Why do immortals not use any neck armour in Highlander (1986)?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
21
down vote

favorite












An Immortal in Highlander can die only if decapitated. That is their only vulnerable point in a sword fight. (I stick to the canon of the original Highlander, as in Highlander V we see immortals resurrecting after they die.)



I think it is extremely unwise not to protect the neck with any kind of armour - especially when being able to prepare for a fight. The importance of protecting the neck has been recognised by mortals - they used gorgets, aventails, bevors, etc.



Why is the use of such protection uncommon among Immortals?





In case of any inconsistencies I consider only the original (1986) movie canon.





In the original movie Immortals do not die and resurrect, they also do not lose consciousness when stabbed, impaled, drowned etc.:




  • Neither Ramirez nor Kurgan lost consciousness when impaled,

  • Connor walks underwater,

  • Connor stabs his heart proving he is immortal to Brenda, but does not fall to the floor (he just kneels).










share|improve this question




















  • 5




    In the movies but also in the series, if an immortal is say stubbed in the chest during the fight, they will be rendered unconscious. Then, their opponent can easily remove the neck armor and decapitate them. So really, there's no advantage of wearing the armor in the first place, as it might hinder them during the fight.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 27




    I choose to ignore anything other than the movie as There can only be one
    – Peter M
    2 days ago






  • 1




    There's a fair amount of discussion at tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander although nothing official.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Maybe, being immortal, they reach a point where they've lived long enough that they don't really care as much about dying. After all, if you have to spend your whole life sword fighting people for survival, who wants to live forever?
    – Steve-O
    2 days ago






  • 4




    @abukaj Technically, I believe it was Freddie Mercury.
    – Steve-O
    2 days ago

















up vote
21
down vote

favorite












An Immortal in Highlander can die only if decapitated. That is their only vulnerable point in a sword fight. (I stick to the canon of the original Highlander, as in Highlander V we see immortals resurrecting after they die.)



I think it is extremely unwise not to protect the neck with any kind of armour - especially when being able to prepare for a fight. The importance of protecting the neck has been recognised by mortals - they used gorgets, aventails, bevors, etc.



Why is the use of such protection uncommon among Immortals?





In case of any inconsistencies I consider only the original (1986) movie canon.





In the original movie Immortals do not die and resurrect, they also do not lose consciousness when stabbed, impaled, drowned etc.:




  • Neither Ramirez nor Kurgan lost consciousness when impaled,

  • Connor walks underwater,

  • Connor stabs his heart proving he is immortal to Brenda, but does not fall to the floor (he just kneels).










share|improve this question




















  • 5




    In the movies but also in the series, if an immortal is say stubbed in the chest during the fight, they will be rendered unconscious. Then, their opponent can easily remove the neck armor and decapitate them. So really, there's no advantage of wearing the armor in the first place, as it might hinder them during the fight.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 27




    I choose to ignore anything other than the movie as There can only be one
    – Peter M
    2 days ago






  • 1




    There's a fair amount of discussion at tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander although nothing official.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Maybe, being immortal, they reach a point where they've lived long enough that they don't really care as much about dying. After all, if you have to spend your whole life sword fighting people for survival, who wants to live forever?
    – Steve-O
    2 days ago






  • 4




    @abukaj Technically, I believe it was Freddie Mercury.
    – Steve-O
    2 days ago













up vote
21
down vote

favorite









up vote
21
down vote

favorite











An Immortal in Highlander can die only if decapitated. That is their only vulnerable point in a sword fight. (I stick to the canon of the original Highlander, as in Highlander V we see immortals resurrecting after they die.)



I think it is extremely unwise not to protect the neck with any kind of armour - especially when being able to prepare for a fight. The importance of protecting the neck has been recognised by mortals - they used gorgets, aventails, bevors, etc.



Why is the use of such protection uncommon among Immortals?





In case of any inconsistencies I consider only the original (1986) movie canon.





In the original movie Immortals do not die and resurrect, they also do not lose consciousness when stabbed, impaled, drowned etc.:




  • Neither Ramirez nor Kurgan lost consciousness when impaled,

  • Connor walks underwater,

  • Connor stabs his heart proving he is immortal to Brenda, but does not fall to the floor (he just kneels).










share|improve this question















An Immortal in Highlander can die only if decapitated. That is their only vulnerable point in a sword fight. (I stick to the canon of the original Highlander, as in Highlander V we see immortals resurrecting after they die.)



I think it is extremely unwise not to protect the neck with any kind of armour - especially when being able to prepare for a fight. The importance of protecting the neck has been recognised by mortals - they used gorgets, aventails, bevors, etc.



Why is the use of such protection uncommon among Immortals?





In case of any inconsistencies I consider only the original (1986) movie canon.





In the original movie Immortals do not die and resurrect, they also do not lose consciousness when stabbed, impaled, drowned etc.:




  • Neither Ramirez nor Kurgan lost consciousness when impaled,

  • Connor walks underwater,

  • Connor stabs his heart proving he is immortal to Brenda, but does not fall to the floor (he just kneels).







highlander armor






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago

























asked 2 days ago









abukaj

26427




26427








  • 5




    In the movies but also in the series, if an immortal is say stubbed in the chest during the fight, they will be rendered unconscious. Then, their opponent can easily remove the neck armor and decapitate them. So really, there's no advantage of wearing the armor in the first place, as it might hinder them during the fight.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 27




    I choose to ignore anything other than the movie as There can only be one
    – Peter M
    2 days ago






  • 1




    There's a fair amount of discussion at tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander although nothing official.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Maybe, being immortal, they reach a point where they've lived long enough that they don't really care as much about dying. After all, if you have to spend your whole life sword fighting people for survival, who wants to live forever?
    – Steve-O
    2 days ago






  • 4




    @abukaj Technically, I believe it was Freddie Mercury.
    – Steve-O
    2 days ago














  • 5




    In the movies but also in the series, if an immortal is say stubbed in the chest during the fight, they will be rendered unconscious. Then, their opponent can easily remove the neck armor and decapitate them. So really, there's no advantage of wearing the armor in the first place, as it might hinder them during the fight.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 27




    I choose to ignore anything other than the movie as There can only be one
    – Peter M
    2 days ago






  • 1




    There's a fair amount of discussion at tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander although nothing official.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago






  • 5




    Maybe, being immortal, they reach a point where they've lived long enough that they don't really care as much about dying. After all, if you have to spend your whole life sword fighting people for survival, who wants to live forever?
    – Steve-O
    2 days ago






  • 4




    @abukaj Technically, I believe it was Freddie Mercury.
    – Steve-O
    2 days ago








5




5




In the movies but also in the series, if an immortal is say stubbed in the chest during the fight, they will be rendered unconscious. Then, their opponent can easily remove the neck armor and decapitate them. So really, there's no advantage of wearing the armor in the first place, as it might hinder them during the fight.
– Loki
2 days ago




In the movies but also in the series, if an immortal is say stubbed in the chest during the fight, they will be rendered unconscious. Then, their opponent can easily remove the neck armor and decapitate them. So really, there's no advantage of wearing the armor in the first place, as it might hinder them during the fight.
– Loki
2 days ago




27




27




I choose to ignore anything other than the movie as There can only be one
– Peter M
2 days ago




I choose to ignore anything other than the movie as There can only be one
– Peter M
2 days ago




1




1




There's a fair amount of discussion at tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander although nothing official.
– FuzzyBoots
2 days ago




There's a fair amount of discussion at tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander although nothing official.
– FuzzyBoots
2 days ago




5




5




Maybe, being immortal, they reach a point where they've lived long enough that they don't really care as much about dying. After all, if you have to spend your whole life sword fighting people for survival, who wants to live forever?
– Steve-O
2 days ago




Maybe, being immortal, they reach a point where they've lived long enough that they don't really care as much about dying. After all, if you have to spend your whole life sword fighting people for survival, who wants to live forever?
– Steve-O
2 days ago




4




4




@abukaj Technically, I believe it was Freddie Mercury.
– Steve-O
2 days ago




@abukaj Technically, I believe it was Freddie Mercury.
– Steve-O
2 days ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
17
down vote













As others have noted, a neck collar wouldn't help much once one was rendered unconscious or dead-and-not-yet-resurrected. Even if the collar wasn't removable, surely it would count as a beheading if one could slice over or under the edge of the collar? Which suggests the 'collar' needs to actually cover the entire head and a good portion of the torso - highly cumbersome.



There is also this to consider: Most immortals are trying to blend into society, to not draw scrutiny by those around them [mortal or immortal]. Exactly how inconspicuous do you think YOU would be if you always went around wearing thick neck armor?






share|improve this answer








New contributor




PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2




    I do not remember immortals dieing and resurrecting in the original movie - Krugan received a fatal wound fighting Ramirez, but instantly recovered. As mentioned here: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander - it is better to have some protection than none. Also I think it is easier to blend into society wearing a kevlar scarf than a sword. Not to mention you may put it on only when you expect duel.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 2




    You never know when some other immortal might sneak up on you (happened all the time in the series), so wearing the kevlar scarf 24/7 would be necessary.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 2




    But immortals are able to sense each others presence. Even a warning time of 15 - 20 secs should be enough in many situations to put on your kevlar scarf
    – Volker Landgraf
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj - As I recall, Connor proved his immortality to [sorry, forgot her name] by being stabbed to death, then coming back.
    – PMar
    2 days ago










  • Her name is Brenda. Connor only knelt of pain, but even did not fall. In the duel prank Connor fell, but did not look as dieing. Ramirez was quite alive when impaled and executed by Kurgan, also Kurgan did not die when stabbed by Ramirez (so Ramirez might cut his head off).
    – abukaj
    2 days ago


















up vote
11
down vote













Notably, they don't wear any armor at all. Getting any serious wound that immobilizes you would be just as fatal as a blow to the neck, because if you are wounded or helpless, you will get your head chopped off no matter.



It would seem that the immortals have a full focus on speed and mobility, with as little to distract as possible, since they only expect to be fighting duels. Connor's ugly sneakers in the first fighting scene confirms this: he picked functional shoes over something that would actually match his trench coat.



And in case they expect a full-scaled battle against mortals, they do wear armor, as we can see in the first movie: The Kurgan is wearing some manner of plate armor, although with no particular protection for the neck.






share|improve this answer





















  • That is good point - why he is not protecting his single point of failure when combating mortals? He risks being decapitated by sheer accident.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj Arrogance/boldness most likely. Seems more important for him to look intimidating than anything else.
    – Amarth
    2 days ago






  • 4




    In Addition: Armor in real life does not work like in a video-game. Wearing only some kind of neck collar would give you hardly any protection against the swords they are fighting with. The blow of a long-sword is strong enough to break your neck and crush your trachea. So a functional protection would have to be mounted to a upper-torso part to provide any real protection. And flexible torso and shoulders are very important for good swordsmanship - and armor hinders that.
    – Falco
    2 days ago






  • 3




    @Falco we are talking about Immortals. Broken neck, crushed trachea etc. is fine as long as head is attached to body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @jpmc26 slicing Kurgan's throat did not saved Ramirez. Also Connor was walking underwater, so unability to breath is definitely ok. Not sure about a broken neck (not featured in the original movie), but I expect Immortal to recover as quickly as from any other fatal (for a mortal) wound seen in the movie.
    – abukaj
    yesterday


















up vote
10
down vote













Even the armor of mortals often neglects neck protection.



Most rigid helmets prior to the plate armor of mounted knights had nothing heavier than the fall of a chainmail coif protecting the neck, and that armor was relatively short-lived, lasting only a couple centuries before being rendered obsolete (for mortals) by guns. Also, rigid neck armor generally is very restrictive of head movement, which is necessary for the kind of fighting the immortals seem to prefer.



In the end, an immortal without neck armor who can see around himself and move freely during battle likely has the advantage over one with neck protection that restricts his ability to keep track of a fast-moving opponent.






share|improve this answer





















  • In case of an immortal a coif-like scarf should not restrict their move drastically, while providing protection against separation of head from body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    A coif is in no way insignificant protection and I would not call hundreds of years short-lived. Mortal men would not only protect their neck - it is kind of a whole package deal - so when they stopped with full body armor because it was more costly than it was worth, they stopped with the neck protection too. Immortals don't have that problem. They don't need a full-body suit of armor restricting their mobility (a problem blown far out of proportion) in order to wear something around their neck.
    – pluckedkiwi
    2 days ago


















up vote
6
down vote













What exactly are you trying to protect against?



Immortals generally are not decapitated in the heat of battle, but after being beaten, followed by beheading executioner-style. There are exceptions like Kastagir, but most of the deaths at least in the first movie come against relatively helpless opponents like Fasil.



Kurgen's attempt to kill Connor early on? Same story.



If you can't keep your head from being cut off in the course of trading blows you're going to die anyways, and if you can a neck collar isn't going to matter when you're disarmed and on your knees and as others have pointed out would be actively detrimental to avoiding that state.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    Assuming we base the answer solely on the 1986 film's fights, three resulted in direct beheadings during the fight and one resulted in a near-beheading. It seems to be the most common outcome, not the least
    – Valorum
    2 days ago












  • @Valorum perhaps, I'm working from memory here (Fasil, Ramirez, Connor in Act 1, so 3 and 3?). But I stand by the assertion (I've been fencing for 20+ years and a fencing coach for over a decade) that if you can't keep your head on your shoulders during a one-on-one exchange of blows you weren't going to live anyways. Also, thanks for the spelling fixes.
    – Jared Smith
    2 days ago








  • 2




    Fasil Vs. Connor - Execution-style / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Execution-style (failed) / Kurgen Vs. Ramirez - Mid-fight Beheading (nearly) and an Execution-style / Connor Vs. Dandy - Draw / Kurgen Vs. Kastagir - Mid-fight Beheading / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Mid-fight Beheading
    – Valorum
    2 days ago




















up vote
5
down vote













Sometimes they do. In Highlander: The Source, immortal character 'The Guardian' wears a big stupid-looking metal collar. It must be to ward off blows to his neck since he can't possibly be wearing it for its fashionable look.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I am not sure if we can consider the cursed Guardian an example of Immortal. Also Highlander V is inconsistent with the original movie.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago








  • 7




    @abukaj - lol. Did you miss the part where the sequel indicated that the immortals were in fact aliens from the planet Zeist and that they weren't immortal at all and that the sky was under a gigantic shield that no-one ever mentions again? I think the idea of a consistent "highlander canon" flew out of the window so hard it's still going to this day
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 2




    @Loki - Which exists less, H:tS or H2:tQ?
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Valorum In my reality only the TV series exists, even though that's also a canon mess...
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Valorum Oh, because decapitations happen so naturally in swordfights...
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 days ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199594%2fwhy-do-immortals-not-use-any-neck-armour-in-highlander-1986%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes








5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
17
down vote













As others have noted, a neck collar wouldn't help much once one was rendered unconscious or dead-and-not-yet-resurrected. Even if the collar wasn't removable, surely it would count as a beheading if one could slice over or under the edge of the collar? Which suggests the 'collar' needs to actually cover the entire head and a good portion of the torso - highly cumbersome.



There is also this to consider: Most immortals are trying to blend into society, to not draw scrutiny by those around them [mortal or immortal]. Exactly how inconspicuous do you think YOU would be if you always went around wearing thick neck armor?






share|improve this answer








New contributor




PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2




    I do not remember immortals dieing and resurrecting in the original movie - Krugan received a fatal wound fighting Ramirez, but instantly recovered. As mentioned here: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander - it is better to have some protection than none. Also I think it is easier to blend into society wearing a kevlar scarf than a sword. Not to mention you may put it on only when you expect duel.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 2




    You never know when some other immortal might sneak up on you (happened all the time in the series), so wearing the kevlar scarf 24/7 would be necessary.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 2




    But immortals are able to sense each others presence. Even a warning time of 15 - 20 secs should be enough in many situations to put on your kevlar scarf
    – Volker Landgraf
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj - As I recall, Connor proved his immortality to [sorry, forgot her name] by being stabbed to death, then coming back.
    – PMar
    2 days ago










  • Her name is Brenda. Connor only knelt of pain, but even did not fall. In the duel prank Connor fell, but did not look as dieing. Ramirez was quite alive when impaled and executed by Kurgan, also Kurgan did not die when stabbed by Ramirez (so Ramirez might cut his head off).
    – abukaj
    2 days ago















up vote
17
down vote













As others have noted, a neck collar wouldn't help much once one was rendered unconscious or dead-and-not-yet-resurrected. Even if the collar wasn't removable, surely it would count as a beheading if one could slice over or under the edge of the collar? Which suggests the 'collar' needs to actually cover the entire head and a good portion of the torso - highly cumbersome.



There is also this to consider: Most immortals are trying to blend into society, to not draw scrutiny by those around them [mortal or immortal]. Exactly how inconspicuous do you think YOU would be if you always went around wearing thick neck armor?






share|improve this answer








New contributor




PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2




    I do not remember immortals dieing and resurrecting in the original movie - Krugan received a fatal wound fighting Ramirez, but instantly recovered. As mentioned here: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander - it is better to have some protection than none. Also I think it is easier to blend into society wearing a kevlar scarf than a sword. Not to mention you may put it on only when you expect duel.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 2




    You never know when some other immortal might sneak up on you (happened all the time in the series), so wearing the kevlar scarf 24/7 would be necessary.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 2




    But immortals are able to sense each others presence. Even a warning time of 15 - 20 secs should be enough in many situations to put on your kevlar scarf
    – Volker Landgraf
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj - As I recall, Connor proved his immortality to [sorry, forgot her name] by being stabbed to death, then coming back.
    – PMar
    2 days ago










  • Her name is Brenda. Connor only knelt of pain, but even did not fall. In the duel prank Connor fell, but did not look as dieing. Ramirez was quite alive when impaled and executed by Kurgan, also Kurgan did not die when stabbed by Ramirez (so Ramirez might cut his head off).
    – abukaj
    2 days ago













up vote
17
down vote










up vote
17
down vote









As others have noted, a neck collar wouldn't help much once one was rendered unconscious or dead-and-not-yet-resurrected. Even if the collar wasn't removable, surely it would count as a beheading if one could slice over or under the edge of the collar? Which suggests the 'collar' needs to actually cover the entire head and a good portion of the torso - highly cumbersome.



There is also this to consider: Most immortals are trying to blend into society, to not draw scrutiny by those around them [mortal or immortal]. Exactly how inconspicuous do you think YOU would be if you always went around wearing thick neck armor?






share|improve this answer








New contributor




PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









As others have noted, a neck collar wouldn't help much once one was rendered unconscious or dead-and-not-yet-resurrected. Even if the collar wasn't removable, surely it would count as a beheading if one could slice over or under the edge of the collar? Which suggests the 'collar' needs to actually cover the entire head and a good portion of the torso - highly cumbersome.



There is also this to consider: Most immortals are trying to blend into society, to not draw scrutiny by those around them [mortal or immortal]. Exactly how inconspicuous do you think YOU would be if you always went around wearing thick neck armor?







share|improve this answer








New contributor




PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 2 days ago









PMar

1712




1712




New contributor




PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






PMar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    I do not remember immortals dieing and resurrecting in the original movie - Krugan received a fatal wound fighting Ramirez, but instantly recovered. As mentioned here: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander - it is better to have some protection than none. Also I think it is easier to blend into society wearing a kevlar scarf than a sword. Not to mention you may put it on only when you expect duel.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 2




    You never know when some other immortal might sneak up on you (happened all the time in the series), so wearing the kevlar scarf 24/7 would be necessary.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 2




    But immortals are able to sense each others presence. Even a warning time of 15 - 20 secs should be enough in many situations to put on your kevlar scarf
    – Volker Landgraf
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj - As I recall, Connor proved his immortality to [sorry, forgot her name] by being stabbed to death, then coming back.
    – PMar
    2 days ago










  • Her name is Brenda. Connor only knelt of pain, but even did not fall. In the duel prank Connor fell, but did not look as dieing. Ramirez was quite alive when impaled and executed by Kurgan, also Kurgan did not die when stabbed by Ramirez (so Ramirez might cut his head off).
    – abukaj
    2 days ago














  • 2




    I do not remember immortals dieing and resurrecting in the original movie - Krugan received a fatal wound fighting Ramirez, but instantly recovered. As mentioned here: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander - it is better to have some protection than none. Also I think it is easier to blend into society wearing a kevlar scarf than a sword. Not to mention you may put it on only when you expect duel.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 2




    You never know when some other immortal might sneak up on you (happened all the time in the series), so wearing the kevlar scarf 24/7 would be necessary.
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 2




    But immortals are able to sense each others presence. Even a warning time of 15 - 20 secs should be enough in many situations to put on your kevlar scarf
    – Volker Landgraf
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj - As I recall, Connor proved his immortality to [sorry, forgot her name] by being stabbed to death, then coming back.
    – PMar
    2 days ago










  • Her name is Brenda. Connor only knelt of pain, but even did not fall. In the duel prank Connor fell, but did not look as dieing. Ramirez was quite alive when impaled and executed by Kurgan, also Kurgan did not die when stabbed by Ramirez (so Ramirez might cut his head off).
    – abukaj
    2 days ago








2




2




I do not remember immortals dieing and resurrecting in the original movie - Krugan received a fatal wound fighting Ramirez, but instantly recovered. As mentioned here: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander - it is better to have some protection than none. Also I think it is easier to blend into society wearing a kevlar scarf than a sword. Not to mention you may put it on only when you expect duel.
– abukaj
2 days ago




I do not remember immortals dieing and resurrecting in the original movie - Krugan received a fatal wound fighting Ramirez, but instantly recovered. As mentioned here: tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Headscratchers/Highlander - it is better to have some protection than none. Also I think it is easier to blend into society wearing a kevlar scarf than a sword. Not to mention you may put it on only when you expect duel.
– abukaj
2 days ago




2




2




You never know when some other immortal might sneak up on you (happened all the time in the series), so wearing the kevlar scarf 24/7 would be necessary.
– Loki
2 days ago




You never know when some other immortal might sneak up on you (happened all the time in the series), so wearing the kevlar scarf 24/7 would be necessary.
– Loki
2 days ago




2




2




But immortals are able to sense each others presence. Even a warning time of 15 - 20 secs should be enough in many situations to put on your kevlar scarf
– Volker Landgraf
2 days ago




But immortals are able to sense each others presence. Even a warning time of 15 - 20 secs should be enough in many situations to put on your kevlar scarf
– Volker Landgraf
2 days ago












@abukaj - As I recall, Connor proved his immortality to [sorry, forgot her name] by being stabbed to death, then coming back.
– PMar
2 days ago




@abukaj - As I recall, Connor proved his immortality to [sorry, forgot her name] by being stabbed to death, then coming back.
– PMar
2 days ago












Her name is Brenda. Connor only knelt of pain, but even did not fall. In the duel prank Connor fell, but did not look as dieing. Ramirez was quite alive when impaled and executed by Kurgan, also Kurgan did not die when stabbed by Ramirez (so Ramirez might cut his head off).
– abukaj
2 days ago




Her name is Brenda. Connor only knelt of pain, but even did not fall. In the duel prank Connor fell, but did not look as dieing. Ramirez was quite alive when impaled and executed by Kurgan, also Kurgan did not die when stabbed by Ramirez (so Ramirez might cut his head off).
– abukaj
2 days ago












up vote
11
down vote













Notably, they don't wear any armor at all. Getting any serious wound that immobilizes you would be just as fatal as a blow to the neck, because if you are wounded or helpless, you will get your head chopped off no matter.



It would seem that the immortals have a full focus on speed and mobility, with as little to distract as possible, since they only expect to be fighting duels. Connor's ugly sneakers in the first fighting scene confirms this: he picked functional shoes over something that would actually match his trench coat.



And in case they expect a full-scaled battle against mortals, they do wear armor, as we can see in the first movie: The Kurgan is wearing some manner of plate armor, although with no particular protection for the neck.






share|improve this answer





















  • That is good point - why he is not protecting his single point of failure when combating mortals? He risks being decapitated by sheer accident.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj Arrogance/boldness most likely. Seems more important for him to look intimidating than anything else.
    – Amarth
    2 days ago






  • 4




    In Addition: Armor in real life does not work like in a video-game. Wearing only some kind of neck collar would give you hardly any protection against the swords they are fighting with. The blow of a long-sword is strong enough to break your neck and crush your trachea. So a functional protection would have to be mounted to a upper-torso part to provide any real protection. And flexible torso and shoulders are very important for good swordsmanship - and armor hinders that.
    – Falco
    2 days ago






  • 3




    @Falco we are talking about Immortals. Broken neck, crushed trachea etc. is fine as long as head is attached to body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @jpmc26 slicing Kurgan's throat did not saved Ramirez. Also Connor was walking underwater, so unability to breath is definitely ok. Not sure about a broken neck (not featured in the original movie), but I expect Immortal to recover as quickly as from any other fatal (for a mortal) wound seen in the movie.
    – abukaj
    yesterday















up vote
11
down vote













Notably, they don't wear any armor at all. Getting any serious wound that immobilizes you would be just as fatal as a blow to the neck, because if you are wounded or helpless, you will get your head chopped off no matter.



It would seem that the immortals have a full focus on speed and mobility, with as little to distract as possible, since they only expect to be fighting duels. Connor's ugly sneakers in the first fighting scene confirms this: he picked functional shoes over something that would actually match his trench coat.



And in case they expect a full-scaled battle against mortals, they do wear armor, as we can see in the first movie: The Kurgan is wearing some manner of plate armor, although with no particular protection for the neck.






share|improve this answer





















  • That is good point - why he is not protecting his single point of failure when combating mortals? He risks being decapitated by sheer accident.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj Arrogance/boldness most likely. Seems more important for him to look intimidating than anything else.
    – Amarth
    2 days ago






  • 4




    In Addition: Armor in real life does not work like in a video-game. Wearing only some kind of neck collar would give you hardly any protection against the swords they are fighting with. The blow of a long-sword is strong enough to break your neck and crush your trachea. So a functional protection would have to be mounted to a upper-torso part to provide any real protection. And flexible torso and shoulders are very important for good swordsmanship - and armor hinders that.
    – Falco
    2 days ago






  • 3




    @Falco we are talking about Immortals. Broken neck, crushed trachea etc. is fine as long as head is attached to body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @jpmc26 slicing Kurgan's throat did not saved Ramirez. Also Connor was walking underwater, so unability to breath is definitely ok. Not sure about a broken neck (not featured in the original movie), but I expect Immortal to recover as quickly as from any other fatal (for a mortal) wound seen in the movie.
    – abukaj
    yesterday













up vote
11
down vote










up vote
11
down vote









Notably, they don't wear any armor at all. Getting any serious wound that immobilizes you would be just as fatal as a blow to the neck, because if you are wounded or helpless, you will get your head chopped off no matter.



It would seem that the immortals have a full focus on speed and mobility, with as little to distract as possible, since they only expect to be fighting duels. Connor's ugly sneakers in the first fighting scene confirms this: he picked functional shoes over something that would actually match his trench coat.



And in case they expect a full-scaled battle against mortals, they do wear armor, as we can see in the first movie: The Kurgan is wearing some manner of plate armor, although with no particular protection for the neck.






share|improve this answer












Notably, they don't wear any armor at all. Getting any serious wound that immobilizes you would be just as fatal as a blow to the neck, because if you are wounded or helpless, you will get your head chopped off no matter.



It would seem that the immortals have a full focus on speed and mobility, with as little to distract as possible, since they only expect to be fighting duels. Connor's ugly sneakers in the first fighting scene confirms this: he picked functional shoes over something that would actually match his trench coat.



And in case they expect a full-scaled battle against mortals, they do wear armor, as we can see in the first movie: The Kurgan is wearing some manner of plate armor, although with no particular protection for the neck.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Amarth

425111




425111












  • That is good point - why he is not protecting his single point of failure when combating mortals? He risks being decapitated by sheer accident.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj Arrogance/boldness most likely. Seems more important for him to look intimidating than anything else.
    – Amarth
    2 days ago






  • 4




    In Addition: Armor in real life does not work like in a video-game. Wearing only some kind of neck collar would give you hardly any protection against the swords they are fighting with. The blow of a long-sword is strong enough to break your neck and crush your trachea. So a functional protection would have to be mounted to a upper-torso part to provide any real protection. And flexible torso and shoulders are very important for good swordsmanship - and armor hinders that.
    – Falco
    2 days ago






  • 3




    @Falco we are talking about Immortals. Broken neck, crushed trachea etc. is fine as long as head is attached to body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @jpmc26 slicing Kurgan's throat did not saved Ramirez. Also Connor was walking underwater, so unability to breath is definitely ok. Not sure about a broken neck (not featured in the original movie), but I expect Immortal to recover as quickly as from any other fatal (for a mortal) wound seen in the movie.
    – abukaj
    yesterday


















  • That is good point - why he is not protecting his single point of failure when combating mortals? He risks being decapitated by sheer accident.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago










  • @abukaj Arrogance/boldness most likely. Seems more important for him to look intimidating than anything else.
    – Amarth
    2 days ago






  • 4




    In Addition: Armor in real life does not work like in a video-game. Wearing only some kind of neck collar would give you hardly any protection against the swords they are fighting with. The blow of a long-sword is strong enough to break your neck and crush your trachea. So a functional protection would have to be mounted to a upper-torso part to provide any real protection. And flexible torso and shoulders are very important for good swordsmanship - and armor hinders that.
    – Falco
    2 days ago






  • 3




    @Falco we are talking about Immortals. Broken neck, crushed trachea etc. is fine as long as head is attached to body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @jpmc26 slicing Kurgan's throat did not saved Ramirez. Also Connor was walking underwater, so unability to breath is definitely ok. Not sure about a broken neck (not featured in the original movie), but I expect Immortal to recover as quickly as from any other fatal (for a mortal) wound seen in the movie.
    – abukaj
    yesterday
















That is good point - why he is not protecting his single point of failure when combating mortals? He risks being decapitated by sheer accident.
– abukaj
2 days ago




That is good point - why he is not protecting his single point of failure when combating mortals? He risks being decapitated by sheer accident.
– abukaj
2 days ago












@abukaj Arrogance/boldness most likely. Seems more important for him to look intimidating than anything else.
– Amarth
2 days ago




@abukaj Arrogance/boldness most likely. Seems more important for him to look intimidating than anything else.
– Amarth
2 days ago




4




4




In Addition: Armor in real life does not work like in a video-game. Wearing only some kind of neck collar would give you hardly any protection against the swords they are fighting with. The blow of a long-sword is strong enough to break your neck and crush your trachea. So a functional protection would have to be mounted to a upper-torso part to provide any real protection. And flexible torso and shoulders are very important for good swordsmanship - and armor hinders that.
– Falco
2 days ago




In Addition: Armor in real life does not work like in a video-game. Wearing only some kind of neck collar would give you hardly any protection against the swords they are fighting with. The blow of a long-sword is strong enough to break your neck and crush your trachea. So a functional protection would have to be mounted to a upper-torso part to provide any real protection. And flexible torso and shoulders are very important for good swordsmanship - and armor hinders that.
– Falco
2 days ago




3




3




@Falco we are talking about Immortals. Broken neck, crushed trachea etc. is fine as long as head is attached to body.
– abukaj
2 days ago




@Falco we are talking about Immortals. Broken neck, crushed trachea etc. is fine as long as head is attached to body.
– abukaj
2 days ago




1




1




@jpmc26 slicing Kurgan's throat did not saved Ramirez. Also Connor was walking underwater, so unability to breath is definitely ok. Not sure about a broken neck (not featured in the original movie), but I expect Immortal to recover as quickly as from any other fatal (for a mortal) wound seen in the movie.
– abukaj
yesterday




@jpmc26 slicing Kurgan's throat did not saved Ramirez. Also Connor was walking underwater, so unability to breath is definitely ok. Not sure about a broken neck (not featured in the original movie), but I expect Immortal to recover as quickly as from any other fatal (for a mortal) wound seen in the movie.
– abukaj
yesterday










up vote
10
down vote













Even the armor of mortals often neglects neck protection.



Most rigid helmets prior to the plate armor of mounted knights had nothing heavier than the fall of a chainmail coif protecting the neck, and that armor was relatively short-lived, lasting only a couple centuries before being rendered obsolete (for mortals) by guns. Also, rigid neck armor generally is very restrictive of head movement, which is necessary for the kind of fighting the immortals seem to prefer.



In the end, an immortal without neck armor who can see around himself and move freely during battle likely has the advantage over one with neck protection that restricts his ability to keep track of a fast-moving opponent.






share|improve this answer





















  • In case of an immortal a coif-like scarf should not restrict their move drastically, while providing protection against separation of head from body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    A coif is in no way insignificant protection and I would not call hundreds of years short-lived. Mortal men would not only protect their neck - it is kind of a whole package deal - so when they stopped with full body armor because it was more costly than it was worth, they stopped with the neck protection too. Immortals don't have that problem. They don't need a full-body suit of armor restricting their mobility (a problem blown far out of proportion) in order to wear something around their neck.
    – pluckedkiwi
    2 days ago















up vote
10
down vote













Even the armor of mortals often neglects neck protection.



Most rigid helmets prior to the plate armor of mounted knights had nothing heavier than the fall of a chainmail coif protecting the neck, and that armor was relatively short-lived, lasting only a couple centuries before being rendered obsolete (for mortals) by guns. Also, rigid neck armor generally is very restrictive of head movement, which is necessary for the kind of fighting the immortals seem to prefer.



In the end, an immortal without neck armor who can see around himself and move freely during battle likely has the advantage over one with neck protection that restricts his ability to keep track of a fast-moving opponent.






share|improve this answer





















  • In case of an immortal a coif-like scarf should not restrict their move drastically, while providing protection against separation of head from body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    A coif is in no way insignificant protection and I would not call hundreds of years short-lived. Mortal men would not only protect their neck - it is kind of a whole package deal - so when they stopped with full body armor because it was more costly than it was worth, they stopped with the neck protection too. Immortals don't have that problem. They don't need a full-body suit of armor restricting their mobility (a problem blown far out of proportion) in order to wear something around their neck.
    – pluckedkiwi
    2 days ago













up vote
10
down vote










up vote
10
down vote









Even the armor of mortals often neglects neck protection.



Most rigid helmets prior to the plate armor of mounted knights had nothing heavier than the fall of a chainmail coif protecting the neck, and that armor was relatively short-lived, lasting only a couple centuries before being rendered obsolete (for mortals) by guns. Also, rigid neck armor generally is very restrictive of head movement, which is necessary for the kind of fighting the immortals seem to prefer.



In the end, an immortal without neck armor who can see around himself and move freely during battle likely has the advantage over one with neck protection that restricts his ability to keep track of a fast-moving opponent.






share|improve this answer












Even the armor of mortals often neglects neck protection.



Most rigid helmets prior to the plate armor of mounted knights had nothing heavier than the fall of a chainmail coif protecting the neck, and that armor was relatively short-lived, lasting only a couple centuries before being rendered obsolete (for mortals) by guns. Also, rigid neck armor generally is very restrictive of head movement, which is necessary for the kind of fighting the immortals seem to prefer.



In the end, an immortal without neck armor who can see around himself and move freely during battle likely has the advantage over one with neck protection that restricts his ability to keep track of a fast-moving opponent.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Zeiss Ikon

8,44311549




8,44311549












  • In case of an immortal a coif-like scarf should not restrict their move drastically, while providing protection against separation of head from body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    A coif is in no way insignificant protection and I would not call hundreds of years short-lived. Mortal men would not only protect their neck - it is kind of a whole package deal - so when they stopped with full body armor because it was more costly than it was worth, they stopped with the neck protection too. Immortals don't have that problem. They don't need a full-body suit of armor restricting their mobility (a problem blown far out of proportion) in order to wear something around their neck.
    – pluckedkiwi
    2 days ago


















  • In case of an immortal a coif-like scarf should not restrict their move drastically, while providing protection against separation of head from body.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago






  • 1




    A coif is in no way insignificant protection and I would not call hundreds of years short-lived. Mortal men would not only protect their neck - it is kind of a whole package deal - so when they stopped with full body armor because it was more costly than it was worth, they stopped with the neck protection too. Immortals don't have that problem. They don't need a full-body suit of armor restricting their mobility (a problem blown far out of proportion) in order to wear something around their neck.
    – pluckedkiwi
    2 days ago
















In case of an immortal a coif-like scarf should not restrict their move drastically, while providing protection against separation of head from body.
– abukaj
2 days ago




In case of an immortal a coif-like scarf should not restrict their move drastically, while providing protection against separation of head from body.
– abukaj
2 days ago




1




1




A coif is in no way insignificant protection and I would not call hundreds of years short-lived. Mortal men would not only protect their neck - it is kind of a whole package deal - so when they stopped with full body armor because it was more costly than it was worth, they stopped with the neck protection too. Immortals don't have that problem. They don't need a full-body suit of armor restricting their mobility (a problem blown far out of proportion) in order to wear something around their neck.
– pluckedkiwi
2 days ago




A coif is in no way insignificant protection and I would not call hundreds of years short-lived. Mortal men would not only protect their neck - it is kind of a whole package deal - so when they stopped with full body armor because it was more costly than it was worth, they stopped with the neck protection too. Immortals don't have that problem. They don't need a full-body suit of armor restricting their mobility (a problem blown far out of proportion) in order to wear something around their neck.
– pluckedkiwi
2 days ago










up vote
6
down vote













What exactly are you trying to protect against?



Immortals generally are not decapitated in the heat of battle, but after being beaten, followed by beheading executioner-style. There are exceptions like Kastagir, but most of the deaths at least in the first movie come against relatively helpless opponents like Fasil.



Kurgen's attempt to kill Connor early on? Same story.



If you can't keep your head from being cut off in the course of trading blows you're going to die anyways, and if you can a neck collar isn't going to matter when you're disarmed and on your knees and as others have pointed out would be actively detrimental to avoiding that state.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    Assuming we base the answer solely on the 1986 film's fights, three resulted in direct beheadings during the fight and one resulted in a near-beheading. It seems to be the most common outcome, not the least
    – Valorum
    2 days ago












  • @Valorum perhaps, I'm working from memory here (Fasil, Ramirez, Connor in Act 1, so 3 and 3?). But I stand by the assertion (I've been fencing for 20+ years and a fencing coach for over a decade) that if you can't keep your head on your shoulders during a one-on-one exchange of blows you weren't going to live anyways. Also, thanks for the spelling fixes.
    – Jared Smith
    2 days ago








  • 2




    Fasil Vs. Connor - Execution-style / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Execution-style (failed) / Kurgen Vs. Ramirez - Mid-fight Beheading (nearly) and an Execution-style / Connor Vs. Dandy - Draw / Kurgen Vs. Kastagir - Mid-fight Beheading / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Mid-fight Beheading
    – Valorum
    2 days ago

















up vote
6
down vote













What exactly are you trying to protect against?



Immortals generally are not decapitated in the heat of battle, but after being beaten, followed by beheading executioner-style. There are exceptions like Kastagir, but most of the deaths at least in the first movie come against relatively helpless opponents like Fasil.



Kurgen's attempt to kill Connor early on? Same story.



If you can't keep your head from being cut off in the course of trading blows you're going to die anyways, and if you can a neck collar isn't going to matter when you're disarmed and on your knees and as others have pointed out would be actively detrimental to avoiding that state.






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    Assuming we base the answer solely on the 1986 film's fights, three resulted in direct beheadings during the fight and one resulted in a near-beheading. It seems to be the most common outcome, not the least
    – Valorum
    2 days ago












  • @Valorum perhaps, I'm working from memory here (Fasil, Ramirez, Connor in Act 1, so 3 and 3?). But I stand by the assertion (I've been fencing for 20+ years and a fencing coach for over a decade) that if you can't keep your head on your shoulders during a one-on-one exchange of blows you weren't going to live anyways. Also, thanks for the spelling fixes.
    – Jared Smith
    2 days ago








  • 2




    Fasil Vs. Connor - Execution-style / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Execution-style (failed) / Kurgen Vs. Ramirez - Mid-fight Beheading (nearly) and an Execution-style / Connor Vs. Dandy - Draw / Kurgen Vs. Kastagir - Mid-fight Beheading / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Mid-fight Beheading
    – Valorum
    2 days ago















up vote
6
down vote










up vote
6
down vote









What exactly are you trying to protect against?



Immortals generally are not decapitated in the heat of battle, but after being beaten, followed by beheading executioner-style. There are exceptions like Kastagir, but most of the deaths at least in the first movie come against relatively helpless opponents like Fasil.



Kurgen's attempt to kill Connor early on? Same story.



If you can't keep your head from being cut off in the course of trading blows you're going to die anyways, and if you can a neck collar isn't going to matter when you're disarmed and on your knees and as others have pointed out would be actively detrimental to avoiding that state.






share|improve this answer














What exactly are you trying to protect against?



Immortals generally are not decapitated in the heat of battle, but after being beaten, followed by beheading executioner-style. There are exceptions like Kastagir, but most of the deaths at least in the first movie come against relatively helpless opponents like Fasil.



Kurgen's attempt to kill Connor early on? Same story.



If you can't keep your head from being cut off in the course of trading blows you're going to die anyways, and if you can a neck collar isn't going to matter when you're disarmed and on your knees and as others have pointed out would be actively detrimental to avoiding that state.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered 2 days ago









Jared Smith

58138




58138








  • 2




    Assuming we base the answer solely on the 1986 film's fights, three resulted in direct beheadings during the fight and one resulted in a near-beheading. It seems to be the most common outcome, not the least
    – Valorum
    2 days ago












  • @Valorum perhaps, I'm working from memory here (Fasil, Ramirez, Connor in Act 1, so 3 and 3?). But I stand by the assertion (I've been fencing for 20+ years and a fencing coach for over a decade) that if you can't keep your head on your shoulders during a one-on-one exchange of blows you weren't going to live anyways. Also, thanks for the spelling fixes.
    – Jared Smith
    2 days ago








  • 2




    Fasil Vs. Connor - Execution-style / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Execution-style (failed) / Kurgen Vs. Ramirez - Mid-fight Beheading (nearly) and an Execution-style / Connor Vs. Dandy - Draw / Kurgen Vs. Kastagir - Mid-fight Beheading / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Mid-fight Beheading
    – Valorum
    2 days ago
















  • 2




    Assuming we base the answer solely on the 1986 film's fights, three resulted in direct beheadings during the fight and one resulted in a near-beheading. It seems to be the most common outcome, not the least
    – Valorum
    2 days ago












  • @Valorum perhaps, I'm working from memory here (Fasil, Ramirez, Connor in Act 1, so 3 and 3?). But I stand by the assertion (I've been fencing for 20+ years and a fencing coach for over a decade) that if you can't keep your head on your shoulders during a one-on-one exchange of blows you weren't going to live anyways. Also, thanks for the spelling fixes.
    – Jared Smith
    2 days ago








  • 2




    Fasil Vs. Connor - Execution-style / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Execution-style (failed) / Kurgen Vs. Ramirez - Mid-fight Beheading (nearly) and an Execution-style / Connor Vs. Dandy - Draw / Kurgen Vs. Kastagir - Mid-fight Beheading / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Mid-fight Beheading
    – Valorum
    2 days ago










2




2




Assuming we base the answer solely on the 1986 film's fights, three resulted in direct beheadings during the fight and one resulted in a near-beheading. It seems to be the most common outcome, not the least
– Valorum
2 days ago






Assuming we base the answer solely on the 1986 film's fights, three resulted in direct beheadings during the fight and one resulted in a near-beheading. It seems to be the most common outcome, not the least
– Valorum
2 days ago














@Valorum perhaps, I'm working from memory here (Fasil, Ramirez, Connor in Act 1, so 3 and 3?). But I stand by the assertion (I've been fencing for 20+ years and a fencing coach for over a decade) that if you can't keep your head on your shoulders during a one-on-one exchange of blows you weren't going to live anyways. Also, thanks for the spelling fixes.
– Jared Smith
2 days ago






@Valorum perhaps, I'm working from memory here (Fasil, Ramirez, Connor in Act 1, so 3 and 3?). But I stand by the assertion (I've been fencing for 20+ years and a fencing coach for over a decade) that if you can't keep your head on your shoulders during a one-on-one exchange of blows you weren't going to live anyways. Also, thanks for the spelling fixes.
– Jared Smith
2 days ago






2




2




Fasil Vs. Connor - Execution-style / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Execution-style (failed) / Kurgen Vs. Ramirez - Mid-fight Beheading (nearly) and an Execution-style / Connor Vs. Dandy - Draw / Kurgen Vs. Kastagir - Mid-fight Beheading / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Mid-fight Beheading
– Valorum
2 days ago






Fasil Vs. Connor - Execution-style / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Execution-style (failed) / Kurgen Vs. Ramirez - Mid-fight Beheading (nearly) and an Execution-style / Connor Vs. Dandy - Draw / Kurgen Vs. Kastagir - Mid-fight Beheading / Connor Vs. Kurgen - Mid-fight Beheading
– Valorum
2 days ago












up vote
5
down vote













Sometimes they do. In Highlander: The Source, immortal character 'The Guardian' wears a big stupid-looking metal collar. It must be to ward off blows to his neck since he can't possibly be wearing it for its fashionable look.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I am not sure if we can consider the cursed Guardian an example of Immortal. Also Highlander V is inconsistent with the original movie.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago








  • 7




    @abukaj - lol. Did you miss the part where the sequel indicated that the immortals were in fact aliens from the planet Zeist and that they weren't immortal at all and that the sky was under a gigantic shield that no-one ever mentions again? I think the idea of a consistent "highlander canon" flew out of the window so hard it's still going to this day
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 2




    @Loki - Which exists less, H:tS or H2:tQ?
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Valorum In my reality only the TV series exists, even though that's also a canon mess...
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Valorum Oh, because decapitations happen so naturally in swordfights...
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 days ago















up vote
5
down vote













Sometimes they do. In Highlander: The Source, immortal character 'The Guardian' wears a big stupid-looking metal collar. It must be to ward off blows to his neck since he can't possibly be wearing it for its fashionable look.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    I am not sure if we can consider the cursed Guardian an example of Immortal. Also Highlander V is inconsistent with the original movie.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago








  • 7




    @abukaj - lol. Did you miss the part where the sequel indicated that the immortals were in fact aliens from the planet Zeist and that they weren't immortal at all and that the sky was under a gigantic shield that no-one ever mentions again? I think the idea of a consistent "highlander canon" flew out of the window so hard it's still going to this day
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 2




    @Loki - Which exists less, H:tS or H2:tQ?
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Valorum In my reality only the TV series exists, even though that's also a canon mess...
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Valorum Oh, because decapitations happen so naturally in swordfights...
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 days ago













up vote
5
down vote










up vote
5
down vote









Sometimes they do. In Highlander: The Source, immortal character 'The Guardian' wears a big stupid-looking metal collar. It must be to ward off blows to his neck since he can't possibly be wearing it for its fashionable look.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer














Sometimes they do. In Highlander: The Source, immortal character 'The Guardian' wears a big stupid-looking metal collar. It must be to ward off blows to his neck since he can't possibly be wearing it for its fashionable look.



enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 5 hours ago

























answered 2 days ago









Valorum

389k10028333069




389k10028333069








  • 1




    I am not sure if we can consider the cursed Guardian an example of Immortal. Also Highlander V is inconsistent with the original movie.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago








  • 7




    @abukaj - lol. Did you miss the part where the sequel indicated that the immortals were in fact aliens from the planet Zeist and that they weren't immortal at all and that the sky was under a gigantic shield that no-one ever mentions again? I think the idea of a consistent "highlander canon" flew out of the window so hard it's still going to this day
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 2




    @Loki - Which exists less, H:tS or H2:tQ?
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Valorum In my reality only the TV series exists, even though that's also a canon mess...
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Valorum Oh, because decapitations happen so naturally in swordfights...
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 days ago














  • 1




    I am not sure if we can consider the cursed Guardian an example of Immortal. Also Highlander V is inconsistent with the original movie.
    – abukaj
    2 days ago








  • 7




    @abukaj - lol. Did you miss the part where the sequel indicated that the immortals were in fact aliens from the planet Zeist and that they weren't immortal at all and that the sky was under a gigantic shield that no-one ever mentions again? I think the idea of a consistent "highlander canon" flew out of the window so hard it's still going to this day
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 2




    @Loki - Which exists less, H:tS or H2:tQ?
    – Valorum
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @Valorum In my reality only the TV series exists, even though that's also a canon mess...
    – Loki
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Valorum Oh, because decapitations happen so naturally in swordfights...
    – Zeiss Ikon
    2 days ago








1




1




I am not sure if we can consider the cursed Guardian an example of Immortal. Also Highlander V is inconsistent with the original movie.
– abukaj
2 days ago






I am not sure if we can consider the cursed Guardian an example of Immortal. Also Highlander V is inconsistent with the original movie.
– abukaj
2 days ago






7




7




@abukaj - lol. Did you miss the part where the sequel indicated that the immortals were in fact aliens from the planet Zeist and that they weren't immortal at all and that the sky was under a gigantic shield that no-one ever mentions again? I think the idea of a consistent "highlander canon" flew out of the window so hard it's still going to this day
– Valorum
2 days ago






@abukaj - lol. Did you miss the part where the sequel indicated that the immortals were in fact aliens from the planet Zeist and that they weren't immortal at all and that the sky was under a gigantic shield that no-one ever mentions again? I think the idea of a consistent "highlander canon" flew out of the window so hard it's still going to this day
– Valorum
2 days ago






2




2




@Loki - Which exists less, H:tS or H2:tQ?
– Valorum
2 days ago






@Loki - Which exists less, H:tS or H2:tQ?
– Valorum
2 days ago






1




1




@Valorum In my reality only the TV series exists, even though that's also a canon mess...
– Loki
2 days ago




@Valorum In my reality only the TV series exists, even though that's also a canon mess...
– Loki
2 days ago




1




1




@Valorum Oh, because decapitations happen so naturally in swordfights...
– Zeiss Ikon
2 days ago




@Valorum Oh, because decapitations happen so naturally in swordfights...
– Zeiss Ikon
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199594%2fwhy-do-immortals-not-use-any-neck-armour-in-highlander-1986%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

List directoties down one level, excluding some named directories and files

list processes belonging to a network namespace

list systemd RuntimeDirectory mounts