Countable Attributive nouns in plural context
There are a lot of topics about this question. All of them explain the form (plural, singular) of the attributive noun coupled with a main noun in the singular form, for example:
- ladies room
- steel bridge
To show the plural form, we should change the form of the main noun (right?), that is:
- ladies rooms (many rooms for ladies)
- steel bridges (many bridges)
I've discovered a pattern: in most cases, such nouns are compounded with an uncountable attributive noun. But when we try to modify the main noun with an uncountable noun, and want to show plural form, it leads to ambiguity. For instance:
subnet identifiers
In this case, subnet has several identifiers. But if I want to show that there is more than one subnet, and that each (one) of them has several identifiers, is it correct to write:
subnets identifiers
Or in such situations, should I prepositional expression, such as:
identifiers of subnets
grammar attributive-nouns
edited 11 hours ago
Carly
1,489213
asked 14 hours ago
Ilya Zlobin
345
add a comment |
There are a lot of topics about this question. All of them explain the form (plural, singular) of the attributive noun coupled with a main noun in the singular form, for example:
- ladies room
- steel bridge
To show the plural form, we should change the form of the main noun (right?), that is:
- ladies rooms (many rooms for ladies)
- steel bridges (many bridges)
I've discovered a pattern: in most cases, such nouns are compounded with an uncountable attributive noun. But when we try to modify the main noun with an uncountable noun, and want to show plural form, it leads to ambiguity. For instance:
subnet identifiers
In this case, subnet has several identifiers. But if I want to show that there is more than one subnet, and that each (one) of them has several identifiers, is it correct to write:
subnets identifiers
Or in such situations, should I prepositional expression, such as:
identifiers of subnets
grammar attributive-nouns
edited 11 hours ago
Carly
1,489213
asked 14 hours ago
Ilya Zlobin
345
add a comment |
There are a lot of topics about this question. All of them explain the form (plural, singular) of the attributive noun coupled with a main noun in the singular form, for example:
- ladies room
- steel bridge
To show the plural form, we should change the form of the main noun (right?), that is:
- ladies rooms (many rooms for ladies)
- steel bridges (many bridges)
I've discovered a pattern: in most cases, such nouns are compounded with an uncountable attributive noun. But when we try to modify the main noun with an uncountable noun, and want to show plural form, it leads to ambiguity. For instance:
subnet identifiers
In this case, subnet has several identifiers. But if I want to show that there is more than one subnet, and that each (one) of them has several identifiers, is it correct to write:
subnets identifiers
Or in such situations, should I prepositional expression, such as:
identifiers of subnets
grammar attributive-nouns
edited 11 hours ago
Carly
1,489213
asked 14 hours ago
Ilya Zlobin
345
There are a lot of topics about this question. All of them explain the form (plural, singular) of the attributive noun coupled with a main noun in the singular form, for example:
- ladies room
- steel bridge
To show the plural form, we should change the form of the main noun (right?), that is:
- ladies rooms (many rooms for ladies)
- steel bridges (many bridges)
I've discovered a pattern: in most cases, such nouns are compounded with an uncountable attributive noun. But when we try to modify the main noun with an uncountable noun, and want to show plural form, it leads to ambiguity. For instance:
subnet identifiers
In this case, subnet has several identifiers. But if I want to show that there is more than one subnet, and that each (one) of them has several identifiers, is it correct to write:
subnets identifiers
Or in such situations, should I prepositional expression, such as:
identifiers of subnets
grammar attributive-nouns
grammar attributive-nouns
edited 11 hours ago
Carly
1,489213
asked 14 hours ago
Ilya Zlobin
345
edited 11 hours ago
Carly
1,489213
asked 14 hours ago
Ilya Zlobin
345
edited 11 hours ago
Carly
1,489213
edited 11 hours ago
Carly
1,489213
edited 11 hours ago
Carly
1,489213
1,489213
asked 14 hours ago
Ilya Zlobin
345
asked 14 hours ago
Ilya Zlobin
345
asked 14 hours ago
Ilya Zlobin
345
345
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
When dealing with objects that aren't people, like subnets, the only correct way is the last one. The usage of the apostrophe ' can be used if and only if we talk about people's possessions. However, if your object is daughters then the only correct way would be daughters' identifiers.
So use the apostrophe when referring to humans and use of when referring to inanimate objects.
answered 14 hours ago
tyler1
832
New contributor
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478730%2fcountable-attributive-nouns-in-plural-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
When dealing with objects that aren't people, like subnets, the only correct way is the last one. The usage of the apostrophe ' can be used if and only if we talk about people's possessions. However, if your object is daughters then the only correct way would be daughters' identifiers.
So use the apostrophe when referring to humans and use of when referring to inanimate objects.
answered 14 hours ago
tyler1
832
New contributor
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
When dealing with objects that aren't people, like subnets, the only correct way is the last one. The usage of the apostrophe ' can be used if and only if we talk about people's possessions. However, if your object is daughters then the only correct way would be daughters' identifiers.
So use the apostrophe when referring to humans and use of when referring to inanimate objects.
answered 14 hours ago
tyler1
832
New contributor
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
When dealing with objects that aren't people, like subnets, the only correct way is the last one. The usage of the apostrophe ' can be used if and only if we talk about people's possessions. However, if your object is daughters then the only correct way would be daughters' identifiers.
So use the apostrophe when referring to humans and use of when referring to inanimate objects.
answered 14 hours ago
tyler1
832
New contributor
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
When dealing with objects that aren't people, like subnets, the only correct way is the last one. The usage of the apostrophe ' can be used if and only if we talk about people's possessions. However, if your object is daughters then the only correct way would be daughters' identifiers.
So use the apostrophe when referring to humans and use of when referring to inanimate objects.
answered 14 hours ago
tyler1
832
New contributor
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 14 hours ago
tyler1
832
New contributor
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 14 hours ago
tyler1
832
answered 14 hours ago
tyler1
832
832
New contributor
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
tyler1 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478730%2fcountable-attributive-nouns-in-plural-context%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
