Why is “the” used here? I would use not article in this dialog
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It upsets Sheldon when you play with the food...It upsets Sheldon when you play with the Sheldon. First sentence I kinda can justify the, second one - just don't get it.
(The big bang theory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCK6ZwpNICQ)
articles
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It upsets Sheldon when you play with the food...It upsets Sheldon when you play with the Sheldon. First sentence I kinda can justify the, second one - just don't get it.
(The big bang theory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCK6ZwpNICQ)
articles
New contributor
1
It's used for comedic effect. While correct grammar prohibitsthe
before a person's name; by usingthe
Sheldon is given the status of an object, a robot. It has the added advantage of being a symmetrical callback to the last line.
– Tushar Raj
Dec 7 at 10:21
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
It upsets Sheldon when you play with the food...It upsets Sheldon when you play with the Sheldon. First sentence I kinda can justify the, second one - just don't get it.
(The big bang theory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCK6ZwpNICQ)
articles
New contributor
It upsets Sheldon when you play with the food...It upsets Sheldon when you play with the Sheldon. First sentence I kinda can justify the, second one - just don't get it.
(The big bang theory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCK6ZwpNICQ)
articles
articles
New contributor
New contributor
edited Dec 7 at 10:19
Tushar Raj
17.7k863111
17.7k863111
New contributor
asked Dec 7 at 7:42
Oksana
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
1
It's used for comedic effect. While correct grammar prohibitsthe
before a person's name; by usingthe
Sheldon is given the status of an object, a robot. It has the added advantage of being a symmetrical callback to the last line.
– Tushar Raj
Dec 7 at 10:21
add a comment |
1
It's used for comedic effect. While correct grammar prohibitsthe
before a person's name; by usingthe
Sheldon is given the status of an object, a robot. It has the added advantage of being a symmetrical callback to the last line.
– Tushar Raj
Dec 7 at 10:21
1
1
It's used for comedic effect. While correct grammar prohibits
the
before a person's name; by using the
Sheldon is given the status of an object, a robot. It has the added advantage of being a symmetrical callback to the last line.– Tushar Raj
Dec 7 at 10:21
It's used for comedic effect. While correct grammar prohibits
the
before a person's name; by using the
Sheldon is given the status of an object, a robot. It has the added advantage of being a symmetrical callback to the last line.– Tushar Raj
Dec 7 at 10:21
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It's just a jokey continuation of the conversation. Prior to this there are several instances where they say, "It upsets Sheldon when you play with the X."
It also jokingly insinuates that there is only one 'Sheldon' in the world and at the same time dehumanises him somewhat.
Thanks a lot! It was very helpful.
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
'the' is known as the definite article (as opposed to the indefinite 'a' or 'an') and implies that something is special, important, significant or one of a kind. You can't go to an Eiffel Tower, but you can go to the Eiffel tower. Often in speech we misuse this article in order to imply that something is more important than it is. 'the Sheldon' is probably mocking Sheldon's self-important perspective of himself.
It's also a rhetorical technique known as parallelism, to emphasise the place value of the word as an object in the sentence.
Thank you very much, Joseph!
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
The definite article does not in any way imply that something special, important or one of a kind. It only implies that the thing you’re talking about is expected to be familiar and recognisable by the listener in the scope of the current conversation. For example, in your last sentence, you use it no less than three times (“the place value” [whatever exactly that is], “the word”, and “the sentence”), none of which denote things that are special, important, or one of a kind.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 7 at 17:13
To Oksana: no worries, glad it helped. @JanusBahsJacquet you're absolutely correct (in certain contexts, including this), but that level of detail isn't really necessary for a question like this - the asker is interested in an aberration in normal speech patterns, not detailed grammatical laws. Saying that 'the' means something specific (i.e. special) is as good as saying that it defines it as familiar/recognisable/ specific. Thanks for pointing it out, but I don't think any amendment is called for.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:28
@JanusBahsJacquet in other contexts, you get constructions like 'the one and only', which more clearly demonstrates how 'the' makes something special. He was the one. Worship a god, I'll worship the God. It's not common, but when 'the' is used out of place - such as the Sheldon, it can imply uniqueness.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:35
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
It's just a jokey continuation of the conversation. Prior to this there are several instances where they say, "It upsets Sheldon when you play with the X."
It also jokingly insinuates that there is only one 'Sheldon' in the world and at the same time dehumanises him somewhat.
Thanks a lot! It was very helpful.
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
It's just a jokey continuation of the conversation. Prior to this there are several instances where they say, "It upsets Sheldon when you play with the X."
It also jokingly insinuates that there is only one 'Sheldon' in the world and at the same time dehumanises him somewhat.
Thanks a lot! It was very helpful.
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
It's just a jokey continuation of the conversation. Prior to this there are several instances where they say, "It upsets Sheldon when you play with the X."
It also jokingly insinuates that there is only one 'Sheldon' in the world and at the same time dehumanises him somewhat.
It's just a jokey continuation of the conversation. Prior to this there are several instances where they say, "It upsets Sheldon when you play with the X."
It also jokingly insinuates that there is only one 'Sheldon' in the world and at the same time dehumanises him somewhat.
answered Dec 7 at 10:22
chasly from UK
22.7k13068
22.7k13068
Thanks a lot! It was very helpful.
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
add a comment |
Thanks a lot! It was very helpful.
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
Thanks a lot! It was very helpful.
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
Thanks a lot! It was very helpful.
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
'the' is known as the definite article (as opposed to the indefinite 'a' or 'an') and implies that something is special, important, significant or one of a kind. You can't go to an Eiffel Tower, but you can go to the Eiffel tower. Often in speech we misuse this article in order to imply that something is more important than it is. 'the Sheldon' is probably mocking Sheldon's self-important perspective of himself.
It's also a rhetorical technique known as parallelism, to emphasise the place value of the word as an object in the sentence.
Thank you very much, Joseph!
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
The definite article does not in any way imply that something special, important or one of a kind. It only implies that the thing you’re talking about is expected to be familiar and recognisable by the listener in the scope of the current conversation. For example, in your last sentence, you use it no less than three times (“the place value” [whatever exactly that is], “the word”, and “the sentence”), none of which denote things that are special, important, or one of a kind.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 7 at 17:13
To Oksana: no worries, glad it helped. @JanusBahsJacquet you're absolutely correct (in certain contexts, including this), but that level of detail isn't really necessary for a question like this - the asker is interested in an aberration in normal speech patterns, not detailed grammatical laws. Saying that 'the' means something specific (i.e. special) is as good as saying that it defines it as familiar/recognisable/ specific. Thanks for pointing it out, but I don't think any amendment is called for.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:28
@JanusBahsJacquet in other contexts, you get constructions like 'the one and only', which more clearly demonstrates how 'the' makes something special. He was the one. Worship a god, I'll worship the God. It's not common, but when 'the' is used out of place - such as the Sheldon, it can imply uniqueness.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:35
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
'the' is known as the definite article (as opposed to the indefinite 'a' or 'an') and implies that something is special, important, significant or one of a kind. You can't go to an Eiffel Tower, but you can go to the Eiffel tower. Often in speech we misuse this article in order to imply that something is more important than it is. 'the Sheldon' is probably mocking Sheldon's self-important perspective of himself.
It's also a rhetorical technique known as parallelism, to emphasise the place value of the word as an object in the sentence.
Thank you very much, Joseph!
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
The definite article does not in any way imply that something special, important or one of a kind. It only implies that the thing you’re talking about is expected to be familiar and recognisable by the listener in the scope of the current conversation. For example, in your last sentence, you use it no less than three times (“the place value” [whatever exactly that is], “the word”, and “the sentence”), none of which denote things that are special, important, or one of a kind.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 7 at 17:13
To Oksana: no worries, glad it helped. @JanusBahsJacquet you're absolutely correct (in certain contexts, including this), but that level of detail isn't really necessary for a question like this - the asker is interested in an aberration in normal speech patterns, not detailed grammatical laws. Saying that 'the' means something specific (i.e. special) is as good as saying that it defines it as familiar/recognisable/ specific. Thanks for pointing it out, but I don't think any amendment is called for.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:28
@JanusBahsJacquet in other contexts, you get constructions like 'the one and only', which more clearly demonstrates how 'the' makes something special. He was the one. Worship a god, I'll worship the God. It's not common, but when 'the' is used out of place - such as the Sheldon, it can imply uniqueness.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:35
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
'the' is known as the definite article (as opposed to the indefinite 'a' or 'an') and implies that something is special, important, significant or one of a kind. You can't go to an Eiffel Tower, but you can go to the Eiffel tower. Often in speech we misuse this article in order to imply that something is more important than it is. 'the Sheldon' is probably mocking Sheldon's self-important perspective of himself.
It's also a rhetorical technique known as parallelism, to emphasise the place value of the word as an object in the sentence.
'the' is known as the definite article (as opposed to the indefinite 'a' or 'an') and implies that something is special, important, significant or one of a kind. You can't go to an Eiffel Tower, but you can go to the Eiffel tower. Often in speech we misuse this article in order to imply that something is more important than it is. 'the Sheldon' is probably mocking Sheldon's self-important perspective of himself.
It's also a rhetorical technique known as parallelism, to emphasise the place value of the word as an object in the sentence.
answered Dec 7 at 10:26
Joseph Paduch
1206
1206
Thank you very much, Joseph!
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
The definite article does not in any way imply that something special, important or one of a kind. It only implies that the thing you’re talking about is expected to be familiar and recognisable by the listener in the scope of the current conversation. For example, in your last sentence, you use it no less than three times (“the place value” [whatever exactly that is], “the word”, and “the sentence”), none of which denote things that are special, important, or one of a kind.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 7 at 17:13
To Oksana: no worries, glad it helped. @JanusBahsJacquet you're absolutely correct (in certain contexts, including this), but that level of detail isn't really necessary for a question like this - the asker is interested in an aberration in normal speech patterns, not detailed grammatical laws. Saying that 'the' means something specific (i.e. special) is as good as saying that it defines it as familiar/recognisable/ specific. Thanks for pointing it out, but I don't think any amendment is called for.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:28
@JanusBahsJacquet in other contexts, you get constructions like 'the one and only', which more clearly demonstrates how 'the' makes something special. He was the one. Worship a god, I'll worship the God. It's not common, but when 'the' is used out of place - such as the Sheldon, it can imply uniqueness.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:35
add a comment |
Thank you very much, Joseph!
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
The definite article does not in any way imply that something special, important or one of a kind. It only implies that the thing you’re talking about is expected to be familiar and recognisable by the listener in the scope of the current conversation. For example, in your last sentence, you use it no less than three times (“the place value” [whatever exactly that is], “the word”, and “the sentence”), none of which denote things that are special, important, or one of a kind.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 7 at 17:13
To Oksana: no worries, glad it helped. @JanusBahsJacquet you're absolutely correct (in certain contexts, including this), but that level of detail isn't really necessary for a question like this - the asker is interested in an aberration in normal speech patterns, not detailed grammatical laws. Saying that 'the' means something specific (i.e. special) is as good as saying that it defines it as familiar/recognisable/ specific. Thanks for pointing it out, but I don't think any amendment is called for.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:28
@JanusBahsJacquet in other contexts, you get constructions like 'the one and only', which more clearly demonstrates how 'the' makes something special. He was the one. Worship a god, I'll worship the God. It's not common, but when 'the' is used out of place - such as the Sheldon, it can imply uniqueness.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:35
Thank you very much, Joseph!
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
Thank you very much, Joseph!
– Oksana
Dec 7 at 11:15
The definite article does not in any way imply that something special, important or one of a kind. It only implies that the thing you’re talking about is expected to be familiar and recognisable by the listener in the scope of the current conversation. For example, in your last sentence, you use it no less than three times (“the place value” [whatever exactly that is], “the word”, and “the sentence”), none of which denote things that are special, important, or one of a kind.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 7 at 17:13
The definite article does not in any way imply that something special, important or one of a kind. It only implies that the thing you’re talking about is expected to be familiar and recognisable by the listener in the scope of the current conversation. For example, in your last sentence, you use it no less than three times (“the place value” [whatever exactly that is], “the word”, and “the sentence”), none of which denote things that are special, important, or one of a kind.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
Dec 7 at 17:13
To Oksana: no worries, glad it helped. @JanusBahsJacquet you're absolutely correct (in certain contexts, including this), but that level of detail isn't really necessary for a question like this - the asker is interested in an aberration in normal speech patterns, not detailed grammatical laws. Saying that 'the' means something specific (i.e. special) is as good as saying that it defines it as familiar/recognisable/ specific. Thanks for pointing it out, but I don't think any amendment is called for.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:28
To Oksana: no worries, glad it helped. @JanusBahsJacquet you're absolutely correct (in certain contexts, including this), but that level of detail isn't really necessary for a question like this - the asker is interested in an aberration in normal speech patterns, not detailed grammatical laws. Saying that 'the' means something specific (i.e. special) is as good as saying that it defines it as familiar/recognisable/ specific. Thanks for pointing it out, but I don't think any amendment is called for.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:28
@JanusBahsJacquet in other contexts, you get constructions like 'the one and only', which more clearly demonstrates how 'the' makes something special. He was the one. Worship a god, I'll worship the God. It's not common, but when 'the' is used out of place - such as the Sheldon, it can imply uniqueness.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:35
@JanusBahsJacquet in other contexts, you get constructions like 'the one and only', which more clearly demonstrates how 'the' makes something special. He was the one. Worship a god, I'll worship the God. It's not common, but when 'the' is used out of place - such as the Sheldon, it can imply uniqueness.
– Joseph Paduch
Dec 8 at 8:35
add a comment |
Oksana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Oksana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Oksana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Oksana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475951%2fwhy-is-the-used-here-i-would-use-not-article-in-this-dialog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
It's used for comedic effect. While correct grammar prohibits
the
before a person's name; by usingthe
Sheldon is given the status of an object, a robot. It has the added advantage of being a symmetrical callback to the last line.– Tushar Raj
Dec 7 at 10:21