Non-italic (roman) subscripts in math mode











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Is there a way to set indices (subscripts) to non-italic globally? I'm aware of the case by case



X_{text{text goes here}}


But I'm having to change that across a whole document is becoming a pain.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • The following is not an answer but a remark. With text the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend using textnormal instead.
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago










  • It is possible to overload _ to do this, but it might break things. Might defining newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}} and doing a search-and-replace for _subtxt be a good alternative?
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago










  • see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
    – Ulrike Fischer
    7 hours ago










  • @Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
    – Andy Grey
    7 hours ago










  • @AndyGrey: make sure to include a space in subtxt (at the end) if your document contains things like X_a without {}.
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Is there a way to set indices (subscripts) to non-italic globally? I'm aware of the case by case



X_{text{text goes here}}


But I'm having to change that across a whole document is becoming a pain.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • The following is not an answer but a remark. With text the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend using textnormal instead.
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago










  • It is possible to overload _ to do this, but it might break things. Might defining newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}} and doing a search-and-replace for _subtxt be a good alternative?
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago










  • see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
    – Ulrike Fischer
    7 hours ago










  • @Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
    – Andy Grey
    7 hours ago










  • @AndyGrey: make sure to include a space in subtxt (at the end) if your document contains things like X_a without {}.
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











Is there a way to set indices (subscripts) to non-italic globally? I'm aware of the case by case



X_{text{text goes here}}


But I'm having to change that across a whole document is becoming a pain.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Is there a way to set indices (subscripts) to non-italic globally? I'm aware of the case by case



X_{text{text goes here}}


But I'm having to change that across a whole document is becoming a pain.







math-mode subscripts






share|improve this question









New contributor




Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Mico

272k30369756




272k30369756






New contributor




Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









Andy Grey

283




283




New contributor




Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Andy Grey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • The following is not an answer but a remark. With text the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend using textnormal instead.
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago










  • It is possible to overload _ to do this, but it might break things. Might defining newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}} and doing a search-and-replace for _subtxt be a good alternative?
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago










  • see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
    – Ulrike Fischer
    7 hours ago










  • @Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
    – Andy Grey
    7 hours ago










  • @AndyGrey: make sure to include a space in subtxt (at the end) if your document contains things like X_a without {}.
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago


















  • The following is not an answer but a remark. With text the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend using textnormal instead.
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago










  • It is possible to overload _ to do this, but it might break things. Might defining newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}} and doing a search-and-replace for _subtxt be a good alternative?
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago










  • see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
    – Ulrike Fischer
    7 hours ago










  • @Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
    – Andy Grey
    7 hours ago










  • @AndyGrey: make sure to include a space in subtxt (at the end) if your document contains things like X_a without {}.
    – Circumscribe
    7 hours ago
















The following is not an answer but a remark. With text the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend using textnormal instead.
– Circumscribe
7 hours ago




The following is not an answer but a remark. With text the font will change with the surrounding text, so it'll e.g. be italic inside a theorem environment. This is probably undesirable, so I would recommend using textnormal instead.
– Circumscribe
7 hours ago












It is possible to overload _ to do this, but it might break things. Might defining newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}} and doing a search-and-replace for _subtxt be a good alternative?
– Circumscribe
7 hours ago




It is possible to overload _ to do this, but it might break things. Might defining newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}} and doing a search-and-replace for _subtxt be a good alternative?
– Circumscribe
7 hours ago












see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
– Ulrike Fischer
7 hours ago




see e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/228606/2388
– Ulrike Fischer
7 hours ago












@Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
– Andy Grey
7 hours ago




@Circumscribe thanks! I'll give that a try!
– Andy Grey
7 hours ago












@AndyGrey: make sure to include a space in subtxt (at the end) if your document contains things like X_a without {}.
– Circumscribe
7 hours ago




@AndyGrey: make sure to include a space in subtxt (at the end) if your document contains things like X_a without {}.
– Circumscribe
7 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













It is possible to overload _ to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.



You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt) below.
Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _ to expand to subtxt whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts

begin{document}

newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}

[
X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
]

end{document}


output



Notes:




  • I'm using textnormal instead of text because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.


  • I'm using DeclareRobustCommand to redefine _ because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.



Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _ into _.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    enter image description here



    documentclass{article}

    begin{document}
    sbox0{$$}

    scriptfont1=scriptfont0


    $X_{abc}+y_{max}$


    end{document}


    Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
      – Andy Grey
      6 hours ago










    • @AndyGrey yes..
      – David Carlisle
      6 hours ago






    • 2




      What kind of sorcery is sbox0{$$} for? Just loading the math fonts?
      – Werner
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      @Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at normalsize it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
      – David Carlisle
      4 hours ago








    • 1




      $x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
      – egreg
      3 hours ago


















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _ (underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$, it's not processed by the Lua code.



    If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _ and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.



    To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff.



    enter image description here



    % !TEX TS-program = lualatex
    documentclass{article}

    usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
    usepackage{luacode}
    %% Lua-side code:
    begin{luacode}


    function sub_up ( s )
    return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
    end


    end{luacode}
    %% LaTeX-side code:
    newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
    "process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
    newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
    "process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
    AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default

    begin{document}
    $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$

    upsubOff
    $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
    end{document}





    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ? that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses (maybe you can find a way to type it easily).



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amsmath}
      usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓

      % the main command
      newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}

      % this sets up the use of ?
      begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
      AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }

      % this sets up the use of ↓
      newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}

      textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture

      begin{document}

      $x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?

      $x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?

      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer





















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "85"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Andy Grey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466411%2fnon-italic-roman-subscripts-in-math-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        6
        down vote













        It is possible to overload _ to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.



        You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt) below.
        Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _ to expand to subtxt whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).



        documentclass{article}

        usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts

        begin{document}

        newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
        DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}

        [
        X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
        ]

        end{document}


        output



        Notes:




        • I'm using textnormal instead of text because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.


        • I'm using DeclareRobustCommand to redefine _ because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.



        Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _ into _.






        share|improve this answer



























          up vote
          6
          down vote













          It is possible to overload _ to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.



          You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt) below.
          Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _ to expand to subtxt whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).



          documentclass{article}

          usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts

          begin{document}

          newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
          DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}

          [
          X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
          ]

          end{document}


          output



          Notes:




          • I'm using textnormal instead of text because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.


          • I'm using DeclareRobustCommand to redefine _ because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.



          Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _ into _.






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            6
            down vote










            up vote
            6
            down vote









            It is possible to overload _ to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.



            You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt) below.
            Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _ to expand to subtxt whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).



            documentclass{article}

            usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts

            begin{document}

            newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
            DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}

            [
            X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
            ]

            end{document}


            output



            Notes:




            • I'm using textnormal instead of text because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.


            • I'm using DeclareRobustCommand to redefine _ because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.



            Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _ into _.






            share|improve this answer














            It is possible to overload _ to set all subscripts in roman type, but that seems like a bad idea since it might break something unexpected.



            You may instead want to consider defining a macro that produces an upright subscript. I've defined such a macro (subtxt) below.
            Since it seems unlikely that you'll need underscores in math mode, I've also redefined _ to expand to subtxt whenever it is used in math mode (and to produce an underscore otherwise, like normal).



            documentclass{article}

            usepackage{amsmath} %% <- necessary for correct scaling of subscripts

            begin{document}

            newcommand*subtxt[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}
            DeclareRobustCommand_{ifmmodeexpandaftersubtxtelsetextunderscorefi}

            [
            X_i + Xsubtxt{i} + X_i + X_{text goes here}
            ]

            end{document}


            output



            Notes:




            • I'm using textnormal instead of text because the font of subscripts created with the latter command changes based on the surrounding text. You for instance probably wouldn't want all of your subscripts inside theorem environments to be in italics. See e.g. this answer for more info.


            • I'm using DeclareRobustCommand to redefine _ because the original version of this macro is also defined like that. It isn't too important, but more information can be found here.



            Unless you're using underscores for some other purpose in your document, you can now do a search-and-replace to change every _ into _.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 5 hours ago









            Circumscribe

            4,3971430




            4,3971430






















                up vote
                4
                down vote













                enter image description here



                documentclass{article}

                begin{document}
                sbox0{$$}

                scriptfont1=scriptfont0


                $X_{abc}+y_{max}$


                end{document}


                Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
                  – Andy Grey
                  6 hours ago










                • @AndyGrey yes..
                  – David Carlisle
                  6 hours ago






                • 2




                  What kind of sorcery is sbox0{$$} for? Just loading the math fonts?
                  – Werner
                  4 hours ago






                • 1




                  @Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at normalsize it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
                  – David Carlisle
                  4 hours ago








                • 1




                  $x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
                  – egreg
                  3 hours ago















                up vote
                4
                down vote













                enter image description here



                documentclass{article}

                begin{document}
                sbox0{$$}

                scriptfont1=scriptfont0


                $X_{abc}+y_{max}$


                end{document}


                Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
                  – Andy Grey
                  6 hours ago










                • @AndyGrey yes..
                  – David Carlisle
                  6 hours ago






                • 2




                  What kind of sorcery is sbox0{$$} for? Just loading the math fonts?
                  – Werner
                  4 hours ago






                • 1




                  @Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at normalsize it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
                  – David Carlisle
                  4 hours ago








                • 1




                  $x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
                  – egreg
                  3 hours ago













                up vote
                4
                down vote










                up vote
                4
                down vote









                enter image description here



                documentclass{article}

                begin{document}
                sbox0{$$}

                scriptfont1=scriptfont0


                $X_{abc}+y_{max}$


                end{document}


                Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.






                share|improve this answer












                enter image description here



                documentclass{article}

                begin{document}
                sbox0{$$}

                scriptfont1=scriptfont0


                $X_{abc}+y_{max}$


                end{document}


                Note this affects all math uses of the script size font not just subscripts.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 6 hours ago









                David Carlisle

                481k3811121848




                481k3811121848












                • Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
                  – Andy Grey
                  6 hours ago










                • @AndyGrey yes..
                  – David Carlisle
                  6 hours ago






                • 2




                  What kind of sorcery is sbox0{$$} for? Just loading the math fonts?
                  – Werner
                  4 hours ago






                • 1




                  @Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at normalsize it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
                  – David Carlisle
                  4 hours ago








                • 1




                  $x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
                  – egreg
                  3 hours ago


















                • Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
                  – Andy Grey
                  6 hours ago










                • @AndyGrey yes..
                  – David Carlisle
                  6 hours ago






                • 2




                  What kind of sorcery is sbox0{$$} for? Just loading the math fonts?
                  – Werner
                  4 hours ago






                • 1




                  @Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at normalsize it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
                  – David Carlisle
                  4 hours ago








                • 1




                  $x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
                  – egreg
                  3 hours ago
















                Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
                – Andy Grey
                6 hours ago




                Would that work for equation, align and other environments?
                – Andy Grey
                6 hours ago












                @AndyGrey yes..
                – David Carlisle
                6 hours ago




                @AndyGrey yes..
                – David Carlisle
                6 hours ago




                2




                2




                What kind of sorcery is sbox0{$$} for? Just loading the math fonts?
                – Werner
                4 hours ago




                What kind of sorcery is sbox0{$$} for? Just loading the math fonts?
                – Werner
                4 hours ago




                1




                1




                @Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at normalsize it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
                – David Carlisle
                4 hours ago






                @Werner latex delays finalizing the math setup until the first use of math at each font size, so that you can switch math fonts. actually for basic math at normalsize it probably makes no difference as things are pre-loaded, but it's a good habit to make sure...
                – David Carlisle
                4 hours ago






                1




                1




                $x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
                – egreg
                3 hours ago




                $x_{max}$ worksfootnote{But $X_{max}$ doesn't} and what about $x_{max}$?
                – egreg
                3 hours ago










                up vote
                3
                down vote













                Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _ (underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$, it's not processed by the Lua code.



                If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _ and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.



                To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff.



                enter image description here



                % !TEX TS-program = lualatex
                documentclass{article}

                usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
                usepackage{luacode}
                %% Lua-side code:
                begin{luacode}


                function sub_up ( s )
                return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
                end


                end{luacode}
                %% LaTeX-side code:
                newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
                "process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
                newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
                "process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
                AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default

                begin{document}
                $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$

                upsubOff
                $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
                end{document}





                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote













                  Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _ (underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$, it's not processed by the Lua code.



                  If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _ and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.



                  To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff.



                  enter image description here



                  % !TEX TS-program = lualatex
                  documentclass{article}

                  usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
                  usepackage{luacode}
                  %% Lua-side code:
                  begin{luacode}


                  function sub_up ( s )
                  return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
                  end


                  end{luacode}
                  %% LaTeX-side code:
                  newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
                  "process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
                  newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
                  "process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
                  AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default

                  begin{document}
                  $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$

                  upsubOff
                  $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
                  end{document}





                  share|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote









                    Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _ (underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$, it's not processed by the Lua code.



                    If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _ and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.



                    To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff.



                    enter image description here



                    % !TEX TS-program = lualatex
                    documentclass{article}

                    usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
                    usepackage{luacode}
                    %% Lua-side code:
                    begin{luacode}


                    function sub_up ( s )
                    return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
                    end


                    end{luacode}
                    %% LaTeX-side code:
                    newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
                    "process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
                    newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
                    "process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
                    AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default

                    begin{document}
                    $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$

                    upsubOff
                    $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
                    end{document}





                    share|improve this answer












                    Here's a LuaLaTeX-based solution. Subscripts enclosed by curly braces are typeset with upright ("roman") letters, as long as there's no space between the _ (underscore) character and the material enclosed in curly braces. If a subscript term is not enclosed in curly braces, e.g., $x_i$, it's not processed by the Lua code.



                    If, for some reason, you do not want to the Lua function to operate on a subscript term encased in curly braces, just make sure that there are one or more spaces between _ and the subscript term. An obvious reason for wanting to suspend operation of the Lua function would be the fact that the subscript term contains math material which should be processed in math mode.



                    To activate operations, issue the instruction upsubOn. To terminate them completely, execute upsubOff.



                    enter image description here



                    % !TEX TS-program = lualatex
                    documentclass{article}

                    usepackage{amsmath,unicode-math}
                    usepackage{luacode}
                    %% Lua-side code:
                    begin{luacode}


                    function sub_up ( s )
                    return ( s:gsub ( "_(%b{})" , "_{\textnormal%1}" ) )
                    end


                    end{luacode}
                    %% LaTeX-side code:
                    newcommandupsubOn{directlua{luatexbase.add_to_callback(
                    "process_input_buffer" , sub_up , "subup" )}}
                    newcommandupsubOff{directlua{luatexbase.remove_from_callback(
                    "process_input_buffer" , "subup" )}}
                    AtBeginDocument{upsubOn} % activate the Lua function by default

                    begin{document}
                    $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$

                    upsubOff
                    $X_{text goes here}$quad $x_ {ab cd}$quad $x_ {i_j},x_k^u$
                    end{document}






                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 4 hours ago









                    Mico

                    272k30369756




                    272k30369756






















                        up vote
                        3
                        down vote













                        I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ? that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses (maybe you can find a way to type it easily).



                        documentclass{article}
                        usepackage{amsmath}
                        usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓

                        % the main command
                        newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}

                        % this sets up the use of ?
                        begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
                        AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }

                        % this sets up the use of ↓
                        newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}

                        textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture

                        begin{document}

                        $x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?

                        $x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?

                        end{document}


                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          3
                          down vote













                          I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ? that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses (maybe you can find a way to type it easily).



                          documentclass{article}
                          usepackage{amsmath}
                          usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓

                          % the main command
                          newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}

                          % this sets up the use of ?
                          begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
                          AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }

                          % this sets up the use of ↓
                          newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}

                          textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture

                          begin{document}

                          $x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?

                          $x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?

                          end{document}


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            3
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            3
                            down vote









                            I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ? that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses (maybe you can find a way to type it easily).



                            documentclass{article}
                            usepackage{amsmath}
                            usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓

                            % the main command
                            newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}

                            % this sets up the use of ?
                            begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
                            AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }

                            % this sets up the use of ↓
                            newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}

                            textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture

                            begin{document}

                            $x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?

                            $x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?

                            end{document}


                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer












                            I suggest to use a different character for those subscripts. One way could be to use ? that's very rarely used in math mode. Another uses (maybe you can find a way to type it easily).



                            documentclass{article}
                            usepackage{amsmath}
                            usepackage{newunicodechar} % for using ↓

                            % the main command
                            newcommand{uprightsubscript}[1]{_{textnormal{#1}}}

                            % this sets up the use of ?
                            begingrouplccode`~=`?lowercase{endgrouplet~}uprightsubscript
                            AtBeginDocument{mathcode`?="8000 }

                            % this sets up the use of ↓
                            newunicodechar{↓}{uprightsubscript}

                            textheight=2cm % just for making a smaller picture

                            begin{document}

                            $x?{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x?{max}$} and again $x?{max}$?

                            $x↓{max}$ worksfootnote{Also here $x↓{max}$} and again $x↓{max}$?

                            end{document}


                            enter image description here







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 3 hours ago









                            egreg

                            705k8618773157




                            705k8618773157






















                                Andy Grey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Andy Grey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Andy Grey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Andy Grey is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466411%2fnon-italic-roman-subscripts-in-math-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                List directoties down one level, excluding some named directories and files

                                list processes belonging to a network namespace

                                list systemd RuntimeDirectory mounts