What is the meaning of “sexual predication”? [on hold]

up vote
-1
down vote

favorite

The sexual predication of the individual is fundamental to his/her personhood.

asked Dec 5 at 9:28

BeatsMe

12719

put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles Dec 5 at 19:04

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 9:50

@TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:03

1

@Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 10:06

1

A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
– michael.hor257k
Dec 5 at 10:19

add a comment |

up vote
-1
down vote

favorite

The sexual predication of the individual is fundamental to his/her personhood.

asked Dec 5 at 9:28

BeatsMe

12719

put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles Dec 5 at 19:04

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 9:50

@TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:03

1

@Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 10:06

1

A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
– michael.hor257k
Dec 5 at 10:19

add a comment |

up vote
-1
down vote

favorite

The sexual predication of the individual is fundamental to his/her personhood.

asked Dec 5 at 9:28

BeatsMe

12719

The sexual predication of the individual is fundamental to his/her personhood.

meaning

asked Dec 5 at 9:28

BeatsMe

12719

asked Dec 5 at 9:28

BeatsMe

12719

asked Dec 5 at 9:28

BeatsMe

12719

asked Dec 5 at 9:28

BeatsMe

12719

asked Dec 5 at 9:28

BeatsMe

12719

put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles Dec 5 at 19:04

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles Dec 5 at 19:04

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

"Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 9:50

@TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:03

1

@Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 10:06

1

A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
– michael.hor257k
Dec 5 at 10:19

add a comment |

1

The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 9:50

@TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:03

1

@Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 10:06

1

A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
– michael.hor257k
Dec 5 at 10:19

The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 9:50

@TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:03

@Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 10:06

A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
– michael.hor257k
Dec 5 at 10:19

add a comment |

active

oldest

votes

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Cfrtjryk