What is the meaning of “sexual predication”? [on hold]











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












The sexual predication of the individual is fundamental to his/her personhood.










share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles Dec 5 at 19:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
    – TripeHound
    Dec 5 at 9:50










  • @TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
    – Kris
    Dec 5 at 10:03






  • 1




    @Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
    – TripeHound
    Dec 5 at 10:06






  • 1




    A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
    – michael.hor257k
    Dec 5 at 10:19















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












The sexual predication of the individual is fundamental to his/her personhood.










share|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles Dec 5 at 19:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
    – TripeHound
    Dec 5 at 9:50










  • @TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
    – Kris
    Dec 5 at 10:03






  • 1




    @Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
    – TripeHound
    Dec 5 at 10:06






  • 1




    A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
    – michael.hor257k
    Dec 5 at 10:19













up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











The sexual predication of the individual is fundamental to his/her personhood.










share|improve this question













The sexual predication of the individual is fundamental to his/her personhood.







meaning






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 5 at 9:28









BeatsMe

12719




12719




put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles Dec 5 at 19:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles Dec 5 at 19:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – J. Taylor, GEdgar, bookmanu, Jason Bassford, Mark Beadles

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
    – TripeHound
    Dec 5 at 9:50










  • @TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
    – Kris
    Dec 5 at 10:03






  • 1




    @Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
    – TripeHound
    Dec 5 at 10:06






  • 1




    A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
    – michael.hor257k
    Dec 5 at 10:19














  • 1




    The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
    – TripeHound
    Dec 5 at 9:50










  • @TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
    – Kris
    Dec 5 at 10:03






  • 1




    @Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
    – TripeHound
    Dec 5 at 10:06






  • 1




    A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
    – michael.hor257k
    Dec 5 at 10:19








1




1




The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 9:50




The definitions of both words are freely available: you should edit your question to explain what doubts you have about their combined meaning. It may also help to quote a longer section of the text from which I assume this sentence is taken.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 9:50












@TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:03




@TripeHound Phrases such as this do not merely reflect the juxtaposition of their constituents' meanings. This is a question for sociology-psychology related SE.
– Kris
Dec 5 at 10:03




1




1




@Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 10:06




@Kris No, which is why I suggested a wider context may help. However, I think – as part of "required research" – questioners should indicate how, in that larger context, a simple juxtaposition isn't working for them.
– TripeHound
Dec 5 at 10:06




1




1




A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
– michael.hor257k
Dec 5 at 10:19




A simple juxtaposition isn't working for me either. And searching for "sexual predication" returns this very page as the top result. There are a handful of results from Books, but none too revealing.
– michael.hor257k
Dec 5 at 10:19















active

oldest

votes






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

Morgemoulin

Scott Moir

Souastre