Finding the Maximum and Minimum Values of a Function in a Domain











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












Find the maximum and minimum values of the function $f(x, y) = 2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$ on the domain $x^2+y^2le 225$.



After finding the first partial derivatives, I found that $(1, 0)$ was a critical point and I found that it was a local minimum from the second derivative test. So the minimum value of $f(x, y)$ would be $-7$ at the point $(1, 0)$.



However, what I am confused about is how to find the maximum value and point. Since this function does not have a local maximum point, I thought that the answer would simply be on the boundaries of the inequality. However, it seems that neither the point $(15, 0)$ or $(0, 15)$ give the correct answer.



If anyone knows how I should approach this problem and can provide feedback, I would be very grateful!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    The boundary of the domain is a full circle defined by $x^2+y^2leq 225$, not just the two points $(15,0)$ and $(0,15)$.
    – 高田航
    Nov 24 at 6:15










  • Yes I see. So in that case, could you please tell me how I should approach this problem instead? Thank you!
    – sktsasus
    Nov 24 at 6:31










  • have you heard about Langrange multipliers?
    – Thomas
    Nov 24 at 6:37















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












Find the maximum and minimum values of the function $f(x, y) = 2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$ on the domain $x^2+y^2le 225$.



After finding the first partial derivatives, I found that $(1, 0)$ was a critical point and I found that it was a local minimum from the second derivative test. So the minimum value of $f(x, y)$ would be $-7$ at the point $(1, 0)$.



However, what I am confused about is how to find the maximum value and point. Since this function does not have a local maximum point, I thought that the answer would simply be on the boundaries of the inequality. However, it seems that neither the point $(15, 0)$ or $(0, 15)$ give the correct answer.



If anyone knows how I should approach this problem and can provide feedback, I would be very grateful!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    The boundary of the domain is a full circle defined by $x^2+y^2leq 225$, not just the two points $(15,0)$ and $(0,15)$.
    – 高田航
    Nov 24 at 6:15










  • Yes I see. So in that case, could you please tell me how I should approach this problem instead? Thank you!
    – sktsasus
    Nov 24 at 6:31










  • have you heard about Langrange multipliers?
    – Thomas
    Nov 24 at 6:37













up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2






2





Find the maximum and minimum values of the function $f(x, y) = 2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$ on the domain $x^2+y^2le 225$.



After finding the first partial derivatives, I found that $(1, 0)$ was a critical point and I found that it was a local minimum from the second derivative test. So the minimum value of $f(x, y)$ would be $-7$ at the point $(1, 0)$.



However, what I am confused about is how to find the maximum value and point. Since this function does not have a local maximum point, I thought that the answer would simply be on the boundaries of the inequality. However, it seems that neither the point $(15, 0)$ or $(0, 15)$ give the correct answer.



If anyone knows how I should approach this problem and can provide feedback, I would be very grateful!










share|cite|improve this question













Find the maximum and minimum values of the function $f(x, y) = 2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$ on the domain $x^2+y^2le 225$.



After finding the first partial derivatives, I found that $(1, 0)$ was a critical point and I found that it was a local minimum from the second derivative test. So the minimum value of $f(x, y)$ would be $-7$ at the point $(1, 0)$.



However, what I am confused about is how to find the maximum value and point. Since this function does not have a local maximum point, I thought that the answer would simply be on the boundaries of the inequality. However, it seems that neither the point $(15, 0)$ or $(0, 15)$ give the correct answer.



If anyone knows how I should approach this problem and can provide feedback, I would be very grateful!







calculus multivariable-calculus optimization partial-derivative






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 24 at 6:07









sktsasus

973414




973414








  • 1




    The boundary of the domain is a full circle defined by $x^2+y^2leq 225$, not just the two points $(15,0)$ and $(0,15)$.
    – 高田航
    Nov 24 at 6:15










  • Yes I see. So in that case, could you please tell me how I should approach this problem instead? Thank you!
    – sktsasus
    Nov 24 at 6:31










  • have you heard about Langrange multipliers?
    – Thomas
    Nov 24 at 6:37














  • 1




    The boundary of the domain is a full circle defined by $x^2+y^2leq 225$, not just the two points $(15,0)$ and $(0,15)$.
    – 高田航
    Nov 24 at 6:15










  • Yes I see. So in that case, could you please tell me how I should approach this problem instead? Thank you!
    – sktsasus
    Nov 24 at 6:31










  • have you heard about Langrange multipliers?
    – Thomas
    Nov 24 at 6:37








1




1




The boundary of the domain is a full circle defined by $x^2+y^2leq 225$, not just the two points $(15,0)$ and $(0,15)$.
– 高田航
Nov 24 at 6:15




The boundary of the domain is a full circle defined by $x^2+y^2leq 225$, not just the two points $(15,0)$ and $(0,15)$.
– 高田航
Nov 24 at 6:15












Yes I see. So in that case, could you please tell me how I should approach this problem instead? Thank you!
– sktsasus
Nov 24 at 6:31




Yes I see. So in that case, could you please tell me how I should approach this problem instead? Thank you!
– sktsasus
Nov 24 at 6:31












have you heard about Langrange multipliers?
– Thomas
Nov 24 at 6:37




have you heard about Langrange multipliers?
– Thomas
Nov 24 at 6:37










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










According to the method of Lagrange parameters, the gradient of $f$ will be normal to the boundary in an extremal value. The normal to the circle in a given point $(x,y)$ is just the position vector $(x,y)$, so you have to look for points where $nabla f$ is a mulitple of that vector.



Now



$$nabla f =left ( array{4x-4 \ 6y} right) $$
which means we are looking for $x, y$ such that $ 4x-4 = lambda x, 6y= lambda y$ with the side condition $x^2+y^2=225$



This is true iff ($lambda = 6$ or $y=0$).



If $lambda = 6$ you easily see that then $x=-2$ and $y$ is determined by the side condition.



If $y=0$ $x$ is determined by the side condition (and $lambda$ by the equation for $x$ and $lambda$).



Plugging in $x$ and $y$ into the function will show whether you have a maximum or minimum.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thank you for the answer! I am familiar with Lagrange Multipliers but I just wasn't sure how they would work here. But now I do see that I needed to check for the global minimum as well as the critical point I found may not have been it. Thanks for the clarification!
    – sktsasus
    2 days ago




















up vote
3
down vote













As the guy in the comment says, the boundary of the domain is the circumference of the circle $x^2 + y^2 = 225$, not just the two points. Since the function has a minima at $(1,0)$ and no other critical points in the region, it means that the function is increasing in every direction from that point. So the maxima of the function will be at one of the boundary points. Now if the point is on the boundary, it will lie on the circle's circumference and satisfy the equation $x^2 + y^2 = 225$. Putting this in the function equation, we get



$$f(x,y) = 2x^2 + 3y^2 -4x -5$$
$$2x^2 + 3(225 - x^2) -4x -5$$
$$g(x)=-x^2 -4x + 670$$



Now you can diffrentiate to find out where this will have its maxima



$$g'(x) = -2x - 4 = 0$$
$$x=-2$$



As you can quickly confirm from the original equation or the graph of a quadratic equation, this is a maxima. Using this to get $y$



$$y^2 = 225 - x^2 = 225 -4 = 221$$
$$y = sqrt{221}$$



Putting $x=-2$ and $y=sqrt{221}$ back in the original function



$$f(x,y) = 674$$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Note the function must either be constant or must have at least one minimum and one maximum along the boundary, since that is compact and the function is continuous. You are loosing at least one solution by your approach.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago








  • 2




    Actually, $f(x,y) = f(x, -y)$, so with your values of $x, y$ you found two minima or maxima with the same value. This means you actually missed at least two other extrem values.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Hint: note that $-25 le xle 25$, so also the one dimensional problem to which you reduced the two dimensional one is an extreme value problem with a boundary condition.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago








  • 2




    The values you found for $y$ are the locations of the two maxima. In $y=0, x=pm 25$ you have two more extreme values (with respect to the boundary), which are the minima of $f$ along the boundary (but not global minima, the global minimum is attained in the interior of the region, which was discoverd by the OP already).
    – Thomas
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Thomas Every occurrence of "25" should be "15" in your comments. This doesn't affect anything else, but may have misled others.
    – Teepeemm
    2 days ago


















up vote
2
down vote













If you don't know, or want to use, Lagrange Multipliers as in Thomas's answer, and you want to find the local extrema on the boundary to make sure you don't miss anything, then you can either handle the endpoints with $x=pm15$ that Sauhard Sharma neglected to address in their answer, or you can give the circle a more natural parametrization.



Circles can be parametrized with cosines and sines, so the circle $x^2+y^2=225$ is parametrized by $x=15cos t,, y=15sin t$. If you substitute this in to the objective function $2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$, you'll see how the values of the function above the circle depend on the angle $t$, and you can then use single-variable calculus to find the local extrema. Since cosine and sine are continuous on the whole real line, you don't have to worry about missing end-points with this method.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    With free CAS Maxima and my programm "nopt":



    package "nopt"



    examples



    enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • @ Mark S Link to package "nopt" I include.
      – Aleksas Domarkas
      19 hours ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011249%2ffinding-the-maximum-and-minimum-values-of-a-function-in-a-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    According to the method of Lagrange parameters, the gradient of $f$ will be normal to the boundary in an extremal value. The normal to the circle in a given point $(x,y)$ is just the position vector $(x,y)$, so you have to look for points where $nabla f$ is a mulitple of that vector.



    Now



    $$nabla f =left ( array{4x-4 \ 6y} right) $$
    which means we are looking for $x, y$ such that $ 4x-4 = lambda x, 6y= lambda y$ with the side condition $x^2+y^2=225$



    This is true iff ($lambda = 6$ or $y=0$).



    If $lambda = 6$ you easily see that then $x=-2$ and $y$ is determined by the side condition.



    If $y=0$ $x$ is determined by the side condition (and $lambda$ by the equation for $x$ and $lambda$).



    Plugging in $x$ and $y$ into the function will show whether you have a maximum or minimum.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thank you for the answer! I am familiar with Lagrange Multipliers but I just wasn't sure how they would work here. But now I do see that I needed to check for the global minimum as well as the critical point I found may not have been it. Thanks for the clarification!
      – sktsasus
      2 days ago

















    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    According to the method of Lagrange parameters, the gradient of $f$ will be normal to the boundary in an extremal value. The normal to the circle in a given point $(x,y)$ is just the position vector $(x,y)$, so you have to look for points where $nabla f$ is a mulitple of that vector.



    Now



    $$nabla f =left ( array{4x-4 \ 6y} right) $$
    which means we are looking for $x, y$ such that $ 4x-4 = lambda x, 6y= lambda y$ with the side condition $x^2+y^2=225$



    This is true iff ($lambda = 6$ or $y=0$).



    If $lambda = 6$ you easily see that then $x=-2$ and $y$ is determined by the side condition.



    If $y=0$ $x$ is determined by the side condition (and $lambda$ by the equation for $x$ and $lambda$).



    Plugging in $x$ and $y$ into the function will show whether you have a maximum or minimum.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Thank you for the answer! I am familiar with Lagrange Multipliers but I just wasn't sure how they would work here. But now I do see that I needed to check for the global minimum as well as the critical point I found may not have been it. Thanks for the clarification!
      – sktsasus
      2 days ago















    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted






    According to the method of Lagrange parameters, the gradient of $f$ will be normal to the boundary in an extremal value. The normal to the circle in a given point $(x,y)$ is just the position vector $(x,y)$, so you have to look for points where $nabla f$ is a mulitple of that vector.



    Now



    $$nabla f =left ( array{4x-4 \ 6y} right) $$
    which means we are looking for $x, y$ such that $ 4x-4 = lambda x, 6y= lambda y$ with the side condition $x^2+y^2=225$



    This is true iff ($lambda = 6$ or $y=0$).



    If $lambda = 6$ you easily see that then $x=-2$ and $y$ is determined by the side condition.



    If $y=0$ $x$ is determined by the side condition (and $lambda$ by the equation for $x$ and $lambda$).



    Plugging in $x$ and $y$ into the function will show whether you have a maximum or minimum.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    According to the method of Lagrange parameters, the gradient of $f$ will be normal to the boundary in an extremal value. The normal to the circle in a given point $(x,y)$ is just the position vector $(x,y)$, so you have to look for points where $nabla f$ is a mulitple of that vector.



    Now



    $$nabla f =left ( array{4x-4 \ 6y} right) $$
    which means we are looking for $x, y$ such that $ 4x-4 = lambda x, 6y= lambda y$ with the side condition $x^2+y^2=225$



    This is true iff ($lambda = 6$ or $y=0$).



    If $lambda = 6$ you easily see that then $x=-2$ and $y$ is determined by the side condition.



    If $y=0$ $x$ is determined by the side condition (and $lambda$ by the equation for $x$ and $lambda$).



    Plugging in $x$ and $y$ into the function will show whether you have a maximum or minimum.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    Thomas

    16.6k21530




    16.6k21530












    • Thank you for the answer! I am familiar with Lagrange Multipliers but I just wasn't sure how they would work here. But now I do see that I needed to check for the global minimum as well as the critical point I found may not have been it. Thanks for the clarification!
      – sktsasus
      2 days ago




















    • Thank you for the answer! I am familiar with Lagrange Multipliers but I just wasn't sure how they would work here. But now I do see that I needed to check for the global minimum as well as the critical point I found may not have been it. Thanks for the clarification!
      – sktsasus
      2 days ago


















    Thank you for the answer! I am familiar with Lagrange Multipliers but I just wasn't sure how they would work here. But now I do see that I needed to check for the global minimum as well as the critical point I found may not have been it. Thanks for the clarification!
    – sktsasus
    2 days ago






    Thank you for the answer! I am familiar with Lagrange Multipliers but I just wasn't sure how they would work here. But now I do see that I needed to check for the global minimum as well as the critical point I found may not have been it. Thanks for the clarification!
    – sktsasus
    2 days ago












    up vote
    3
    down vote













    As the guy in the comment says, the boundary of the domain is the circumference of the circle $x^2 + y^2 = 225$, not just the two points. Since the function has a minima at $(1,0)$ and no other critical points in the region, it means that the function is increasing in every direction from that point. So the maxima of the function will be at one of the boundary points. Now if the point is on the boundary, it will lie on the circle's circumference and satisfy the equation $x^2 + y^2 = 225$. Putting this in the function equation, we get



    $$f(x,y) = 2x^2 + 3y^2 -4x -5$$
    $$2x^2 + 3(225 - x^2) -4x -5$$
    $$g(x)=-x^2 -4x + 670$$



    Now you can diffrentiate to find out where this will have its maxima



    $$g'(x) = -2x - 4 = 0$$
    $$x=-2$$



    As you can quickly confirm from the original equation or the graph of a quadratic equation, this is a maxima. Using this to get $y$



    $$y^2 = 225 - x^2 = 225 -4 = 221$$
    $$y = sqrt{221}$$



    Putting $x=-2$ and $y=sqrt{221}$ back in the original function



    $$f(x,y) = 674$$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Note the function must either be constant or must have at least one minimum and one maximum along the boundary, since that is compact and the function is continuous. You are loosing at least one solution by your approach.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago








    • 2




      Actually, $f(x,y) = f(x, -y)$, so with your values of $x, y$ you found two minima or maxima with the same value. This means you actually missed at least two other extrem values.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago






    • 1




      Hint: note that $-25 le xle 25$, so also the one dimensional problem to which you reduced the two dimensional one is an extreme value problem with a boundary condition.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago








    • 2




      The values you found for $y$ are the locations of the two maxima. In $y=0, x=pm 25$ you have two more extreme values (with respect to the boundary), which are the minima of $f$ along the boundary (but not global minima, the global minimum is attained in the interior of the region, which was discoverd by the OP already).
      – Thomas
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @Thomas Every occurrence of "25" should be "15" in your comments. This doesn't affect anything else, but may have misled others.
      – Teepeemm
      2 days ago















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    As the guy in the comment says, the boundary of the domain is the circumference of the circle $x^2 + y^2 = 225$, not just the two points. Since the function has a minima at $(1,0)$ and no other critical points in the region, it means that the function is increasing in every direction from that point. So the maxima of the function will be at one of the boundary points. Now if the point is on the boundary, it will lie on the circle's circumference and satisfy the equation $x^2 + y^2 = 225$. Putting this in the function equation, we get



    $$f(x,y) = 2x^2 + 3y^2 -4x -5$$
    $$2x^2 + 3(225 - x^2) -4x -5$$
    $$g(x)=-x^2 -4x + 670$$



    Now you can diffrentiate to find out where this will have its maxima



    $$g'(x) = -2x - 4 = 0$$
    $$x=-2$$



    As you can quickly confirm from the original equation or the graph of a quadratic equation, this is a maxima. Using this to get $y$



    $$y^2 = 225 - x^2 = 225 -4 = 221$$
    $$y = sqrt{221}$$



    Putting $x=-2$ and $y=sqrt{221}$ back in the original function



    $$f(x,y) = 674$$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Note the function must either be constant or must have at least one minimum and one maximum along the boundary, since that is compact and the function is continuous. You are loosing at least one solution by your approach.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago








    • 2




      Actually, $f(x,y) = f(x, -y)$, so with your values of $x, y$ you found two minima or maxima with the same value. This means you actually missed at least two other extrem values.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago






    • 1




      Hint: note that $-25 le xle 25$, so also the one dimensional problem to which you reduced the two dimensional one is an extreme value problem with a boundary condition.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago








    • 2




      The values you found for $y$ are the locations of the two maxima. In $y=0, x=pm 25$ you have two more extreme values (with respect to the boundary), which are the minima of $f$ along the boundary (but not global minima, the global minimum is attained in the interior of the region, which was discoverd by the OP already).
      – Thomas
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @Thomas Every occurrence of "25" should be "15" in your comments. This doesn't affect anything else, but may have misled others.
      – Teepeemm
      2 days ago













    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    As the guy in the comment says, the boundary of the domain is the circumference of the circle $x^2 + y^2 = 225$, not just the two points. Since the function has a minima at $(1,0)$ and no other critical points in the region, it means that the function is increasing in every direction from that point. So the maxima of the function will be at one of the boundary points. Now if the point is on the boundary, it will lie on the circle's circumference and satisfy the equation $x^2 + y^2 = 225$. Putting this in the function equation, we get



    $$f(x,y) = 2x^2 + 3y^2 -4x -5$$
    $$2x^2 + 3(225 - x^2) -4x -5$$
    $$g(x)=-x^2 -4x + 670$$



    Now you can diffrentiate to find out where this will have its maxima



    $$g'(x) = -2x - 4 = 0$$
    $$x=-2$$



    As you can quickly confirm from the original equation or the graph of a quadratic equation, this is a maxima. Using this to get $y$



    $$y^2 = 225 - x^2 = 225 -4 = 221$$
    $$y = sqrt{221}$$



    Putting $x=-2$ and $y=sqrt{221}$ back in the original function



    $$f(x,y) = 674$$






    share|cite|improve this answer












    As the guy in the comment says, the boundary of the domain is the circumference of the circle $x^2 + y^2 = 225$, not just the two points. Since the function has a minima at $(1,0)$ and no other critical points in the region, it means that the function is increasing in every direction from that point. So the maxima of the function will be at one of the boundary points. Now if the point is on the boundary, it will lie on the circle's circumference and satisfy the equation $x^2 + y^2 = 225$. Putting this in the function equation, we get



    $$f(x,y) = 2x^2 + 3y^2 -4x -5$$
    $$2x^2 + 3(225 - x^2) -4x -5$$
    $$g(x)=-x^2 -4x + 670$$



    Now you can diffrentiate to find out where this will have its maxima



    $$g'(x) = -2x - 4 = 0$$
    $$x=-2$$



    As you can quickly confirm from the original equation or the graph of a quadratic equation, this is a maxima. Using this to get $y$



    $$y^2 = 225 - x^2 = 225 -4 = 221$$
    $$y = sqrt{221}$$



    Putting $x=-2$ and $y=sqrt{221}$ back in the original function



    $$f(x,y) = 674$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 24 at 6:36









    Sauhard Sharma

    3108




    3108








    • 1




      Note the function must either be constant or must have at least one minimum and one maximum along the boundary, since that is compact and the function is continuous. You are loosing at least one solution by your approach.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago








    • 2




      Actually, $f(x,y) = f(x, -y)$, so with your values of $x, y$ you found two minima or maxima with the same value. This means you actually missed at least two other extrem values.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago






    • 1




      Hint: note that $-25 le xle 25$, so also the one dimensional problem to which you reduced the two dimensional one is an extreme value problem with a boundary condition.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago








    • 2




      The values you found for $y$ are the locations of the two maxima. In $y=0, x=pm 25$ you have two more extreme values (with respect to the boundary), which are the minima of $f$ along the boundary (but not global minima, the global minimum is attained in the interior of the region, which was discoverd by the OP already).
      – Thomas
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @Thomas Every occurrence of "25" should be "15" in your comments. This doesn't affect anything else, but may have misled others.
      – Teepeemm
      2 days ago














    • 1




      Note the function must either be constant or must have at least one minimum and one maximum along the boundary, since that is compact and the function is continuous. You are loosing at least one solution by your approach.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago








    • 2




      Actually, $f(x,y) = f(x, -y)$, so with your values of $x, y$ you found two minima or maxima with the same value. This means you actually missed at least two other extrem values.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago






    • 1




      Hint: note that $-25 le xle 25$, so also the one dimensional problem to which you reduced the two dimensional one is an extreme value problem with a boundary condition.
      – Thomas
      2 days ago








    • 2




      The values you found for $y$ are the locations of the two maxima. In $y=0, x=pm 25$ you have two more extreme values (with respect to the boundary), which are the minima of $f$ along the boundary (but not global minima, the global minimum is attained in the interior of the region, which was discoverd by the OP already).
      – Thomas
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @Thomas Every occurrence of "25" should be "15" in your comments. This doesn't affect anything else, but may have misled others.
      – Teepeemm
      2 days ago








    1




    1




    Note the function must either be constant or must have at least one minimum and one maximum along the boundary, since that is compact and the function is continuous. You are loosing at least one solution by your approach.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago






    Note the function must either be constant or must have at least one minimum and one maximum along the boundary, since that is compact and the function is continuous. You are loosing at least one solution by your approach.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago






    2




    2




    Actually, $f(x,y) = f(x, -y)$, so with your values of $x, y$ you found two minima or maxima with the same value. This means you actually missed at least two other extrem values.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago




    Actually, $f(x,y) = f(x, -y)$, so with your values of $x, y$ you found two minima or maxima with the same value. This means you actually missed at least two other extrem values.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago




    1




    1




    Hint: note that $-25 le xle 25$, so also the one dimensional problem to which you reduced the two dimensional one is an extreme value problem with a boundary condition.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago






    Hint: note that $-25 le xle 25$, so also the one dimensional problem to which you reduced the two dimensional one is an extreme value problem with a boundary condition.
    – Thomas
    2 days ago






    2




    2




    The values you found for $y$ are the locations of the two maxima. In $y=0, x=pm 25$ you have two more extreme values (with respect to the boundary), which are the minima of $f$ along the boundary (but not global minima, the global minimum is attained in the interior of the region, which was discoverd by the OP already).
    – Thomas
    2 days ago




    The values you found for $y$ are the locations of the two maxima. In $y=0, x=pm 25$ you have two more extreme values (with respect to the boundary), which are the minima of $f$ along the boundary (but not global minima, the global minimum is attained in the interior of the region, which was discoverd by the OP already).
    – Thomas
    2 days ago




    1




    1




    @Thomas Every occurrence of "25" should be "15" in your comments. This doesn't affect anything else, but may have misled others.
    – Teepeemm
    2 days ago




    @Thomas Every occurrence of "25" should be "15" in your comments. This doesn't affect anything else, but may have misled others.
    – Teepeemm
    2 days ago










    up vote
    2
    down vote













    If you don't know, or want to use, Lagrange Multipliers as in Thomas's answer, and you want to find the local extrema on the boundary to make sure you don't miss anything, then you can either handle the endpoints with $x=pm15$ that Sauhard Sharma neglected to address in their answer, or you can give the circle a more natural parametrization.



    Circles can be parametrized with cosines and sines, so the circle $x^2+y^2=225$ is parametrized by $x=15cos t,, y=15sin t$. If you substitute this in to the objective function $2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$, you'll see how the values of the function above the circle depend on the angle $t$, and you can then use single-variable calculus to find the local extrema. Since cosine and sine are continuous on the whole real line, you don't have to worry about missing end-points with this method.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      If you don't know, or want to use, Lagrange Multipliers as in Thomas's answer, and you want to find the local extrema on the boundary to make sure you don't miss anything, then you can either handle the endpoints with $x=pm15$ that Sauhard Sharma neglected to address in their answer, or you can give the circle a more natural parametrization.



      Circles can be parametrized with cosines and sines, so the circle $x^2+y^2=225$ is parametrized by $x=15cos t,, y=15sin t$. If you substitute this in to the objective function $2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$, you'll see how the values of the function above the circle depend on the angle $t$, and you can then use single-variable calculus to find the local extrema. Since cosine and sine are continuous on the whole real line, you don't have to worry about missing end-points with this method.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        If you don't know, or want to use, Lagrange Multipliers as in Thomas's answer, and you want to find the local extrema on the boundary to make sure you don't miss anything, then you can either handle the endpoints with $x=pm15$ that Sauhard Sharma neglected to address in their answer, or you can give the circle a more natural parametrization.



        Circles can be parametrized with cosines and sines, so the circle $x^2+y^2=225$ is parametrized by $x=15cos t,, y=15sin t$. If you substitute this in to the objective function $2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$, you'll see how the values of the function above the circle depend on the angle $t$, and you can then use single-variable calculus to find the local extrema. Since cosine and sine are continuous on the whole real line, you don't have to worry about missing end-points with this method.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        If you don't know, or want to use, Lagrange Multipliers as in Thomas's answer, and you want to find the local extrema on the boundary to make sure you don't miss anything, then you can either handle the endpoints with $x=pm15$ that Sauhard Sharma neglected to address in their answer, or you can give the circle a more natural parametrization.



        Circles can be parametrized with cosines and sines, so the circle $x^2+y^2=225$ is parametrized by $x=15cos t,, y=15sin t$. If you substitute this in to the objective function $2x^2+3y^2-4x-5$, you'll see how the values of the function above the circle depend on the angle $t$, and you can then use single-variable calculus to find the local extrema. Since cosine and sine are continuous on the whole real line, you don't have to worry about missing end-points with this method.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Mark S.

        11.3k22568




        11.3k22568






















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            With free CAS Maxima and my programm "nopt":



            package "nopt"



            examples



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • @ Mark S Link to package "nopt" I include.
              – Aleksas Domarkas
              19 hours ago















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            With free CAS Maxima and my programm "nopt":



            package "nopt"



            examples



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • @ Mark S Link to package "nopt" I include.
              – Aleksas Domarkas
              19 hours ago













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            With free CAS Maxima and my programm "nopt":



            package "nopt"



            examples



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer














            With free CAS Maxima and my programm "nopt":



            package "nopt"



            examples



            enter image description here







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 19 hours ago

























            answered 2 days ago









            Aleksas Domarkas

            7485




            7485












            • @ Mark S Link to package "nopt" I include.
              – Aleksas Domarkas
              19 hours ago


















            • @ Mark S Link to package "nopt" I include.
              – Aleksas Domarkas
              19 hours ago
















            @ Mark S Link to package "nopt" I include.
            – Aleksas Domarkas
            19 hours ago




            @ Mark S Link to package "nopt" I include.
            – Aleksas Domarkas
            19 hours ago


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011249%2ffinding-the-maximum-and-minimum-values-of-a-function-in-a-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Morgemoulin

            Scott Moir

            Souastre