Meaning of “…would not be coming to America, … be risking the most important national security...
In the end, Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America,
he would not be risking the most important national security
arrangement that Israel has if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is
going to end up being an existential threat to his country. —CNN Student News
I read this sentence several times, but I can't grasp the meaning of it. The structure is too complicated. Could you help me understand this sentence?
My guess: In the end, Prime Minister will come to America nevertheless the visit can risk the most important national security arrangement (which is, I guess, the amicable relationship between the U.S and Israel), because the negotiation can be a serious threat to his country and he wants to stop it.
meaning phrases
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
asked Oct 8 '15 at 3:41
InfimumMaximumInfimumMaximum
3151311
add a comment |
In the end, Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America,
he would not be risking the most important national security
arrangement that Israel has if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is
going to end up being an existential threat to his country. —CNN Student News
I read this sentence several times, but I can't grasp the meaning of it. The structure is too complicated. Could you help me understand this sentence?
My guess: In the end, Prime Minister will come to America nevertheless the visit can risk the most important national security arrangement (which is, I guess, the amicable relationship between the U.S and Israel), because the negotiation can be a serious threat to his country and he wants to stop it.
meaning phrases
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
asked Oct 8 '15 at 3:41
InfimumMaximumInfimumMaximum
3151311
2
This is a quote from Rich Santorum, ex-Senator from Pennsylvania, ex-Presidential candidate, and an 11 on the Richter idiocy scale. I wouldn't bother trying to parse the syntax. Republicans invited Netanyahu to address Congress to attack the policies of the sitting President, which basically made Netanyahu a suborner of sedition. Santorum is saying that Netanyahu wouldn't have done something so dire if he didn't think the President's policy of negotiating with Iran held the real possibility of destroying Israel.
– deadrat
Oct 8 '15 at 3:56
add a comment |
In the end, Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America,
he would not be risking the most important national security
arrangement that Israel has if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is
going to end up being an existential threat to his country. —CNN Student News
I read this sentence several times, but I can't grasp the meaning of it. The structure is too complicated. Could you help me understand this sentence?
My guess: In the end, Prime Minister will come to America nevertheless the visit can risk the most important national security arrangement (which is, I guess, the amicable relationship between the U.S and Israel), because the negotiation can be a serious threat to his country and he wants to stop it.
meaning phrases
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
asked Oct 8 '15 at 3:41
InfimumMaximumInfimumMaximum
3151311
In the end, Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America,
he would not be risking the most important national security
arrangement that Israel has if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is
going to end up being an existential threat to his country. —CNN Student News
I read this sentence several times, but I can't grasp the meaning of it. The structure is too complicated. Could you help me understand this sentence?
My guess: In the end, Prime Minister will come to America nevertheless the visit can risk the most important national security arrangement (which is, I guess, the amicable relationship between the U.S and Israel), because the negotiation can be a serious threat to his country and he wants to stop it.
meaning phrases
meaning phrases
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
asked Oct 8 '15 at 3:41
InfimumMaximumInfimumMaximum
3151311
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
asked Oct 8 '15 at 3:41
InfimumMaximumInfimumMaximum
3151311
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
31.6k660112
asked Oct 8 '15 at 3:41
InfimumMaximumInfimumMaximum
3151311
asked Oct 8 '15 at 3:41
InfimumMaximumInfimumMaximum
3151311
asked Oct 8 '15 at 3:41
InfimumMaximumInfimumMaximum
3151311
3151311
2
This is a quote from Rich Santorum, ex-Senator from Pennsylvania, ex-Presidential candidate, and an 11 on the Richter idiocy scale. I wouldn't bother trying to parse the syntax. Republicans invited Netanyahu to address Congress to attack the policies of the sitting President, which basically made Netanyahu a suborner of sedition. Santorum is saying that Netanyahu wouldn't have done something so dire if he didn't think the President's policy of negotiating with Iran held the real possibility of destroying Israel.
– deadrat
Oct 8 '15 at 3:56
add a comment |
2
This is a quote from Rich Santorum, ex-Senator from Pennsylvania, ex-Presidential candidate, and an 11 on the Richter idiocy scale. I wouldn't bother trying to parse the syntax. Republicans invited Netanyahu to address Congress to attack the policies of the sitting President, which basically made Netanyahu a suborner of sedition. Santorum is saying that Netanyahu wouldn't have done something so dire if he didn't think the President's policy of negotiating with Iran held the real possibility of destroying Israel.
– deadrat
Oct 8 '15 at 3:56
2
2
This is a quote from Rich Santorum, ex-Senator from Pennsylvania, ex-Presidential candidate, and an 11 on the Richter idiocy scale. I wouldn't bother trying to parse the syntax. Republicans invited Netanyahu to address Congress to attack the policies of the sitting President, which basically made Netanyahu a suborner of sedition. Santorum is saying that Netanyahu wouldn't have done something so dire if he didn't think the President's policy of negotiating with Iran held the real possibility of destroying Israel.
– deadrat
Oct 8 '15 at 3:56
This is a quote from Rich Santorum, ex-Senator from Pennsylvania, ex-Presidential candidate, and an 11 on the Richter idiocy scale. I wouldn't bother trying to parse the syntax. Republicans invited Netanyahu to address Congress to attack the policies of the sitting President, which basically made Netanyahu a suborner of sedition. Santorum is saying that Netanyahu wouldn't have done something so dire if he didn't think the President's policy of negotiating with Iran held the real possibility of destroying Israel.
– deadrat
Oct 8 '15 at 3:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America:
He is coming to America
(Actually, he came and addressed Congress, which angered Obama and the Department of State as his visit was arranged by the Republicans in order to derail the nuclear negotiation with Iran).
he would not be risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has:
He is risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has.
(Israel's most important national security arrangement is the one with the U.S., and Netanyahu thinks stopping the nuclear deal is more important than a possibility that his visiting and addressing uninvited by the White House can worsen the relationship and arrangement with the U.S.)
if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is going to end up being an existential threat to his country:
It is the fact that he believes in his heart that ....
If you find such sentences written in the subjunctive mood, it is easier to understand them by changing the mood to the indicative mood, from a negative sentence to a positive sentence and vice versa.
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f278604%2fmeaning-of-would-not-be-coming-to-america-be-risking-the-most-important%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America:
He is coming to America
(Actually, he came and addressed Congress, which angered Obama and the Department of State as his visit was arranged by the Republicans in order to derail the nuclear negotiation with Iran).
he would not be risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has:
He is risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has.
(Israel's most important national security arrangement is the one with the U.S., and Netanyahu thinks stopping the nuclear deal is more important than a possibility that his visiting and addressing uninvited by the White House can worsen the relationship and arrangement with the U.S.)
if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is going to end up being an existential threat to his country:
It is the fact that he believes in his heart that ....
If you find such sentences written in the subjunctive mood, it is easier to understand them by changing the mood to the indicative mood, from a negative sentence to a positive sentence and vice versa.
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
add a comment |
Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America:
He is coming to America
(Actually, he came and addressed Congress, which angered Obama and the Department of State as his visit was arranged by the Republicans in order to derail the nuclear negotiation with Iran).
he would not be risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has:
He is risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has.
(Israel's most important national security arrangement is the one with the U.S., and Netanyahu thinks stopping the nuclear deal is more important than a possibility that his visiting and addressing uninvited by the White House can worsen the relationship and arrangement with the U.S.)
if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is going to end up being an existential threat to his country:
It is the fact that he believes in his heart that ....
If you find such sentences written in the subjunctive mood, it is easier to understand them by changing the mood to the indicative mood, from a negative sentence to a positive sentence and vice versa.
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
add a comment |
Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America:
He is coming to America
(Actually, he came and addressed Congress, which angered Obama and the Department of State as his visit was arranged by the Republicans in order to derail the nuclear negotiation with Iran).
he would not be risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has:
He is risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has.
(Israel's most important national security arrangement is the one with the U.S., and Netanyahu thinks stopping the nuclear deal is more important than a possibility that his visiting and addressing uninvited by the White House can worsen the relationship and arrangement with the U.S.)
if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is going to end up being an existential threat to his country:
It is the fact that he believes in his heart that ....
If you find such sentences written in the subjunctive mood, it is easier to understand them by changing the mood to the indicative mood, from a negative sentence to a positive sentence and vice versa.
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
Prime Minister Netanyahu would not be coming to America:
He is coming to America
(Actually, he came and addressed Congress, which angered Obama and the Department of State as his visit was arranged by the Republicans in order to derail the nuclear negotiation with Iran).
he would not be risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has:
He is risking the most important national security arrangement that Israel has.
(Israel's most important national security arrangement is the one with the U.S., and Netanyahu thinks stopping the nuclear deal is more important than a possibility that his visiting and addressing uninvited by the White House can worsen the relationship and arrangement with the U.S.)
if it wasn't for the fact that he believed in his heart that Iran's and the United States` nuclear negotiating is going to end up being an existential threat to his country:
It is the fact that he believes in his heart that ....
If you find such sentences written in the subjunctive mood, it is easier to understand them by changing the mood to the indicative mood, from a negative sentence to a positive sentence and vice versa.
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
edited 13 mins ago
Laurel
31.6k660112
31.6k660112
answered Oct 8 '15 at 5:10
user140086
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f278604%2fmeaning-of-would-not-be-coming-to-america-be-risking-the-most-important%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
This is a quote from Rich Santorum, ex-Senator from Pennsylvania, ex-Presidential candidate, and an 11 on the Richter idiocy scale. I wouldn't bother trying to parse the syntax. Republicans invited Netanyahu to address Congress to attack the policies of the sitting President, which basically made Netanyahu a suborner of sedition. Santorum is saying that Netanyahu wouldn't have done something so dire if he didn't think the President's policy of negotiating with Iran held the real possibility of destroying Israel.
– deadrat
Oct 8 '15 at 3:56