{10 times 9 times cdots times(10-i+1)} = dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!} }= dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!i!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!i!}} = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer

















        • 1




          Wow, this is amazing.
          – Abcd
          Nov 14 at 8:18










        • So does this also imply that considering them as distinct is a sort of "trick" that is always going to work?
          – Abcd
          Nov 14 at 8:22










        • @Abcd If you are going to use a counting calculation, then you want each event to be of equal probability, and treating the balls as physically distinct even when they look the same does this. Otherwise you risk saying that the probability of all white when $i=6$ might be higher than when $i=4$, since when $i=6$ you can get $4$, $5$ or $6$ white balls while with $i=4$ you can get $0$, $1$, $2$, $3$ or $4$ white balls; you need to be able say what the differing probabilities of the various possible outcomes are
          – Henry
          Nov 14 at 8:55















        up vote
        6
        down vote














        • The probability of drawing $i$ white balls is the probability of drawing a white ball and then (without replacement) drawing a second white ball, and so on up to $i$


        • The first ball drawn has a probability of $frac{6}{10}$ of being white


        • Given that the first ball drawn is white, the second ball drawn has a probability of $frac{5}{9}$ of being white


        • An so on up to the $i$th ball having a probability of $frac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$ of being white


        • So the probability all $i$ balls drawn are white is $$frac{6 times 5 times cdots times(6-i+1)}{10 times 9 times cdots times(10-i+1)} = dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!} }= dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!i!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!i!}} = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer

















        • 1




          Wow, this is amazing.
          – Abcd
          Nov 14 at 8:18










        • So does this also imply that considering them as distinct is a sort of "trick" that is always going to work?
          – Abcd
          Nov 14 at 8:22










        • @Abcd If you are going to use a counting calculation, then you want each event to be of equal probability, and treating the balls as physically distinct even when they look the same does this. Otherwise you risk saying that the probability of all white when $i=6$ might be higher than when $i=4$, since when $i=6$ you can get $4$, $5$ or $6$ white balls while with $i=4$ you can get $0$, $1$, $2$, $3$ or $4$ white balls; you need to be able say what the differing probabilities of the various possible outcomes are
          – Henry
          Nov 14 at 8:55













        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote










        • The probability of drawing $i$ white balls is the probability of drawing a white ball and then (without replacement) drawing a second white ball, and so on up to $i$


        • The first ball drawn has a probability of $frac{6}{10}$ of being white


        • Given that the first ball drawn is white, the second ball drawn has a probability of $frac{5}{9}$ of being white


        • An so on up to the $i$th ball having a probability of $frac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$ of being white


        • So the probability all $i$ balls drawn are white is $$frac{6 times 5 times cdots times(6-i+1)}{10 times 9 times cdots times(10-i+1)} = dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!} }= dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!i!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!i!}} = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer













        • The probability of drawing $i$ white balls is the probability of drawing a white ball and then (without replacement) drawing a second white ball, and so on up to $i$


        • The first ball drawn has a probability of $frac{6}{10}$ of being white


        • Given that the first ball drawn is white, the second ball drawn has a probability of $frac{5}{9}$ of being white


        • An so on up to the $i$th ball having a probability of $frac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$ of being white


        • So the probability all $i$ balls drawn are white is $$frac{6 times 5 times cdots times(6-i+1)}{10 times 9 times cdots times(10-i+1)} = dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!} }= dfrac{frac{6!}{(6-i)!i!}}{frac{10!}{(10-i)!i!}} = dfrac{^6C_i}{^{10}C_i}$$








        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 14 at 8:16









        Henry

        96.5k474153




        96.5k474153








        • 1




          Wow, this is amazing.
          – Abcd
          Nov 14 at 8:18










        • So does this also imply that considering them as distinct is a sort of "trick" that is always going to work?
          – Abcd
          Nov 14 at 8:22










        • @Abcd If you are going to use a counting calculation, then you want each event to be of equal probability, and treating the balls as physically distinct even when they look the same does this. Otherwise you risk saying that the probability of all white when $i=6$ might be higher than when $i=4$, since when $i=6$ you can get $4$, $5$ or $6$ white balls while with $i=4$ you can get $0$, $1$, $2$, $3$ or $4$ white balls; you need to be able say what the differing probabilities of the various possible outcomes are
          – Henry
          Nov 14 at 8:55














        • 1




          Wow, this is amazing.
          – Abcd
          Nov 14 at 8:18










        • So does this also imply that considering them as distinct is a sort of "trick" that is always going to work?
          – Abcd
          Nov 14 at 8:22










        • @Abcd If you are going to use a counting calculation, then you want each event to be of equal probability, and treating the balls as physically distinct even when they look the same does this. Otherwise you risk saying that the probability of all white when $i=6$ might be higher than when $i=4$, since when $i=6$ you can get $4$, $5$ or $6$ white balls while with $i=4$ you can get $0$, $1$, $2$, $3$ or $4$ white balls; you need to be able say what the differing probabilities of the various possible outcomes are
          – Henry
          Nov 14 at 8:55








        1




        1




        Wow, this is amazing.
        – Abcd
        Nov 14 at 8:18




        Wow, this is amazing.
        – Abcd
        Nov 14 at 8:18












        So does this also imply that considering them as distinct is a sort of "trick" that is always going to work?
        – Abcd
        Nov 14 at 8:22




        So does this also imply that considering them as distinct is a sort of "trick" that is always going to work?
        – Abcd
        Nov 14 at 8:22












        @Abcd If you are going to use a counting calculation, then you want each event to be of equal probability, and treating the balls as physically distinct even when they look the same does this. Otherwise you risk saying that the probability of all white when $i=6$ might be higher than when $i=4$, since when $i=6$ you can get $4$, $5$ or $6$ white balls while with $i=4$ you can get $0$, $1$, $2$, $3$ or $4$ white balls; you need to be able say what the differing probabilities of the various possible outcomes are
        – Henry
        Nov 14 at 8:55




        @Abcd If you are going to use a counting calculation, then you want each event to be of equal probability, and treating the balls as physically distinct even when they look the same does this. Otherwise you risk saying that the probability of all white when $i=6$ might be higher than when $i=4$, since when $i=6$ you can get $4$, $5$ or $6$ white balls while with $i=4$ you can get $0$, $1$, $2$, $3$ or $4$ white balls; you need to be able say what the differing probabilities of the various possible outcomes are
        – Henry
        Nov 14 at 8:55










        up vote
        4
        down vote













        If you draw the $i$ balls sequentially $$P(Wmid i)=frac{6}{10}cdotfrac{5}{9}cdotsfrac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$$
        If you draw the $i$ balls simultaneously
        $$P(Wmid i)=frac{dbinom{6}{i}cdotdbinom{4}{0}}{dbinom{10}{i}}$$ Now, can you convince yourself that these two are equivalent?






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          up vote
          4
          down vote













          If you draw the $i$ balls sequentially $$P(Wmid i)=frac{6}{10}cdotfrac{5}{9}cdotsfrac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$$
          If you draw the $i$ balls simultaneously
          $$P(Wmid i)=frac{dbinom{6}{i}cdotdbinom{4}{0}}{dbinom{10}{i}}$$ Now, can you convince yourself that these two are equivalent?






          share|cite|improve this answer























            up vote
            4
            down vote










            up vote
            4
            down vote









            If you draw the $i$ balls sequentially $$P(Wmid i)=frac{6}{10}cdotfrac{5}{9}cdotsfrac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$$
            If you draw the $i$ balls simultaneously
            $$P(Wmid i)=frac{dbinom{6}{i}cdotdbinom{4}{0}}{dbinom{10}{i}}$$ Now, can you convince yourself that these two are equivalent?






            share|cite|improve this answer












            If you draw the $i$ balls sequentially $$P(Wmid i)=frac{6}{10}cdotfrac{5}{9}cdotsfrac{6-i+1}{10-i+1}$$
            If you draw the $i$ balls simultaneously
            $$P(Wmid i)=frac{dbinom{6}{i}cdotdbinom{4}{0}}{dbinom{10}{i}}$$ Now, can you convince yourself that these two are equivalent?







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 14 at 8:17









            Jimmy R.

            32.8k42156




            32.8k42156






















                up vote
                4
                down vote













                Since I don't see it anywhere, let me address this part of your question, rather than specific case:




                how that can be true when all blue balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



                Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?




                Let's make a simple thought experiment. Let's say that rather than having indistinguishable white and black balls you have 10 balls numbered 1 to 10. Balls numbered 1 to 6 are white and those numbered 7 to 10 are black.



                Now you have 6 white balls and 4 black balls that are distinguishable. How does that change your probability?



                The numbers on balls change nothing in probability as long as the only thing you're concerned is ball colour. The resulting probability has to be the same as if there were no numbers. We may simply ignore the numbers on the balls and follow the original problem. We still have 6 white balls and 4 black balls so the old approach holds. Whatever other way you count the probability it has to provide the same result.



                But now your balls are distinguishable so you can apply methods specific to distinguishable balls, specifically use combination. The results, as shown earlier will be the same.



                This is why to indistinguishable balls you can always apply approach "Let's assume the balls are distinguishable..."






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  Since I don't see it anywhere, let me address this part of your question, rather than specific case:




                  how that can be true when all blue balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



                  Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?




                  Let's make a simple thought experiment. Let's say that rather than having indistinguishable white and black balls you have 10 balls numbered 1 to 10. Balls numbered 1 to 6 are white and those numbered 7 to 10 are black.



                  Now you have 6 white balls and 4 black balls that are distinguishable. How does that change your probability?



                  The numbers on balls change nothing in probability as long as the only thing you're concerned is ball colour. The resulting probability has to be the same as if there were no numbers. We may simply ignore the numbers on the balls and follow the original problem. We still have 6 white balls and 4 black balls so the old approach holds. Whatever other way you count the probability it has to provide the same result.



                  But now your balls are distinguishable so you can apply methods specific to distinguishable balls, specifically use combination. The results, as shown earlier will be the same.



                  This is why to indistinguishable balls you can always apply approach "Let's assume the balls are distinguishable..."






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote









                    Since I don't see it anywhere, let me address this part of your question, rather than specific case:




                    how that can be true when all blue balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



                    Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?




                    Let's make a simple thought experiment. Let's say that rather than having indistinguishable white and black balls you have 10 balls numbered 1 to 10. Balls numbered 1 to 6 are white and those numbered 7 to 10 are black.



                    Now you have 6 white balls and 4 black balls that are distinguishable. How does that change your probability?



                    The numbers on balls change nothing in probability as long as the only thing you're concerned is ball colour. The resulting probability has to be the same as if there were no numbers. We may simply ignore the numbers on the balls and follow the original problem. We still have 6 white balls and 4 black balls so the old approach holds. Whatever other way you count the probability it has to provide the same result.



                    But now your balls are distinguishable so you can apply methods specific to distinguishable balls, specifically use combination. The results, as shown earlier will be the same.



                    This is why to indistinguishable balls you can always apply approach "Let's assume the balls are distinguishable..."






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Since I don't see it anywhere, let me address this part of your question, rather than specific case:




                    how that can be true when all blue balls are identical and all black balls are identical.



                    Here, $^6C_i$ denotes the combination of $i$ different things from 6 different objects, doesn't it? How can that be used here?




                    Let's make a simple thought experiment. Let's say that rather than having indistinguishable white and black balls you have 10 balls numbered 1 to 10. Balls numbered 1 to 6 are white and those numbered 7 to 10 are black.



                    Now you have 6 white balls and 4 black balls that are distinguishable. How does that change your probability?



                    The numbers on balls change nothing in probability as long as the only thing you're concerned is ball colour. The resulting probability has to be the same as if there were no numbers. We may simply ignore the numbers on the balls and follow the original problem. We still have 6 white balls and 4 black balls so the old approach holds. Whatever other way you count the probability it has to provide the same result.



                    But now your balls are distinguishable so you can apply methods specific to distinguishable balls, specifically use combination. The results, as shown earlier will be the same.



                    This is why to indistinguishable balls you can always apply approach "Let's assume the balls are distinguishable..."







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 14 at 12:41









                    Ister

                    2116




                    2116






















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Let me answer from a different direction.



                        The reason you must use the equations which treat the balls as distinguishable is that thousands of repeated experiments have shown that the statistical behavior of all macroscopic objects is that of distinguishable items. There is no "proof" of this, since it's a physical reality. (by comparison, Bosons often do act as indistinguishable, leading to cool stuff in the super-cold regime).



                        Now, in all statistics, the wording of the question is critical (see arguments about the Monty Hall problem!). If your teacher says "Assume all balls of a given color are truly indistinguishable," then it's a theoretical problem and you basically divide by the number of permutations of distinguishable objects. But unless indistinguishability is specifically given as a premise, objects are distinguishable.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          Let me answer from a different direction.



                          The reason you must use the equations which treat the balls as distinguishable is that thousands of repeated experiments have shown that the statistical behavior of all macroscopic objects is that of distinguishable items. There is no "proof" of this, since it's a physical reality. (by comparison, Bosons often do act as indistinguishable, leading to cool stuff in the super-cold regime).



                          Now, in all statistics, the wording of the question is critical (see arguments about the Monty Hall problem!). If your teacher says "Assume all balls of a given color are truly indistinguishable," then it's a theoretical problem and you basically divide by the number of permutations of distinguishable objects. But unless indistinguishability is specifically given as a premise, objects are distinguishable.






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            Let me answer from a different direction.



                            The reason you must use the equations which treat the balls as distinguishable is that thousands of repeated experiments have shown that the statistical behavior of all macroscopic objects is that of distinguishable items. There is no "proof" of this, since it's a physical reality. (by comparison, Bosons often do act as indistinguishable, leading to cool stuff in the super-cold regime).



                            Now, in all statistics, the wording of the question is critical (see arguments about the Monty Hall problem!). If your teacher says "Assume all balls of a given color are truly indistinguishable," then it's a theoretical problem and you basically divide by the number of permutations of distinguishable objects. But unless indistinguishability is specifically given as a premise, objects are distinguishable.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            Let me answer from a different direction.



                            The reason you must use the equations which treat the balls as distinguishable is that thousands of repeated experiments have shown that the statistical behavior of all macroscopic objects is that of distinguishable items. There is no "proof" of this, since it's a physical reality. (by comparison, Bosons often do act as indistinguishable, leading to cool stuff in the super-cold regime).



                            Now, in all statistics, the wording of the question is critical (see arguments about the Monty Hall problem!). If your teacher says "Assume all balls of a given color are truly indistinguishable," then it's a theoretical problem and you basically divide by the number of permutations of distinguishable objects. But unless indistinguishability is specifically given as a premise, objects are distinguishable.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 14 at 13:40









                            Carl Witthoft

                            31118




                            31118






























                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded



















































                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997942%2fprobability-concepts-how-can-balls-of-same-colour-be-distinguishable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Morgemoulin

                                Scott Moir

                                Souastre