Future simple or present simple?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Which one is the correct sentence?
- If you need a dictionary, I'll lend you mine.
- If you need a dictionary, I lend you mine.
present-tense conditional-future
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Which one is the correct sentence?
- If you need a dictionary, I'll lend you mine.
- If you need a dictionary, I lend you mine.
present-tense conditional-future
New contributor
"I lend" would be ungrammatical. However, it will work in speech because it sounds the same as "I'll lend." Ha!
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:22
2
"I lend" is perfectly grammatical, but it is used in different circumstances. With "I lend" this is timeless or habitual. It could follow something like "Every week we go to French class, but we share our books". In the context the OP probably means, it has to be "I'll lend".
– Colin Fine
Dec 5 at 10:36
Hi Ana, you may not be aware that our other site English Language Learners is the best place to look for answers on English questions that a fluent speaker would find trivial. If you have a question for ELL, be sure to read their guidance on what you can ask. :-)
– Chappo
Dec 5 at 11:08
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Which one is the correct sentence?
- If you need a dictionary, I'll lend you mine.
- If you need a dictionary, I lend you mine.
present-tense conditional-future
New contributor
Which one is the correct sentence?
- If you need a dictionary, I'll lend you mine.
- If you need a dictionary, I lend you mine.
present-tense conditional-future
present-tense conditional-future
New contributor
New contributor
edited Dec 5 at 10:25
Kris
32.3k541116
32.3k541116
New contributor
asked Dec 5 at 10:19
Ana Clara
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
"I lend" would be ungrammatical. However, it will work in speech because it sounds the same as "I'll lend." Ha!
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:22
2
"I lend" is perfectly grammatical, but it is used in different circumstances. With "I lend" this is timeless or habitual. It could follow something like "Every week we go to French class, but we share our books". In the context the OP probably means, it has to be "I'll lend".
– Colin Fine
Dec 5 at 10:36
Hi Ana, you may not be aware that our other site English Language Learners is the best place to look for answers on English questions that a fluent speaker would find trivial. If you have a question for ELL, be sure to read their guidance on what you can ask. :-)
– Chappo
Dec 5 at 11:08
add a comment |
"I lend" would be ungrammatical. However, it will work in speech because it sounds the same as "I'll lend." Ha!
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:22
2
"I lend" is perfectly grammatical, but it is used in different circumstances. With "I lend" this is timeless or habitual. It could follow something like "Every week we go to French class, but we share our books". In the context the OP probably means, it has to be "I'll lend".
– Colin Fine
Dec 5 at 10:36
Hi Ana, you may not be aware that our other site English Language Learners is the best place to look for answers on English questions that a fluent speaker would find trivial. If you have a question for ELL, be sure to read their guidance on what you can ask. :-)
– Chappo
Dec 5 at 11:08
"I lend" would be ungrammatical. However, it will work in speech because it sounds the same as "I'll lend." Ha!
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:22
"I lend" would be ungrammatical. However, it will work in speech because it sounds the same as "I'll lend." Ha!
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:22
2
2
"I lend" is perfectly grammatical, but it is used in different circumstances. With "I lend" this is timeless or habitual. It could follow something like "Every week we go to French class, but we share our books". In the context the OP probably means, it has to be "I'll lend".
– Colin Fine
Dec 5 at 10:36
"I lend" is perfectly grammatical, but it is used in different circumstances. With "I lend" this is timeless or habitual. It could follow something like "Every week we go to French class, but we share our books". In the context the OP probably means, it has to be "I'll lend".
– Colin Fine
Dec 5 at 10:36
Hi Ana, you may not be aware that our other site English Language Learners is the best place to look for answers on English questions that a fluent speaker would find trivial. If you have a question for ELL, be sure to read their guidance on what you can ask. :-)
– Chappo
Dec 5 at 11:08
Hi Ana, you may not be aware that our other site English Language Learners is the best place to look for answers on English questions that a fluent speaker would find trivial. If you have a question for ELL, be sure to read their guidance on what you can ask. :-)
– Chappo
Dec 5 at 11:08
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Both sentences are grammatically correct because they are of different types.
The first one is 'First Conditional'. It refers to real future situations. The verb form in the main clause is usually in the so called 'Future Simple Tense' /will and the bare Infinitive/ or there is a modal complex predicate /must, may, etc. and bare Infinitive/.
The second one is 'Zero Conditional'. It refers to permanent situations which are always true. The verb form in the main clause is in one of the Present Tenses /nearly always the Present Simple/.
In fact, however, the two sentences would not be distinguishable in normal speech; I'll lend you mine sounds just like I lend you mine because of the contraction. So there is only a difference in writing, and that's not likely for a sentence like this one.
– John Lawler
Dec 5 at 23:40
1
I agree. Thee are no geminates in contemporary English pronunciation.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 3:12
(Well, except for incidental ones like bookcase and hat-tip.)
– John Lawler
Dec 6 at 17:43
1
Yes. I meant only linking words in speech, not compounds.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 18:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Both sentences are grammatically correct because they are of different types.
The first one is 'First Conditional'. It refers to real future situations. The verb form in the main clause is usually in the so called 'Future Simple Tense' /will and the bare Infinitive/ or there is a modal complex predicate /must, may, etc. and bare Infinitive/.
The second one is 'Zero Conditional'. It refers to permanent situations which are always true. The verb form in the main clause is in one of the Present Tenses /nearly always the Present Simple/.
In fact, however, the two sentences would not be distinguishable in normal speech; I'll lend you mine sounds just like I lend you mine because of the contraction. So there is only a difference in writing, and that's not likely for a sentence like this one.
– John Lawler
Dec 5 at 23:40
1
I agree. Thee are no geminates in contemporary English pronunciation.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 3:12
(Well, except for incidental ones like bookcase and hat-tip.)
– John Lawler
Dec 6 at 17:43
1
Yes. I meant only linking words in speech, not compounds.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 18:26
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Both sentences are grammatically correct because they are of different types.
The first one is 'First Conditional'. It refers to real future situations. The verb form in the main clause is usually in the so called 'Future Simple Tense' /will and the bare Infinitive/ or there is a modal complex predicate /must, may, etc. and bare Infinitive/.
The second one is 'Zero Conditional'. It refers to permanent situations which are always true. The verb form in the main clause is in one of the Present Tenses /nearly always the Present Simple/.
In fact, however, the two sentences would not be distinguishable in normal speech; I'll lend you mine sounds just like I lend you mine because of the contraction. So there is only a difference in writing, and that's not likely for a sentence like this one.
– John Lawler
Dec 5 at 23:40
1
I agree. Thee are no geminates in contemporary English pronunciation.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 3:12
(Well, except for incidental ones like bookcase and hat-tip.)
– John Lawler
Dec 6 at 17:43
1
Yes. I meant only linking words in speech, not compounds.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 18:26
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Both sentences are grammatically correct because they are of different types.
The first one is 'First Conditional'. It refers to real future situations. The verb form in the main clause is usually in the so called 'Future Simple Tense' /will and the bare Infinitive/ or there is a modal complex predicate /must, may, etc. and bare Infinitive/.
The second one is 'Zero Conditional'. It refers to permanent situations which are always true. The verb form in the main clause is in one of the Present Tenses /nearly always the Present Simple/.
Both sentences are grammatically correct because they are of different types.
The first one is 'First Conditional'. It refers to real future situations. The verb form in the main clause is usually in the so called 'Future Simple Tense' /will and the bare Infinitive/ or there is a modal complex predicate /must, may, etc. and bare Infinitive/.
The second one is 'Zero Conditional'. It refers to permanent situations which are always true. The verb form in the main clause is in one of the Present Tenses /nearly always the Present Simple/.
answered Dec 5 at 11:10
user307254
77119
77119
In fact, however, the two sentences would not be distinguishable in normal speech; I'll lend you mine sounds just like I lend you mine because of the contraction. So there is only a difference in writing, and that's not likely for a sentence like this one.
– John Lawler
Dec 5 at 23:40
1
I agree. Thee are no geminates in contemporary English pronunciation.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 3:12
(Well, except for incidental ones like bookcase and hat-tip.)
– John Lawler
Dec 6 at 17:43
1
Yes. I meant only linking words in speech, not compounds.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 18:26
add a comment |
In fact, however, the two sentences would not be distinguishable in normal speech; I'll lend you mine sounds just like I lend you mine because of the contraction. So there is only a difference in writing, and that's not likely for a sentence like this one.
– John Lawler
Dec 5 at 23:40
1
I agree. Thee are no geminates in contemporary English pronunciation.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 3:12
(Well, except for incidental ones like bookcase and hat-tip.)
– John Lawler
Dec 6 at 17:43
1
Yes. I meant only linking words in speech, not compounds.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 18:26
In fact, however, the two sentences would not be distinguishable in normal speech; I'll lend you mine sounds just like I lend you mine because of the contraction. So there is only a difference in writing, and that's not likely for a sentence like this one.
– John Lawler
Dec 5 at 23:40
In fact, however, the two sentences would not be distinguishable in normal speech; I'll lend you mine sounds just like I lend you mine because of the contraction. So there is only a difference in writing, and that's not likely for a sentence like this one.
– John Lawler
Dec 5 at 23:40
1
1
I agree. Thee are no geminates in contemporary English pronunciation.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 3:12
I agree. Thee are no geminates in contemporary English pronunciation.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 3:12
(Well, except for incidental ones like bookcase and hat-tip.)
– John Lawler
Dec 6 at 17:43
(Well, except for incidental ones like bookcase and hat-tip.)
– John Lawler
Dec 6 at 17:43
1
1
Yes. I meant only linking words in speech, not compounds.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 18:26
Yes. I meant only linking words in speech, not compounds.
– user307254
Dec 6 at 18:26
add a comment |
Ana Clara is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ana Clara is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ana Clara is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ana Clara is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475693%2ffuture-simple-or-present-simple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"I lend" would be ungrammatical. However, it will work in speech because it sounds the same as "I'll lend." Ha!
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:22
2
"I lend" is perfectly grammatical, but it is used in different circumstances. With "I lend" this is timeless or habitual. It could follow something like "Every week we go to French class, but we share our books". In the context the OP probably means, it has to be "I'll lend".
– Colin Fine
Dec 5 at 10:36
Hi Ana, you may not be aware that our other site English Language Learners is the best place to look for answers on English questions that a fluent speaker would find trivial. If you have a question for ELL, be sure to read their guidance on what you can ask. :-)
– Chappo
Dec 5 at 11:08