Can't install Fedora 29 on Thinkpad W550s due to GPT











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a Lenovo Thinkpad W550s that already has Windows 7 on it. I would like to install Fedora 29 Workstation alongside Windows 7, but I have run into some problems.



The hard drive was formatted with MBR (not GPT) and three partitions. Using the fdisk -l command from a Fedora 29 LiveUSB yields the following information:



Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x7a8dee3d

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 3074047 3072000 1.5G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 3074048 944916479 941842432 449.1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 944916480 976771071 31854592 15.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT


The motherboard has UEFI. However, Legacy BIOS is enabled, and Secure Boot is disabled.



In the Fedora 29 Workstation installer, I could shrink the /dev/sda2 partition, and use that for root, home, whatever, and delete the /dev/sda3 partition to satisfy the four partition limit with MBR. But when I try to install the OS, the installer gives an error about requiring a /boot/efi partition. Even when I try deleting /dev/sda1 (still from within the Fedora installer), formatting that and installing the EFI to /dev/sda1, the installer still won't proceed.



Is there a way to install Fedora 29 on this laptop without removing Windows 7? I need it for work, and can't do a reinstall of Windows 7.










share|improve this question






















  • How are you installing? Via USB? How did you make the USB? I would use RUFUS from Windows.
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 21 at 0:42










  • If not, try using DD from Linux or Rufus in DD mode NOT ISO Mode
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 21 at 0:42










  • I used UNETbootin. I'll try using dd instead.
    – Ertain
    Nov 21 at 19:09















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a Lenovo Thinkpad W550s that already has Windows 7 on it. I would like to install Fedora 29 Workstation alongside Windows 7, but I have run into some problems.



The hard drive was formatted with MBR (not GPT) and three partitions. Using the fdisk -l command from a Fedora 29 LiveUSB yields the following information:



Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x7a8dee3d

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 3074047 3072000 1.5G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 3074048 944916479 941842432 449.1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 944916480 976771071 31854592 15.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT


The motherboard has UEFI. However, Legacy BIOS is enabled, and Secure Boot is disabled.



In the Fedora 29 Workstation installer, I could shrink the /dev/sda2 partition, and use that for root, home, whatever, and delete the /dev/sda3 partition to satisfy the four partition limit with MBR. But when I try to install the OS, the installer gives an error about requiring a /boot/efi partition. Even when I try deleting /dev/sda1 (still from within the Fedora installer), formatting that and installing the EFI to /dev/sda1, the installer still won't proceed.



Is there a way to install Fedora 29 on this laptop without removing Windows 7? I need it for work, and can't do a reinstall of Windows 7.










share|improve this question






















  • How are you installing? Via USB? How did you make the USB? I would use RUFUS from Windows.
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 21 at 0:42










  • If not, try using DD from Linux or Rufus in DD mode NOT ISO Mode
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 21 at 0:42










  • I used UNETbootin. I'll try using dd instead.
    – Ertain
    Nov 21 at 19:09













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have a Lenovo Thinkpad W550s that already has Windows 7 on it. I would like to install Fedora 29 Workstation alongside Windows 7, but I have run into some problems.



The hard drive was formatted with MBR (not GPT) and three partitions. Using the fdisk -l command from a Fedora 29 LiveUSB yields the following information:



Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x7a8dee3d

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 3074047 3072000 1.5G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 3074048 944916479 941842432 449.1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 944916480 976771071 31854592 15.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT


The motherboard has UEFI. However, Legacy BIOS is enabled, and Secure Boot is disabled.



In the Fedora 29 Workstation installer, I could shrink the /dev/sda2 partition, and use that for root, home, whatever, and delete the /dev/sda3 partition to satisfy the four partition limit with MBR. But when I try to install the OS, the installer gives an error about requiring a /boot/efi partition. Even when I try deleting /dev/sda1 (still from within the Fedora installer), formatting that and installing the EFI to /dev/sda1, the installer still won't proceed.



Is there a way to install Fedora 29 on this laptop without removing Windows 7? I need it for work, and can't do a reinstall of Windows 7.










share|improve this question













I have a Lenovo Thinkpad W550s that already has Windows 7 on it. I would like to install Fedora 29 Workstation alongside Windows 7, but I have run into some problems.



The hard drive was formatted with MBR (not GPT) and three partitions. Using the fdisk -l command from a Fedora 29 LiveUSB yields the following information:



Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x7a8dee3d

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 3074047 3072000 1.5G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 3074048 944916479 941842432 449.1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 944916480 976771071 31854592 15.2G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT


The motherboard has UEFI. However, Legacy BIOS is enabled, and Secure Boot is disabled.



In the Fedora 29 Workstation installer, I could shrink the /dev/sda2 partition, and use that for root, home, whatever, and delete the /dev/sda3 partition to satisfy the four partition limit with MBR. But when I try to install the OS, the installer gives an error about requiring a /boot/efi partition. Even when I try deleting /dev/sda1 (still from within the Fedora installer), formatting that and installing the EFI to /dev/sda1, the installer still won't proceed.



Is there a way to install Fedora 29 on this laptop without removing Windows 7? I need it for work, and can't do a reinstall of Windows 7.







fedora partition uefi gpt thinkpad






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 at 0:27









Ertain

133




133












  • How are you installing? Via USB? How did you make the USB? I would use RUFUS from Windows.
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 21 at 0:42










  • If not, try using DD from Linux or Rufus in DD mode NOT ISO Mode
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 21 at 0:42










  • I used UNETbootin. I'll try using dd instead.
    – Ertain
    Nov 21 at 19:09


















  • How are you installing? Via USB? How did you make the USB? I would use RUFUS from Windows.
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 21 at 0:42










  • If not, try using DD from Linux or Rufus in DD mode NOT ISO Mode
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 21 at 0:42










  • I used UNETbootin. I'll try using dd instead.
    – Ertain
    Nov 21 at 19:09
















How are you installing? Via USB? How did you make the USB? I would use RUFUS from Windows.
– FreeSoftwareServers
Nov 21 at 0:42




How are you installing? Via USB? How did you make the USB? I would use RUFUS from Windows.
– FreeSoftwareServers
Nov 21 at 0:42












If not, try using DD from Linux or Rufus in DD mode NOT ISO Mode
– FreeSoftwareServers
Nov 21 at 0:42




If not, try using DD from Linux or Rufus in DD mode NOT ISO Mode
– FreeSoftwareServers
Nov 21 at 0:42












I used UNETbootin. I'll try using dd instead.
– Ertain
Nov 21 at 19:09




I used UNETbootin. I'll try using dd instead.
– Ertain
Nov 21 at 19:09










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










One of two things are the issue:




  • You created a UEFI only Installer USB

  • Your booting in UEFI mode and need to boot in MBR/Legacy Mode.


If you can get to the CLI try this :



https://askubuntu.com/questions/162564/how-can-i-tell-if-my-system-was-booted-as-efi-uefi-or-bios



Update:




  • When I have a USB/ISO that is both UEFI/MBR compatible it usually shows two boot options in the BIOS/BootLoader. See if a second option shows up and try that and/or try messing with BIOS settings to force MBR/Legacy mode only.


  • I have also had it where Rufus (Windows ISO write to USB Tool) will say "Do you want to use ISO Mode (Recommended)" or "DD Mode" and I generally use ISO mode. But, I remember having where that created a UEFI only ISO and I then tried DD Mode and had a Hybrid USB which was both MBR and UEFI compatible. Try using DD to create installer USB and then check for a new boot entry.







share|improve this answer























  • How can I check to see whether the USB installer is UEFI only?
    – Ertain
    Nov 21 at 19:11






  • 1




    The problem was with UNETbootin. I should have used dd at first to write the ISO to the USB drive instead of using UNETbootin.
    – Ertain
    Nov 22 at 16:48










  • @Ertain I'm glad you got it sorted! My answer was a bit "vague" but seemed to point you in the right direction! I really like RUFUS for Windows to create USB from ISO, but if using Linux, maybe DD is the way to go!
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 23 at 5:26


















up vote
0
down vote













Try to shrink the partitions from a live cd, apply the changes in GParted or whatever. Then reboot to live cd again. Check the disk, fix the MBR if nessassary, then reboot to the installer and try installing. This should work if your BIOS setting are right.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483093%2fcant-install-fedora-29-on-thinkpad-w550s-due-to-gpt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    One of two things are the issue:




    • You created a UEFI only Installer USB

    • Your booting in UEFI mode and need to boot in MBR/Legacy Mode.


    If you can get to the CLI try this :



    https://askubuntu.com/questions/162564/how-can-i-tell-if-my-system-was-booted-as-efi-uefi-or-bios



    Update:




    • When I have a USB/ISO that is both UEFI/MBR compatible it usually shows two boot options in the BIOS/BootLoader. See if a second option shows up and try that and/or try messing with BIOS settings to force MBR/Legacy mode only.


    • I have also had it where Rufus (Windows ISO write to USB Tool) will say "Do you want to use ISO Mode (Recommended)" or "DD Mode" and I generally use ISO mode. But, I remember having where that created a UEFI only ISO and I then tried DD Mode and had a Hybrid USB which was both MBR and UEFI compatible. Try using DD to create installer USB and then check for a new boot entry.







    share|improve this answer























    • How can I check to see whether the USB installer is UEFI only?
      – Ertain
      Nov 21 at 19:11






    • 1




      The problem was with UNETbootin. I should have used dd at first to write the ISO to the USB drive instead of using UNETbootin.
      – Ertain
      Nov 22 at 16:48










    • @Ertain I'm glad you got it sorted! My answer was a bit "vague" but seemed to point you in the right direction! I really like RUFUS for Windows to create USB from ISO, but if using Linux, maybe DD is the way to go!
      – FreeSoftwareServers
      Nov 23 at 5:26















    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    One of two things are the issue:




    • You created a UEFI only Installer USB

    • Your booting in UEFI mode and need to boot in MBR/Legacy Mode.


    If you can get to the CLI try this :



    https://askubuntu.com/questions/162564/how-can-i-tell-if-my-system-was-booted-as-efi-uefi-or-bios



    Update:




    • When I have a USB/ISO that is both UEFI/MBR compatible it usually shows two boot options in the BIOS/BootLoader. See if a second option shows up and try that and/or try messing with BIOS settings to force MBR/Legacy mode only.


    • I have also had it where Rufus (Windows ISO write to USB Tool) will say "Do you want to use ISO Mode (Recommended)" or "DD Mode" and I generally use ISO mode. But, I remember having where that created a UEFI only ISO and I then tried DD Mode and had a Hybrid USB which was both MBR and UEFI compatible. Try using DD to create installer USB and then check for a new boot entry.







    share|improve this answer























    • How can I check to see whether the USB installer is UEFI only?
      – Ertain
      Nov 21 at 19:11






    • 1




      The problem was with UNETbootin. I should have used dd at first to write the ISO to the USB drive instead of using UNETbootin.
      – Ertain
      Nov 22 at 16:48










    • @Ertain I'm glad you got it sorted! My answer was a bit "vague" but seemed to point you in the right direction! I really like RUFUS for Windows to create USB from ISO, but if using Linux, maybe DD is the way to go!
      – FreeSoftwareServers
      Nov 23 at 5:26













    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted






    One of two things are the issue:




    • You created a UEFI only Installer USB

    • Your booting in UEFI mode and need to boot in MBR/Legacy Mode.


    If you can get to the CLI try this :



    https://askubuntu.com/questions/162564/how-can-i-tell-if-my-system-was-booted-as-efi-uefi-or-bios



    Update:




    • When I have a USB/ISO that is both UEFI/MBR compatible it usually shows two boot options in the BIOS/BootLoader. See if a second option shows up and try that and/or try messing with BIOS settings to force MBR/Legacy mode only.


    • I have also had it where Rufus (Windows ISO write to USB Tool) will say "Do you want to use ISO Mode (Recommended)" or "DD Mode" and I generally use ISO mode. But, I remember having where that created a UEFI only ISO and I then tried DD Mode and had a Hybrid USB which was both MBR and UEFI compatible. Try using DD to create installer USB and then check for a new boot entry.







    share|improve this answer














    One of two things are the issue:




    • You created a UEFI only Installer USB

    • Your booting in UEFI mode and need to boot in MBR/Legacy Mode.


    If you can get to the CLI try this :



    https://askubuntu.com/questions/162564/how-can-i-tell-if-my-system-was-booted-as-efi-uefi-or-bios



    Update:




    • When I have a USB/ISO that is both UEFI/MBR compatible it usually shows two boot options in the BIOS/BootLoader. See if a second option shows up and try that and/or try messing with BIOS settings to force MBR/Legacy mode only.


    • I have also had it where Rufus (Windows ISO write to USB Tool) will say "Do you want to use ISO Mode (Recommended)" or "DD Mode" and I generally use ISO mode. But, I remember having where that created a UEFI only ISO and I then tried DD Mode and had a Hybrid USB which was both MBR and UEFI compatible. Try using DD to create installer USB and then check for a new boot entry.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 23 at 5:25

























    answered Nov 21 at 0:39









    FreeSoftwareServers

    96621836




    96621836












    • How can I check to see whether the USB installer is UEFI only?
      – Ertain
      Nov 21 at 19:11






    • 1




      The problem was with UNETbootin. I should have used dd at first to write the ISO to the USB drive instead of using UNETbootin.
      – Ertain
      Nov 22 at 16:48










    • @Ertain I'm glad you got it sorted! My answer was a bit "vague" but seemed to point you in the right direction! I really like RUFUS for Windows to create USB from ISO, but if using Linux, maybe DD is the way to go!
      – FreeSoftwareServers
      Nov 23 at 5:26


















    • How can I check to see whether the USB installer is UEFI only?
      – Ertain
      Nov 21 at 19:11






    • 1




      The problem was with UNETbootin. I should have used dd at first to write the ISO to the USB drive instead of using UNETbootin.
      – Ertain
      Nov 22 at 16:48










    • @Ertain I'm glad you got it sorted! My answer was a bit "vague" but seemed to point you in the right direction! I really like RUFUS for Windows to create USB from ISO, but if using Linux, maybe DD is the way to go!
      – FreeSoftwareServers
      Nov 23 at 5:26
















    How can I check to see whether the USB installer is UEFI only?
    – Ertain
    Nov 21 at 19:11




    How can I check to see whether the USB installer is UEFI only?
    – Ertain
    Nov 21 at 19:11




    1




    1




    The problem was with UNETbootin. I should have used dd at first to write the ISO to the USB drive instead of using UNETbootin.
    – Ertain
    Nov 22 at 16:48




    The problem was with UNETbootin. I should have used dd at first to write the ISO to the USB drive instead of using UNETbootin.
    – Ertain
    Nov 22 at 16:48












    @Ertain I'm glad you got it sorted! My answer was a bit "vague" but seemed to point you in the right direction! I really like RUFUS for Windows to create USB from ISO, but if using Linux, maybe DD is the way to go!
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 23 at 5:26




    @Ertain I'm glad you got it sorted! My answer was a bit "vague" but seemed to point you in the right direction! I really like RUFUS for Windows to create USB from ISO, but if using Linux, maybe DD is the way to go!
    – FreeSoftwareServers
    Nov 23 at 5:26












    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Try to shrink the partitions from a live cd, apply the changes in GParted or whatever. Then reboot to live cd again. Check the disk, fix the MBR if nessassary, then reboot to the installer and try installing. This should work if your BIOS setting are right.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Try to shrink the partitions from a live cd, apply the changes in GParted or whatever. Then reboot to live cd again. Check the disk, fix the MBR if nessassary, then reboot to the installer and try installing. This should work if your BIOS setting are right.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Try to shrink the partitions from a live cd, apply the changes in GParted or whatever. Then reboot to live cd again. Check the disk, fix the MBR if nessassary, then reboot to the installer and try installing. This should work if your BIOS setting are right.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        Try to shrink the partitions from a live cd, apply the changes in GParted or whatever. Then reboot to live cd again. Check the disk, fix the MBR if nessassary, then reboot to the installer and try installing. This should work if your BIOS setting are right.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered Nov 21 at 1:11









        Michael Prokopec

        52415




        52415




        New contributor




        Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Michael Prokopec is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483093%2fcant-install-fedora-29-on-thinkpad-w550s-due-to-gpt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Morgemoulin

            Scott Moir

            Souastre